EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Allergan PLC pages available for free this week:
- Cash Flow Statement
- Analysis of Solvency Ratios
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
- Price to Sales (P/S) since 2005
- Analysis of Revenues
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Allergan PLC for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The financial performance, as measured by economic profit, demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative value creation over the five-year period. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) remains negative throughout, contributing significantly to the overall negative economic profit. Invested capital exhibits a declining trend, while the cost of capital fluctuates within a relatively narrow range.
- NOPAT Trend
- Net operating profit after taxes begins at -US$3,502,617 thousand in 2015, improves to -US$2,001,620 thousand in 2016, then experiences a substantial decline to -US$10,550,503 thousand in 2017. A partial recovery is seen in 2018 (-US$5,673,614 thousand) and 2019 (-US$5,356,995 thousand), but NOPAT remains negative across all observed years.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital decreases from 19.55% in 2015 to 18.90% in 2016, then further to 16.99% in 2017, representing the lowest value in the observed period. It increases to 18.27% in 2018 and reaches 19.82% in 2019, the highest value in the period. These fluctuations, while present, do not appear to correlate directly with the trends in NOPAT.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital demonstrates a consistent downward trend, decreasing from US$127,501,981 thousand in 2015 to US$80,268,300 thousand in 2019. This reduction in capital employed occurs alongside consistently negative NOPAT, potentially indicating a strategic shift in capital allocation or divestitures.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit is negative in each year of the period, ranging from -US$21,264,246 thousand in 2019 to -US$28,425,003 thousand in 2015. The magnitude of the economic loss generally follows the trend in NOPAT, with the largest loss coinciding with the lowest NOPAT in 2017. While the economic loss decreases slightly in the later years, it remains substantial.
The consistent negative economic profit suggests that the company is not generating returns exceeding its cost of capital. The declining invested capital may be a response to this underperformance, but further investigation is needed to determine the underlying drivers and the effectiveness of any implemented strategies.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrued product warranties.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring reserve.
6 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss) attributable to shareholders.
7 2019 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
8 2019 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 12.50% =
9 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss) attributable to shareholders.
10 2019 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 12.50% =
11 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
12 Elimination of discontinued operations.
- Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders
-
The net income attributable to shareholders shows significant volatility over the observed period. Starting from approximately 3.9 billion US dollars at the end of 2015, it experienced a substantial increase to nearly 15 billion US dollars by the end of 2016. This peak was followed by a sharp reversal into negative territory, with losses amounting to approximately 4.1 billion US dollars in 2017. The negative trend continued in subsequent years, with losses deepening to around 5.1 billion and 5.3 billion US dollars in 2018 and 2019, respectively.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
-
The NOPAT metric also reflects a deteriorating operating performance over the period. It began in 2015 with a negative figure of about 3.5 billion US dollars, improved slightly in 2016 to approximately minus 2 billion US dollars, indicating a reduction in operating losses. However, in 2017, NOPAT deteriorated sharply, reaching a loss exceeding 10.5 billion US dollars. This was followed by some improvement yet continued negative results in 2018 and 2019, with losses of about 5.7 billion and 5.4 billion US dollars, respectively.
- Overall Financial Trends
-
The company’s financial performance exhibits considerable instability over the five-year span. The marked peak in net income in 2016 appears anomalous given the general trend of losses in other years. Both net income and operating profitability suffer from large losses in recent years following the 2016 peak, suggesting potential challenges affecting operational efficiency and profitability after 2016.
The divergence between net income and NOPAT indicates that non-operating factors, such as one-time gains or losses, may have influenced net income, particularly in 2016. The sustained negative operating profit after taxes highlights fundamental operational difficulties that warrant further investigation.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The data reveals significant fluctuations in the provision (benefit) for income taxes over the five years analyzed. Initially, there is a substantial tax benefit recorded, with the provision showing negative values each year from 2015 through 2018, indicating the company recognized income tax benefits rather than expenses during this period. The magnitude of the benefit peaks in 2017 with an amount exceeding -6.6 million US dollars, suggesting an extraordinary tax gain or adjustment that year. However, in 2019, this trend reverses, and the provision shifts to a positive value of approximately 146 thousand US dollars, reflecting a tax expense rather than a benefit.
In contrast, the cash operating taxes exhibit a more variable and less consistent pattern. The cash taxes paid decreased from about 398 thousand US dollars in 2015 to roughly 295 thousand in 2016 but then surged to approximately 1.24 million in 2017. This rise contrasts with the significant tax benefit recorded in the provision for the same year. A striking observation is seen in 2018 when the cash operating taxes turn negative, indicating a tax refund or credit of nearly 399 thousand US dollars. Following this, the cash taxes return to a positive figure of approximately 897 thousand US dollars in 2019.
Overall, the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes demonstrate divergent movements during several years, which may indicate timing differences, adjustments, or tax strategy effects on reported versus actual cash tax payments. The large tax benefits recorded in provisions in earlier years, especially 2017, suggest one-time tax events or re-measurements impacting the income statement, while the cash operating taxes reflect the actual tax payments made or refunded, exhibiting a more volatile profile with a notable negative value in 2018.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of accrued product warranties.
6 Addition of restructuring reserve.
7 Addition of equity equivalents to shareholders’ equity.
8 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
9 Subtraction of construction in progress.
10 Subtraction of marketable securities and other long-term investments.
The financial data reveals several important trends over the five-year period ending December 31, 2019. The total reported debt and leases exhibit a consistent downward trajectory. Starting from approximately $42.89 billion in 2015, the debt decreases every year, reaching about $23.22 billion by the end of 2019. This represents a significant reduction in the company's leverage or obligations associated with debt and leases over the period.
Shareholders’ equity also demonstrates a declining pattern throughout these years. From $76.59 billion at the end of 2015, it slightly decreases to $76.19 billion in 2016 and continues this downward trend to $58.17 billion by 2019. This consistent reduction indicates possible challenges with retained earnings, equity issuance, or other comprehensive income affecting the equity base.
The invested capital, which encompasses the company's overall capital invested in operations, similarly shows a decreasing trend. Beginning at approximately $127.50 billion in 2015, invested capital reduces each year, culminating at about $80.27 billion in 2019. This decline suggests a potential shrinking scale of invested assets or capital employed, which could relate to asset divestitures, depreciation outpacing capital expenditure, or capital structure adjustments.
- Total reported debt & leases
- Substantial reduction by nearly 46% from 2015 to 2019, indicating active debt repayment or lease obligation reduction.
- Shareholders’ equity
- Gradual decline of roughly 24% over the period, possibly signaling diminished profitability, dividend distribution exceeding earnings, share repurchases, or adverse comprehensive income impacts.
- Invested capital
- Marked decrease of approximately 37%, reflecting either asset shrinkage, depreciation exceeding reinvestment, or strategic restructuring.
In summary, all three key financial measures present downward trends, with debt levels showing the most pronounced reduction, followed by invested capital and shareholders’ equity. The data implies an overall contraction in the scale of the business's financial operations and capitalization, alongside a strategic effort to reduce leverage.
Cost of Capital
Allergan PLC, cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Preferred shares, $0.0001 par value per share (book value) | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and capital leases, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 12.50%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 12.50%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and capital leases, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Preferred shares, $0.0001 par value per share (book value) | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and capital leases, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 12.50%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 12.50%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and capital leases, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Preferred shares, $0.0001 par value per share (book value) | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and capital leases, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 12.50%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 12.50%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and capital leases, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Preferred shares, $0.0001 par value per share (book value) | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and capital leases, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 12.50%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 12.50%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and capital leases, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Preferred shares, $0.0001 par value per share (book value) | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and capital leases, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 12.50%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 12.50%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and capital leases, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| AbbVie Inc. | ||||||
| Amgen Inc. | ||||||
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | ||||||
| Danaher Corp. | ||||||
| Eli Lilly & Co. | ||||||
| Gilead Sciences Inc. | ||||||
| Johnson & Johnson | ||||||
| Merck & Co. Inc. | ||||||
| Pfizer Inc. | ||||||
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | ||||||
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance, as indicated by economic value added metrics, demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit over the five-year period. Simultaneously, invested capital exhibits a declining trend. The economic spread ratio, calculated from these figures, reflects the relationship between economic profit and invested capital, and reveals a concerning trend of diminishing returns.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit consistently registers as negative across the observed period, ranging from approximately -21.3 million to -28.4 million US dollars in thousands. While the magnitude of the loss fluctuates year-to-year, it remains a persistent negative value, indicating that the company’s returns are not exceeding its cost of capital. A slight reduction in the absolute value of the loss is observed between 2015 and 2016, followed by an increase in 2017, and then a gradual decrease through 2019, though remaining negative.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital demonstrates a clear downward trend, decreasing from approximately 127.5 million to 80.3 million US dollars in thousands over the five-year period. This reduction in invested capital could be attributed to asset sales, reduced investment in working capital, or other capital management strategies. The consistent decline suggests a strategic shift in capital allocation or potentially a contraction of the business.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio, expressed as a percentage, consistently shows negative values, indicating that the company is not generating returns sufficient to cover its cost of capital. The ratio fluctuates between -20.70% and -27.18%. A general worsening trend is apparent, with the ratio becoming more negative from 2016 to 2019. This suggests that the gap between the company’s return on invested capital and its cost of capital is widening, potentially signaling increasing financial risk and reduced shareholder value creation.
The combined trends suggest a company facing challenges in generating returns on its invested capital. The declining invested capital, while potentially a strategic decision, is occurring alongside persistent negative economic profit and a worsening economic spread ratio. Further investigation into the drivers of these trends is warranted to understand the underlying causes and potential mitigation strategies.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net revenues | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | ||||||
| Adjusted net revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| AbbVie Inc. | ||||||
| Amgen Inc. | ||||||
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | ||||||
| Danaher Corp. | ||||||
| Eli Lilly & Co. | ||||||
| Gilead Sciences Inc. | ||||||
| Johnson & Johnson | ||||||
| Merck & Co. Inc. | ||||||
| Pfizer Inc. | ||||||
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | ||||||
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2019 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance, as indicated by economic profit and its margin, demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit over the five-year period. However, the magnitude of the economic loss appears to be decreasing over time.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit consistently registers as a negative value throughout the observed period, ranging from approximately -28.4 million to -21.3 million US dollars in thousands. While fluctuations exist year-to-year, the most substantial decrease in economic loss occurs between 2018 and 2019, moving from -22.3 million to -21.3 million. The largest absolute loss is observed in 2015.
- Adjusted Net Revenues
- Adjusted net revenues exhibit relative stability, fluctuating between 14.6 million and 16.1 million US dollars in thousands. A slight upward trend is discernible, with revenues increasing from 14.6 million in 2016 to 16.1 million in 2019. This suggests revenue growth is not sufficient to offset the costs associated with generating economic profit.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin is consistently negative, indicating that the company is not generating returns exceeding its cost of capital. The margin improves steadily from -188.71% in 2015 to -132.25% in 2019. This improvement aligns with the decreasing magnitude of the economic loss, suggesting a gradual increase in efficiency or a reduction in the cost of capital relative to earnings. The largest improvement in margin is observed between 2018 and 2019, moving from -141.35% to -132.25%.
In summary, while the company consistently experiences negative economic profit, the trend suggests a gradual improvement in performance. The decreasing economic loss and improving economic profit margin indicate a positive, albeit slow, trajectory towards potentially achieving positive economic profit in the future. Continued monitoring of these metrics is recommended to assess the sustainability of this trend.