Economic Value Added (EVA)
EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Gilead Sciences Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Profitability Ratios
- Analysis of Solvency Ratios
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Gilead Sciences Inc. for $24.99.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
Gilead Sciences Inc., economic profit calculation
US$ in millions
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2024 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) experienced substantial volatility, while the cost of capital exhibited a generally increasing trend. Invested capital consistently decreased over the five-year period. These factors combined to create a dynamic pattern in economic profit, shifting from negative values to positive gains and then back to negative territory.
- NOPAT Trend
- NOPAT began at US$633 million in 2020, surged dramatically to US$6,897 million in 2021, then declined to US$3,687 million in 2022 and US$5,086 million in 2023. A substantial decrease was observed in 2024, resulting in a net operating loss of US$796 million. This represents a significant reversal from the prior year’s performance.
- Cost of Capital Trend
- The cost of capital increased steadily from 5.64% in 2020 to 6.41% in 2024. While the increases were incremental year-over-year, the cumulative effect represents a rise in the required rate of return on invested capital.
- Invested Capital Trend
- Invested capital decreased consistently throughout the period, moving from US$50,285 million in 2020 to US$44,333 million in 2024. This indicates a reduction in the company’s capital employed in operations.
- Economic Profit Trend
- Economic profit was negative in 2020 at US$ -2,204 million. It became positive in 2021, reaching US$4,140 million, and remained positive, though declining, in 2022 (US$866 million) and 2023 (US$2,272 million). In 2024, economic profit turned negative again, reaching US$ -3,636 million. The fluctuations in economic profit closely mirror the changes in NOPAT, but are also influenced by the rising cost of capital and decreasing invested capital.
The shift to negative economic profit in 2024, despite a relatively stable cost of capital, is primarily attributable to the substantial decline in NOPAT. The continued reduction in invested capital may also be contributing to the negative economic profit, as the base upon which returns are calculated diminishes.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Gilead Sciences Inc., NOPAT calculation
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowances for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Gilead.
4 2024 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
5 2024 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Gilead.
7 2024 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net income attributable to Gilead
- The net income experienced a significant increase from 123 million US dollars in 2020 to 6,225 million in 2021, marking a substantial positive shift. This was followed by a decrease to 4,592 million in 2022. In 2023, net income showed a recovery, increasing to 5,665 million, but then declined sharply to 480 million in 2024. Overall, the data indicates volatility with a peak in 2021, fluctuations thereafter, and a downward trend by the final year.
- Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT followed a somewhat similar pattern initially, rising from 633 million US dollars in 2020 to a peak of 6,897 million in 2021. However, unlike net income, NOPAT declined more sharply to 3,687 million in 2022. It showed an improvement in 2023, rising to 5,086 million, before turning negative in 2024 with a value of -796 million. This negative figure in the last period signals a significant operational challenge or increased expenses resulting in operating losses after taxes.
Cash Operating Taxes
Gilead Sciences Inc., cash operating taxes calculation
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
- Income Tax Expense
- The income tax expense displayed a fluctuating pattern over the examined periods. Starting at 1,580 million US dollars in 2020, the expense increased significantly to 2,077 million US dollars in 2021. This was followed by a sharp decline to 1,248 million US dollars in 2022, remaining relatively stable into 2023 with a negligible decrease to 1,247 million US dollars. Notably, in 2024, there was a pronounced drop to 211 million US dollars, marking the lowest point in the time series.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes showed a generally increasing trend from 2020 to 2022. Beginning at 2,006 million US dollars in 2020, they rose to 2,403 million US dollars in 2021 and further to a peak of 2,981 million US dollars in 2022. The trend reversed afterward, with a decrease to 2,366 million US dollars in 2023, followed by a continued decline to 2,205 million US dollars in 2024. Despite this reversal, cash operating taxes remained higher in the last two years compared to 2020 levels.
- Comparative Insights
- The data suggests a divergence between income tax expense and cash operating taxes beginning from 2022 onwards. While cash operating taxes peaked in 2022 and then declined, income tax expense sharply decreased in 2024, indicating possible changes in tax planning, accounting practices, or tax regulations impacting reporting differently from cash outflows related to operating taxes. The significant reduction in income tax expense by 2024 suggests a substantial alteration in either taxable income or effective tax rates.
Invested Capital
Gilead Sciences Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of equity equivalents to total Gilead stockholders’ equity.
5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
6 Subtraction of construction in progress.
7 Subtraction of marketable debt securities.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases decreased significantly from 32,117 million US dollars in 2020 to 25,808 million US dollars in 2022. This trend indicates a reduction in debt obligations over this period. However, from 2022 to 2023, the debt level remained relatively stable, showing only a slight decrease to 25,658 million US dollars. In 2024, there was an uptick in total debt, increasing to 27,322 million US dollars, suggesting a reversal of the prior debt reduction trend.
- Total Gilead stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity saw a consistent increase from 18,202 million US dollars in 2020 to a peak of 22,833 million US dollars in 2023. This upward movement reflects a strengthening of the company's equity base during these years. However, in 2024, equity fell notably to 19,330 million US dollars, implying a decrease in net assets attributable to shareholders, which could be due to various factors such as losses, dividends, or share repurchases.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital showed a declining trend throughout the period from 50,285 million US dollars in 2020 to 44,333 million US dollars in 2024. This steady decrease suggests a contraction in the total capital employed in the business, possibly due to asset disposals, changes in financing structure, or operational adjustments.
- Summary
- Overall, the company experienced a reduction in debt from 2020 to 2022, but this trend reversed in 2024. Equity increased notably until 2023, followed by a significant decline in 2024. Invested capital consistently decreased over the five years. These patterns suggest a shifting financial structure, with potential impacts on leverage and capital deployment in the most recent year.
Cost of Capital
Gilead Sciences Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
Gilead Sciences Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| AbbVie Inc. | ||||||
| Amgen Inc. | ||||||
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | ||||||
| Danaher Corp. | ||||||
| Eli Lilly & Co. | ||||||
| Johnson & Johnson | ||||||
| Merck & Co. Inc. | ||||||
| Pfizer Inc. | ||||||
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | ||||||
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2024 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited considerable fluctuation between 2020 and 2024. Initially negative in 2020, it transitioned to positive values for the subsequent three years before returning to a negative value in 2024. This pattern mirrors the volatility observed in economic profit over the same period.
- Economic Spread Ratio Trend
- In 2020, the economic spread ratio was -4.38%, indicating that the company’s return on invested capital was less than its cost of capital. A substantial improvement occurred in 2021, with the ratio rising to 8.66%, signifying a significant outperformance of invested capital. This positive trend continued, albeit at a slower pace, reaching 1.90% in 2022 and further increasing to 4.96% in 2023. However, the ratio experienced a sharp decline in 2024, falling to -8.20%, representing a substantial underperformance relative to the cost of capital.
The economic spread ratio’s movement is closely linked to changes in economic profit. The negative ratios in 2020 and 2024 correspond with periods of negative economic profit, while the positive ratios in 2021, 2022, and 2023 align with positive economic profit. The magnitude of the ratio’s fluctuation suggests a sensitivity to changes in profitability relative to the capital employed.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital demonstrated a generally decreasing trend throughout the period. Starting at US$50,285 million in 2020, it declined to US$44,333 million by 2024. While the decrease was not linear, the overall direction indicates a reduction in the company’s capital base. This reduction in invested capital occurred concurrently with the fluctuations in economic profit and the economic spread ratio, potentially influencing the ratio’s values.
The return to a negative economic spread ratio in 2024, coupled with the continued decline in invested capital, warrants further investigation. Understanding the factors contributing to the decreased profitability and the reasons behind the capital reduction is crucial for assessing the company’s future financial performance.
Economic Profit Margin
Gilead Sciences Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Product sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| AbbVie Inc. | ||||||
| Amgen Inc. | ||||||
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | ||||||
| Danaher Corp. | ||||||
| Eli Lilly & Co. | ||||||
| Johnson & Johnson | ||||||
| Merck & Co. Inc. | ||||||
| Pfizer Inc. | ||||||
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | ||||||
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2024 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Product sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited significant fluctuations between 2020 and 2024. Initial observations reveal a substantial swing from a negative value in 2020 to positive values in subsequent years, followed by another decline in the most recent period.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- In 2020, the economic profit margin stood at -9.05%. This indicates that the company’s economic profit was negative relative to its product sales. A marked improvement occurred in 2021, with the margin increasing to 15.33%, signifying a considerable increase in economic profit generation. The margin then decreased to 3.21% in 2022, suggesting a moderation in economic profit relative to sales. Further growth was observed in 2023, with the margin reaching 8.44%. However, this positive trend reversed in 2024, as the economic profit margin declined sharply to -12.71%, indicating a return to negative economic profit relative to product sales.
Product sales demonstrated a generally upward trajectory over the five-year period, with a slight dip observed between 2021 and 2022. Despite this minor decrease, sales recovered and continued to grow in 2024. However, the fluctuations in the economic profit margin suggest that increases in product sales do not consistently translate into corresponding increases in economic profit.
- Relationship between Product Sales and Economic Profit Margin
- While product sales increased from US$24,355 million in 2020 to US$28,610 million in 2024, the economic profit margin did not follow a similar pattern. The largest margin occurred in 2021, despite sales being lower than in 2024. This suggests that factors beyond revenue generation, such as cost of capital and operational efficiency, significantly influence economic profit. The negative margins in 2020 and 2024, despite positive sales figures, highlight the importance of these factors.
The volatility in the economic profit margin warrants further investigation to understand the underlying drivers. A detailed analysis of the components of economic profit, including net operating profit after tax and the cost of capital, is recommended to identify the specific factors contributing to these fluctuations.