Stock Analysis on Net

Gilead Sciences Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD)

$24.99

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Gilead Sciences Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2025 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibited volatility, decreasing substantially in 2022 before partially recovering in 2023, experiencing a significant loss in 2024, and then a substantial gain in 2025. Invested capital generally decreased over the five-year period, while the cost of capital showed a gradual increasing trend.

Economic Profit Trend
Economic profit began at US$3,340 million in 2021, declined dramatically to near zero in 2022 (-US$3 million), increased to US$1,426 million in 2023, then fell sharply to a loss of US$4,519 million in 2024, before rebounding strongly to US$5,522 million in 2025. This indicates a highly variable ability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital.
NOPAT and Cost of Capital Relationship
The decline in economic profit in 2022 coincided with a decrease in NOPAT and a rise in the cost of capital. The substantial loss in 2024 occurred despite a moderate increase in NOPAT compared to 2023, primarily driven by a further increase in the cost of capital. The strong recovery in economic profit in 2025 was attributable to a significant increase in NOPAT coupled with a relatively smaller increase in the cost of capital.
Invested Capital Trend
Invested capital decreased from US$47,782 million in 2021 to US$42,812 million in 2025. This consistent reduction in the capital base occurred throughout the period, regardless of economic profit performance. The decreasing invested capital may reflect asset sales, reduced investment in projects, or changes in working capital management.
Cost of Capital Evolution
The cost of capital increased from 7.44% in 2021 to 8.61% in 2025. This upward trend suggests increasing risk perceptions or rising interest rates impacting the company’s funding costs. The increasing cost of capital exerted downward pressure on economic profit, particularly in years with lower NOPAT.

Overall, the economic profit performance demonstrates considerable sensitivity to changes in both NOPAT and the cost of capital. While invested capital decreased consistently, its impact on economic profit was less pronounced than the fluctuations in profitability and funding costs.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Gilead Sciences Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Net income attributable to Gilead
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowances for credit losses2
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents3
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability4
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense5
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes6
(Gain) loss on marketable securities
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income7
Investment income, after taxes8
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowances for credit losses.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Gilead.

4 2025 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

5 2025 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Gilead.

7 2025 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


Net income attributable to Gilead and Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) exhibited considerable fluctuation between 2021 and 2025. While both metrics moved in similar directions, the magnitude of change differed, particularly in 2024.

Overall Trend
From 2021 to 2025, NOPAT demonstrated a volatile pattern. It decreased significantly in 2022, recovered partially in 2023, experienced a substantial loss in 2024, and then rebounded strongly in 2025, ultimately exceeding the 2021 level. Net income followed a similar, though less dramatic, trajectory.
2021-2022
A notable decline is observed in both NOPAT and net income from 2021 to 2022. NOPAT decreased from US$6,897 million to US$3,687 million, representing a decrease of approximately 46.7%. Net income decreased from US$6,225 million to US$4,592 million, a decrease of approximately 26.2%. This suggests a weakening of operational profitability and overall earnings during this period.
2022-2023
Both metrics showed improvement between 2022 and 2023, although the recovery was not complete. NOPAT increased to US$5,086 million, while net income rose to US$5,665 million. This indicates a partial recovery in profitability and earnings.
2023-2024
A significant shift occurred from 2023 to 2024. NOPAT experienced a substantial loss, falling to negative US$796 million. Net income also plummeted to US$480 million. This represents a dramatic downturn in operational performance and overall profitability. The disparity between the decline in net income and the loss in NOPAT suggests potential impacts from non-operating items or changes in the tax structure.
2024-2025
A strong recovery is evident from 2024 to 2025. NOPAT rebounded to US$9,207 million, surpassing the 2021 value. Net income also increased substantially to US$8,510 million. This indicates a significant improvement in operational profitability and overall earnings, potentially driven by new products, cost reductions, or favorable market conditions.

The fluctuations in NOPAT, particularly the substantial loss in 2024 followed by a strong recovery in 2025, warrant further investigation to understand the underlying drivers of these changes. The divergence between NOPAT and net income trends in 2024 also merits closer scrutiny.


Cash Operating Taxes

Gilead Sciences Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Income tax expense
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).


The relationship between income tax expense and cash operating taxes demonstrates fluctuating patterns over the five-year period. While both metrics represent tax-related financial obligations, their divergence suggests timing differences between reported accounting expense and actual cash outflows.

Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense decreased significantly from 2021 to 2022, followed by a minimal change in 2023. A substantial decline occurred in 2024, reaching a low of 211 US$ millions, before increasing again in 2025 to 1,286 US$ millions. This pattern indicates considerable volatility in the company’s reported tax liability.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes increased from 2021 to 2022, reaching 2,981 US$ millions. A subsequent decrease was observed in 2023, followed by a further reduction in 2024 to 2,205 US$ millions. The most significant decline occurred between 2024 and 2025, with cash operating taxes falling to 1,273 US$ millions. This suggests a reduction in actual cash paid for taxes in the most recent year.
Relationship between Metrics
In 2021 and 2022, cash operating taxes exceeded income tax expense, indicating potential deferred tax liabilities being realized or other timing differences. The gap narrowed in 2023 and 2024. By 2025, income tax expense surpassed cash operating taxes, potentially due to the creation of new deferred tax assets or changes in tax regulations impacting reported expense without immediate cash impact. The divergence between these two figures warrants further investigation to understand the underlying causes and their implications for future cash flows and financial reporting.

The observed trends suggest that the company’s effective tax rate and cash tax payments are subject to considerable variation, potentially influenced by factors such as tax credits, loss carryforwards, or changes in the tax code. Continued monitoring of these metrics is recommended to assess the sustainability of these trends and their impact on overall financial performance.


Invested Capital

Gilead Sciences Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Current portion of long-term debt, net
Long-term debt, net, excluding current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Total Gilead stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowances for credit losses3
Equity equivalents4
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax5
Noncontrolling interest
Adjusted total Gilead stockholders’ equity
Construction in progress6
Marketable debt securities7
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of equity equivalents to total Gilead stockholders’ equity.

5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

6 Subtraction of construction in progress.

7 Subtraction of marketable debt securities.


The invested capital of the company demonstrates a generally decreasing trend over the five-year period. Total reported debt & leases and total stockholders’ equity are the components used to calculate invested capital, and their individual movements contribute to this overall pattern.

Invested Capital Trend
Invested capital began at US$47,782 million in 2021 and generally declined to US$42,812 million in 2025. A slight decrease was observed from 2021 to 2022, followed by relative stability between 2022 and 2023. A more pronounced decrease occurred between 2023 and 2024, and this downward trend continued into 2025.
Debt & Leases
Total reported debt & leases decreased from US$27,285 million in 2021 to US$25,808 million in 2022, representing a reduction in financial obligations. It remained relatively stable through 2023 at US$25,658 million before increasing to US$27,322 million in 2024. A subsequent decrease to US$25,541 million was noted in 2025.
Stockholders’ Equity
Total stockholders’ equity exhibited a modest increase from US$21,069 million in 2021 to US$21,240 million in 2022, and continued to rise to US$22,833 million in 2023. However, a significant decrease was observed in 2024, falling to US$19,330 million. Stockholders’ equity partially recovered in 2025, reaching US$22,703 million.

The fluctuations in stockholders’ equity appear to have a more substantial impact on the overall invested capital trend, particularly the decline observed in 2024. While debt & leases experienced some volatility, its impact was less pronounced than the changes in equity. The combined effect of these components resulted in the observed decrease in invested capital over the period.


Cost of Capital

Gilead Sciences Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Gilead Sciences Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
AbbVie Inc.
Amgen Inc.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Danaher Corp.
Eli Lilly & Co.
Johnson & Johnson
Merck & Co. Inc.
Pfizer Inc.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2025 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic spread ratio exhibited considerable fluctuation between 2021 and 2025. Initial values indicated a positive spread, which subsequently declined to a near-zero level before recovering strongly. This pattern mirrors the volatility observed in economic profit over the same period.

Economic Spread Ratio - Trend Analysis
In 2021, the economic spread ratio stood at 6.99%, signifying a substantial positive spread between returns generated from invested capital and the cost of that capital. This positive spread diminished dramatically in 2022, reaching -0.01%, indicating that returns barely covered the cost of capital. A modest recovery occurred in 2023, with the ratio increasing to 3.11%, but this was followed by a significant decline in 2024, plummeting to -10.19%. The ratio experienced a substantial rebound in 2025, reaching 12.90%, representing the highest value within the observed timeframe.

The economic spread ratio’s movement is closely tied to the fluctuations in economic profit. The negative ratios in 2022 and 2024 correspond with periods of negative economic profit, suggesting that the company’s investments were not generating sufficient returns to cover their costs during those years. Conversely, the positive and increasing ratio in 2025 aligns with a substantial increase in economic profit, indicating improved capital efficiency and value creation.

Invested Capital - Trend Analysis
Invested capital demonstrated a generally decreasing trend throughout the period. Starting at US$47,782 million in 2021, it declined to US$42,812 million by 2025. This reduction in invested capital occurred alongside the fluctuations in economic profit and the economic spread ratio, potentially reflecting strategic decisions regarding capital allocation or divestitures.

The interplay between the economic spread ratio and invested capital suggests a dynamic relationship between profitability and capital management. While the company experienced periods of negative economic profit and a shrinking spread, the subsequent recovery in 2025, coupled with continued reduction in invested capital, indicates a potential improvement in the efficiency with which capital is deployed.


Economic Profit Margin

Gilead Sciences Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Product sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
AbbVie Inc.
Amgen Inc.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Danaher Corp.
Eli Lilly & Co.
Johnson & Johnson
Merck & Co. Inc.
Pfizer Inc.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2025 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Product sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic profit margin exhibited significant fluctuation between 2021 and 2025. Initial profitability declined sharply before recovering to levels exceeding those initially observed. A detailed examination of the trends is presented below.

Economic Profit Margin
In 2021, the economic profit margin stood at 12.37%. This represents a substantial level of economic profit generation relative to product sales. However, a dramatic shift occurred in 2022, with the margin decreasing to -0.01%, indicating a near-breakeven position from an economic profit perspective. A partial recovery was seen in 2023, with the margin rising to 5.30%, suggesting improved economic profitability.
The year 2024 witnessed a substantial decline, with the economic profit margin falling to -15.79%. This represents a significant loss in economic profit relative to product sales. A strong rebound occurred in 2025, with the margin increasing to 19.10%, surpassing the 2021 level and indicating a substantial improvement in economic profit generation.

Product sales demonstrated a relatively stable pattern over the five-year period. Sales decreased slightly from 2021 to 2023, remaining around $27 billion. A moderate increase was observed in 2024, reaching $28.610 billion, and continued into 2025, reaching $28.915 billion. This suggests that fluctuations in the economic profit margin are not directly correlated with significant changes in product sales revenue.

The economic profit itself mirrored the volatility of the economic profit margin. Positive economic profit was recorded in 2021 and 2023, while negative economic profit was observed in 2022 and 2024. The substantial increase in economic profit in 2025 aligns with the significant improvement in the economic profit margin.

The observed pattern suggests that factors beyond revenue generation, such as cost of capital or operational expenses, are significantly influencing economic profitability. The large swings in economic profit margin, despite relatively stable product sales, warrant further investigation into the underlying cost structure and capital allocation strategies.