Stock Analysis on Net

Gilead Sciences Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD)

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios 

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Gilead Sciences Inc., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 3.51 3.66 3.64 3.75 4.08
Receivables turnover 5.89 6.47 5.78 5.65 6.01
Payables turnover 8.72 7.50 11.81 6.25 9.36
Working capital turnover 4.43 3.99 5.61 8.42 8.54
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 104 100 100 97 89
Add: Average receivable collection period 62 56 63 65 61
Operating cycle 166 156 163 162 150
Less: Average payables payment period 42 49 31 58 39
Cash conversion cycle 124 107 132 104 111

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).


An analysis of short-term operating activity ratios reveals several trends over the five-year period. Generally, the company demonstrates moderate consistency in some areas, while others exhibit more pronounced fluctuations. A notable trend is a decline in efficiency metrics related to working capital, contrasted with some improvements in receivable management.

Inventory Management
Inventory turnover decreased consistently from 4.08 in 2021 to 3.51 in 2025. This suggests a slowing in the rate at which inventory is sold and replenished. Correspondingly, the average inventory processing period lengthened from 89 days in 2021 to 104 days in 2025, indicating inventory is held for a longer duration. This could be due to a variety of factors, including changes in product mix, increased warehousing costs, or potential obsolescence.
Receivables Management
Receivables turnover experienced some volatility, decreasing from 6.01 in 2021 to 5.65 in 2022, then increasing to 6.47 in 2024 before settling at 5.89 in 2025. The average receivable collection period generally increased from 61 days in 2021 to 65 days in 2022, decreased to 56 days in 2024, and then increased again to 62 days in 2025. While fluctuations exist, the collection period shows a slight overall lengthening, but with a notable improvement in 2024. This suggests some variability in the company’s ability to collect on its credit sales.
Payables Management
Payables turnover demonstrated significant variation. It decreased substantially from 9.36 in 2021 to 6.25 in 2022, increased sharply to 11.81 in 2023, then decreased to 7.50 in 2024, and finally rose to 8.72 in 2025. The average payables payment period increased from 39 days in 2021 to 58 days in 2022, decreased to 31 days in 2023, increased to 49 days in 2024, and decreased to 42 days in 2025. This volatility suggests changes in supplier credit terms or the company’s payment strategies.
Working Capital & Operating Cycle
Working capital turnover declined considerably from 8.54 in 2021 to 3.99 in 2024, with a slight recovery to 4.43 in 2025. This indicates a decreasing efficiency in utilizing working capital to generate sales. The operating cycle generally increased from 150 days in 2021 to 166 days in 2025, reflecting a longer time to convert raw materials into cash. The cash conversion cycle increased from 111 days in 2021 to 132 days in 2023, then decreased to 107 days in 2024, and increased again to 124 days in 2025. This suggests a lengthening of the time required to convert investments in inventory and receivables into cash, although with some fluctuation.

In summary, the observed trends suggest a potential decline in overall operating efficiency, particularly concerning working capital management. While receivables management shows some positive signs, the lengthening inventory processing period and fluctuating payables terms contribute to a more extended cash conversion cycle. Further investigation into the underlying causes of these trends is warranted.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Turnover Ratios


Average No. Days


Inventory Turnover

Gilead Sciences Inc., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of goods sold 6,234 6,251 6,498 5,657 6,601
Inventories 1,774 1,710 1,787 1,507 1,618
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 3.51 3.66 3.64 3.75 4.08
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
AbbVie Inc. 3.68 4.04 4.98 4.87 5.58
Amgen Inc. 1.93 1.84 0.89 1.30 1.58
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 5.18 5.46 4.02 4.33 4.74
Danaher Corp. 4.04 4.15 3.80 4.03 4.16
Eli Lilly & Co. 0.80 1.11 1.23 1.54 1.88
Johnson & Johnson 2.13 2.21 2.37 2.49 2.87
Merck & Co. Inc. 2.46 2.49 2.54 2.95 2.29
Pfizer Inc. 1.51 1.65 2.45 3.82 3.40
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. 0.66 0.64 0.70 0.65 1.25
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 4.85 5.06 5.06 4.60 3.88
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. 0.98 1.27 1.71 2.35 2.56
Inventory Turnover, Sector
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences 2.23 2.46 2.55 3.06 3.11
Inventory Turnover, Industry
Health Care 7.55 7.56 7.36 7.85 7.90

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 2025 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ Inventories
= 6,234 ÷ 1,774 = 3.51

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The inventory turnover ratio exhibits a generally decreasing trend over the five-year period. While cost of goods sold fluctuates, inventories remain relatively stable, driving the observed changes in the ratio.

Inventory Turnover Trend
The inventory turnover ratio decreased from 4.08 in 2021 to 3.51 in 2025. This indicates a lengthening of the average time it takes to sell inventory. The most significant decline occurred between 2021 and 2022, with a decrease of 0.33. Subsequent changes are more moderate.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold decreased from US$6,601 million in 2021 to US$5,657 million in 2022, then increased to US$6,498 million in 2023. It experienced a slight decrease in both 2024 and 2025, settling at US$6,234 million. These fluctuations in cost of goods sold do not fully explain the consistent decline in inventory turnover.
Inventory Levels
Inventory levels decreased from US$1,618 million in 2021 to US$1,507 million in 2022, then increased to US$1,787 million in 2023. Inventory decreased slightly in 2024 to US$1,710 million and increased again in 2025 to US$1,774 million. The relative stability of inventory levels, coupled with the fluctuations in cost of goods sold, contributes to the observed trend in the inventory turnover ratio.

The consistent decline in the inventory turnover ratio suggests a potential slowdown in the rate at which inventory is being converted into sales. Further investigation may be warranted to understand the underlying causes, such as changes in product mix, increased competition, or potential obsolescence of inventory.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Receivables Turnover

Gilead Sciences Inc., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Product sales 28,915 28,610 26,934 26,982 27,008
Accounts receivable, net 4,913 4,420 4,660 4,777 4,493
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 5.89 6.47 5.78 5.65 6.01
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
AbbVie Inc. 4.86 5.16 4.87 5.16 5.63
Amgen Inc. 3.67 4.72 3.70 4.46 4.96
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 4.87 5.19 4.93 5.48 5.65
Danaher Corp. 6.28 6.75 6.09 6.40 6.36
Eli Lilly & Co. 3.67 4.09 3.75 4.14 4.24
Johnson & Johnson 5.48 5.98 5.73 5.88 6.14
Merck & Co. Inc. 5.52 6.24 5.81 6.27 5.28
Pfizer Inc. 5.27 5.55 5.33 9.24 7.16
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. 2.50 2.29 2.31 2.28 2.66
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 5.01 5.23 5.21 5.53 4.92
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. 5.85 6.85 6.31 6.19 6.66
Receivables Turnover, Sector
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences 4.79 5.26 4.96 5.76 5.54
Receivables Turnover, Industry
Health Care 7.58 7.97 7.66 8.22 8.00

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 2025 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Product sales ÷ Accounts receivable, net
= 28,915 ÷ 4,913 = 5.89

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The receivables turnover ratio exhibited fluctuations over the five-year period. While product sales remained relatively stable, accounts receivable and the resulting turnover ratio demonstrated some variability, suggesting shifts in the company’s credit and collection policies or changes in customer payment behavior.

Overall Trend
The receivables turnover ratio decreased from 6.01 in 2021 to 5.65 in 2022, indicating a lengthening of the collection period. It then experienced a slight recovery to 5.78 in 2023, followed by a more substantial increase to 6.47 in 2024. The most recent year, 2025, saw a decrease to 5.89.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable, net, increased from US$4,493 million in 2021 to US$4,777 million in 2022, contributing to the initial decline in the receivables turnover ratio. It remained relatively stable through 2023 at US$4,660 million, before decreasing to US$4,420 million in 2024. A subsequent increase to US$4,913 million was observed in 2025.
Relationship to Product Sales
Product sales showed a modest decline between 2021 and 2023, remaining around US$26,900-27,000 million. A noticeable increase in product sales to US$28,610 million in 2024 coincided with the highest receivables turnover ratio during the period. The continued increase in product sales to US$28,915 million in 2025 did not maintain the high turnover ratio, suggesting other factors influenced collection efficiency.

The peak in receivables turnover in 2024 suggests improved efficiency in collecting receivables, potentially due to more stringent credit terms or more effective collection efforts. However, the subsequent decline in 2025, despite continued sales growth, warrants further investigation to determine the underlying cause. The fluctuations in accounts receivable levels appear to be a key driver of the observed changes in the receivables turnover ratio.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Payables Turnover

Gilead Sciences Inc., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of goods sold 6,234 6,251 6,498 5,657 6,601
Accounts payable 715 833 550 905 705
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 8.72 7.50 11.81 6.25 9.36
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
AbbVie Inc. 5.07 5.74 5.54 5.94 6.05
Amgen Inc. 5.09 6.74 5.32 4.08 4.72
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 3.90 3.88 3.28 3.33 3.37
Danaher Corp. 5.45 5.52 5.58 5.45 4.48
Eli Lilly & Co. 2.05 2.61 2.73 3.43 4.38
Johnson & Johnson 2.52 2.66 2.76 2.66 2.70
Merck & Co. Inc. 3.72 3.72 4.11 4.08 2.96
Pfizer Inc. 3.07 3.17 3.72 5.04 5.53
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. 2.24 2.50 2.99 2.65 4.32
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 7.27 8.18 8.97 7.67 6.83
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. 3.58 3.71 3.46 3.55 4.64
Payables Turnover, Sector
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences 3.72 4.08 4.25 4.28 4.23
Payables Turnover, Industry
Health Care 6.15 6.10 5.97 5.79 5.84

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 2025 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ Accounts payable
= 6,234 ÷ 715 = 8.72

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The accounts payable activity demonstrates fluctuations over the five-year period. A review of cost of goods sold and accounts payable reveals corresponding impacts on the calculated payables turnover ratio.

Payables Turnover Trend
The payables turnover ratio decreased from 9.36 in 2021 to 6.25 in 2022, indicating a lengthening of the time it takes to pay suppliers. A substantial increase followed in 2023, with the ratio rising to 11.81. This suggests a significantly faster rate of paying suppliers in that year. The ratio then decreased to 7.50 in 2024, and increased slightly to 8.72 in 2025.
Cost of Goods Sold Relationship
Cost of goods sold decreased from 2021 to 2022, coinciding with the initial decline in payables turnover. Cost of goods sold increased in 2023, which aligns with the subsequent increase in the payables turnover ratio. The cost of goods sold remained relatively stable between 2024 and 2025, while the payables turnover ratio experienced a slight increase.
Accounts Payable Relationship
Accounts payable increased from 2021 to 2022, contributing to the lower payables turnover. A significant decrease in accounts payable occurred in 2023, which contributed to the higher payables turnover ratio observed in that year. Accounts payable increased again in 2024, and decreased slightly in 2025.

Overall, the payables turnover ratio appears sensitive to changes in both cost of goods sold and accounts payable levels. The largest fluctuation occurred between 2022 and 2023, suggesting a potential shift in supplier payment strategies or negotiation terms during that period.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Working Capital Turnover

Gilead Sciences Inc., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 18,342 19,173 16,085 14,443 14,772
Less: Current liabilities 11,813 12,004 11,280 11,237 11,610
Working capital 6,529 7,169 4,805 3,206 3,162
 
Product sales 28,915 28,610 26,934 26,982 27,008
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 4.43 3.99 5.61 8.42 8.54
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
AbbVie Inc.
Amgen Inc. 9.85 5.40 2.25 3.82 3.37
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 7.83 7.79 4.60 8.30 3.95
Danaher Corp. 4.13 8.85 4.22 4.20 8.40
Eli Lilly & Co. 3.19 10.32 31.84 8.33
Johnson & Johnson 62.88 15.94 11.81 5.95
Merck & Co. Inc. 4.28 6.19 9.29 5.16 7.62
Pfizer Inc. 10.58 8.64 11.09 4.83
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. 1.05 0.97 0.82 0.96 1.59
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 3.30 4.87 4.05 5.46 5.87
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. 1.64 1.83 0.93 0.85 1.02
Working Capital Turnover, Sector
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences 6.50 7.86 6.68 7.25 5.87
Working Capital Turnover, Industry
Health Care 11.25 12.35 10.99 11.30 8.57

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 2025 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Product sales ÷ Working capital
= 28,915 ÷ 6,529 = 4.43

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The working capital turnover ratio exhibited a declining trend over the observed period. Initially, the ratio stood at 8.54 in 2021, decreasing to 4.43 by 2025. This indicates a diminishing efficiency in utilizing working capital to generate product sales revenue.

Working Capital
Working capital increased from US$3,162 million in 2021 to US$4,805 million in 2023, representing a substantial rise. This growth continued to US$7,169 million in 2024 before decreasing slightly to US$6,529 million in 2025. The increase suggests a greater investment in short-term assets and liabilities.
Product Sales
Product sales remained relatively stable between 2021 and 2023, fluctuating around US$27 billion. A moderate increase was observed in 2024, reaching US$28,610 million, followed by a further increase to US$28,915 million in 2025. While sales increased, the rate of increase did not keep pace with the growth in working capital.
Working Capital Turnover Ratio – Trend Analysis
The ratio’s decline from 8.54 in 2021 to 3.99 in 2024 is particularly noteworthy. This suggests that, despite increasing product sales in 2024, the company required significantly more working capital to achieve that level of sales compared to 2021. The slight recovery to 4.43 in 2025 indicates a marginal improvement in efficiency, but the ratio remains considerably lower than its initial value. The increasing working capital base, coupled with relatively stable sales for the first three years, directly contributed to the observed decrease in turnover.

The observed trend warrants further investigation to determine the underlying causes. Potential factors could include changes in inventory management practices, accounts receivable collection periods, or accounts payable payment terms. A deeper analysis of these components of working capital is recommended to understand the drivers behind the declining turnover ratio.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Inventory Processing Period

Gilead Sciences Inc., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 3.51 3.66 3.64 3.75 4.08
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 104 100 100 97 89
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
AbbVie Inc. 99 90 73 75 65
Amgen Inc. 189 199 411 281 231
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 70 67 91 84 77
Danaher Corp. 90 88 96 91 88
Eli Lilly & Co. 454 329 298 237 194
Johnson & Johnson 171 165 154 147 127
Merck & Co. Inc. 148 147 144 124 159
Pfizer Inc. 242 222 149 95 107
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. 556 572 519 562 292
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 75 72 72 79 94
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. 373 287 214 156 143
Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences 164 149 143 119 117
Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry
Health Care 48 48 50 46 46

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 2025 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 3.51 = 104

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An examination of the short-term operating activity reveals a consistent trend in inventory management over the five-year period. Specifically, the average inventory processing period demonstrates a gradual increase, while the inventory turnover ratio exhibits a corresponding decline.

Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio decreased from 4.08 in 2021 to 3.51 in 2025. While the decline was not substantial year-over-year, a consistent downward trajectory is apparent. The ratio decreased from 4.08 to 3.75 between 2021 and 2022, then continued to decrease to 3.64 in 2023. The rate of decline slowed between 2023 and 2024, with the ratio reaching 3.66, before resuming its downward trend to 3.51 in 2025.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period increased steadily from 89 days in 2021 to 104 days in 2025. An increase of 97 days was recorded in 2022, followed by increases to 100 days in both 2023 and 2024. The period then increased further to 104 days in 2025. This indicates a lengthening of the time required to convert inventory into sales.

The observed trends suggest a potential slowing in the efficiency of inventory management. The decreasing inventory turnover ratio, coupled with the increasing average inventory processing period, implies that inventory is taking longer to sell. This could be due to a variety of factors, including changes in product mix, increased competition, or inefficiencies in the supply chain. Further investigation would be required to determine the underlying causes and potential implications.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Receivable Collection Period

Gilead Sciences Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 5.89 6.47 5.78 5.65 6.01
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 62 56 63 65 61
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
AbbVie Inc. 75 71 75 71 65
Amgen Inc. 99 77 99 82 74
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 75 70 74 67 65
Danaher Corp. 58 54 60 57 57
Eli Lilly & Co. 99 89 97 88 86
Johnson & Johnson 67 61 64 62 59
Merck & Co. Inc. 66 58 63 58 69
Pfizer Inc. 69 66 69 40 51
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. 146 160 158 160 137
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 73 70 70 66 74
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. 62 53 58 59 55
Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences 76 69 74 63 66
Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry
Health Care 48 46 48 44 46

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 2025 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.89 = 62

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The average receivable collection period exhibited fluctuations over the five-year period. While generally remaining within a narrow range, observable shifts indicate changes in the efficiency of collecting outstanding receivables.

Average Receivable Collection Period
The average receivable collection period increased from 61 days in 2021 to 65 days in 2022, suggesting a lengthening in the time required to collect receivables. A slight decrease to 63 days was noted in 2023. A more substantial decrease occurred in 2024, with the period falling to 56 days, indicating improved collection efficiency. However, the period increased again in 2025, returning to 62 days.

The observed changes in the average collection period appear to correlate inversely with the receivables turnover ratio. The increase in the collection period from 2021 to 2022 coincided with a decrease in receivables turnover. The improvement in 2024, reflected in the shorter collection period, was accompanied by a higher receivables turnover. The slight increase in the collection period in 2025 aligns with a corresponding decrease in the receivables turnover ratio.

Overall, the company demonstrates a generally stable, but not consistently improving, ability to convert receivables into cash. The fluctuations suggest potential influences from credit policies, customer payment behavior, or broader economic conditions. Further investigation into the underlying causes of these shifts may be warranted.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Operating Cycle

Gilead Sciences Inc., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 104 100 100 97 89
Average receivable collection period 62 56 63 65 61
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 166 156 163 162 150
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
AbbVie Inc. 174 161 148 146 130
Amgen Inc. 288 276 510 363 305
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 145 137 165 151 142
Danaher Corp. 148 142 156 148 145
Eli Lilly & Co. 553 418 395 325 280
Johnson & Johnson 238 226 218 209 186
Merck & Co. Inc. 214 205 207 182 228
Pfizer Inc. 311 288 218 135 158
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. 702 732 677 722 429
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 148 142 142 145 168
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. 435 340 272 215 198
Operating Cycle, Sector
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences 240 218 217 182 183
Operating Cycle, Industry
Health Care 96 94 98 90 92

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 2025 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 104 + 62 = 166

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operating cycle exhibited a generally increasing trend over the five-year period. While fluctuations occurred, the overall movement suggests a lengthening of the time required to convert raw materials into cash from sales.

Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period demonstrated a consistent upward trend, increasing from 89 days in 2021 to 104 days in 2025. This indicates a gradual slowdown in the efficiency of inventory management, potentially due to increased inventory levels, slower production processes, or shifts in product mix towards items with longer production or storage times. The rate of increase appeared to stabilize between 2022 and 2024, before resuming an upward trajectory in 2025.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average receivable collection period showed some variability. It increased from 61 days in 2021 to 65 days in 2022, then decreased to 56 days in 2024, before rising again to 62 days in 2025. The decrease in 2024 suggests improved efficiency in collecting receivables, potentially due to stricter credit policies or more effective collection efforts. However, the subsequent increase in 2025 partially offset this improvement.
Operating Cycle
The operating cycle, calculated as the sum of the average inventory processing period and the average receivable collection period, increased from 150 days in 2021 to 166 days in 2025. This increase largely mirrors the trend in the average inventory processing period, as the receivable collection period exhibited more fluctuation. The dip in the operating cycle in 2024 was driven by the reduction in the receivable collection period, but this effect was not sustained into 2025.

The lengthening operating cycle warrants further investigation. Potential causes could include changes in sales patterns, inventory management strategies, or credit terms offered to customers. Monitoring these trends is crucial for maintaining optimal working capital management and overall financial health.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Payables Payment Period

Gilead Sciences Inc., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 8.72 7.50 11.81 6.25 9.36
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 42 49 31 58 39
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
AbbVie Inc. 72 64 66 61 60
Amgen Inc. 72 54 69 90 77
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 94 94 111 109 108
Danaher Corp. 67 66 65 67 82
Eli Lilly & Co. 178 140 134 106 83
Johnson & Johnson 145 137 132 137 135
Merck & Co. Inc. 98 98 89 89 123
Pfizer Inc. 119 115 98 72 66
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. 163 146 122 138 84
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 50 45 41 48 53
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. 102 98 106 103 79
Average Payables Payment Period, Sector
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences 98 90 86 85 86
Average Payables Payment Period, Industry
Health Care 59 60 61 63 63

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 2025 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 8.72 = 42

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The average payables payment period exhibited fluctuations over the five-year period. Initially, the period increased before decreasing and stabilizing. The payables turnover ratio, conversely, showed an inverse relationship, declining then increasing before decreasing again.

Average Payables Payment Period
The average payables payment period increased from 39 days in 2021 to 58 days in 2022, representing a 49% increase. This suggests a lengthening in the time taken to settle obligations to suppliers. Subsequently, a significant decrease was observed in 2023, falling to 31 days. This indicates improved efficiency in paying suppliers or a change in payment terms. The period then rose to 49 days in 2024 before settling at 42 days in 2025, suggesting a moderate increase followed by a slight correction.
Payables Turnover
Payables turnover decreased from 9.36 in 2021 to 6.25 in 2022, indicating a slower rate at which the company paid off its suppliers. This aligns with the observed increase in the average payables payment period. The ratio then increased substantially to 11.81 in 2023, coinciding with the decrease in the payment period. A subsequent decline to 7.50 in 2024 and a slight recovery to 8.72 in 2025 were noted, mirroring the fluctuations in the payment period.

The observed patterns suggest a dynamic relationship between the company’s payment practices and its supplier arrangements. The increase in the payment period in 2022, coupled with the decrease in payables turnover, could be attributed to strategic decisions to manage cash flow or potentially to negotiations with suppliers regarding extended payment terms. The subsequent reversal in 2023 suggests a return to more rapid payment cycles. The stabilization in 2024 and 2025 indicates a more consistent, though not necessarily optimal, approach to managing payables.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Cash Conversion Cycle

Gilead Sciences Inc., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 104 100 100 97 89
Average receivable collection period 62 56 63 65 61
Average payables payment period 42 49 31 58 39
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 124 107 132 104 111
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
AbbVie Inc. 102 97 82 85 70
Amgen Inc. 216 222 441 273 228
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 51 43 54 42 34
Danaher Corp. 81 76 91 81 63
Eli Lilly & Co. 375 278 261 219 197
Johnson & Johnson 93 89 86 72 51
Merck & Co. Inc. 116 107 118 93 105
Pfizer Inc. 192 173 120 63 92
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. 539 586 555 584 345
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 98 97 101 97 115
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. 333 242 166 112 119
Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences 142 128 131 97 97
Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry
Health Care 37 34 37 27 29

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 2025 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 104 + 6242 = 124

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An examination of short-term operating activity ratios reveals evolving trends in the company’s working capital management between 2021 and 2025. The average inventory processing period, average receivable collection period, average payables payment period, and the resulting cash conversion cycle all demonstrate fluctuations over the five-year period.

Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period exhibits a consistent upward trend, increasing from 89 days in 2021 to 104 days in 2025. This suggests a lengthening of the time required to convert raw materials into finished goods and ultimately sell them. The rate of increase appears to be accelerating in later years.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average receivable collection period initially increased from 61 days in 2021 to 65 days in 2022, then decreased to 63 days in 2023 and further to 56 days in 2024. A slight increase to 62 days is observed in 2025. This indicates some volatility in the efficiency of collecting payments from customers, with a notable improvement in 2024 before a minor reversion in the final year.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average payables payment period shows the most significant fluctuation. It rose substantially from 39 days in 2021 to 58 days in 2022, then decreased to 31 days in 2023, increased again to 49 days in 2024, and settled at 42 days in 2025. This suggests a changing strategy or ability to negotiate payment terms with suppliers, or potentially reflects shifts in supplier relationships and credit availability.
Cash Conversion Cycle
The cash conversion cycle initially decreased from 111 days in 2021 to 104 days in 2022. However, it then increased significantly to 132 days in 2023, before decreasing to 107 days in 2024 and increasing again to 124 days in 2025. The cycle’s movement is largely influenced by the combined effects of the inventory processing period and payables payment period, with the 2023 peak coinciding with a short payables period and a lengthening inventory period. The 2025 value indicates a return to a longer cycle than observed in 2022 and 2024.

Overall, the company’s cash conversion cycle demonstrates instability over the period. While there were periods of improvement, the trend towards the end of the period suggests a potential need to review working capital management strategies, particularly concerning inventory turnover and supplier payment terms.

AI Ask an analyst for more