Paying users zone. Data is covered by 
.
Get 1 month access to Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. for $17.99, or
get full access to entire website for at least 3 months from $49.99.
We accept:
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO)
Short-term (Operating) Activity Analysis
Difficulty: Beginner
Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs day-to-day tasks, such us the collection of receivables and management of inventory.
Ratios (Summary)
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., short-term (operating) activity ratios
Based on: 10-K (filing date: 2019-02-27), 10-K (filing date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2017-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2016-02-25), 10-K (filing date: 2015-02-26).
| Ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Inventory turnover | An activity ratio calculated as cost of goods sold divided by inventory. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s inventory turnover deteriorated from 2016 to 2017 but then improved from 2017 to 2018 exceeding 2016 level. |
| Receivables turnover | An activity ratio equal to revenue divided by receivables. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s receivables turnover deteriorated from 2016 to 2017 but then improved from 2017 to 2018 not reaching 2016 level. |
| Payables turnover | An activity ratio calculated as cost of goods sold divided by payables. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s payables turnover declined from 2016 to 2017 but then slightly increased from 2017 to 2018. |
| Working capital turnover | An activity ratio calculated as revenue divided by working capital. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s working capital turnover improved from 2016 to 2017 but then deteriorated significantly from 2017 to 2018. |
| Ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Average inventory processing period | An activity ratio equal to the number of days in the period divided by inventory turnover over the period. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s average inventory processing period deteriorated from 2016 to 2017 but then improved from 2017 to 2018 exceeding 2016 level. |
| Average receivable collection period | An activity ratio equal to the number of days in the period divided by receivables turnover. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s average receivable collection period deteriorated from 2016 to 2017 but then improved from 2017 to 2018 not reaching 2016 level. |
| Operating cycle | Equal to average inventory processing period plus average receivables collection period. | |
| Average payables payment period | An estimate of the average number of days it takes a company to pay its suppliers; equal to the number of days in the period divided by payables turnover ratio for the period. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s average payables payment period increased from 2016 to 2017 but then slightly declined from 2017 to 2018. |
| Cash conversion cycle | A financial metric that measures the length of time required for a company to convert cash invested in its operations to cash received as a result of its operations; equal to average inventory processing period plus average receivables collection period minus average payables payment period. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s cash conversion cycle deteriorated from 2016 to 2017 but then improved from 2017 to 2018 exceeding 2016 level. |
Inventory Turnover
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions) | ||||||
| Cost of revenues | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Inventories | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ratio | ||||||
| Inventory turnover1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Inventory Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Becton, Dickinson & Co. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Medtronic PLC | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stryker Corp. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Inventory Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Health Care Equipment & Services | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Inventory Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Health Care | |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on: 10-K (filing date: 2019-02-27), 10-K (filing date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2017-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2016-02-25), 10-K (filing date: 2015-02-26).
1 2018 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of revenues ÷ Inventories
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
| Ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Inventory turnover | An activity ratio calculated as cost of goods sold divided by inventory. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s inventory turnover deteriorated from 2016 to 2017 but then improved from 2017 to 2018 exceeding 2016 level. |
Receivables Turnover
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions) | ||||||
| Revenues | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Accounts receivable, less allowances | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ratio | ||||||
| Receivables turnover1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Receivables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Becton, Dickinson & Co. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Medtronic PLC | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stryker Corp. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Receivables Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Health Care Equipment & Services | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Receivables Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Health Care | |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on: 10-K (filing date: 2019-02-27), 10-K (filing date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2017-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2016-02-25), 10-K (filing date: 2015-02-26).
1 2018 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Revenues ÷ Accounts receivable, less allowances
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
| Ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Receivables turnover | An activity ratio equal to revenue divided by receivables. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s receivables turnover deteriorated from 2016 to 2017 but then improved from 2017 to 2018 not reaching 2016 level. |
Payables Turnover
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions) | ||||||
| Cost of revenues | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Accounts payable | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ratio | ||||||
| Payables turnover1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Payables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Becton, Dickinson & Co. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Medtronic PLC | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stryker Corp. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Payables Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Health Care Equipment & Services | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Payables Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Health Care | |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on: 10-K (filing date: 2019-02-27), 10-K (filing date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2017-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2016-02-25), 10-K (filing date: 2015-02-26).
1 2018 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of revenues ÷ Accounts payable
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
| Ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Payables turnover | An activity ratio calculated as cost of goods sold divided by payables. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s payables turnover declined from 2016 to 2017 but then slightly increased from 2017 to 2018. |
Working Capital Turnover
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (USD $ in millions) | ||||||
| Current assets | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Less: Current liabilities | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Working capital | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Revenues | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ratio | ||||||
| Working capital turnover1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Becton, Dickinson & Co. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Medtronic PLC | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stryker Corp. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Working Capital Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Health Care Equipment & Services | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Working Capital Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Health Care | |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on: 10-K (filing date: 2019-02-27), 10-K (filing date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2017-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2016-02-25), 10-K (filing date: 2015-02-26).
1 2018 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Revenues ÷ Working capital
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
| Ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Working capital turnover | An activity ratio calculated as revenue divided by working capital. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s working capital turnover improved from 2016 to 2017 but then deteriorated significantly from 2017 to 2018. |
Average Inventory Processing Period
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Inventory turnover | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ratio (no. of days) | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Benchmarks (no. of days) | ||||||
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Becton, Dickinson & Co. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Medtronic PLC | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stryker Corp. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector | ||||||
| Health Care Equipment & Services | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry | ||||||
| Health Care | |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on: 10-K (filing date: 2019-02-27), 10-K (filing date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2017-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2016-02-25), 10-K (filing date: 2015-02-26).
1 2018 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
| Ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Average inventory processing period | An activity ratio equal to the number of days in the period divided by inventory turnover over the period. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s average inventory processing period deteriorated from 2016 to 2017 but then improved from 2017 to 2018 exceeding 2016 level. |
Average Receivable Collection Period
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Receivables turnover | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ratio (no. of days) | ||||||
| Average receivable collection period1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Benchmarks (no. of days) | ||||||
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Becton, Dickinson & Co. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Medtronic PLC | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stryker Corp. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector | ||||||
| Health Care Equipment & Services | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry | ||||||
| Health Care | |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on: 10-K (filing date: 2019-02-27), 10-K (filing date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2017-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2016-02-25), 10-K (filing date: 2015-02-26).
1 2018 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
| Ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Average receivable collection period | An activity ratio equal to the number of days in the period divided by receivables turnover. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s average receivable collection period deteriorated from 2016 to 2017 but then improved from 2017 to 2018 not reaching 2016 level. |
Operating Cycle
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks
No. of days
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Average receivable collection period | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ratio | ||||||
| Operating cycle1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Operating Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Becton, Dickinson & Co. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Medtronic PLC | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stryker Corp. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Operating Cycle, Sector | ||||||
| Health Care Equipment & Services | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Operating Cycle, Industry | ||||||
| Health Care | |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on: 10-K (filing date: 2019-02-27), 10-K (filing date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2017-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2016-02-25), 10-K (filing date: 2015-02-26).
1 2018 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= + =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
| Ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Operating cycle | Equal to average inventory processing period plus average receivables collection period. |
Average Payables Payment Period
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Payables turnover | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ratio (no. of days) | ||||||
| Average payables payment period1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Benchmarks (no. of days) | ||||||
| Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Becton, Dickinson & Co. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Medtronic PLC | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stryker Corp. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Average Payables Payment Period, Sector | ||||||
| Health Care Equipment & Services | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Average Payables Payment Period, Industry | ||||||
| Health Care | |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on: 10-K (filing date: 2019-02-27), 10-K (filing date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2017-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2016-02-25), 10-K (filing date: 2015-02-26).
1 2018 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
| Ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Average payables payment period | An estimate of the average number of days it takes a company to pay its suppliers; equal to the number of days in the period divided by payables turnover ratio for the period. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s average payables payment period increased from 2016 to 2017 but then slightly declined from 2017 to 2018. |
Cash Conversion Cycle
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks
No. of days
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Average receivable collection period | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Average payables payment period | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ratio | ||||||
| Cash conversion cycle1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Becton, Dickinson & Co. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Medtronic PLC | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stryker Corp. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector | ||||||
| Health Care Equipment & Services | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry | ||||||
| Health Care | |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on: 10-K (filing date: 2019-02-27), 10-K (filing date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2017-02-28), 10-K (filing date: 2016-02-25), 10-K (filing date: 2015-02-26).
1 2018 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= + – =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
| Ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Cash conversion cycle | A financial metric that measures the length of time required for a company to convert cash invested in its operations to cash received as a result of its operations; equal to average inventory processing period plus average receivables collection period minus average payables payment period. | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s cash conversion cycle deteriorated from 2016 to 2017 but then improved from 2017 to 2018 exceeding 2016 level. |