- Goodwill and Intangible Asset Disclosure
- Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Goodwill
- Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Goodwill (Summary)
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- Adjusted Financial Leverage
- Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Goodwill and Intangible Asset Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
Between December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2019, there was a consistent decline in the total carrying value of goodwill, product rights, and other intangible assets, which decreased from 114.48 billion USD to 80.14 billion USD. This overall contraction is primarily driven by the accelerated amortization of definite-lived intangible assets and a steady reduction in indefinite-lived assets.
- Definite-Lived Intangible Assets
- While the cost basis of definite-lived intangible assets peaked in 2017 at 74.58 billion USD, the net book value experienced a continuous decline from 56.73 billion USD in 2015 to 33.35 billion USD in 2019. This trend is attributed to a significant increase in accumulated amortization, which grew from 8.51 billion USD to 39.55 billion USD over the five-year period, indicating that the economic utility of acquired product rights is being consumed at an accelerating rate.
- Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and IPR&D
- Indefinite-lived intangible assets, including In-Process Research and Development (IPR&D), showed a persistent downward trend. The value declined from 11.20 billion USD in 2015 to 4.54 billion USD in 2019. This suggests a pattern of these assets either being transitioned into definite-lived assets upon regulatory approval or being written down through impairment charges.
- Goodwill Analysis
- Goodwill remained relatively stable compared to other intangible categories, though it exhibited volatility. After peaking at 49.86 billion USD in 2017, it decreased to 42.25 billion USD by 2019. This reduction suggests a period of asset impairment or the divestiture of certain business segments during the latter part of the analyzed timeframe.
- Aggregate Asset Trajectory
- The combined value of net product rights and other intangibles fell from 67.93 billion USD in 2015 to 37.89 billion USD in 2019. When coupled with the decline in goodwill, the total asset base for these categories contracted by approximately 30%, reflecting a shift from a high-growth acquisition phase toward a phase of asset amortization and potential impairment.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Goodwill
Allergan PLC, Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
A consistent downward trend is observed across all primary balance sheet metrics between 2015 and 2019. Total assets and shareholders' equity experienced steady declines, while net income transitioned from positive figures in the early period to sustained losses in the latter years.
- Asset Composition and Adjustment Impact
- Reported total assets decreased from 135.8 billion USD in 2015 to 94.7 billion USD in 2019. When removing goodwill and intangible assets, the adjusted total assets fell from 89.3 billion USD to 52.5 billion USD over the same period. The gap between reported and adjusted assets indicates that a substantial portion of the company's asset base consists of intangible valuations, which represented approximately 34% of total assets in 2015 and grew to approximately 45% by 2019.
- Equity Erosion
- Shareholders' equity shows a marked decline in both reported and adjusted terms. Reported equity moved from 76.6 billion USD in 2015 to 58.2 billion USD in 2019. The adjusted equity, which excludes goodwill and intangibles, shows a more severe contraction, falling from 30.0 billion USD to 15.9 billion USD. This suggests that the reduction in the company's overall value is more pronounced when focusing on tangible equity.
- Net Income Volatility and Amortization Effects
- The company transitioned from a net income of 3.9 billion USD in 2015 and 15.0 billion USD in 2016 to reported losses starting in 2017. While reported net losses deepened to 5.3 billion USD by 2019, the adjusted net income figures reveal a different trend for the final two years. In 2018 and 2019, the adjusted losses were significantly lower than the reported losses, with the 2019 adjusted loss of 1.7 billion USD being substantially less than the reported loss of 5.3 billion USD. This discrepancy indicates that non-cash charges, likely related to the amortization of intangible assets, are a primary driver of the reported net losses.
The overall analysis reveals a company with a shrinking tangible asset base and a high reliance on intangible valuations. The divergence between reported and adjusted net income in the later years suggests that operational performance is more resilient than the reported bottom line indicates, as the reported losses are heavily influenced by the accounting treatment of intangible assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Goodwill (Summary)
Allergan PLC, Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The removal of goodwill and intangible assets from the balance sheet reveals a significant divergence between reported financial performance and the underlying operational efficiency. While reported figures are heavily influenced by the amortization and potential impairment of intangible assets, the adjusted ratios provide a clearer view of the company's core asset utilization and capital structure.
- Profitability and Returns
- Net profit margins experienced extreme volatility between 2015 and 2019. While both reported and adjusted margins peaked in 2016 at 102.76%, a sharp decline followed. However, from 2018 to 2019, the adjusted net profit margin showed a recovery trend, moving from -14.29% to -10.68%, whereas the reported margin continued to deteriorate to -32.76%. This suggests that non-cash charges related to intangibles heavily weighed down reported earnings in the latter period.
- Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Assets (ROA) mirror this pattern. Adjusted ROE was substantially higher during the 2016 peak (50.18% vs 19.65%) and showed a less severe decline and faster recovery from 2017 to 2019 compared to reported ROE. Adjusted ROA similarly improved from -6.02% in 2017 to -3.28% in 2019, indicating that the operational return on tangible assets is recovering more quickly than the return on the total asset base.
- Asset Efficiency
- A consistent disparity is observed in total asset turnover. Reported turnover remained low, ranging from 0.11 to 0.17. In contrast, adjusted total asset turnover was significantly higher and exhibited a steady upward trend, increasing from 0.17 in 2015 to 0.31 in 2019. This indicates that a large portion of the company's total assets consists of non-revenue-generating goodwill and intangibles, and that the tangible asset base is becoming increasingly efficient at generating sales.
- Financial Leverage
- The adjustment leads to a substantial increase in financial leverage ratios. Reported leverage remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 1.56 and 1.77. However, adjusted financial leverage is significantly higher, rising from 2.97 in 2015 to 3.29 in 2019. This increase occurs because the removal of goodwill and intangible assets reduces the total asset base (the denominator), thereby amplifying the perceived impact of debt relative to the company's tangible net worth.
Overall, the adjusted analysis indicates that while the company has faced significant profitability challenges since 2017, the underlying operational efficiency is improving. The divergence in leverage and turnover ratios highlights a balance sheet heavily weighted toward intangible assets, which masks the higher risk profile and improved tangible asset productivity evident in the adjusted metrics.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders ÷ Net revenues
= 100 × -5,271,000 ÷ 16,088,900 = -32.76%
2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) attributable to shareholders ÷ Net revenues
= 100 × -1,718,200 ÷ 16,088,900 = -10.68%
The financial performance from 2015 to 2019 is characterized by extreme volatility in profitability, transitioning from a period of significant gains to sustained reported losses. While reported figures indicate a deepening deficit over the latter half of the period, adjusted metrics reveal a trajectory of gradual recovery in underlying operational efficiency.
- Reported versus Adjusted Profitability Divergence
- A significant gap emerged between reported and adjusted net profit margins starting in 2018. In 2018, the reported margin stood at -32.28%, while the adjusted margin was -14.29%. By 2019, this divergence increased, with the reported margin at -32.76% and the adjusted margin improving to -10.68%. This variance indicates that substantial non-cash charges, likely associated with the amortization of intangible assets or goodwill impairment, are heavily weighing down the reported net income relative to the adjusted operational results.
- Analysis of Profitability Anomalies
- A sharp peak occurred in 2016, during which both reported and adjusted net profit margins reached 102.76%. A margin exceeding 100% suggests the realization of a substantial one-time non-operational gain or a significant tax benefit that temporarily obscured the core business trajectory before the entity transitioned to negative margins in 2017.
- Operational Recovery Trend
- Despite reported net losses remaining deep between 2017 and 2019, the adjusted net income demonstrates a consistent upward trend. Adjusted losses narrowed from -4,125,500 thousand US$ in 2017 to -1,718,200 thousand US$ in 2019. This pattern suggests that the core business is stabilizing and recovering its profitability profile when the effects of non-recurring items and intangible asset charges are excluded.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Net revenues ÷ Total assets
= 16,088,900 ÷ 94,699,100 = 0.17
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Net revenues ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 16,088,900 ÷ 52,450,800 = 0.31
A consistent contraction in the asset base is evident between 2015 and 2019, affecting both reported and adjusted figures. While reported total assets decreased by approximately 30%, adjusted total assets experienced a more pronounced decline of roughly 41%, indicating a significant reduction in the net value of operating assets relative to the total balance sheet.
- Asset Base Reduction
- Reported total assets declined from 135.8 billion US dollars in 2015 to 94.7 billion US dollars in 2019. Concurrently, adjusted total assets fell from 89.3 billion US dollars to 52.5 billion US dollars over the same period. The more rapid decline in adjusted assets suggests a shifting composition of the balance sheet over the five-year interval.
- Reported Total Asset Turnover
- The reported turnover ratio demonstrates a steady upward trend, rising from 0.11 in 2015 and 2016 to 0.17 by 2019. This indicates a gradual improvement in the capacity to generate revenue from the total asset base, including the impact of goodwill and intangible assets.
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- The adjusted turnover ratio, which excludes the impact of goodwill and intangible assets, shows a more aggressive improvement, increasing from 0.17 in 2015 to 0.31 in 2019. This growth rate significantly outpaces that of the reported turnover ratio, highlighting a substantial increase in the operational efficiency of the core asset base.
- Comparative Efficiency Analysis
- A widening gap is observed between the reported and adjusted asset turnover ratios. The variance between the two metrics increased from 0.06 in 2015 to 0.14 by 2019. This divergence confirms that intangible assets and goodwill exert a substantial downward pressure on efficiency metrics, and the operational core of the business improved its revenue-generating capacity at a significantly faster rate than the total corporate structure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 94,699,100 ÷ 58,173,600 = 1.63
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity
= 52,450,800 ÷ 15,925,300 = 3.29
A consistent downward trajectory is observed across all primary balance sheet metrics between 2015 and 2019. Both total assets and shareholders' equity experienced steady declines, with the adjustments for goodwill and intangible assets revealing a more pronounced contraction in the company's tangible financial base.
- Asset Valuation Trends
- Reported total assets decreased from 135.84 billion USD in 2015 to 94.70 billion USD in 2019. When adjusted to remove goodwill and intangible assets, the asset base declined more sharply, falling from 89.29 billion USD to 52.45 billion USD. This indicates that the reduction in total assets was driven significantly by a contraction in tangible holdings.
- Shareholders' Equity Erosion
- Reported shareholders' equity showed a moderate decline from 76.59 billion USD to 58.17 billion USD over the analyzed period. However, adjusted shareholders' equity exhibited a much more severe contraction, falling from 30.04 billion USD in 2015 to 15.93 billion USD in 2019. The fact that adjusted equity decreased by nearly 47% while reported equity decreased by approximately 24% underscores the heavy weighting of intangible assets within the equity structure.
- Financial Leverage Divergence
- A significant disparity is evident between reported and adjusted financial leverage ratios. Reported leverage remained relatively stable, oscillating between a high of 1.77 in 2015 and a low of 1.56 in 2018, before ending at 1.63 in 2019. Conversely, adjusted financial leverage was consistently higher and followed an upward trend, increasing from 2.97 in 2015 to 3.29 in 2019. This divergence indicates that the company's actual financial risk is substantially higher than reported figures suggest when intangible assets are excluded from the calculation.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 100 × -5,271,000 ÷ 58,173,600 = -9.06%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) attributable to shareholders ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity
= 100 × -1,718,200 ÷ 15,925,300 = -10.79%
A significant shift in financial performance is evident between 2016 and 2017, marking a transition from a period of high profitability to sustained net losses. While reported figures indicate a gradual decline in shareholders' equity, the adjusted figures reveal a more aggressive contraction of the capital base, suggesting that the removal of goodwill and intangible assets exposes a more volatile underlying financial structure.
- Net Income Trends
- Reported net income experienced a peak in 2016 at 14.97 billion US$ before shifting to a negative trajectory. From 2017 to 2019, reported losses expanded, reaching 5.27 billion US$ in the final period. Adjusted net income follows a similar downward pattern but demonstrates a mitigation of losses in the latter years, improving from a reported loss of 5.10 billion US$ in 2018 to an adjusted loss of 1.72 billion US$ by 2019.
- Shareholders' Equity Analysis
- A consistent downward trend is observed in both reported and adjusted equity. Reported equity decreased from 76.59 billion US$ in 2015 to 58.17 billion US$ in 2019. Adjusted equity, which excludes the impact of goodwill and intangible assets, declined more steeply from 30.04 billion US$ to 15.93 billion US$ over the same period. This indicates a substantial reduction in the company's tangible book value.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Dynamics
- The disparity between reported and adjusted ROE underscores the influence of intangible assets on performance metrics. Adjusted ROE exhibited extreme volatility, peaking at 50.18% in 2016 before plunging to -17.22% in 2017. While adjusted ROE remained negative through 2019, it showed a slight recovery trend from its 2017 low, ending at -10.79%. Conversely, reported ROE showed a steadier but continuous deterioration from 2016 onwards, ending at -9.06% in 2019.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders ÷ Total assets
= 100 × -5,271,000 ÷ 94,699,100 = -5.57%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) attributable to shareholders ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × -1,718,200 ÷ 52,450,800 = -3.28%
Financial performance between 2015 and 2019 is characterized by an initial period of profitability followed by three consecutive years of net losses. During this same interval, there was a consistent contraction in both reported and adjusted total asset bases.
- Asset Base Contraction
- Reported total assets declined steadily from 135.84 billion US$ in 2015 to 94.70 billion US$ in 2019. A more pronounced decrease is observed in adjusted total assets, which fell from 89.29 billion US$ to 52.45 billion US$ over the same period. The significant variance between reported and adjusted assets indicates a substantial concentration of goodwill and intangible assets within the balance sheet.
- Net Income Trends
- Profitability peaked in 2016 with a reported net income of 14.97 billion US$. However, a sharp reversal occurred in 2017, leading to a period of sustained losses. By 2019, reported net losses reached 5.27 billion US$. Adjusted net income figures mitigated these losses in 2018 and 2019, reducing the reported deficit to 2.26 billion US$ and 1.72 billion US$, respectively.
- Return on Assets (ROA) Variance
- During the profitable years of 2015 and 2016, the adjusted ROA was significantly higher than the reported ROA, reaching a peak of 18.12% compared to 11.61% in 2016. This divergence demonstrates that the exclusion of goodwill and intangible assets substantially amplifies the perceived efficiency of the remaining asset base during periods of positive earnings.
- ROA Performance during Loss Periods
- Following the transition to net losses in 2017, the adjusted ROA initially dropped more severely than the reported ROA, falling to -6.02% against a reported -3.49%. In the subsequent two years, however, the adjusted ROA showed a trend of gradual recovery, improving from -4.04% in 2018 to -3.28% in 2019, while the reported ROA continued to deteriorate to -5.57%.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?