Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Allergan PLC (NYSE:AGN)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 7, 2020.

Analysis of Property, Plant and Equipment

Microsoft Excel

Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure

Allergan PLC, balance sheet: property, plant and equipment

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Machinery and equipment 682,000 590,400 545,300 437,100 1,231,700
Research and laboratory equipment 97,000 67,400 59,000 48,800 171,900
Transportation/Other 643,500 529,600 475,300 381,400 596,000
Land, buildings and leasehold improvements 989,500 911,100 814,900 705,300 1,439,900
Construction in progress 442,400 466,700 507,000 446,100 578,400
Property, plant and equipment, cost 2,854,400 2,565,200 2,401,500 2,018,700 4,017,900
Accumulated depreciation (927,800) (778,200) (616,100) (407,400) (1,088,400)
Property, plant and equipment, net 1,926,600 1,787,000 1,785,400 1,611,300 2,929,500

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


A significant contraction in the total cost of property, plant, and equipment occurred between December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2016, with gross assets decreasing from $4.02 billion to $2.02 billion. Following this period of sharp decline, a consistent upward trajectory in asset acquisition was observed through December 31, 2019, as the company steadily expanded its asset base.

Gross Asset Composition and Growth
Following a substantial reduction in 2016, nearly all asset categories exhibited steady growth. Land, buildings, and leasehold improvements increased from $705.3 million in 2016 to $989.5 million in 2019. Similarly, machinery and equipment grew from $437.1 million to $682.0 million over the same period, and transportation and other assets rose from $381.4 million to $643.5 million.
Research and Development Infrastructure
Research and laboratory equipment experienced the most significant proportional drop between 2015 and 2016, falling from $171.9 million to $48.8 million. However, a consistent recovery trend followed, with values increasing annually to reach $97.0 million by the end of 2019.
Construction and Capital Projects
Construction in progress was the only category that did not demonstrate a recovery trend after 2016. After decreasing from $578.4 million in 2015 to $446.1 million in 2016, the value remained relatively stagnant, ending at $442.4 million in 2019, suggesting a shift away from large-scale new construction toward the utilization of existing facilities.
Net Book Value and Depreciation Analysis
The net book value of property, plant, and equipment fell from $2.93 billion in 2015 to $1.61 billion in 2016. While the net value recovered to $1.93 billion by 2019, this was accompanied by a steady increase in accumulated depreciation, which rose from $407.4 million in 2016 to $927.8 million in 2019, reflecting the aging of the asset portfolio.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Asset Age Ratios (Summary)

Allergan PLC, asset age ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Average age ratio 32.50% 30.34% 25.65% 20.18% 27.09%
Estimated total useful life (years) 14 13 14 13 18
Estimated age, time elapsed since purchase (years) 5 4 4 3 5
Estimated remaining life (years) 9 9 10 10 13

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


The analysis of asset age metrics indicates a general progression toward an older asset base, punctuated by a period of modernization in 2016. The overall trend suggests that the consumption of the useful life of property, plant, and equipment has accelerated in the latter years of the period.

Average Age Ratio
A volatile but generally upward trend is observed in the average age ratio. After an initial decline from 27.09% in 2015 to 20.18% in 2016, the ratio increased steadily each year, reaching a five-year peak of 32.50% by December 31, 2019. This indicates that a larger percentage of the assets' estimated useful lives have been exhausted as of the end of 2019 compared to previous years.
Estimated Total Useful Life and Remaining Life
The estimated total useful life saw a significant reduction from 18 years in 2015 to a more stable range of 13 to 14 years from 2016 through 2019. Concurrent with this, the estimated remaining life declined from 13 years in 2015 to 9 years in 2019. This downward trend in remaining life reflects the natural aging of the asset portfolio and a potential revision in the estimated durability or strategic utility of the equipment.
Estimated Age since Purchase
The estimated age of assets decreased from 5 years in 2015 to 3 years in 2016, which typically signifies a period of significant capital investment or the acquisition of new assets. Following this dip, the estimated age increased incrementally, returning to 5 years by the end of 2019, confirming that subsequent capital expenditures were insufficient to offset the natural aging of the existing asset base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Average Age

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Accumulated depreciation 927,800 778,200 616,100 407,400 1,088,400
Property, plant and equipment, cost 2,854,400 2,565,200 2,401,500 2,018,700 4,017,900
Asset Age Ratio
Average age1 32.50% 30.34% 25.65% 20.18% 27.09%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ Property, plant and equipment, cost
= 100 × 927,800 ÷ 2,854,400 = 32.50%


The analysis of property, plant, and equipment reveals a significant structural shift in the asset base between 2015 and 2016, followed by a period of steady growth and asset aging from 2017 through 2019.

Asset Base and Depreciation Trends
A substantial reduction in both the gross cost of property, plant, and equipment and accumulated depreciation occurred between December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2016. The cost of assets decreased from 4,017,900 thousand USD to 2,018,700 thousand USD, while accumulated depreciation fell from 1,088,400 thousand USD to 407,400 thousand USD. This sharp decline suggests a major divestiture or a significant write-down of assets during that period.
From 2016 onward, a consistent upward trend is observed in both metrics. Property, plant, and equipment costs rose steadily each year, reaching 2,854,400 thousand USD by the end of 2019. Similarly, accumulated depreciation increased annually from 407,400 thousand USD in 2016 to 927,800 thousand USD in 2019, reflecting the ongoing consumption of the assets' economic utility.
Average Age Ratio Analysis
The average age ratio experienced a notable dip in 2016, falling to 20.18% from 27.09% in 2015. This decrease aligns with the reduction in total asset cost and accumulated depreciation, indicating that the remaining or newly acquired asset base was younger on average at that time.
Between 2016 and 2019, the average age ratio demonstrated a continuous and accelerating increase, rising to 25.65% in 2017, 30.34% in 2018, and finally 32.50% in 2019. This progression indicates that the assets are aging and that the rate of depreciation is outpacing the rate of new capital investment relative to the total asset base.

Overall, the data indicates a transition from a period of asset contraction in 2016 to a phase of gradual expansion. However, the steadily increasing average age ratio suggests that a larger portion of the company's productive capacity is reaching a more advanced stage of its useful life.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Estimated Total Useful Life

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Property, plant and equipment, cost 2,854,400 2,565,200 2,401,500 2,018,700 4,017,900
Depreciation expense 204,500 196,300 171,500 155,800 218,300
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated total useful life1 14 13 14 13 18

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 Estimated total useful life = Property, plant and equipment, cost ÷ Depreciation expense
= 2,854,400 ÷ 204,500 = 14


The financial trajectory of property, plant, and equipment exhibits a significant structural shift between 2015 and 2016, followed by a period of consistent growth and stabilization through 2019.

Asset Cost and Depreciation Expenditure
A substantial reduction in property, plant, and equipment cost is observed in 2016, falling from 4,017,900 thousand US dollars to 2,018,700 thousand US dollars. This contraction is mirrored by a decrease in depreciation expense, which dropped from 218,300 thousand US dollars to 155,800 thousand US dollars in the same period. From 2017 onward, both metrics exhibit a steady upward trend, with asset costs increasing annually to reach 2,854,400 thousand US dollars and depreciation expenses rising to 204,500 thousand US dollars by the end of 2019.
Estimated Total Useful Life
A notable adjustment in accounting estimates occurred in 2016, where the estimated total useful life of assets decreased from 18 years to 13 years. For the subsequent three years, this figure remained relatively stable, fluctuating minimally between 13 and 14 years. This downward revision indicates a change in the composition of the asset portfolio or a strategic shift toward more conservative amortization periods.
Correlation of Asset Management Trends
The simultaneous reduction in total asset cost and the shortening of estimated useful life in 2016 suggests a comprehensive realignment of capital assets. The subsequent period from 2017 to 2019 is characterized by steady capital reinvestment, as evidenced by the gradual increase in cost and the corresponding rise in depreciation expenses, all while maintaining the revised shorter useful life parameters.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Accumulated depreciation 927,800 778,200 616,100 407,400 1,088,400
Depreciation expense 204,500 196,300 171,500 155,800 218,300
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Time elapsed since purchase1 5 4 4 3 5

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense
= 927,800 ÷ 204,500 = 5


The analysis of property, plant, and equipment reveals a significant restructuring of the asset base between 2015 and 2016, followed by a period of consistent growth in depreciation and asset aging through 2019.

Accumulated Depreciation Trends
A substantial reduction in accumulated depreciation occurred between 2015 and 2016, where the balance decreased from 1,088,400 to 407,400 US$ in thousands. This sharp decline is indicative of a major disposal, sale, or write-off of older assets. Subsequent to this event, the balance increased steadily each year, reaching 927,800 US$ in thousands by December 31, 2019, reflecting the standard accounting treatment of the remaining and newly acquired assets.
Depreciation Expense Patterns
Depreciation expenses mirrored the volatility seen in the accumulated balance, falling from 218,300 to 155,800 US$ in thousands in 2016. From 2017 through 2019, a progressive upward trend is observed, with annual expenses rising to 204,500 US$ in thousands. This steady increase suggests an expansion of the depreciable asset base or the integration of assets with higher depreciation schedules over the period.
Asset Age and Time Elapsed
The estimated time elapsed since purchase dropped from 5 years in 2015 to 3 years in 2016, providing evidence that the asset portfolio was refreshed through the acquisition of newer equipment or the removal of aged assets. Following this shift, the average age increased incrementally, returning to 5 years by 2019. This movement is consistent with the growth in accumulated depreciation, signaling a transition from a newly refreshed asset base back toward a more mature lifecycle.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Estimated Remaining Life

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Property, plant and equipment, net 1,926,600 1,787,000 1,785,400 1,611,300 2,929,500
Depreciation expense 204,500 196,300 171,500 155,800 218,300
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated remaining life1 9 9 10 10 13

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 Estimated remaining life = Property, plant and equipment, net ÷ Depreciation expense
= 1,926,600 ÷ 204,500 = 9


The financial data reveals a significant restructuring of property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) and a corresponding adjustment in asset lifespan expectations between 2015 and 2019.

Net Property, Plant, and Equipment Trends
A sharp contraction in net PP&E occurred between 2015 and 2016, where values decreased from US$ 2,929,500 thousand to US$ 1,611,300 thousand. Following this decline, a gradual recovery phase is observed, with the net value rising steadily to US$ 1,926,600 thousand by December 31, 2019.
Depreciation Expense Trajectory
Depreciation expenses mirrored the initial decline in asset value, dropping from US$ 218,300 thousand in 2015 to US$ 155,800 thousand in 2016. However, from 2017 onward, depreciation expenses increased annually, reaching US$ 204,500 thousand by 2019, despite the asset base not returning to its 2015 peak.
Estimated Remaining Life of Assets
The estimated remaining life of the asset base exhibits a consistent downward trend, decreasing from 13 years in 2015 to 9 years by 2019. The most significant reduction occurred between 2015 and 2016, with a further marginal decrease noted between 2017 and 2018.

The correlation between the decreasing estimated remaining life and the rising depreciation expenses relative to the net asset value suggests an acceleration in the rate of asset consumption. The shift from a 13-year to a 9-year remaining life period indicates the adoption of a more aggressive depreciation schedule or a structural shift in the asset portfolio toward shorter-lived assets.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?