Stock Analysis on Net

Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:MSFT)

Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF) 

Microsoft Excel

Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)

Microsoft Corp., FCFF calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 30, 2025 Jun 30, 2024 Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020
Net income 101,832 88,136 72,361 72,738 61,271 44,281
Net noncash charges 39,680 28,588 17,609 15,851 16,405 17,877
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (5,350) 1,824 (2,388) 446 (936) (1,483)
Net cash from operations 136,162 118,548 87,582 89,035 76,740 60,675
Cash paid for interest on debt, net of tax1 1,318 1,391 1,377 1,651 1,724 2,004
Additions to property and equipment (64,551) (44,477) (28,107) (23,886) (20,622) (15,441)
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) 72,929 75,462 60,852 66,800 57,842 47,238

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30).


Net Cash from Operations
The net cash from operations demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory over the observed periods. Starting at 60,675 million US dollars in June 2020, it increased steadily each year, reaching 136,162 million US dollars by June 2025. The growth indicates enhanced operational efficiency and strong cash-generating capabilities, with notable acceleration between June 2023 and June 2025.
Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
The free cash flow to the firm also showed a general rising trend from June 2020 through June 2024, growing from 47,238 million US dollars to 75,462 million US dollars. However, there was a slight decline in June 2025, falling to 72,929 million US dollars. This may suggest increased capital expenditures or a temporary dip in cash flow performance. Despite this minor decrease, the overall level remained significantly higher than at the start of the period, reflecting sustained robust financial health.
Comparative Observations
While both net cash from operations and FCFF grew overall, net cash from operations experienced more pronounced and uninterrupted growth. The divergence observed in the final period for FCFF compared to net cash from operations suggests differences in investment or financing activities impacting free cash flow specifically. The data implies effective operational cash generation is maintaining strength, though free cash flow is subject to more variability due to other financial activities.

Interest Paid, Net of Tax

Microsoft Corp., interest paid, net of tax calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 30, 2025 Jun 30, 2024 Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020
Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
EITR1 17.60% 18.20% 19.00% 13.10% 13.80% 16.50%
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Cash paid for interest on debt, before tax 1,600 1,700 1,700 1,900 2,000 2,400
Less: Cash paid for interest on debt, tax2 282 309 323 249 276 396
Cash paid for interest on debt, net of tax 1,318 1,391 1,377 1,651 1,724 2,004

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30).

1 See details »

2 2025 Calculation
Cash paid for interest on debt, tax = Cash paid for interest on debt × EITR
= 1,600 × 17.60% = 282


The analysis of the financial data over the six-year period reveals notable trends in the effective income tax rate (EITR) and cash paid for interest on debt, net of tax. These elements display patterns that offer insights into the company's financial management and tax strategy.

Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
The effective income tax rate shows a fluctuating but generally increasing trend after reaching its lowest point in the specified timeline. Starting at 16.5% in mid-2020, the rate decreased to 13.1% by mid-2022, reflecting a possible optimization in tax planning or changes in tax regulations during this period. However, from mid-2022 onwards, the EITR rose sharply to 19% in mid-2023, before slightly declining to 17.6% by mid-2025. This pattern suggests adjustments in the company's tax obligations or strategies, with a recent trend toward higher effective taxation.
Cash Paid for Interest on Debt, Net of Tax
The cash paid for interest on debt exhibits a consistent declining trend over the years. Beginning at $2,004 million as of mid-2020, this outflow diminishes steadily each year, reaching $1,318 million by mid-2025. This reduction may indicate effective debt management, possibly through refinancing at lower interest rates, paying down debt, or improved cash flow management reducing the need for interest-bearing debt. The steady decline suggests a strategic focus on minimizing financing costs.

Overall, the data points to a company that has been actively managing its tax and debt interest obligations. While the effective income tax rate has seen some variability and a recent increase, the ongoing reduction in interest payments points to strengthening financial efficiency and potentially improved leverage management.


Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current

Microsoft Corp., current EV/FCFF calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV) 3,764,163
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) 72,929
Valuation Ratio
EV/FCFF 51.61
Benchmarks
EV/FCFF, Competitors1
Accenture PLC 13.51
Adobe Inc. 17.30
AppLovin Corp. 119.19
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 77.22
CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. 120.21
Datadog Inc. 66.34
International Business Machines Corp. 23.54
Intuit Inc. 29.18
Oracle Corp. 309.57
Palantir Technologies Inc. 387.92
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 40.25
Salesforce Inc. 18.66
ServiceNow Inc. 52.65
Synopsys Inc. 56.02
Workday Inc. 24.98
EV/FCFF, Sector
Software & Services 45.96
EV/FCFF, Industry
Information Technology 57.25

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-30).

1 Click competitor name to see calculations.

If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.


Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical

Microsoft Corp., historical EV/FCFF calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2025 Jun 30, 2024 Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV)1 3,809,756 3,146,813 2,410,213 2,021,362 2,093,369 1,487,741
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 72,929 75,462 60,852 66,800 57,842 47,238
Valuation Ratio
EV/FCFF3 52.24 41.70 39.61 30.26 36.19 31.49
Benchmarks
EV/FCFF, Competitors4
Accenture PLC 13.12 25.76 20.26 16.99 24.76 17.90
Adobe Inc. 21.98 37.75 20.82 33.61 40.43
AppLovin Corp. 63.01 19.50 13.94 43.78
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 61.26 63.83 44.54 35.05 44.13
CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. 67.26 81.46 38.65 96.35 141.44 807.14
Datadog Inc. 52.45 68.76 66.00 198.40 346.45
International Business Machines Corp. 20.11 15.27 16.47 13.10 9.35
Intuit Inc. 29.77 36.79 31.28 32.85 48.64 37.90
Oracle Corp. 263.29 31.24 35.83 31.60 16.36 14.99
Palantir Technologies Inc. 251.61 69.13 82.97 66.45
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 35.88 34.69 28.15 29.30 32.74 26.50
Salesforce Inc. 21.83 29.95 28.41 35.97 44.91 39.63
ServiceNow Inc. 60.21 56.55 40.86 60.13 83.74
Synopsys Inc. 56.23 55.87 30.82 38.59 42.88
Workday Inc. 26.14 32.57 33.40 45.74 57.52 72.44
EV/FCFF, Sector
Software & Services 38.23 34.89 28.82 32.02 27.40
EV/FCFF, Industry
Information Technology 39.07 33.99 26.34 27.38 23.71

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30).

1 See details »

2 See details »

3 2025 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 3,809,756 ÷ 72,929 = 52.24

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
The enterprise value of the company has shown a generally increasing trend over the observed period. Starting at approximately $1.49 trillion in mid-2020, the EV rose significantly to about $2.09 trillion by mid-2021. Although there was a slight decline to roughly $2.02 trillion in mid-2022, the value resumed its upward trajectory, reaching approximately $3.81 trillion by mid-2025. This indicates a substantial overall growth in the company's market valuation over the five-year span, reflecting potentially favorable market conditions or improved business prospects.
Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Trends
The free cash flow to the firm exhibited a more fluctuating pattern. It rose from around $47.2 billion in mid-2020 to about $66.8 billion in mid-2022, indicating an improvement in cash generation ability during this period. However, there was a slight decrease in mid-2023 to approximately $60.9 billion, followed by a recovery to $75.5 billion by mid-2024. In mid-2025, FCFF slightly declined again to about $72.9 billion. Overall, the cash flow remained relatively strong, with some volatility but an upward tendency in the medium term.
EV/FCFF Ratio Analysis
The EV to FCFF ratio, which can be viewed as a valuation multiple indicating how many times the firm’s free cash flow is covered by its enterprise value, revealed increasing valuation multiples over the period. The ratio began at 31.49 in 2020, climbed modestly to 36.19 in 2021, then declined to 30.26 in 2022, reflecting a more attractive valuation at that point. However, from 2023 onwards, the ratio rose notably to 39.61, then 41.7, and ultimately to 52.24 by 2025. This rising trend suggests that the enterprise value has been growing at a faster pace than free cash flow, potentially indicating increasing market optimism, higher growth expectations, or possibly overvaluation in the later periods.
Summary of Patterns and Insights
Overall, the company experienced significant growth in enterprise value with some fluctuation in free cash flow generation. The upward movement in EV/FCFF ratio, particularly its sharp increase in the most recent years, may reflect changing market perceptions where valuation premiums have expanded relative to the underlying cash flows. The data implies that while cash flows have generally improved, market valuation has grown disproportionately, warranting attention to the sustainability of such valuations and underlying business performance in future assessments.