Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:MSFT)

$24.99

Debt to Equity
since 2005

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check

Calculation

Microsoft Corp., debt to equity, long-term trends, calculation

Microsoft Excel

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-06-30).

1 US$ in millions


An analysis of the financial structure between 2005 and 2026 reveals a cyclical trend in leverage, characterized by a period of aggressive debt accumulation followed by a sustained phase of equity-driven deleveraging.

Initial Stability and Moderate Leverage (2009–2013)
During this period, the debt to equity ratio remained relatively low and stable, fluctuating between 0.13 and 0.25. Total debt and finance lease liabilities grew modestly from US$ 5,746 million in 2009 to US$ 15,600 million in 2013, while stockholders' equity saw a steady increase from US$ 39,558 million to US$ 78,944 million.
Leverage Expansion Phase (2014–2017)
A significant shift occurred starting in 2014, marked by a rapid increase in both total debt and the resulting debt to equity ratio. The ratio climbed from 0.25 in 2014 to a peak of 1.23 in 2017. This spike was driven by a substantial rise in total debt and finance lease liabilities, which surged from US$ 22,645 million in 2014 to US$ 88,732 million in 2017, outpacing the growth of stockholders' equity during the same interval.
Sustained Deleveraging and Equity Growth (2018–2026)
From 2018 onward, a consistent downward trend in the debt to equity ratio is observed, falling from 0.97 to a projected 0.24 by 2026. This trend is primarily attributed to the exponential growth of stockholders' equity, which rose from US$ 82,718 million in 2018 to a projected US$ 442,387 million by 2026. Although total debt increased again in the latter years, reaching a projected US$ 106,888 million, the rate of equity accumulation far exceeded the rate of debt growth, leading to a strengthened solvency position.

The long-term trajectory indicates a transition toward a more equity-heavy capital structure. The substantial expansion of the equity base has effectively mitigated the impact of increased nominal debt, resulting in a debt to equity ratio in 2026 that is comparable to the levels observed over a decade prior.



Comparison to Competitors

Microsoft Corp., debt to equity, long-term trends, comparison to competitors

Microsoft Excel

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-06-30).



Comparison to Sector (Software & Services)



Comparison to Industry (Information Technology)