- Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
- Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
- Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
- Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
- Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- Adjusted Financial Leverage
- Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Automatic Data Processing Inc., income tax expense (benefit), continuing operations
US$ in thousands
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
The total provision for income taxes exhibited a fluctuating trend over the six-year period ending June 30, 2021. While the total provision remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2020, oscillating between 550.3 million and 797.7 million US dollars, the underlying components of this provision shifted significantly by the final year of the analysis.
- Current Income Tax Expenses
- Current tax obligations demonstrated substantial volatility, reaching a peak of 1,013.8 million US dollars in 2021. A notable decline occurred in 2018, where expenses dropped to 549.8 million US dollars, followed by a steady recovery through 2020 and a sharp increase in 2021.
- Deferred Income Tax Dynamics
- Deferred taxes remained nominal and predominantly represented small expenses from 2016 through 2020, ranging from 500 thousand to 26 million US dollars. A significant reversal is observed in 2021, transitioning to a deferred tax benefit of 251.1 million US dollars.
- Aggregate Provision Analysis
- The total provision for income taxes was heavily influenced by current tax components for most of the period. In 2021, the total provision of 762.7 million US dollars was materially lower than the current tax expense of 1,013.8 million US dollars, as the result of the substantial offsetting deferred tax benefit.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
The effective tax rate exhibited a consistent downward trajectory over the analyzed six-year period, decreasing from 33.20% in 2016 to 22.70% in 2021. The most pronounced contractions occurred between 2017 and 2019, mirroring fundamental shifts in the U.S. federal statutory tax environment.
- Impact of Statutory Tax Rate Changes
- The primary catalyst for the reduction in the effective tax rate was the decrease in the U.S. federal statutory tax rate. This rate remained constant at 35.00% through 2017, declined to 28.10% in 2018, and stabilized at 21.00% from 2019 through 2021. This statutory decline created the baseline for the lower overall tax burden in the latter three years of the period.
- Foreign Tax Components and Transition
- A shift in the treatment of foreign earnings is observable. From 2016 to 2018, the rate was influenced by U.S. taxes on foreign income and the utilization of foreign tax credits, the latter of which provided a significant reduction of 7.00% in 2016. Starting in 2019, these components were replaced by a foreign rate differential, which contributed a relatively stable increase to the effective rate, ranging from 1.00% to 1.60%.
- Tax Credits and Regulatory Incentives
- Section 199 Qualified Production Activities consistently reduced the effective tax rate between 2016 and 2018, with impacts ranging from 1.30% to 1.50%. Furthermore, the rate was lowered by specific refund claims related to research tax credits and production activities, which provided one-time benefits of 2.10% in 2017 and 1.60% in 2018.
- Secondary Adjustments and State Taxes
- State taxes, net of federal benefit, remained a consistent additive factor, fluctuating narrowly between 2.00% and 2.70%. The excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation provided a steady downward adjustment, although the magnitude of this benefit diminished over time, falling from a peak of 1.30% in 2017 to 0.20% by 2021.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
The company's deferred tax profile transitioned from a marginal net liability position in the early part of the period to a substantial net deferred tax liability by 2020, followed by a partial reduction in 2021. This shift is primarily characterized by a significant expansion of deferred tax liabilities that outweighed the relatively stable or declining trends in deferred tax assets.
- Analysis of Deferred Tax Assets (DTAs)
- Gross deferred tax assets peaked in 2017 at $487.7 million and generally declined to approximately $384.9 million by 2021. Accrued expenses not currently deductible remained the largest component of DTAs, though they exhibited volatility, dropping to a period low of $178.3 million in 2018 before recovering. A consistent downward trend was observed in stock-based compensation expenses, which decreased from $75.5 million in 2017 to $33.8 million in 2020, suggesting a narrowing gap between accounting and tax treatment for these expenses.
- Analysis of Deferred Tax Liabilities (DTLs)
- Deferred tax liabilities experienced significant growth and volatility, rising from $589.6 million in 2016 to a peak of $1.062 billion in 2020. A primary catalyst for this increase was deferred revenue, which surged from $16.5 million in 2018 to $475.9 million in 2019, remaining at elevated levels through 2021. Liabilities associated with fixed and intangible assets also grew steadily until 2020, after which a sharp decline occurred, falling to $119.4 million by June 30, 2021. Unrealized investment gains contributed intermittent volatility to the liability balance throughout the period.
- Net Deferred Tax Position and Valuation Allowances
- The net deferred tax liability widened substantially between 2018 and 2020, moving from $17.2 million to $693.2 million. This expansion reflects a period where the growth of taxable temporary differences significantly outpaced the creation of deductible temporary differences. Valuation allowances against deferred tax assets were volatile, peaking at $46 million in 2018, which indicates adjustments based on the estimated realizability of the assets. By 2021, the net deferred tax liability narrowed to $434.7 million, driven largely by the reduction in liabilities related to fixed and intangible assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
Automatic Data Processing Inc., deferred tax assets and liabilities, classification
US$ in thousands
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
The analysis of deferred tax accounts between June 30, 2016, and June 30, 2021, reveals a period of significant volatility in tax liabilities and a general contraction in tax assets, resulting in a substantial increase in the net deferred tax liability position over the long term.
- Long-term Deferred Tax Assets
- A consistent downward trend is observed from 2016 to 2020, with assets decreasing from 100,300 thousand US$ to 38,800 thousand US$. This represents a cumulative decline of approximately 61% over four years. A partial reversal of this trend occurred in 2021, as assets increased to 48,300 thousand US$, though the balance remained well below the 2016 levels.
- Long-term Deferred Tax Liabilities
- The liabilities exhibited a non-linear trajectory. An initial reduction occurred between 2016 and 2018, with balances falling from 251,100 thousand US$ to a low of 107,300 thousand US$. This was followed by a sharp escalation in 2019, where liabilities surged to 659,900 thousand US$, peaking in 2020 at 731,900 thousand US$. By June 30, 2021, these liabilities decreased to 482,900 thousand US$, although they remained nearly double the 2016 starting point.
- Net Deferred Tax Position
- The company maintained a net deferred tax liability position throughout the entire period. The net liability was most compressed in 2018, reaching its lowest point. However, the convergence of declining assets and spiking liabilities between 2019 and 2020 led to a dramatic expansion of the net tax liability. Despite the reduction in liabilities observed in 2021, the net liability position remained elevated compared to the 2016-2018 period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
Automatic Data Processing Inc., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
The removal of deferred taxes results in a consistent systemic adjustment across the balance sheet and income statement from 2016 to 2021. The primary effect of these adjustments is a reduction in total liabilities, which consequently enhances the stockholders' equity position, while having a marginal impact on total assets.
- Impact on Total Assets
- Adjusted total assets are consistently lower than reported total assets across the entire six-year period. The magnitude of this difference is relatively small, ranging from a reduction of approximately 100.3 million USD in 2016 to 48.3 million USD in 2021. A general narrowing of the gap between reported and adjusted assets is observed over time.
- Impact on Total Liabilities
- A significant and consistent reduction in total liabilities is observed when deferred taxes are removed. The most pronounced adjustments occurred between 2019 and 2021, with the largest variance appearing in 2020, where adjusted liabilities were 731.9 million USD lower than reported figures. This suggests that deferred tax liabilities constitute a substantial portion of the company's reported obligations.
- Impact on Stockholders' Equity
- The removal of deferred taxes leads to a corresponding increase in adjusted stockholders' equity. This positive variance grew substantially starting in 2019, peaking in 2020 with an increase of 693.2 million USD over reported equity. The adjustment reflects a stronger net asset position for shareholders when deferred tax obligations are excluded.
- Analysis of Net Earnings
- From 2016 through 2020, adjusted net earnings remained marginally higher than reported net earnings, indicating that deferred tax adjustments had a slight positive effect on the bottom line. However, a sharp reversal occurred in 2021, where adjusted net earnings fell to 2.347 billion USD compared to reported net earnings of 2.598 billion USD, representing a negative adjustment of 251.1 million USD.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
Automatic Data Processing Inc., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
An analysis of the financial ratios from 2016 to 2021 reveals that the removal of deferred taxes has a varying impact across different performance metrics, with the most significant divergences appearing in profitability and leverage ratios toward the end of the period.
- Profitability and Margin Analysis
- The reported net profit margin exhibited a general upward trend, rising from 12.79% in 2016 to 17.32% in 2021. The adjusted net profit margin closely mirrored this trajectory until 2021, where a notable divergence occurred; the adjusted margin fell to 15.64%, indicating that deferred tax effects positively inflated the reported margin in the final year. Similarly, the Return on Assets (ROA) showed an overall increase, though the adjusted ROA in 2021 (4.82%) was lower than the reported ROA (5.33%), reinforcing the observation that deferred tax adjustments reduce reported profitability metrics in later periods.
- Asset Utilization and Financial Leverage
- Total asset turnover remained identical between reported and adjusted figures throughout the entire six-year duration, fluctuating between 0.27 and 0.37. This indicates that deferred tax accounting has no impact on asset turnover. In contrast, financial leverage was consistently lower in the adjusted figures. While reported leverage peaked at 10.72 in 2018 and ended at 8.60 in 2021, the adjusted leverage was consistently lower, reaching 7.98 in 2021. This suggests that deferred tax liabilities contribute to a higher reported leverage profile.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Divergence
- The most substantial discrepancy is observed in the Return on Equity. Reported ROE grew significantly from 33.30% in 2016 to 45.83% in 2021. However, the adjusted ROE tells a different story: after peaking at 46.63% in 2018, it declined and stabilized around 38.45% by 2021. The widening gap between reported and adjusted ROE, particularly from 2019 onwards, indicates that the reported figures are heavily influenced by deferred tax accounting, which overstates the actual return on equity when those tax effects are removed.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
2021 Calculations
1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net earnings ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 2,598,500 ÷ 15,005,400 = 17.32%
2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net earnings ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 2,347,400 ÷ 15,005,400 = 15.64%
The analysis of net earnings and profit margins from June 30, 2016, to June 30, 2021, reveals a general upward trajectory in profitability, characterized by a significant expansion in margins starting in 2019, despite a notable divergence between reported and adjusted figures in the final year.
- Net Earnings Trends
- Reported net earnings grew from 1,492,500 thousand US$ in 2016 to 2,598,500 thousand US$ by 2021. While a temporary decline occurred in 2018, the subsequent years showed aggressive growth, particularly between 2018 and 2019. Adjusted net earnings followed a similar pattern through 2020, peaking at 2,492,500 thousand US$, before experiencing a contraction to 2,347,400 thousand US$ in 2021.
- Net Profit Margin Expansion
- Both reported and adjusted net profit margins exhibited a cyclical pattern. A decline was observed in 2018, with the adjusted margin reaching a period low of 12.17%. This was followed by a substantial increase in 2019, with the adjusted margin rising to 16.24%. The margin peaked in 2020 at 17.08% for adjusted figures and 16.91% for reported figures.
- Reported versus Adjusted Divergence
- Between 2016 and 2020, adjusted net profit margins consistently remained slightly above reported margins, indicating that adjustments generally had a positive impact on the perceived profitability. However, a reversal occurred in 2021, where the reported net profit margin rose to 17.32% while the adjusted margin fell to 15.64%. This variance indicates that the reported earnings for 2021 were bolstered by items that were excluded from the adjusted calculations, leading to a discrepancy of 1.68 percentage points.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
2021 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Total assets
= 15,005,400 ÷ 48,772,500 = 0.31
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 15,005,400 ÷ 48,724,200 = 0.31
The analysis of asset utilization from June 30, 2016, to June 30, 2021, reveals a period of fluctuating asset levels accompanied by a general, though inconsistent, improvement in asset turnover efficiency until 2020.
- Total Asset Trends
- Total assets experienced a notable decline between 2016 and 2018, falling from 43.67 billion USD to approximately 37.09 billion USD. This was followed by a recovery phase, peaking at 48.77 billion USD by June 30, 2021. The most significant single-year increase occurred between 2020 and 2021, where assets grew by approximately 9.6 billion USD.
- Asset Turnover Efficiency
- The total asset turnover ratio demonstrated a positive trajectory for the majority of the period, rising from 0.27 in 2016 to a peak of 0.37 in 2020. This suggests an increase in the company's ability to generate revenue relative to its asset base. However, a reversal occurred in 2021, with the ratio declining to 0.31. This decrease correlates with the substantial expansion of the asset base in the same period, indicating that asset growth outpaced revenue growth during the final year of the analysis.
- Impact of Adjustments
- A comparison between reported and adjusted figures indicates that the adjustments applied to total assets were immaterial. The adjusted total assets mirrored the reported figures closely across all six years, resulting in identical adjusted and reported total asset turnover ratios. This suggests that no significant accounting or tax-related adjustments impacted the interpretation of asset efficiency.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
2021 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 48,772,500 ÷ 5,670,100 = 8.60
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 48,724,200 ÷ 6,104,800 = 7.98
The financial structure over the period from June 30, 2016, to June 30, 2021, is characterized by fluctuating asset levels and a notable shift in equity positions, which directly influenced the organization's financial leverage. A general pattern of volatility is evident, particularly between 2018 and 2021, where a significant reduction in leverage was followed by a recent increase.
- Asset and Equity Dynamics
- Total assets experienced an initial decline from 43.67 billion USD in 2016 to a low of approximately 37.09 billion USD in 2018. This was followed by a recovery phase, culminating in a peak of 48.77 billion USD by June 30, 2021. Simultaneously, stockholders' equity trended downward until 2018, reaching a minimum of 3.46 billion USD, before surging to 5.40 billion USD in 2019 and stabilizing above 5.6 billion USD in the subsequent years.
- Reported Financial Leverage
- The reported financial leverage ratio peaked in 2018 at 10.72, coinciding with the lowest point of stockholders' equity. A sharp deleveraging trend occurred between 2018 and 2020, with the ratio dropping to 6.81. However, by June 30, 2021, the reported leverage increased to 8.60, reflecting a higher proportion of assets funded by liabilities relative to equity compared to the previous two years.
- Adjusted Financial Leverage Analysis
- Adjusted financial leverage consistently remained lower than reported leverage across all analyzed periods. The adjusted ratio peaked at 10.64 in 2018 and reached its lowest point of 6.07 in 2020. The consistent delta between reported and adjusted figures suggests that the adjustments to total assets and stockholders' equity—specifically the increase in adjusted equity—serve to lower the perceived financial risk and leverage of the balance sheet.
- Comparative Trend Analysis
- The most significant shift in the capital structure occurred between 2018 and 2019, where both reported and adjusted leverage saw substantial decreases. This was driven primarily by a rapid increase in stockholders' equity, which grew by approximately 56% on a reported basis in a single year. While the 2021 increase in leverage to 7.98 (adjusted) indicates a rise in gearing, the level remains significantly lower than the 2016-2018 period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
2021 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net earnings ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,598,500 ÷ 5,670,100 = 45.83%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net earnings ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,347,400 ÷ 6,104,800 = 38.45%
The financial performance from 2016 to 2021 is characterized by a steady increase in net earnings alongside significant fluctuations in stockholders' equity. While reported earnings grew consistently over the six-year period, the return on equity metrics diverged notably between reported and adjusted figures starting in 2019.
- Net Earnings Trends
- Reported net earnings rose from US$ 1,492,500 thousand in 2016 to US$ 2,598,500 thousand in 2021. Adjusted net earnings followed a similar trajectory until 2021, at which point adjusted figures (US$ 2,347,400 thousand) fell below reported figures, indicating a shift in the impact of adjusting items on profitability.
- Stockholders' Equity Volatility
- Stockholders' equity experienced a downward trend between 2016 and 2018, reaching a minimum reported value of US$ 3,459,600 thousand. This was followed by a sharp increase in 2019 to US$ 5,399,900 thousand, with equity levels remaining relatively stable through 2021. Adjusted equity consistently remained higher than reported equity throughout the period, particularly from 2019 onward.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Divergence
- Reported ROE demonstrated overall growth, increasing from 33.30% in 2016 to 45.83% in 2021, with a peak of 46.85% in 2018. In contrast, Adjusted ROE peaked at 46.63% in 2018 before declining and stabilizing at approximately 38.4% between 2019 and 2021. The widening gap between reported and adjusted ROE suggests that the adjustments to equity and earnings had a more pronounced downward effect on the return ratio in the latter half of the observed period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
2021 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net earnings ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 2,598,500 ÷ 48,772,500 = 5.33%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net earnings ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 2,347,400 ÷ 48,724,200 = 4.82%
An analysis of the financial performance from June 30, 2016, to June 30, 2021, reveals a general growth trend in earnings accompanied by volatility in the total asset base. The narrow variance between reported and adjusted figures across most metrics suggests that one-time adjustments had a limited impact on the overall financial trajectory, with the exception of the final fiscal year.
- Net Earnings Trends
- Reported net earnings grew consistently from US$ 1,492.5 million in 2016 to US$ 2,598.5 million in 2021. Adjusted net earnings followed a similar upward trajectory for most of the period, peaking in 2020 at US$ 2,492.5 million. A divergence is noted in 2021, where adjusted net earnings declined to US$ 2,347.4 million, falling below the reported earnings for the first time in the observed period.
- Asset Base Fluctuations
- Total assets experienced a period of contraction between 2016 and 2018, decreasing from US$ 43.67 billion to US$ 37.09 billion. This was followed by a recovery phase and a substantial increase in 2021, where reported total assets reached a period high of US$ 48.77 billion.
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA) Analysis
- The Adjusted ROA exhibited a steady improvement over five years, rising from 3.43% in 2016 to a peak of 6.37% in 2020. This indicates increasing efficiency in asset utilization during that timeframe. However, a decline to 4.82% occurred in 2021. This contraction is the result of a combined effect: a significant expansion of the asset base and a simultaneous reduction in adjusted net earnings.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?