AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Automatic Data Processing Inc. (NASDAQ:ADP)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 29, 2022.

Return on Capital (ROC)

Microsoft Excel

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

Automatic Data Processing Inc., ROIC calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017 Jun 30, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 2,334,712 2,508,856 2,290,136 1,628,778 1,771,847 1,527,436
Invested capital2 10,152,600 9,580,300 9,463,158 7,289,794 7,519,836 7,921,908
Performance Ratio
ROIC3 23.00% 26.19% 24.20% 22.34% 23.56% 19.28%
Benchmarks
ROIC, Competitors4
Accenture PLC 25.83% — — — — —
Adobe Inc. 29.44% 21.67% — — — —
AppLovin Corp. 0.83% — — — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 24.26% — — — — —
Datadog Inc. 16.66% — — — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 3.86% — — — — —
Intuit Inc. 17.64% — — — — —
Microsoft Corp. 45.56% — — — — —
Oracle Corp. 17.55% — — — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. -14.60% — — — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 11.48% — — — — —
Salesforce Inc. 8.25% — — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 18.88% — — — — —
Synopsys Inc. 11.52% 11.63% — — — —
Workday Inc. 1.38% — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 2,334,712 ÷ 10,152,600 = 23.00%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between June 30, 2016, and June 30, 2021, the return on invested capital exhibited a general upward trajectory with a peak in 2020, reflecting a period of fluctuating operational efficiency and shifting capital allocation strategies.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
A general growth trend is observed in NOPAT, which increased from 1,527,436 thousand in 2016 to a peak of 2,508,856 thousand in 2020. While there were intermittent declines in 2018 and 2021, the overall trend indicates a substantial expansion in the company's capacity to generate operating profits after taxes over the six-year period.
Invested Capital Trends
The invested capital base underwent two distinct phases. From 2016 to 2018, a contraction was observed, with capital decreasing from 7,921,908 thousand to 7,289,794 thousand. This was followed by a period of significant expansion beginning in 2019, where invested capital rose sharply to 9,463,158 thousand and continued to climb, reaching 10,152,600 thousand by 2021.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) Performance
ROIC remained consistently above 19%, demonstrating strong capital efficiency. The initial increase from 19.28% in 2016 to 23.56% in 2017 was driven by a combination of rising NOPAT and a reducing capital base. The efficiency peak of 26.19% occurred in 2020, coinciding with the highest recorded NOPAT. However, a decline to 23.00% is noted in 2021, attributable to the simultaneous decrease in NOPAT and a continued increase in invested capital.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Decomposition of ROIC

Automatic Data Processing Inc., decomposition of ROIC

Microsoft Excel
ROIC = OPM1 × TO2 × 1 – CTR3
Jun 30, 2021 23.00% = 22.37% × 1.48 × 69.63%
Jun 30, 2020 26.19% = 22.01% × 1.52 × 78.33%
Jun 30, 2019 24.20% = 21.27% × 1.49 × 76.24%
Jun 30, 2018 22.34% = 16.45% × 1.83 × 74.42%
Jun 30, 2017 23.56% = 20.71% × 1.65 × 69.05%
Jun 30, 2016 19.28% = 19.44% × 1.48 × 67.22%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).

1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »

2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »

3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »


Return on invested capital exhibited a general upward trajectory from 2016 through 2020, before experiencing a moderate contraction in 2021. The overall increase from 19.28% to a peak of 26.19% indicates an improvement in capital efficiency over the majority of the analyzed period.

Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
A positive long-term trend in profitability is observed, with the margin expanding from 19.44% in 2016 to 22.37% in 2021. A significant outlier occurred in 2018, where the margin declined to 16.45%, followed by a consistent recovery and expansion through the subsequent three years.
Turnover of Capital (TO)
Capital utilization demonstrated volatility, reaching a peak ratio of 1.83 in 2018. This peak coincided with the period of lowest operating profit margin, suggesting an inverse relationship between margin and turnover during that specific cycle. From 2019 to 2021, the turnover ratio stabilized, maintaining a narrow range between 1.48 and 1.52.
After-Tax Retention Factor (1 – CTR)
The effective cash tax rate factor showed a steady improvement from 67.22% in 2016 to a maximum of 78.33% in 2020. This trend provided a tailwind for the growth of the return on invested capital. However, a sharp decrease to 69.63% was recorded in 2021, representing a significant reversal in tax efficiency.
Integrated ROIC Drivers
The decomposition of the return on invested capital reveals that the peak in 2020 was driven by the alignment of expanding operating margins and a highly favorable after-tax retention factor. The subsequent decline in 2021 is attributed primarily to the reduction in the after-tax retention factor, as the operating profit margin continued to improve during the same period, thereby offsetting some of the negative impact from the increased tax burden.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Profit Margin (OPM)

Automatic Data Processing Inc., OPM calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017 Jun 30, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 2,334,712 2,508,856 2,290,136 1,628,778 1,771,847 1,527,436
Add: Cash operating taxes2 1,018,322 694,262 713,664 559,875 794,364 744,765
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) 3,353,034 3,203,118 3,003,800 2,188,653 2,566,210 2,272,201
 
Revenues 15,005,400 14,589,800 14,175,200 13,325,800 12,379,800 11,667,800
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues (16,800) (36,900) (53,800) (20,000) 10,000 23,000
Adjusted revenues 14,988,600 14,552,900 14,121,400 13,305,800 12,389,800 11,690,800
Profitability Ratio
OPM3 22.37% 22.01% 21.27% 16.45% 20.71% 19.44%
Benchmarks
OPM, Competitors4
Accenture PLC 16.65% — — — — —
Adobe Inc. 40.89% 34.42% — — — —
AppLovin Corp. 5.23% — — — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 28.51% — — — — —
Datadog Inc. 13.48% — — — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 11.04% — — — — —
Intuit Inc. 28.02% — — — — —
Microsoft Corp. 43.49% — — — — —
Oracle Corp. 40.03% — — — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. -23.57% — — — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 16.95% — — — — —
Salesforce Inc. 20.31% — — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 17.20% — — — — —
Synopsys Inc. 22.47% 22.28% — — — —
Workday Inc. 2.23% — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × 3,353,034 ÷ 14,988,600 = 22.37%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between June 30, 2016, and June 30, 2021, the financial trajectory is characterized by consistent revenue growth and an overall expansion of operating profitability, notwithstanding a temporary decline in 2018.

Revenue Growth
Adjusted revenues demonstrated a steady upward trend, increasing from US$ 11,690,800 thousand in 2016 to US$ 14,988,600 thousand in 2021. This consistent year-over-year increase suggests a stable expansion of the top line over the analyzed six-year period.
Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
NOPBT exhibited volatility in the initial years, growing in 2017 before experiencing a contraction to US$ 2,188,653 thousand in 2018. Following this dip, a significant recovery occurred in 2019, with profit rising to US$ 3,003,800 thousand and continuing a positive trajectory to reach US$ 3,353,034 thousand by 2021.
Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
The OPM closely mirrored the fluctuations of the NOPBT. The margin rose to 20.71% in 2017 before falling to a period low of 16.45% in 2018. Subsequent years show a phase of sustained expansion, with the margin climbing to 21.27% in 2019, 22.01% in 2020, and peaking at 22.37% in 2021.

The convergence of increasing revenues and an expanding operating profit margin from 2019 through 2021 indicates an improvement in operational efficiency and a strengthened ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Turnover of Capital (TO)

Automatic Data Processing Inc., TO calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017 Jun 30, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Revenues 15,005,400 14,589,800 14,175,200 13,325,800 12,379,800 11,667,800
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues (16,800) (36,900) (53,800) (20,000) 10,000 23,000
Adjusted revenues 14,988,600 14,552,900 14,121,400 13,305,800 12,389,800 11,690,800
 
Invested capital1 10,152,600 9,580,300 9,463,158 7,289,794 7,519,836 7,921,908
Efficiency Ratio
TO2 1.48 1.52 1.49 1.83 1.65 1.48
Benchmarks
TO, Competitors3
Accenture PLC 1.95 — — — — —
Adobe Inc. 0.80 0.70 — — — —
AppLovin Corp. 0.50 — — — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 0.98 — — — — —
Datadog Inc. 1.26 — — — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 0.53 — — — — —
Intuit Inc. 0.79 — — — — —
Microsoft Corp. 1.20 — — — — —
Oracle Corp. 0.51 — — — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. 0.61 — — — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 0.74 — — — — —
Salesforce Inc. 0.44 — — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 1.16 — — — — —
Synopsys Inc. 0.63 0.58 — — — —
Workday Inc. 0.77 — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).

1 Invested capital. See details »

2 2021 Calculation
TO = Adjusted revenues ÷ Invested capital
= 14,988,600 ÷ 10,152,600 = 1.48

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Analysis of the financial performance from 2016 to 2021 reveals a consistent upward trajectory in adjusted revenues, which grew from US$ 11.69 billion to US$ 14.99 billion. This steady growth indicates a sustained expansion in top-line operations throughout the observed period.

Revenue Growth Trend
Adjusted revenues exhibited linear growth, increasing annually without exception. The total growth over the six-year period was approximately 28.2%, reflecting a stable increase in operational scale.
Invested Capital Dynamics
Invested capital followed a non-linear path. From 2016 to 2018, there was a gradual reduction in invested capital, falling from US$ 7.92 billion to US$ 7.29 billion. This trend reversed sharply in 2019, where invested capital jumped to US$ 9.46 billion, continuing a moderate climb to reach US$ 10.15 billion by June 30, 2021.
Turnover of Capital (TO) Analysis
The turnover of capital ratio experienced a notable peak in 2018 at 1.83, a result of increasing revenues coupled with a decreasing capital base. This period represented the highest level of capital efficiency. However, the significant increase in invested capital in 2019 led to a sharp correction in the ratio, which dropped to 1.49. For the remaining years, the turnover ratio remained relatively stagnant, fluctuating slightly between 1.48 and 1.52.

The data suggests a strategic shift in capital allocation occurring around 2019. While the company maintained strong revenue growth, the expansion of the invested capital base effectively neutralized the efficiency gains observed between 2016 and 2018, returning the capital turnover ratio to levels nearly identical to the 2016 baseline.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)

Automatic Data Processing Inc., CTR calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017 Jun 30, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 2,334,712 2,508,856 2,290,136 1,628,778 1,771,847 1,527,436
Add: Cash operating taxes2 1,018,322 694,262 713,664 559,875 794,364 744,765
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) 3,353,034 3,203,118 3,003,800 2,188,653 2,566,210 2,272,201
Tax Rate
CTR3 30.37% 21.67% 23.76% 25.58% 30.95% 32.78%
Benchmarks
CTR, Competitors4
Accenture PLC 20.47% — — — — —
Adobe Inc. 10.28% 9.63% — — — —
AppLovin Corp. 68.18% — — — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 13.59% — — — — —
Datadog Inc. 1.83% — — — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 33.45% — — — — —
Intuit Inc. 20.15% — — — — —
Microsoft Corp. 13.05% — — — — —
Oracle Corp. 13.28% — — — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. — — — — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 8.83% — — — — —
Salesforce Inc. 6.83% — — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 5.03% — — — — —
Synopsys Inc. 18.39% 10.36% — — — —
Workday Inc. 19.25% — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 1,018,322 ÷ 3,353,034 = 30.37%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance between 2016 and 2021 is characterized by a general expansion in operating profitability alongside a volatile effective cash tax rate. While net operating profit before taxes showed a long-term upward trajectory, the cash tax burden experienced a period of steady decline before a significant increase in the final year of the period.

Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
NOPBT increased from US$ 2,272,201 thousand in 2016 to US$ 3,353,034 thousand in 2021. Although a contraction was noted in 2018, where profit decreased to US$ 2,188,653 thousand, the subsequent years showed consistent growth, with the most substantial year-over-year increase occurring between 2018 and 2019.
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR) Trajectory
A consistent downward trend in the effective cash tax rate was observed from 2016 to 2020, with the rate falling from 32.78% to a period low of 21.67%. This indicates a systematic reduction in the cash tax leakage relative to operating profits over five years. This trend reversed abruptly in 2021, as the CTR climbed back to 30.37%.
Cash Operating Taxes Analysis
Cash operating taxes exhibited significant volatility, reaching a minimum of US$ 559,875 thousand in 2018 and a maximum of US$ 1,018,322 thousand in 2021. The sharp increase in cash taxes in 2021 occurred despite only a modest increase in NOPBT compared to the previous year, which drove the corresponding spike in the effective cash tax rate.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?