AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Automatic Data Processing Inc. (NASDAQ:ADP)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 29, 2022.

Analysis of Property, Plant and Equipment

Microsoft Excel

Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure

Automatic Data Processing Inc., balance sheet: property, plant and equipment

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017 Jun 30, 2016
Land and buildings 686,500 737,200 781,200 791,800 778,100 745,700
Data processing equipment 902,000 847,900 749,000 707,400 653,700 605,000
Furniture, leaseholds and other 656,000 643,600 651,600 637,100 599,600 490,100
Property, plant and equipment at cost 2,244,500 2,228,700 2,181,800 2,136,300 2,031,400 1,840,800
Accumulated depreciation (1,560,000) (1,524,800) (1,417,600) (1,342,600) (1,251,500) (1,155,800)
Property, plant and equipment, net 684,500 703,900 764,200 793,700 779,900 685,000

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).


An analysis of the property, plant and equipment accounts from 2016 to 2021 reveals a strategic shift in asset allocation, characterized by a transition from physical real estate toward technological infrastructure. While the gross cost of assets increased steadily over the period, the net book value experienced a peak in 2018 followed by a consistent decline, indicating that depreciation and potential asset disposals began to outweigh new capital expenditures.

Gross Asset Growth and Composition
Property, plant and equipment at cost grew consistently from 1,840,800 thousand US dollars in 2016 to 2,244,500 thousand US dollars in 2021. This overall increase was primarily driven by a significant expansion in data processing equipment, which rose from 605,000 thousand US dollars to 902,000 thousand US dollars over the six-year period. Conversely, land and buildings peaked in 2018 at 791,800 thousand US dollars before declining to 686,500 thousand US dollars by 2021, suggesting a reduction in the company's physical real estate footprint.
Operational Infrastructure Trends
Furniture, leaseholds, and other assets saw a sharp increase between 2016 and 2017, rising from 490,100 thousand US dollars to 599,600 thousand US dollars, before stabilizing around 650,000 thousand US dollars for the remainder of the period. The diverging trends between data processing equipment and land and buildings indicate a prioritization of digital capabilities over physical office or facility ownership.
Depreciation and Net Valuation
Accumulated depreciation increased steadily every year, growing from 1,155,800 thousand US dollars in 2016 to 1,560,000 thousand US dollars in 2021. This consistent rise in accumulated depreciation contributed to the decline in net property, plant and equipment after 2018. The net book value peaked at 793,700 thousand US dollars in 2018 and retreated to 684,500 thousand US dollars by 2021, effectively returning to 2016 levels despite the higher gross investment in assets.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Asset Age Ratios (Summary)

Automatic Data Processing Inc., asset age ratios

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017 Jun 30, 2016
Average age ratio 69.50% 68.42% 64.97% 62.85% 61.61% 62.79%
Estimated total useful life (years) 12 12 12 12 14 14
Estimated age, time elapsed since purchase (years) 9 8 8 8 8 9
Estimated remaining life (years) 4 4 4 5 5 5

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).


The analysis of asset age ratios between June 30, 2016, and June 30, 2021, indicates a progressive increase in the average age of the company's property, plant, and equipment. This upward trend suggests that the fixed asset base is maturing and that the pace of asset replacement has not kept pace with the natural depreciation of the existing portfolio.

Average Age Ratio Trend
A consistent increase is observed in the average age ratio, which climbed from 62.79% in 2016 to 69.50% in 2021. This trajectory indicates that the assets are, on average, closer to the end of their estimated useful lives than they were at the beginning of the analyzed period.
Revisions to Useful Life
The estimated total useful life was reduced from 14 years to 12 years beginning in June 2018 and remained at that level through 2021. Such a reduction typically reflects a management reassessment of the assets' economic utility or a response to accelerated technological obsolescence.
Asset Lifecycle Metrics
The time elapsed since purchase remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 8 and 9 years over the six-year period. However, the estimated remaining life decreased from 5 years to 4 years starting in 2019, a shift that correlates with the overall reduction in the total estimated useful life.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Average Age

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017 Jun 30, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Accumulated depreciation 1,560,000 1,524,800 1,417,600 1,342,600 1,251,500 1,155,800
Property, plant and equipment at cost 2,244,500 2,228,700 2,181,800 2,136,300 2,031,400 1,840,800
Asset Age Ratio
Average age1 69.50% 68.42% 64.97% 62.85% 61.61% 62.79%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).

2021 Calculations

1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ Property, plant and equipment at cost
= 100 × 1,560,000 ÷ 2,244,500 = 69.50%


An analysis of the fixed asset profile reveals a consistent increase in the average age of the property, plant, and equipment portfolio over the six-year period ending June 30, 2021.

Gross Asset Investment and Depreciation Trends
Property, plant, and equipment at cost increased from 1,840,800 thousand dollars in 2016 to 2,244,500 thousand dollars in 2021. During the same interval, accumulated depreciation rose steadily from 1,155,800 thousand dollars to 1,560,000 thousand dollars. While gross asset costs grew throughout the period, the rate of expansion decelerated toward the end of the observed timeframe.
Average Age Ratio Progression
The average age ratio shows a general upward trend, climbing from 62.79% in 2016 to 69.50% in 2021. Following a slight decrease to 61.61% in 2017, the ratio experienced uninterrupted annual growth, with the most significant increases occurring between 2018 and 2021.
Interpretation of Asset Aging
The rising average age ratio indicates that a larger percentage of the company's fixed assets have been depreciated relative to their original cost. This pattern suggests that the acquisition of new assets has not been sufficient to offset the depreciation of existing equipment, resulting in an aging infrastructure that is closer to the end of its estimated useful life.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Estimated Total Useful Life

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017 Jun 30, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Property, plant and equipment at cost 2,244,500 2,228,700 2,181,800 2,136,300 2,031,400 1,840,800
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 183,300 192,800 180,600 173,100 147,300 135,600
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated total useful life1 12 12 12 12 14 14

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).

2021 Calculations

1 Estimated total useful life = Property, plant and equipment at cost ÷ Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
= 2,244,500 ÷ 183,300 = 12


The analysis of capital assets between 2016 and 2021 reveals a steady expansion of the property, plant, and equipment base accompanied by a strategic revision in the estimated useful life of these assets.

Asset Base Expansion
A consistent upward trajectory in property, plant, and equipment at cost is observed, rising from US$1,840,800 thousand in 2016 to US$2,244,500 thousand by 2021. This trend indicates a period of sustained capital investment and growth in the physical asset infrastructure.
Revision of Estimated Useful Life
The estimated total useful life of assets remained constant at 14 years for the 2016 and 2017 periods. In 2018, a downward adjustment to 12 years was implemented and maintained through 2021. This reduction suggests a more conservative accounting estimate regarding the longevity of assets, potentially reflecting faster technological obsolescence or a change in asset utilization strategies.
Depreciation Trends and Correlation
Depreciation expenses grew from US$135,600 thousand in 2016 to US$192,800 thousand in 2020. The notable increase in depreciation between 2017 and 2018 coincides with the reduction in the estimated useful life, which effectively accelerated the periodic depreciation charge. A slight decline in depreciation to US$183,300 thousand is observed in 2021, occurring despite an increase in the total asset cost, which may point to the disposal of older, high-depreciation assets or a shift toward assets with different depreciation profiles.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017 Jun 30, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Accumulated depreciation 1,560,000 1,524,800 1,417,600 1,342,600 1,251,500 1,155,800
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 183,300 192,800 180,600 173,100 147,300 135,600
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Time elapsed since purchase1 9 8 8 8 8 9

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).

2021 Calculations

1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
= 1,560,000 ÷ 183,300 = 9


The financial results reflect a consistent growth in accumulated depreciation paired with a stable estimated asset age, suggesting a systematic approach to capital expenditure and asset replacement over the six-year period ending June 30, 2021.

Accumulated Depreciation Trends
A continuous upward trajectory is observed in accumulated depreciation, which rose from US$ 1,155,800 thousand in 2016 to US$ 1,560,000 thousand in 2021. This steady increase indicates the ongoing allocation of cost over the useful lives of the company's tangible assets.
Annual Depreciation Expense Analysis
Annual depreciation charges exhibited a general increase from 2016 through 2020, rising from US$ 135,600 thousand to a peak of US$ 192,800 thousand, before a slight moderation to US$ 183,300 thousand in 2021. The trend suggests an expansion in the scale or value of the property, plant, and equipment portfolio during the majority of the analyzed period.
Asset Lifecycle and Replacement Strategy
The estimated time elapsed since purchase remained highly stable, fluctuating narrowly between 8 and 9 years. The fact that the average asset age did not increase significantly despite the rise in accumulated depreciation implies a disciplined reinvestment cycle. New asset acquisitions appear to have been timed to offset the aging of existing equipment, thereby maintaining a consistent average age of the asset base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Estimated Remaining Life

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017 Jun 30, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Property, plant and equipment, net 684,500 703,900 764,200 793,700 779,900 685,000
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 183,300 192,800 180,600 173,100 147,300 135,600
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated remaining life1 4 4 4 5 5 5

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).

2021 Calculations

1 Estimated remaining life = Property, plant and equipment, net ÷ Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
= 684,500 ÷ 183,300 = 4


Analysis of the property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) trends reveals a cycle of initial expansion followed by a steady contraction in net asset value over the six-year period ending June 30, 2021.

Net Property, Plant, and Equipment Trends
The net book value of PP&E experienced growth from 685 million USD in 2016 to a peak of 793.7 million USD in 2018. Following this peak, a consistent downward trend occurred, with the value declining to 684.5 million USD by 2021, effectively returning the asset base to its 2016 levels.
Depreciation Expenditure Patterns
Depreciation costs exhibited a sustained upward trajectory from 135.6 million USD in 2016, reaching a maximum of 192.8 million USD in 2020, before a slight moderation to 183.3 million USD in 2021. The fact that depreciation continued to rise while the net asset base declined after 2018 suggests that capital expenditures did not keep pace with the depreciation of existing assets.
Impact of Estimated Remaining Life
The estimated remaining useful life of assets was maintained at five years between 2016 and 2018. Beginning in 2019, this estimate was revised downward to four years and remained constant through 2021. This reduction in estimated life coincides with the period of declining net PP&E and rising depreciation, indicating that the shorter amortization period accelerated the reduction of the net book value.

The observed data suggests a shift in asset management strategy, characterized by a reduction in the long-term asset base and an acceleration of depreciation through the lowering of estimated remaining life. This pattern indicates a transition toward assets with shorter lifecycles or a strategic decision to reduce overall property, plant, and equipment intensity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?