Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
A consistent upward trajectory is observed in both net cash flows provided by operating activities and free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) over the six-year period ending June 30, 2021. The simultaneous growth of these metrics indicates a strong operational capacity to generate cash and a disciplined approach to capital allocation.
- Operating Cash Flow Performance
- Net cash flows from operating activities increased steadily from US$ 1,859,900 thousand in 2016 to US$ 3,093,300 thousand in 2021. This represents a total increase of approximately 66% over the analyzed period, with the most significant year-over-year growth occurring between 2017 and 2018.
- FCFF Growth Dynamics
- Free cash flow to the firm followed a similar growth pattern, rising from US$ 1,498,950 thousand in 2016 to US$ 2,628,446 thousand in 2021. This constitutes a total growth of approximately 75%, reflecting an increase in the cash available to both debt and equity holders after necessary investments in working capital and fixed assets.
- Cash Conversion Efficiency
- The conversion of operating cash flow into FCFF remained remarkably stable and high, consistently exceeding 80% throughout the period. The FCFF-to-operating cash flow ratio rose from approximately 80.6% in 2016 to 85.0% in 2021, suggesting that the proportion of operational cash retained as free cash flow has improved slightly over time.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
2 2021 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, tax = Cash paid for interest × EITR
= 53,100 × 22.70% = 12,054
The financial data reveals a significant fluctuation in net interest expenditures coupled with a steady decline in the effective income tax rate over the six-year period ending June 30, 2021.
- Interest Expenditure Patterns
- A substantial increase in cash paid for interest, net of tax, occurred between 2016 and 2019, rising from $25,050 thousand to a peak of $97,283 thousand. This represents a growth of approximately 288% over three years. Following 2019, a sharp reversal is observed, with payments falling to $81,220 thousand in 2020 and further decreasing to $41,046 thousand by 2021.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Trends
- The effective income tax rate demonstrated a consistent downward trajectory for the majority of the period. Starting at 33.20% in 2016, the rate declined annually to reach a low of 22.50% in 2020, before stabilizing at 22.70% in 2021. This represents a total reduction of 10.5 percentage points over the observed timeframe.
- Analysis of Net Cost Drivers
- The reduction in the EITR suggests a diminishing tax shield on interest expenses, which generally increases the net cost of borrowing. However, the net cash paid for interest in 2021 was significantly lower than the 2019 peak, indicating that the reduction in gross interest obligations or debt repayment outweighed the impact of the lower tax rate.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 56,671,571) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | 2,628,446) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | 21.56 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Accenture PLC | 12.23 |
| Adobe Inc. | 9.57 |
| AppLovin Corp. | 20.86 |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | 55.96 |
| Datadog Inc. | 100.54 |
| International Business Machines Corp. | 22.06 |
| Intuit Inc. | 10.06 |
| Microsoft Corp. | 58.17 |
| Oracle Corp. | — |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | 221.33 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | 75.37 |
| Salesforce Inc. | 13.37 |
| ServiceNow Inc. | 23.97 |
| Synopsys Inc. | 61.86 |
| Workday Inc. | 15.65 |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | |
| Software & Services | 56.02 |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | |
| Information Technology | 77.71 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Jun 30, 2021 | Jun 30, 2020 | Jun 30, 2019 | Jun 30, 2018 | Jun 30, 2017 | Jun 30, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 55,220,578) | 31,348,038) | 43,666,032) | 31,507,210) | 21,429,404) | 5,880,787) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | 2,628,446) | 2,491,020) | 2,219,083) | 2,119,474) | 1,708,799) | 1,498,950) | |
| Valuation Ratio | |||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | 21.01 | 12.58 | 19.68 | 14.87 | 12.54 | 3.92 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | 24.76 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Adobe Inc. | 33.61 | 40.43 | — | — | — | — | |
| AppLovin Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | 35.05 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Datadog Inc. | 198.40 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| International Business Machines Corp. | 13.10 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Intuit Inc. | 48.64 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Microsoft Corp. | 36.19 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Oracle Corp. | 16.36 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | 66.45 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | 32.74 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Salesforce Inc. | 44.91 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ServiceNow Inc. | 60.12 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Synopsys Inc. | 38.59 | 42.88 | — | — | — | — | |
| Workday Inc. | 57.52 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | |||||||
| Software & Services | 32.08 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | |||||||
| Information Technology | 27.37 | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
3 2021 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 55,220,578 ÷ 2,628,446 = 21.01
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Analysis of the enterprise value to free cash flow to the firm (EV/FCFF) ratio reveals a general trend of valuation expansion between 2016 and 2021. This trajectory is characterized by significant fluctuations in enterprise value that outpaced the steady growth of cash flow generation.
- Enterprise Value Trends
- The enterprise value exhibited substantial volatility over the six-year period. Starting at 5.88 billion in 2016, the value climbed sharply to 43.67 billion by 2019. A notable contraction occurred in 2020, with the value receding to 31.35 billion, before rebounding to a period peak of 55.22 billion in 2021.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- Unlike the enterprise value, the free cash flow to the firm demonstrated a consistent and linear upward trend. FCFF grew from 1.50 billion in 2016 to 2.63 billion in 2021, indicating a stable and progressive improvement in the company's ability to generate cash available to all capital providers.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Interpretation
- The EV/FCFF ratio expanded from 3.92 in 2016 to 21.01 in 2021. The movement of this ratio closely mirrors the volatility seen in the enterprise value. The sharp increase in the ratio between 2016 and 2017, and the subsequent dip in 2020, suggest that the market's valuation premium shifted more aggressively than the underlying operational cash flows. The peak ratio in 2021 indicates a significantly higher valuation multiple relative to the cash flow generated compared to the start of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?