Stock Analysis on Net

Fair Isaac Corp. (NYSE:FICO) 

Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)

Microsoft Excel

Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)

Fair Isaac Corp., FCFF calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Sep 30, 2024 Sep 30, 2023 Sep 30, 2022 Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019
Net income 512,811 429,375 373,541 392,084 236,411 192,124
Net noncash charges 140,638 102,988 171,820 44,473 169,813 123,692
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (20,485) (63,448) (35,911) (12,740) (41,308) (55,466)
Net cash provided by operating activities 632,964 468,915 509,450 423,817 364,916 260,350
Cash paid for interest, net of tax1 84,972 75,138 45,343 31,453 34,712 35,500
Purchases of property and equipment (8,884) (4,237) (6,029) (7,569) (21,989) (23,981)
Capitalized internal-use software costs (16,667)
Finance lease obligation incurred (11,740) (1,387) (5,803)
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) 680,645 539,816 548,764 447,701 376,252 266,066

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30).


Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

The net cash provided by operating activities demonstrates a generally upward trajectory over the analyzed period. Starting at approximately 260.35 million USD in 2019, it increased significantly to 364.92 million USD in 2020, representing a strong growth phase. This positive momentum continued through subsequent years, reaching 423.82 million USD in 2021 and further expanding to 509.45 million USD in 2022. Despite a slight dip in 2023 to 468.92 million USD, the metric rebounded sharply in 2024 with a notable increase to 632.96 million USD, the highest value observed in the sequence.

Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)

The free cash flow to the firm follows a similar pattern to operating cash flow, displaying steady growth throughout the period under review. Beginning at roughly 266.07 million USD in 2019, FCFF rose to 376.25 million USD in 2020, maintaining a robust upward trend. Values escalated further to 447.70 million USD in 2021 and peaked at 548.76 million USD in 2022. A marginal contraction occurred in 2023 when FCFF slightly decreased to 539.82 million USD; however, in 2024, the figure advanced again substantially to 680.65 million USD, surpassing all prior years.

Overall Trend Analysis

Both key cash flow indicators reveal consistent improvement across the six-year span, with only minor year-over-year fluctuations in 2023. The general increase in net operating cash and FCFF signifies enhanced operational efficiency and the firm's ability to generate cash from core business activities. The sharp recoveries in 2024 suggest a strong financial position and effective cash management strategies. These trends provide positive signals regarding liquidity and potential for reinvestment or distribution to stakeholders.


Interest Paid, Net of Tax

Fair Isaac Corp., interest paid, net of tax calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Sep 30, 2024 Sep 30, 2023 Sep 30, 2022 Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019
Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
EITR1 20.13% 22.44% 20.74% 17.13% 8.01% 11.08%
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Cash paid for interest, before tax 106,388 96,877 57,208 37,955 37,735 39,924
Less: Cash paid for interest, tax2 21,416 21,739 11,865 6,502 3,023 4,424
Cash paid for interest, net of tax 84,972 75,138 45,343 31,453 34,712 35,500

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30).

1 See details »

2 2024 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, tax = Cash paid for interest × EITR
= 106,388 × 20.13% = 21,416


Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Trend
The effective income tax rate exhibited variability over the six-year period. Starting at 11.08% in 2019, it decreased notably to 8.01% in 2020, indicating a lower tax burden in that year. However, from 2020 onward, the rate increased progressively, reaching 17.13% in 2021, 20.74% in 2022, and peaking at 22.44% in 2023. In 2024, there was a slight decline to 20.13%, but the rate remained significantly higher than in the initial years. This upward trend from 2020 to 2023 may suggest changes in tax regulations, adjustments in income composition, or shifts in the company's taxable income.
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Tax
Cash paid for interest, net of tax, exhibited an overall increasing trajectory through the period analyzed. The amount was relatively stable in the initial years with US$35,500 thousand in 2019 and a slight decline to US$34,712 thousand in 2020 and US$31,453 thousand in 2021. Starting in 2022, the figure showed a significant upward trend, increasing sharply to US$45,343 thousand, followed by a substantial rise to US$75,138 thousand in 2023, and further to US$84,972 thousand in 2024. This marked increase from 2022 onwards suggests either higher interest-bearing debt levels or increasing interest rates impacting the interest expense.
Summary Conclusions
The effective income tax rate showed a decrease followed by a sustained upward trend, indicating possible changes in tax strategy or tax environment. Concurrently, the cash paid for interest net of tax remained relatively stable initially but escalated significantly in later years, indicating increased financing costs or debt levels. These trends suggest evolving financial strategies or external conditions impacting cost of capital and tax expenses.

Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current

Fair Isaac Corp., current EV/FCFF calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Enterprise value (EV) 46,269,375
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) 680,645
Valuation Ratio
EV/FCFF 67.98
Benchmarks
EV/FCFF, Competitors1
Accenture PLC 20.99
Adobe Inc. 20.16
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 71.78
CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. 112.73
International Business Machines Corp. 22.43
Intuit Inc. 45.31
Microsoft Corp. 57.98
Oracle Corp. 265.42
Palantir Technologies Inc. 293.79
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 42.93
Salesforce Inc. 20.11
ServiceNow Inc. 60.43
Synopsys Inc. 56.73
Workday Inc. 25.57
EV/FCFF, Sector
Software & Services 47.65
EV/FCFF, Industry
Information Technology 49.54

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-09-30).

1 Click competitor name to see calculations.

If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.


Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical

Fair Isaac Corp., historical EV/FCFF calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2024 Sep 30, 2023 Sep 30, 2022 Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Enterprise value (EV)1 52,971,217 24,966,250 12,803,897 11,695,394 14,117,513 10,327,169
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 680,645 539,816 548,764 447,701 376,252 266,066
Valuation Ratio
EV/FCFF3 77.83 46.25 23.33 26.12 37.52 38.81
Benchmarks
EV/FCFF, Competitors4
Accenture PLC 25.76 20.26 16.99 24.76 17.90 18.49
Adobe Inc. 21.98 37.75 20.82 33.61 40.43 40.48
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 61.26 63.83 44.54 35.05 44.13
CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. 81.46 38.65 96.35 141.44 807.14
International Business Machines Corp. 20.11 15.27 16.47 13.10 9.35
Intuit Inc. 36.79 31.28 32.85 48.64 37.90 33.30
Microsoft Corp. 49.30 41.75 32.31 38.37 33.99 26.37
Oracle Corp. 31.24 35.83 31.60 16.36 14.99
Palantir Technologies Inc. 251.61 69.13 82.97 66.45
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 34.69 28.15 29.30 32.74 26.50 20.44
Salesforce Inc. 29.95 28.41 35.97 44.91 39.63
ServiceNow Inc. 60.21 56.55 40.86 60.13 83.74
Synopsys Inc. 56.23 55.87 30.82 38.59 42.88 33.32
Workday Inc. 32.57 33.40 45.74 57.52 72.44
EV/FCFF, Sector
Software & Services 41.40 35.81 29.81 32.52 28.14
EV/FCFF, Industry
Information Technology 40.41 34.37 26.67 27.51 23.95

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30).

1 See details »

2 See details »

3 2024 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 52,971,217 ÷ 680,645 = 77.83

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data reveals several noteworthy trends regarding the company's valuation and cash flow generation over the six-year period.

Enterprise Value (EV)
There is a general upward trajectory in enterprise value from 2019 through 2024, with a marked acceleration in growth during the last two years. The EV increased from approximately $10.3 billion in 2019 to over $52.9 billion in 2024, representing more than a fivefold increase. The rise was relatively moderate in the initial years but surged significantly after 2022, suggesting heightened market valuation or acquisitions contributing to EV growth.
Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
FCFF demonstrates consistent positive growth across the entire period, increasing from approximately $266 million in 2019 to roughly $681 million in 2024. The growth appears steady without any significant declines, indicating improving cash generation capabilities. However, the pace of FCFF increase is much more moderate compared to the rapid increase in enterprise value observed in recent years.
EV to FCFF Ratio
This valuation multiple declined from 38.81 in 2019 to 23.33 in 2022, reflecting a period where the enterprise value grew at a slower rate relative to cash flow improvements, possibly indicating more conservative or rational market pricing. However, post-2022, the ratio escalated sharply to 46.25 in 2023 and further to 77.83 in 2024. This substantial rise implies that enterprise value is increasing much faster than free cash flow, potentially signaling market expectations of future growth, overvaluation concerns, or external market factors impacting valuation multiples.

Overall, the data shows a company with steadily improving free cash flows but a rapidly escalating enterprise value in recent years, leading to a significant increase in valuation multiples. This divergence warrants further analysis to understand the drivers behind market valuation and the sustainability of the observed trends.