EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Visa Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- Analysis of Long-term (Investment) Activity Ratios
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Current Ratio since 2008
- Total Asset Turnover since 2008
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Visa Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Sep 30, 2022 | Sep 30, 2021 | Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The financial performance from 2017 to 2022 indicates a strong upward trajectory in economic value creation, characterized by substantial growth in economic profit despite a temporary contraction in 2020.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT exhibited a consistent growth trend, rising from 8,706 million USD in 2017 to 15,234 million USD in 2022. A marginal decline was recorded in 2020, falling to 11,433 million USD, but this was followed by a robust recovery and acceleration in the subsequent two years.
- Cost of Capital and Invested Capital
- The cost of capital remained highly stable throughout the period, oscillating within a narrow range between 15.21% and 15.62%. Invested capital showed a notable increase in 2020, rising from 50,974 million USD to 61,524 million USD, and remained relatively plateaued near 61 billion USD through 2022.
- Economic Profit Analysis
- Economic profit demonstrated significant volatility but overall growth, increasing from 939 million USD in 2017 to a period high of 5,709 million USD in 2022. The decline observed in 2020 to 1,933 million USD was the result of a simultaneous decrease in NOPAT and an increase in invested capital, which expanded the capital charge. The subsequent surge in 2022 suggests a significant improvement in the efficiency of capital utilization relative to the cost of capital.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
3 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
4 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
5 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
6 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
The financial data reveals a consistent upward trajectory in both net income and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) over the period analyzed. Net income increased steadily from $6,699 million in 2017 to $14,957 million in 2022, showing robust growth across the years with a noticeable rise between 2017 and 2018, followed by continued incremental increases in subsequent years.
Similarly, NOPAT demonstrated an overall positive trend, starting at $8,706 million in 2017 and rising to $15,234 million in 2022. There was a slight deceleration in growth in 2018 compared to the previous year's jump, but subsequent years showed considerable gains, particularly between 2019 and 2021, before reaching the highest value in 2022.
Both metrics exhibit resilience during the year 2020, marked by a slight dip in net income from the previous year but a relatively stable NOPAT, indicating effective operational performance despite potential challenges. By 2021 and 2022, the figures rebounded strongly, surpassing prior highs, reflecting enhanced profitability and operational efficiency.
- Net Income Trend
- Substantial growth over the six-year span with minor fluctuations in 2020.
- NOPAT Trend
- Steady increase with a minor slowdown in 2018 and slight decline in 2020, followed by strong recovery.
- Comparison Insights
- The relationship between net income and NOPAT suggests consistent improvements in operational profitability and tax management, with NOPAT consistently exceeding net income, emphasizing effective operating margins.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
- Income Tax Provision
- The income tax provision shows a fluctuating trend over the six-year period. Starting at 4,995 million USD in 2017, there is a significant decrease to 2,505 million USD in 2018. This is followed by a modest increase through 2019 and 2020, reaching 2,804 million USD and 2,924 million USD respectively. A notable rise occurs in 2021, reaching 3,752 million USD, before declining again to 3,179 million USD in 2022. Overall, despite some variability, the data suggests a downward shift from the initial 2017 level, with intermittent recovery periods.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- The cash operating taxes demonstrate some variability but generally display a less pronounced downward pattern compared to the income tax provision. Beginning at 3,463 million USD in 2017, there is an upward shift to 3,833 million USD in 2018, followed by a sharp drop to 2,626 million USD in 2019. From 2019 onward, values stabilize somewhat, with slight increases to 2,686 million USD in 2020 and 2,838 million USD in 2021. However, a considerable increase is observed in 2022, reaching 3,678 million USD, nearly returning to the 2017 level. This indicates fluctuating cash tax payments with a strong recovery in the final recorded year.
- Comparative Insights
- While both income tax provision and cash operating taxes fluctuate throughout the period, the income tax provision exhibits a more defined declining trend from 2017 to 2022 despite occasional rises. Conversely, cash operating taxes are more volatile, with a significant dip in the middle years but a marked rebound by 2022. The data may suggest differences in tax expense recognition versus actual cash tax payments, reflecting possible timing differences, changes in tax planning, or variations in tax liabilities versus cash outflows over time.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of equity equivalents to equity.
4 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
5 Subtraction of construction-in-progress.
6 Subtraction of investment securities.
The analysis of the financial data reveals notable trends in the company's capital structure and debt levels over the six-year period under review.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- There is a general upward trend in total reported debt and leases from 2017 through 2022. The value initially decreased from 18,928 million USD in 2017 to 17,297 million USD in 2018, remaining relatively stable in 2019 at 17,430 million USD. However, a significant increase is observed in 2020, where debt and leases rose sharply to 24,640 million USD. Following this peak, the debt level decreased somewhat in 2021 to 21,551 million USD but increased again in 2022 to 22,970 million USD. This suggests an increased reliance on debt financing particularly beginning in 2020, likely influenced by external factors impacting liquidity needs or strategic financing decisions during that period.
- Equity
- Equity demonstrates a steady increase from 32,760 million USD in 2017 to a peak of 37,589 million USD in 2021, followed by a slight decline to 35,581 million USD in 2022. This upward trend until 2021 indicates consistent growth in shareholders’ equity, possibly driven by retained earnings or capital contributions. The minor decrease in 2022 may reflect changes such as share repurchases, dividend payments, or fluctuations in comprehensive income.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital shows some variability over the period, with an initial decrease from 51,080 million USD in 2017 to 47,578 million USD in 2018. It then rises to 50,974 million USD in 2019, followed by a marked increase to 61,524 million USD in 2020. After a slight decrease and stabilization, invested capital remains fairly steady at approximately 60,800 million USD in 2021 and 60,981 million USD in 2022. The significant jump in 2020 aligns with the increase in debt, suggesting expanded investment activity or asset acquisitions funded partially through increased borrowing.
Overall, the data reflects an increased financial leverage beginning in 2020, alongside growth in invested capital. Equity growth has been steady but exhibits a slight contraction in the final year, which merits monitoring in view of the rising debt levels. These patterns indicate strategic financial management responding to evolving operational or market conditions during the timeframe analyzed.
Cost of Capital
Visa Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 25.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 25.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Sep 30, 2022 | Sep 30, 2021 | Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Workday Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2017 to 2022 demonstrates a substantial expansion in economic value creation, characterized by a general increase in both absolute economic profit and the efficiency of capital utilization. Despite a significant disruption in 2020, the overall trend indicates a strong capacity to generate returns well above the cost of capital.
- Economic Profit Trends
- A significant upward trajectory is observed in economic profit, which grew from US$ 939 million in 2017 to US$ 5,709 million in 2022. The growth was most aggressive between 2018 and 2019, with profit increasing from US$ 1,752 million to US$ 4,475 million. A sharp decline occurred in 2020, with values falling to US$ 1,933 million, followed by a robust recovery over the next two years.
- Invested Capital Dynamics
- The invested capital base remained relatively stable between 2017 and 2019, fluctuating around US$ 50 billion. A notable increase occurred in 2020, when invested capital rose to US$ 61,524 million. This expanded capital base was maintained through 2022, ending at US$ 60,981 million, indicating that the increase in economic profit seen in the final two years was achieved without a corresponding increase in the required capital investment.
- Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
- The economic spread ratio exhibits high volatility, closely mirroring the fluctuations in economic profit. The ratio climbed from 1.84% in 2017 to 8.78% in 2019, before dropping to 3.14% in 2020. A consistent recovery followed, with the ratio reaching a period high of 9.36% in 2022. This progression suggests a significant improvement in the company's ability to convert invested capital into economic value, achieving its highest level of capital efficiency at the end of the analyzed period.
Economic Profit Margin
| Sep 30, 2022 | Sep 30, 2021 | Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Net revenues | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Workday Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of economic value added from 2017 to 2022 reveals a strong overall growth trajectory in value creation, characterized by significant expansion punctuated by a temporary contraction in 2020.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit exhibited substantial growth over the six-year period, rising from 939 million USD in 2017 to 5,709 million USD in 2022. A notable peak occurred in 2019 at 4,475 million USD, followed by a sharp decline to 1,933 million USD in 2020. This downturn was followed by a robust recovery, with profits increasing consistently in 2021 and reaching a period high by the end of the 2022 fiscal year.
- Net Revenue Performance
- Net revenues demonstrated a steady upward trend, increasing from 18,358 million USD in 2017 to 29,310 million USD in 2022. While a slight contraction was observed in 2020, where revenues dipped to 21,846 million USD from the previous year's 22,977 million USD, the subsequent growth in 2021 and 2022 indicates strong revenue resilience and expansion capabilities.
- Economic Profit Margin Dynamics
- The economic profit margin showed significant volatility but ended the period at its highest level. The margin expanded from 5.12% in 2017 to a peak of 19.47% in 2019. In 2020, the margin compressed to 8.85%, mirroring the decline in absolute economic profit. However, a recovery phase followed, with the margin climbing to 14.82% in 2021 and ultimately reaching 19.48% in 2022, suggesting an optimized ability to generate value above the cost of capital relative to revenue.
The correlation between revenue growth and economic profit indicates that while revenues provided a stable foundation, the volatility in the economic profit margin suggests that external factors or capital charge fluctuations had a more pronounced impact on value creation than on top-line growth.