EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Visa Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Solvency Ratios
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Selected Financial Data since 2008
- Operating Profit Margin since 2008
- Debt to Equity since 2008
- Analysis of Revenues
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Visa Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Sep 30, 2022 | Sep 30, 2021 | Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period between September 30, 2017, and September 30, 2022, demonstrates a generally positive trend in economic profit, although with some fluctuations. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) and invested capital both exhibited increases over the observed timeframe, while the cost of capital remained relatively stable. These factors collectively influenced the observed economic profit performance.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT increased from US$8,706 million in 2017 to US$15,234 million in 2022. A notable increase occurred between 2018 and 2019, rising from US$9,137 million to US$12,431 million. A slight decrease was observed between 2019 and 2020, falling to US$11,433 million, before resuming an upward trajectory through 2022.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained consistently around 15% throughout the period, fluctuating between 15.18% and 15.59%. The highest value was recorded in 2022 at 15.59%, while the lowest was in 2017 at 15.18%. These changes were relatively minor and did not appear to significantly impact economic profit.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital decreased from US$51,080 million in 2017 to US$47,578 million in 2018. It then increased to US$50,974 million in 2019, followed by a more substantial increase to US$61,524 million in 2020. The level of invested capital remained relatively stable between 2020 and 2022, fluctuating between US$60,806 million and US$60,981 million.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit showed a positive trend overall. Starting at US$954 million in 2017, it increased to US$1,766 million in 2018 and reached a peak of US$4,489 million in 2019. A decrease to US$1,950 million occurred in 2020, followed by increases to US$3,589 million in 2021 and US$5,727 million in 2022. The economic profit in 2022 represents the highest value observed during the analyzed period.
The observed increases in NOPAT, coupled with a stable cost of capital and fluctuations in invested capital, contributed to the overall positive trend in economic profit. The significant increase in economic profit in 2019 and 2022 suggests periods of particularly strong value creation. The dip in 2020 warrants further investigation to understand the underlying factors contributing to the temporary decline in economic profit.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
3 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
4 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
5 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
6 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
The financial data reveals a consistent upward trajectory in both net income and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) over the period analyzed. Net income increased steadily from $6,699 million in 2017 to $14,957 million in 2022, showing robust growth across the years with a noticeable rise between 2017 and 2018, followed by continued incremental increases in subsequent years.
Similarly, NOPAT demonstrated an overall positive trend, starting at $8,706 million in 2017 and rising to $15,234 million in 2022. There was a slight deceleration in growth in 2018 compared to the previous year's jump, but subsequent years showed considerable gains, particularly between 2019 and 2021, before reaching the highest value in 2022.
Both metrics exhibit resilience during the year 2020, marked by a slight dip in net income from the previous year but a relatively stable NOPAT, indicating effective operational performance despite potential challenges. By 2021 and 2022, the figures rebounded strongly, surpassing prior highs, reflecting enhanced profitability and operational efficiency.
- Net Income Trend
- Substantial growth over the six-year span with minor fluctuations in 2020.
- NOPAT Trend
- Steady increase with a minor slowdown in 2018 and slight decline in 2020, followed by strong recovery.
- Comparison Insights
- The relationship between net income and NOPAT suggests consistent improvements in operational profitability and tax management, with NOPAT consistently exceeding net income, emphasizing effective operating margins.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
- Income Tax Provision
- The income tax provision shows a fluctuating trend over the six-year period. Starting at 4,995 million USD in 2017, there is a significant decrease to 2,505 million USD in 2018. This is followed by a modest increase through 2019 and 2020, reaching 2,804 million USD and 2,924 million USD respectively. A notable rise occurs in 2021, reaching 3,752 million USD, before declining again to 3,179 million USD in 2022. Overall, despite some variability, the data suggests a downward shift from the initial 2017 level, with intermittent recovery periods.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- The cash operating taxes demonstrate some variability but generally display a less pronounced downward pattern compared to the income tax provision. Beginning at 3,463 million USD in 2017, there is an upward shift to 3,833 million USD in 2018, followed by a sharp drop to 2,626 million USD in 2019. From 2019 onward, values stabilize somewhat, with slight increases to 2,686 million USD in 2020 and 2,838 million USD in 2021. However, a considerable increase is observed in 2022, reaching 3,678 million USD, nearly returning to the 2017 level. This indicates fluctuating cash tax payments with a strong recovery in the final recorded year.
- Comparative Insights
- While both income tax provision and cash operating taxes fluctuate throughout the period, the income tax provision exhibits a more defined declining trend from 2017 to 2022 despite occasional rises. Conversely, cash operating taxes are more volatile, with a significant dip in the middle years but a marked rebound by 2022. The data may suggest differences in tax expense recognition versus actual cash tax payments, reflecting possible timing differences, changes in tax planning, or variations in tax liabilities versus cash outflows over time.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of equity equivalents to equity.
4 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
5 Subtraction of construction-in-progress.
6 Subtraction of investment securities.
The analysis of the financial data reveals notable trends in the company's capital structure and debt levels over the six-year period under review.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- There is a general upward trend in total reported debt and leases from 2017 through 2022. The value initially decreased from 18,928 million USD in 2017 to 17,297 million USD in 2018, remaining relatively stable in 2019 at 17,430 million USD. However, a significant increase is observed in 2020, where debt and leases rose sharply to 24,640 million USD. Following this peak, the debt level decreased somewhat in 2021 to 21,551 million USD but increased again in 2022 to 22,970 million USD. This suggests an increased reliance on debt financing particularly beginning in 2020, likely influenced by external factors impacting liquidity needs or strategic financing decisions during that period.
- Equity
- Equity demonstrates a steady increase from 32,760 million USD in 2017 to a peak of 37,589 million USD in 2021, followed by a slight decline to 35,581 million USD in 2022. This upward trend until 2021 indicates consistent growth in shareholders’ equity, possibly driven by retained earnings or capital contributions. The minor decrease in 2022 may reflect changes such as share repurchases, dividend payments, or fluctuations in comprehensive income.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital shows some variability over the period, with an initial decrease from 51,080 million USD in 2017 to 47,578 million USD in 2018. It then rises to 50,974 million USD in 2019, followed by a marked increase to 61,524 million USD in 2020. After a slight decrease and stabilization, invested capital remains fairly steady at approximately 60,800 million USD in 2021 and 60,981 million USD in 2022. The significant jump in 2020 aligns with the increase in debt, suggesting expanded investment activity or asset acquisitions funded partially through increased borrowing.
Overall, the data reflects an increased financial leverage beginning in 2020, alongside growth in invested capital. Equity growth has been steady but exhibits a slight contraction in the final year, which merits monitoring in view of the rising debt levels. These patterns indicate strategic financial management responding to evolving operational or market conditions during the timeframe analyzed.
Cost of Capital
Visa Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 25.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 25.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Sep 30, 2022 | Sep 30, 2021 | Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Workday Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The period between September 30, 2017, and September 30, 2022, demonstrates fluctuating performance in economic profit and invested capital, resulting in a dynamic economic spread ratio. Overall, the economic spread ratio exhibits an increasing trend, though with significant yearly variations.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit began at US$954 million in 2017 and increased substantially to US$1,766 million in 2018. A significant surge followed, reaching US$4,489 million in 2019. However, economic profit decreased to US$1,950 million in 2020, before recovering to US$3,589 million in 2021. The latest reported value for 2022 shows a further increase to US$5,727 million, representing the highest level of economic profit within the observed period.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital decreased from US$51,080 million in 2017 to US$47,578 million in 2018. It then experienced a modest increase to US$50,974 million in 2019. A more substantial rise occurred in 2020, reaching US$61,524 million. Invested capital remained relatively stable in 2021 at US$60,806 million and saw a slight increase to US$60,981 million in 2022.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio began at 1.87% in 2017 and increased to 3.71% in 2018, mirroring the growth in economic profit. The most significant increase was observed between 2018 and 2019, with the ratio climbing to 8.81%. A substantial decrease followed in 2020, with the ratio falling to 3.17%. The ratio recovered to 5.90% in 2021 and continued its upward trajectory, reaching 9.39% in 2022. This represents the highest economic spread ratio observed during the analyzed period, indicating an improved ability to generate returns above the cost of capital.
The fluctuations in economic profit appear to be a primary driver of the changes in the economic spread ratio. While invested capital generally increased over the period, the more pronounced changes in economic profit had a greater impact on the ratio’s overall trend. The 2022 results suggest a strengthening of the company’s economic performance relative to its capital base.
Economic Profit Margin
| Sep 30, 2022 | Sep 30, 2021 | Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Net revenues | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Workday Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The period between September 30, 2017, and September 30, 2022, demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit and a corresponding impact on the economic profit margin. Economic profit exhibited an overall upward trend, though not consistently. Net revenues consistently increased over the observed period, with a notable acceleration in the final year.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit began at US$954 million in 2017 and increased substantially to US$1,766 million in 2018. A significant surge occurred in 2019, reaching US$4,489 million. However, economic profit decreased to US$1,950 million in 2020, before recovering to US$3,589 million in 2021. The most recent year, 2022, saw a further increase, with economic profit reaching US$5,727 million, representing the highest value in the observed period.
- Net Revenues
- Net revenues showed consistent year-over-year growth throughout the period. From US$18,358 million in 2017, revenues increased to US$20,609 million in 2018, and continued to rise to US$22,977 million in 2019. A slight decrease was observed in 2020, with revenues at US$21,846 million, but growth resumed in 2021, reaching US$24,105 million. The largest increase occurred between 2021 and 2022, with net revenues reaching US$29,310 million.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin mirrored the fluctuations in economic profit. Starting at 5.19% in 2017, the margin increased to 8.57% in 2018. A substantial increase was observed in 2019, reaching 19.54%. The margin decreased significantly in 2020 to 8.93%, followed by a recovery to 14.89% in 2021. The margin reached 19.54% in 2022, matching the peak observed in 2019. The economic profit margin generally increased alongside net revenues, though the impact of changes in economic profit was more pronounced on the margin.
The observed volatility in economic profit, despite consistent revenue growth, suggests potential fluctuations in the cost of capital or operational expenses. The strong correlation between economic profit and economic profit margin indicates that the company’s ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital is a primary driver of its profitability as measured by this metric.