AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Visa Inc. (NYSE:V)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 27, 2023.

Analysis of Solvency Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Solvency Ratios (Summary)

Debt Ratios

Coverage Ratios

Visa Inc., solvency ratios

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2022 Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017
Debt Ratios
Debt to equity 0.63 0.56 0.66 0.48 0.49 0.56
Debt to equity (including operating lease liability) 0.65 0.57 0.68 0.48 0.49 0.56
Debt to capital 0.39 0.36 0.40 0.33 0.33 0.36
Debt to capital (including operating lease liability) 0.39 0.36 0.40 0.33 0.33 0.36
Debt to assets 0.26 0.25 0.30 0.23 0.24 0.27
Debt to assets (including operating lease liability) 0.27 0.26 0.30 0.23 0.24 0.27
Financial leverage 2.40 2.21 2.23 2.09 2.04 2.08
Coverage Ratios
Interest coverage 34.71 32.31 27.72 28.92 21.92 21.77
Fixed charge coverage 28.69 26.74 22.89 19.17 16.32 17.20

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).


The solvency profile exhibits a moderate increase in leverage paired with a significant improvement in the capacity to service debt obligations over the six-year period ending September 30, 2022. While leverage ratios experienced fluctuations, particularly peaking in 2020, the overall trend in coverage ratios indicates a strengthening credit position.

Leverage and Capital Structure
Debt to equity and debt to capital ratios followed a similar trajectory, decreasing from 2017 to 2019 before reaching a peak in 2020. Specifically, the debt to equity ratio moved from 0.56 in 2017 to a low of 0.48 in 2019, before rising to 0.66 in 2020 and settling at 0.63 by 2022. The inclusion of operating lease liabilities had a marginal impact on these figures, suggesting that lease obligations represent a minimal portion of the total capital structure.
Asset and Leverage Trends
The debt to assets ratio remained relatively stable, ranging between 0.23 and 0.30, with a peak occurring in 2020. Simultaneously, financial leverage showed a steady upward trend, increasing from 2.08 in 2017 to 2.40 in 2022. This indicates a gradual increase in the proportion of assets funded by debt relative to equity over the analyzed period.
Debt Service Coverage
A strong positive trend is observed in both interest and fixed charge coverage ratios. The interest coverage ratio grew consistently from 21.77 in 2017 to 34.71 in 2022, while the fixed charge coverage ratio increased from 17.20 to 28.69 over the same timeframe. These figures demonstrate a substantial increase in the company's ability to meet its interest and fixed obligations from operating earnings, effectively offsetting the slight increase in overall leverage.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Debt to Equity

Visa Inc., debt to equity calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2022 Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current maturities of debt 2,250 999 2,999 — — 1,749
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities 20,200 19,978 21,071 16,729 16,630 16,618
Total debt 22,450 20,977 24,070 16,729 16,630 18,367
 
Equity 35,581 37,589 36,210 34,684 34,006 32,760
Solvency Ratio
Debt to equity1 0.63 0.56 0.66 0.48 0.49 0.56
Benchmarks
Debt to Equity, Competitors2
Accenture PLC 0.00 0.00 — — — —
Adobe Inc. 0.29 0.28 0.31 — — —
AppLovin Corp. 1.72 1.53 — — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 0.27 0.13 — — — —
Datadog Inc. 0.52 0.71 — — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 2.32 2.74 — — — —
Intuit Inc. 0.42 0.21 — — — —
Microsoft Corp. 0.39 0.50 — — — —
Oracle Corp. — 16.08 — — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. 0.00 0.00 — — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 17.51 5.08 — — — —
Salesforce Inc. 0.19 0.07 — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 0.30 0.43 — — — —
Synopsys Inc. 0.00 0.02 0.03 — — —
Workday Inc. 0.41 0.55 — — — —
Debt to Equity, Sector
Software & Services 0.71 0.83 — — — —
Debt to Equity, Industry
Information Technology 0.70 0.83 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).

1 2022 Calculation
Debt to equity = Total debt ÷ Equity
= 22,450 ÷ 35,581 = 0.63

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the solvency metrics reveals a period of fluctuating leverage between 2017 and 2022, characterized by a significant deviation in 2020. While total equity grew steadily for the majority of the period, debt levels exhibited more volatility, directly impacting the debt-to-equity profile.

Total Debt Trends
A reduction in total debt was observed from 2017 to 2018, with levels remaining relatively stable through 2019. A sharp increase occurred in 2020, with total debt rising to 24,070 million USD. This peak was followed by a partial reduction in 2021 and a subsequent moderate increase to 22,450 million USD by September 30, 2022.
Equity Growth and Contraction
Equity demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory from 2017 through 2021, rising from 32,760 million USD to a peak of 37,589 million USD. A reversal of this trend occurred in 2022, where equity decreased to 35,581 million USD.
Debt to Equity Ratio Analysis
The debt-to-equity ratio decreased from 0.56 in 2017 to a low of 0.48 in 2019, indicating a period of deleveraging. A significant spike to 0.66 was recorded in 2020, coinciding with the increase in total debt. The ratio moderated to 0.56 in 2021 before rising again to 0.63 in 2022, reflecting the combined impact of increased debt and decreased equity during the final year of the observed period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability)

Visa Inc., debt to equity (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2022 Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current maturities of debt 2,250 999 2,999 — — 1,749
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities 20,200 19,978 21,071 16,729 16,630 16,618
Total debt 22,450 20,977 24,070 16,729 16,630 18,367
Current portion of operating lease liabilities (included in Accrued liabilities) 98 103 97 — — —
Long-term portion of operating lease liabilities (included in Other liabilities) 422 471 473 — — —
Total debt (including operating lease liability) 22,970 21,551 24,640 16,729 16,630 18,367
 
Equity 35,581 37,589 36,210 34,684 34,006 32,760
Solvency Ratio
Debt to equity (including operating lease liability)1 0.65 0.57 0.68 0.48 0.49 0.56
Benchmarks
Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability), Competitors2
Accenture PLC 0.15 0.18 — — — —
Adobe Inc. 0.33 0.32 0.35 — — —
AppLovin Corp. 1.76 1.57 — — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 0.34 0.18 — — — —
Datadog Inc. 0.59 0.78 — — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 2.46 2.92 — — — —
Intuit Inc. 0.46 0.25 — — — —
Microsoft Corp. 0.47 0.58 — — — —
Oracle Corp. — 16.61 — — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. 0.10 0.11 — — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 19.12 5.68 — — — —
Salesforce Inc. 0.25 0.15 — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 0.44 0.60 — — — —
Synopsys Inc. 0.12 0.13 0.14 — — —
Workday Inc. 0.46 0.68 — — — —
Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability), Sector
Software & Services 0.81 0.93 — — — —
Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability), Industry
Information Technology 0.76 0.90 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).

1 2022 Calculation
Debt to equity (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Equity
= 22,970 ÷ 35,581 = 0.65

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The solvency profile of the organization exhibits a period of volatility between 2017 and 2022, characterized by a mid-term spike in leverage followed by a partial correction and a subsequent increase. While equity remained relatively stable with a general upward trajectory until 2021, the fluctuations in the debt-to-equity ratio were primarily driven by shifts in total debt, including operating lease liabilities.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio Trends
A downward trend in leverage was observed from 2017 to 2019, with the ratio declining from 0.56 to a period low of 0.48. This improvement was the result of a reduction in total debt coupled with a steady increase in equity. However, a significant reversal occurred in 2020, where the ratio peaked at 0.68. Following this peak, the ratio decreased to 0.57 in 2021 before rising again to 0.65 by September 30, 2022.
Total Debt Dynamics
Total debt, including operating lease liabilities, remained relatively stable between 2018 and 2019 at approximately US$ 16.6 billion to US$ 16.7 billion. A sharp increase is noted in 2020, with debt rising to US$ 24.64 billion. Although there was a reduction to US$ 21.55 billion in 2021, the debt levels trended upward again in 2022, ending the period at US$ 22.97 billion.
Equity Position
Equity demonstrated consistent growth from 2017 through 2021, rising from US$ 32.76 billion to a peak of US$ 37.59 billion. This growth provided a buffer against increasing debt levels for several years. In 2022, a contraction in equity to US$ 35.58 billion occurred, which, when combined with rising debt, contributed to the increase in the final debt-to-equity ratio.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Debt to Capital

Visa Inc., debt to capital calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2022 Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current maturities of debt 2,250 999 2,999 — — 1,749
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities 20,200 19,978 21,071 16,729 16,630 16,618
Total debt 22,450 20,977 24,070 16,729 16,630 18,367
Equity 35,581 37,589 36,210 34,684 34,006 32,760
Total capital 58,031 58,566 60,280 51,413 50,636 51,127
Solvency Ratio
Debt to capital1 0.39 0.36 0.40 0.33 0.33 0.36
Benchmarks
Debt to Capital, Competitors2
Accenture PLC 0.00 0.00 — — — —
Adobe Inc. 0.23 0.22 0.24 — — —
AppLovin Corp. 0.63 0.60 — — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 0.21 0.11 — — — —
Datadog Inc. 0.34 0.41 — — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 0.70 0.73 — — — —
Intuit Inc. 0.30 0.17 — — — —
Microsoft Corp. 0.28 0.33 — — — —
Oracle Corp. 1.09 0.94 — — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. 0.00 0.00 — — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 0.95 0.84 — — — —
Salesforce Inc. 0.16 0.06 — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 0.23 0.30 — — — —
Synopsys Inc. 0.00 0.02 0.03 — — —
Workday Inc. 0.29 0.35 — — — —
Debt to Capital, Sector
Software & Services 0.42 0.45 — — — —
Debt to Capital, Industry
Information Technology 0.41 0.45 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).

1 2022 Calculation
Debt to capital = Total debt ÷ Total capital
= 22,450 ÷ 58,031 = 0.39

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The solvency profile exhibits a period of relative stability followed by a notable increase in leverage starting in 2020. While total debt and total capital fluctuated over the six-year period, the organization maintained a balanced capital structure with a debt-to-capital ratio that remained within a range of 0.33 to 0.40.

Total Debt Trends
Between 2017 and 2019, total debt experienced a slight contraction, moving from 18,367 million USD to 16,729 million USD. A significant spike occurred in 2020, with debt increasing to 24,070 million USD. Following a partial reduction to 20,977 million USD in 2021, total debt rose again to 22,450 million USD by September 30, 2022.
Total Capital Dynamics
Total capital remained nearly constant from 2017 through 2019, hovering around 51 billion USD. A sharp increase was recorded in 2020, reaching 60,280 million USD, which correlates with the expansion of total debt during the same period. In the subsequent two years, total capital saw a gradual decline, settling at 58,031 million USD by 2022.
Debt to Capital Ratio Analysis
The debt to capital ratio demonstrated stability between 2018 and 2019 at 0.33. A peak of 0.40 was observed in 2020, marking the highest level of leverage in the analyzed period. Although the ratio normalized to 0.36 in 2021, it trended upward again to 0.39 in 2022, suggesting a sustained increase in the proportion of debt used to finance the capital base compared to pre-2020 levels.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability)

Visa Inc., debt to capital (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2022 Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current maturities of debt 2,250 999 2,999 — — 1,749
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities 20,200 19,978 21,071 16,729 16,630 16,618
Total debt 22,450 20,977 24,070 16,729 16,630 18,367
Current portion of operating lease liabilities (included in Accrued liabilities) 98 103 97 — — —
Long-term portion of operating lease liabilities (included in Other liabilities) 422 471 473 — — —
Total debt (including operating lease liability) 22,970 21,551 24,640 16,729 16,630 18,367
Equity 35,581 37,589 36,210 34,684 34,006 32,760
Total capital (including operating lease liability) 58,551 59,140 60,850 51,413 50,636 51,127
Solvency Ratio
Debt to capital (including operating lease liability)1 0.39 0.36 0.40 0.33 0.33 0.36
Benchmarks
Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability), Competitors2
Accenture PLC 0.13 0.15 — — — —
Adobe Inc. 0.25 0.24 0.26 — — —
AppLovin Corp. 0.64 0.61 — — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 0.25 0.15 — — — —
Datadog Inc. 0.37 0.44 — — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 0.71 0.74 — — — —
Intuit Inc. 0.31 0.20 — — — —
Microsoft Corp. 0.32 0.37 — — — —
Oracle Corp. 1.08 0.94 — — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. 0.09 0.10 — — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 0.95 0.85 — — — —
Salesforce Inc. 0.20 0.13 — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 0.31 0.37 — — — —
Synopsys Inc. 0.11 0.11 0.12 — — —
Workday Inc. 0.32 0.41 — — — —
Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability), Sector
Software & Services 0.45 0.48 — — — —
Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability), Industry
Information Technology 0.43 0.47 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).

1 2022 Calculation
Debt to capital (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Total capital (including operating lease liability)
= 22,970 ÷ 58,551 = 0.39

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The solvency profile between September 30, 2017, and September 30, 2022, exhibits moderate volatility in debt levels relative to a comparatively stable capital base. A notable escalation in both total debt and total capital occurred in 2020, representing the peak of leverage within the analyzed period before a partial correction and subsequent stabilization.

Debt to Capital Ratio Trends
The ratio fluctuated between a low of 0.33 and a high of 0.40. After starting at 0.36 in 2017, the ratio improved to 0.33 in 2018 and remained constant through 2019. A significant increase to 0.40 was recorded in 2020, followed by a decrease to 0.36 in 2021 and a slight rise to 0.39 by 2022. This indicates a period of increased financial leverage during 2020 that was not fully reversed by the end of the observation period.
Total Debt Analysis
Total debt, inclusive of operating lease liabilities, showed a downward trend from US$ 18,367 million in 2017 to US$ 16,630 million in 2018, maintaining stability in 2019. A sharp increase to US$ 24,640 million occurred in 2020, marking the highest debt level in the six-year period. Debt levels subsequently declined to US$ 21,551 million in 2021 before increasing slightly to US$ 22,970 million in 2022.
Total Capital Analysis
Total capital remained relatively stagnant between 2017 and 2019, moving within a narrow range between US$ 50,636 million and US$ 51,413 million. A substantial expansion to US$ 60,850 million was observed in 2020, coinciding with the spike in total debt. Since 2020, total capital has seen a gradual contraction, ending at US$ 58,551 million in 2022.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Debt to Assets

Visa Inc., debt to assets calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2022 Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current maturities of debt 2,250 999 2,999 — — 1,749
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities 20,200 19,978 21,071 16,729 16,630 16,618
Total debt 22,450 20,977 24,070 16,729 16,630 18,367
 
Total assets 85,501 82,896 80,919 72,574 69,225 67,977
Solvency Ratio
Debt to assets1 0.26 0.25 0.30 0.23 0.24 0.27
Benchmarks
Debt to Assets, Competitors2
Accenture PLC 0.00 0.00 — — — —
Adobe Inc. 0.15 0.15 0.17 — — —
AppLovin Corp. 0.56 0.53 — — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 0.15 0.08 — — — —
Datadog Inc. 0.25 0.31 — — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 0.40 0.39 — — — —
Intuit Inc. 0.25 0.13 — — — —
Microsoft Corp. 0.18 0.21 — — — —
Oracle Corp. 0.69 0.64 — — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. 0.00 0.00 — — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 0.30 0.31 — — — —
Salesforce Inc. 0.12 0.04 — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 0.11 0.15 — — — —
Synopsys Inc. 0.00 0.01 0.02 — — —
Workday Inc. 0.18 0.21 — — — —
Debt to Assets, Sector
Software & Services 0.26 0.28 — — — —
Debt to Assets, Industry
Information Technology 0.26 0.29 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).

1 2022 Calculation
Debt to assets = Total debt ÷ Total assets
= 22,450 ÷ 85,501 = 0.26

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The solvency profile demonstrates a consistent growth in the asset base paired with fluctuations in total debt obligations, resulting in a relatively stable debt-to-assets ratio over the six-year period. Total assets exhibited an uninterrupted upward trajectory, increasing from 67,977 million USD in 2017 to 85,501 million USD by 2022.

Total Debt Trends
Total debt experienced a period of decline and stabilization between 2017 and 2019, reaching a low of 16,630 million USD in 2018. A significant increase occurred in 2020, where debt peaked at 24,070 million USD. This peak was followed by a reduction to 20,977 million USD in 2021 and a subsequent slight increase to 22,450 million USD in 2022.
Debt to Assets Ratio Analysis
The debt-to-assets ratio remained within a narrow range of 0.23 to 0.30. The ratio declined from 0.27 in 2017 to its lowest point of 0.23 in 2019, indicating an improvement in the solvency position. The spike in total debt in 2020 led to a corresponding peak in the ratio at 0.30, the highest level recorded in the period. Since 2020, the ratio has moderated, settling at 0.26 by September 30, 2022.
Solvency Interpretation
The steady expansion of total assets provided a buffer against the volatility of total debt. Even during the peak debt period of 2020, the ratio indicates that less than one-third of the assets were financed through debt, suggesting a conservative approach to leverage and a strong long-term solvency position.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability)

Visa Inc., debt to assets (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2022 Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current maturities of debt 2,250 999 2,999 — — 1,749
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities 20,200 19,978 21,071 16,729 16,630 16,618
Total debt 22,450 20,977 24,070 16,729 16,630 18,367
Current portion of operating lease liabilities (included in Accrued liabilities) 98 103 97 — — —
Long-term portion of operating lease liabilities (included in Other liabilities) 422 471 473 — — —
Total debt (including operating lease liability) 22,970 21,551 24,640 16,729 16,630 18,367
 
Total assets 85,501 82,896 80,919 72,574 69,225 67,977
Solvency Ratio
Debt to assets (including operating lease liability)1 0.27 0.26 0.30 0.23 0.24 0.27
Benchmarks
Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability), Competitors2
Accenture PLC 0.07 0.08 — — — —
Adobe Inc. 0.17 0.17 0.19 — — —
AppLovin Corp. 0.57 0.54 — — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 0.18 0.11 — — — —
Datadog Inc. 0.28 0.34 — — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 0.42 0.42 — — — —
Intuit Inc. 0.27 0.16 — — — —
Microsoft Corp. 0.21 0.25 — — — —
Oracle Corp. 0.73 0.66 — — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. 0.07 0.08 — — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 0.33 0.35 — — — —
Salesforce Inc. 0.15 0.10 — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 0.17 0.21 — — — —
Synopsys Inc. 0.07 0.08 0.08 — — —
Workday Inc. 0.20 0.26 — — — —
Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability), Sector
Software & Services 0.30 0.32 — — — —
Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability), Industry
Information Technology 0.29 0.31 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).

1 2022 Calculation
Debt to assets (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Total assets
= 22,970 ÷ 85,501 = 0.27

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The solvency profile demonstrates a period of overall stability characterized by consistent asset growth and fluctuating debt levels. While the total asset base expanded steadily over the six-year period, the total debt experienced a significant spike in 2020 before stabilizing at a higher baseline than seen in the 2018-2019 period.

Total Asset Growth
A consistent upward trajectory is observed in total assets, which increased from US$ 67,977 million in 2017 to US$ 85,501 million by 2022. This represents a steady expansion of the balance sheet, providing a broader capital base to support liabilities.
Total Debt Dynamics
Total debt, including operating lease liabilities, exhibited volatility. After a slight decline between 2017 and 2019, there was a sharp increase in 2020, where debt peaked at US$ 24,640 million. Although this figure decreased in 2021, it rose again to US$ 22,970 million by 2022, indicating a higher level of leverage compared to the 2018-2019 window.
Debt to Assets Ratio Analysis
The debt to assets ratio remained within a narrow range of 0.23 to 0.30. The ratio improved from 0.27 in 2017 to a low of 0.23 in 2019, suggesting a period of deleveraging or faster asset growth. However, the ratio peaked at 0.30 in 2020, correlating with the surge in total debt. In the subsequent two years, the ratio stabilized, ending at 0.27 in 2022, which is identical to the level recorded at the start of the period in 2017.

The analysis indicates that despite a temporary increase in leverage in 2020, the solvency position has remained resilient. The consistent growth in assets has effectively offset the increase in debt, maintaining a balanced debt-to-asset relationship over the long term.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Financial Leverage

Visa Inc., financial leverage calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2022 Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Total assets 85,501 82,896 80,919 72,574 69,225 67,977
Equity 35,581 37,589 36,210 34,684 34,006 32,760
Solvency Ratio
Financial leverage1 2.40 2.21 2.23 2.09 2.04 2.08
Benchmarks
Financial Leverage, Competitors2
Accenture PLC 2.14 2.21 — — — —
Adobe Inc. 1.93 1.84 1.83 — — —
AppLovin Corp. 3.07 2.88 — — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 1.87 1.60 — — — —
Datadog Inc. 2.13 2.29 — — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 5.80 6.98 — — — —
Intuit Inc. 1.69 1.57 — — — —
Microsoft Corp. 2.19 2.35 — — — —
Oracle Corp. — 25.03 — — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. 1.35 1.42 — — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 58.35 16.14 — — — —
Salesforce Inc. 1.64 1.60 — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 2.64 2.92 — — — —
Synopsys Inc. 1.71 1.65 1.64 — — —
Workday Inc. 2.31 2.66 — — — —
Financial Leverage, Sector
Software & Services 2.72 2.95 — — — —
Financial Leverage, Industry
Information Technology 2.65 2.87 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).

1 2022 Calculation
Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Equity
= 85,501 ÷ 35,581 = 2.40

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Total assets exhibited a consistent upward trajectory over the six-year period, increasing from 67,977 million US$ in 2017 to 85,501 million US$ in 2022. Equity followed a general growth pattern from 2017 through 2021, peaking at 37,589 million US$, before experiencing a contraction to 35,581 million US$ in 2022.

Financial Leverage Ratio Trends
The financial leverage ratio remained relatively stable between 2017 and 2019, fluctuating within a narrow range of 2.04 to 2.09. A gradual increase began in 2020, with the ratio rising to 2.23, reflecting a shift in the composition of the capital structure toward a higher proportion of liabilities relative to equity.
Analysis of the 2022 Pivot
The most pronounced increase in leverage occurred in 2022, where the ratio reached a period high of 2.40. This spike is the result of total assets continuing to grow while total equity declined by approximately 2,008 million US$ compared to the previous year. This divergence indicates a heightened reliance on debt or other liabilities to fund asset growth during this period.

The overall trend demonstrates an expansion of the balance sheet coupled with a progressive increase in financial leverage. While the growth in assets was linear, the volatility in equity during the final year accelerated the leverage ratio, marking a transition toward a more leveraged financial position by the end of the analyzed period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Interest Coverage

Visa Inc., interest coverage calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2022 Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income 14,957 12,311 10,866 12,080 10,301 6,699
Add: Income tax expense 3,179 3,752 2,924 2,804 2,505 4,995
Add: Interest expense 538 513 516 533 612 563
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) 18,674 16,576 14,306 15,417 13,418 12,257
Solvency Ratio
Interest coverage1 34.71 32.31 27.72 28.92 21.92 21.77
Benchmarks
Interest Coverage, Competitors2
Accenture PLC 195.34 131.46 — — — —
Adobe Inc. 54.64 51.49 37.00 — — —
AppLovin Corp. -0.19 1.45 — — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 46.58 46.26 — — — —
Datadog Inc. -1.30 0.12 — — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 1.97 5.20 — — — —
Intuit Inc. 32.38 89.14 — — — —
Microsoft Corp. 41.58 31.31 — — — —
Oracle Corp. 3.84 6.28 — — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. -87.97 -133.20 — — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. -6.56 -1.85 — — — —
Salesforce Inc. 7.93 21.49 — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 15.78 9.89 — — — —
Synopsys Inc. 657.96 240.38 125.16 — — —
Workday Inc. 1.97 -3.00 — — — —
Interest Coverage, Sector
Software & Services 17.77 17.09 — — — —
Interest Coverage, Industry
Information Technology 22.18 19.66 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).

1 2022 Calculation
Interest coverage = EBIT ÷ Interest expense
= 18,674 ÷ 538 = 34.71

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The solvency profile demonstrates a strong and improving capacity to meet interest obligations over the six-year period ending September 30, 2022. A consistent upward trajectory in the interest coverage ratio indicates a significant reduction in financial risk and an increased margin of safety for debt servicing.

Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT)
Operating profitability exhibited a general growth pattern, increasing from US$ 12,257 million in 2017 to US$ 18,674 million in 2022. Although a temporary contraction occurred in 2020, with earnings declining to US$ 14,306 million, the subsequent recovery was robust, culminating in the highest recorded EBIT by the end of the period.
Interest Expense
Interest costs remained relatively stable and well-managed. Following a peak of US$ 612 million in 2018, expenses trended downward and stabilized, fluctuating within a narrow range between US$ 513 million and US$ 538 million from 2019 through 2022.
Interest Coverage Ratio
The interest coverage ratio improved from 21.77 in 2017 to 34.71 in 2022. This expansion is primarily attributed to the divergence between growing operating earnings and stagnant interest costs. The ratio experienced a brief dip in 2020 to 27.72, mirroring the decline in EBIT, before accelerating to its peak in 2022, signifying a highly favorable solvency position.

Overall, the analysis reveals a strengthening credit profile. The ability to cover interest payments has increased substantially over the observed period, reflecting efficient operational scaling relative to the cost of maintaining debt.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Fixed Charge Coverage

Visa Inc., fixed charge coverage calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2022 Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income 14,957 12,311 10,866 12,080 10,301 6,699
Add: Income tax expense 3,179 3,752 2,924 2,804 2,505 4,995
Add: Interest expense 538 513 516 533 612 563
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) 18,674 16,576 14,306 15,417 13,418 12,257
Add: Operating lease cost 117 111 114 286 224 159
Earnings before fixed charges and tax 18,791 16,687 14,420 15,703 13,642 12,416
 
Interest expense 538 513 516 533 612 563
Operating lease cost 117 111 114 286 224 159
Fixed charges 655 624 630 819 836 722
Solvency Ratio
Fixed charge coverage1 28.69 26.74 22.89 19.17 16.32 17.20
Benchmarks
Fixed Charge Coverage, Competitors2
Accenture PLC 12.25 10.41 — — — —
Adobe Inc. 26.79 25.59 18.77 — — —
AppLovin Corp. -0.07 1.35 — — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 15.50 13.77 — — — —
Datadog Inc. 0.09 0.55 — — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 1.52 3.13 — — — —
Intuit Inc. 14.67 25.58 — — — —
Microsoft Corp. 19.50 16.90 — — — —
Oracle Corp. 3.22 5.17 — — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. -5.06 -7.89 — — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. -1.18 -1.09 — — — —
Salesforce Inc. 2.18 2.92 — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 3.87 2.95 — — — —
Synopsys Inc. 12.91 9.29 7.46 — — —
Workday Inc. 1.15 -0.69 — — — —
Fixed Charge Coverage, Sector
Software & Services 9.33 9.14 — — — —
Fixed Charge Coverage, Industry
Information Technology 13.28 12.13 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).

1 2022 Calculation
Fixed charge coverage = Earnings before fixed charges and tax ÷ Fixed charges
= 18,791 ÷ 655 = 28.69

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of solvency ratios reveals a significant strengthening of the capacity to meet fixed financial obligations over the six-year period ending September 30, 2022. The overall trend is characterized by increasing operational earnings paired with a general reduction in fixed charges, leading to a substantial expansion of the fixed charge coverage ratio.

Earnings before fixed charges and tax
A positive growth trajectory is observed, with earnings rising from US$ 12,416 million in 2017 to US$ 18,791 million in 2022. While a temporary contraction occurred in 2020, where earnings fell to US$ 14,420 million, the subsequent recovery was robust, reaching peak levels by the end of the period.
Fixed charges
Fixed charges exhibited a peak of US$ 836 million in 2018 before entering a downward trend. By 2021, these charges had declined to US$ 624 million and remained relatively stable through 2022 at US$ 655 million, reflecting a reduction in the fixed financial burden relative to the scale of operations.
Fixed charge coverage ratio
The coverage ratio demonstrated a consistent upward trend from 2018 onwards. Starting at 17.20 in 2017, the ratio climbed to 28.69 by 2022. This progression indicates a heightened margin of safety and a diminished risk regarding the fulfillment of fixed financial commitments, as the earnings available to cover these charges grew significantly faster than the charges themselves.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?