Solvency ratios also known as long-term debt ratios measure a company ability to meet long-term obligations.
Paying user area
Try for free
Workday Inc. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Workday Inc. for $24.99.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Solvency Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
Solvency ratios for the analyzed period demonstrate a generally improving financial position, though with some volatility. Overall, the company appears to be decreasing its reliance on debt financing, with several key ratios indicating a strengthening ability to meet its long-term obligations. However, fluctuations in interest and fixed charge coverage warrant attention.
- Debt Ratios (Debt to Equity, Debt to Capital, Debt to Assets)
- A consistent trend across debt to equity, debt to capital, and debt to assets ratios indicates a decrease in leverage from 2021 through 2025. Debt to equity decreased from 0.55 to 0.33, while debt to capital fell from 0.35 to 0.25 over the same period. Debt to assets also exhibited a similar decline, moving from 0.21 to 0.17. A slight increase is observed in these ratios in 2026, suggesting a potential stabilization or modest increase in debt utilization. The inclusion of operating lease liabilities consistently shows higher leverage ratios than those excluding them, highlighting the impact of lease obligations on the company’s debt profile.
- Leverage Ratios (Financial Leverage)
- Financial leverage, measured as total assets to total equity, generally decreased from 2.66 in 2021 to 1.99 in 2025, mirroring the trends in other debt ratios. An increase to 2.32 is noted in 2026, potentially linked to the slight rise in debt ratios. This suggests a reduced dependence on financial leverage to generate assets.
- Coverage Ratios (Interest Coverage, Fixed Charge Coverage)
- Interest coverage and fixed charge coverage ratios experienced significant fluctuations. Both ratios were negative in 2021 and 2023, indicating insufficient earnings to cover interest and fixed charges in those years. However, a substantial improvement is evident from 2024 onwards, with interest coverage rising to 6.60 in 2025 and 9.85 in 2026, and fixed charge coverage increasing to 2.60 and 4.67 respectively. This suggests a strengthening ability to service debt obligations, particularly in the later years of the analyzed period. The negative values in earlier years require further investigation to understand the underlying causes.
In summary, the company demonstrates a positive trend in reducing its debt burden and improving its ability to cover fixed charges. While earlier periods exhibited concerns regarding coverage, the latter years show a marked improvement. The slight increases in debt ratios in 2026 warrant monitoring to ensure continued solvency.
Debt Ratios
Coverage Ratios
Debt to Equity
| Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Debt, current | |||||||
| Debt, noncurrent | |||||||
| Total debt | |||||||
| Stockholders’ equity | |||||||
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Debt to equity1 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Debt to Equity, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Debt to Equity, Sector | |||||||
| Software & Services | |||||||
| Debt to Equity, Industry | |||||||
| Information Technology | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 2026 Calculation
Debt to equity = Total debt ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The debt to equity ratio exhibits fluctuations over the observed period. Initially, the ratio decreased, then increased before decreasing again, suggesting shifts in the company’s capital structure and financing decisions.
- Overall Trend
- From January 31, 2021, to January 31, 2025, the debt to equity ratio generally decreased, indicating a growing proportion of equity relative to debt. However, a slight increase is observed from January 31, 2025, to January 31, 2026, suggesting a potential shift towards increased leverage.
- Initial Decrease (2021-2022)
- The ratio decreased from 0.55 in 2021 to 0.41 in 2022. This decline coincided with an increase in stockholders’ equity that outpaced the growth in total debt, suggesting the company was financing growth through equity rather than debt during this period.
- Subsequent Increase (2022-2023)
- The ratio increased from 0.41 in 2022 to 0.53 in 2023. This increase was driven by a larger percentage increase in total debt compared to stockholders’ equity, indicating a greater reliance on debt financing.
- Recent Decrease and Stabilization (2023-2025)
- The ratio decreased from 0.53 in 2023 to 0.33 in 2025. This decrease is attributable to a substantial increase in stockholders’ equity, significantly outpacing the relatively stable total debt. This suggests a period of strong equity performance and potentially reduced reliance on debt.
- Latest Observation (2025-2026)
- The ratio increased slightly from 0.33 in 2025 to 0.38 in 2026. This marginal increase, coupled with a decrease in stockholders’ equity, suggests a minor increase in financial leverage. The total debt remained relatively constant during this period.
The observed fluctuations in the debt to equity ratio warrant further investigation into the underlying financing strategies and their impact on the company’s overall financial risk profile.
Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability)
Workday Inc., debt to equity (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Debt, current | |||||||
| Debt, noncurrent | |||||||
| Total debt | |||||||
| Operating lease liabilities, current | |||||||
| Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent | |||||||
| Total debt (including operating lease liability) | |||||||
| Stockholders’ equity | |||||||
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Debt to equity (including operating lease liability)1 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability), Competitors2 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability), Sector | |||||||
| Software & Services | |||||||
| Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability), Industry | |||||||
| Information Technology | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 2026 Calculation
Debt to equity (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The debt to equity ratio, including operating lease liability, demonstrates a fluctuating pattern over the observed period. Initially, the ratio decreased before stabilizing and then increasing again. Total debt, inclusive of operating lease liabilities, generally increased throughout the period, while stockholders’ equity exhibited more substantial fluctuations.
- Debt to Equity Ratio - Overall Trend
- The debt to equity ratio began at 0.68 in 2021. A significant decrease was observed in 2022, falling to 0.46. The ratio then increased to 0.58 in 2023, before declining further to 0.41 in 2024 and reaching a low of 0.37 in 2025. Finally, the ratio increased to 0.49 in 2026.
- Total Debt (including Operating Lease Liability)
- Total debt exhibited an overall upward trend, increasing from US$2,238 million in 2021 to US$3,821 million in 2026. There was a slight decrease between 2021 and 2022, from US$2,238 million to US$2,103 million. However, debt increased substantially in 2023 to US$3,249 million, and continued to rise in subsequent years, though at a slower pace.
- Stockholders’ Equity
- Stockholders’ equity demonstrated a more volatile pattern. It increased significantly from US$3,278 million in 2021 to US$4,535 million in 2022, and continued to grow to US$5,586 million in 2023. A substantial increase was seen in 2024, reaching US$8,082 million, followed by a further increase to US$9,034 million in 2025. However, equity decreased in 2026 to US$7,805 million.
The interplay between increasing debt and fluctuating equity has resulted in the observed changes in the debt to equity ratio. The decrease in the ratio between 2021 and 2025 suggests a strengthening of the equity position relative to debt. The increase in 2026, however, indicates a shift towards greater reliance on debt financing or a reduction in equity.
Debt to Capital
| Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Debt, current | |||||||
| Debt, noncurrent | |||||||
| Total debt | |||||||
| Stockholders’ equity | |||||||
| Total capital | |||||||
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Debt to capital1 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Debt to Capital, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Debt to Capital, Sector | |||||||
| Software & Services | |||||||
| Debt to Capital, Industry | |||||||
| Information Technology | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 2026 Calculation
Debt to capital = Total debt ÷ Total capital
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The Debt to Capital ratio exhibits a fluctuating pattern over the observed period. Initially, the ratio decreased before stabilizing and then experiencing a slight increase towards the end of the period.
- Overall Trend
- The Debt to Capital ratio began at 0.35 in 2021, decreased to 0.29 in 2022, and then rose to 0.35 in 2023. It subsequently declined to 0.27 in 2024 and further to 0.25 in 2025, before increasing slightly to 0.28 in 2026. This indicates a period of decreasing leverage followed by relative stability and a minor increase in recent years.
- Debt Component
- Total debt remained relatively stable between 2021 and 2023, increasing from US$1,795 million to US$2,976 million. From 2023 to 2026, the increase in total debt was minimal, moving from US$2,976 million to US$2,987 million. This suggests a period of significant debt accumulation followed by a period of controlled debt management.
- Capital Component
- Total capital demonstrated a consistent upward trend from 2021 to 2025, increasing from US$5,073 million to US$12,018 million. However, in 2026, total capital decreased to US$10,792 million. This fluctuation in total capital significantly influences the Debt to Capital ratio, particularly the decrease observed in 2026.
- Ratio Interpretation
- The initial decrease in the Debt to Capital ratio from 2021 to 2022 suggests a strengthening financial position with a reduced reliance on debt financing relative to the company’s capital base. The subsequent increase in 2023, despite the increase in debt, indicates a faster growth in capital. The recent stabilization and slight increase in the ratio from 2024 to 2026, coupled with the decrease in total capital in 2026, warrants further investigation to understand the underlying drivers of these changes.
In summary, the Debt to Capital ratio indicates a dynamic relationship between debt and capital, with periods of decreasing and increasing leverage. The recent fluctuations suggest a potential shift in the company’s capital structure or financing strategy.
Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability)
Workday Inc., debt to capital (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Debt, current | |||||||
| Debt, noncurrent | |||||||
| Total debt | |||||||
| Operating lease liabilities, current | |||||||
| Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent | |||||||
| Total debt (including operating lease liability) | |||||||
| Stockholders’ equity | |||||||
| Total capital (including operating lease liability) | |||||||
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Debt to capital (including operating lease liability)1 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability), Competitors2 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability), Sector | |||||||
| Software & Services | |||||||
| Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability), Industry | |||||||
| Information Technology | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 2026 Calculation
Debt to capital (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Total capital (including operating lease liability)
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The Debt to Capital ratio, inclusive of operating lease liabilities, demonstrates a fluctuating pattern over the observed period. Initially, the ratio decreased before stabilizing and then increasing slightly towards the end of the period. Total debt, including operating lease liability, generally increased, while total capital experienced more substantial growth, influencing the overall ratio.
- Debt to Capital Ratio - Overall Trend
- The Debt to Capital ratio began at 0.41 in 2021, decreased to a low of 0.29 in 2023, and then exhibited a slight increase, reaching 0.33 in 2026. This suggests a period of decreasing reliance on debt financing relative to capital, followed by a modest shift back towards debt.
- Total Debt (including operating lease liability)
- Total debt increased from US$2,238 million in 2021 to US$3,821 million in 2026. The increase was not linear, with a slight decrease observed between 2021 and 2022. The most significant increase occurred between 2022 and 2023, rising from US$2,103 million to US$3,249 million.
- Total Capital (including operating lease liability)
- Total capital experienced consistent growth throughout the period, increasing from US$5,516 million in 2021 to US$12,396 million in 2025, before decreasing slightly to US$11,626 million in 2026. This growth in capital base outpaced the growth in debt for a portion of the period, contributing to the initial decline in the Debt to Capital ratio.
- Relationship between Debt and Capital
- The larger increase in total capital between 2021 and 2023 resulted in a decrease in the Debt to Capital ratio. However, as debt increased more rapidly than capital in the later years, the ratio began to rise again. The slight decrease in total capital in 2026 also contributed to the increase in the ratio during that year.
In summary, the company initially reduced its reliance on debt relative to its capital base, but subsequently experienced a modest increase in this reliance as debt levels rose and capital growth slowed. The fluctuations suggest a dynamic capital structure management approach.
Debt to Assets
| Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Debt, current | |||||||
| Debt, noncurrent | |||||||
| Total debt | |||||||
| Total assets | |||||||
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Debt to assets1 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Debt to Assets, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Debt to Assets, Sector | |||||||
| Software & Services | |||||||
| Debt to Assets, Industry | |||||||
| Information Technology | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 2026 Calculation
Debt to assets = Total debt ÷ Total assets
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The Debt-to-Assets ratio exhibits a fluctuating pattern over the observed period. Initially, the ratio decreased before stabilizing and showing a slight decline. Total debt increased significantly between 2021 and 2023, but has remained relatively stable in subsequent years. Simultaneously, total assets have consistently increased throughout the period, albeit at a varying rate.
- Debt-to-Assets Ratio - Overall Trend
- The Debt-to-Assets ratio began at 0.21 in 2021, decreased to 0.18 in 2022, then increased to 0.22 in 2023. Following this peak, the ratio decreased to 0.18 in 2024 and continued to decline, reaching 0.17 in both 2025 and 2026. This suggests a generally decreasing reliance on debt financing relative to asset base over the latter part of the period.
- Debt Trend
- Total debt experienced a moderate increase from US$1,795 million in 2021 to US$1,840 million in 2022. A substantial increase was then observed, rising to US$2,976 million in 2023. However, debt levels have remained remarkably consistent from 2023 through 2026, fluctuating minimally between US$2,976 million and US$2,987 million.
- Asset Trend
- Total assets demonstrated consistent growth throughout the period. From US$8,718 million in 2021, assets increased to US$10,499 million in 2022, then to US$13,486 million in 2023. This growth continued, reaching US$16,452 million in 2024, US$17,977 million in 2025, and US$18,074 million in 2026. The rate of asset growth appears to have slowed slightly in the most recent two years.
The stabilization of debt alongside continued asset growth contributes to the observed decline in the Debt-to-Assets ratio in the later years. This indicates a strengthening of the company’s solvency position, as assets are growing at a faster pace than debt.
Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability)
Workday Inc., debt to assets (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Debt, current | |||||||
| Debt, noncurrent | |||||||
| Total debt | |||||||
| Operating lease liabilities, current | |||||||
| Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent | |||||||
| Total debt (including operating lease liability) | |||||||
| Total assets | |||||||
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Debt to assets (including operating lease liability)1 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability), Competitors2 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability), Sector | |||||||
| Software & Services | |||||||
| Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability), Industry | |||||||
| Information Technology | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 2026 Calculation
Debt to assets (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Total assets
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The debt to assets ratio, including operating lease liability, demonstrates a fluctuating pattern over the observed period. Initially, the ratio decreased before stabilizing and then increasing slightly towards the end of the forecast. Total debt increased over the period, but at a slower rate than total assets, contributing to the observed ratio behavior.
- Debt to Assets Ratio - Trend Analysis
- The ratio began at 0.26 in January 2021, indicating that 26% of assets were financed by debt. A decrease was observed in January 2022, falling to 0.20. The ratio experienced a slight increase to 0.24 in January 2023, before returning to 0.20 in January 2024. A further decrease to 0.19 was noted in January 2025, followed by a rise to 0.21 in January 2026.
- Total Debt - Trend Analysis
- Total debt, including operating lease liability, decreased from US$2,238 million in January 2021 to US$2,103 million in January 2022. Subsequently, debt increased to US$3,249 million in January 2023 and continued to rise, reaching US$3,821 million in January 2026. The rate of increase in debt appears to accelerate in the later years of the period.
- Total Assets - Trend Analysis
- Total assets exhibited consistent growth throughout the period. Starting at US$8,718 million in January 2021, assets increased to US$10,499 million in January 2022, US$13,486 million in January 2023, US$16,452 million in January 2024, US$17,977 million in January 2025, and finally US$18,074 million in January 2026. The growth rate of assets appears to slow down towards the end of the period.
The relatively stable debt to assets ratio, despite increasing debt levels, suggests that asset growth has largely offset the increase in liabilities. The slight increase in the ratio in the final year indicates a potential shift towards greater reliance on debt financing, although the ratio remains within a similar range as earlier periods.
Financial Leverage
| Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Total assets | |||||||
| Stockholders’ equity | |||||||
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Financial leverage1 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Financial Leverage, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Financial Leverage, Sector | |||||||
| Software & Services | |||||||
| Financial Leverage, Industry | |||||||
| Information Technology | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 2026 Calculation
Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An examination of the financial information reveals trends in the company’s financial leverage over a five-year period. Total assets consistently increased from 2021 to 2026, while stockholders’ equity also generally increased, though with a decrease in the final year observed. The financial leverage ratio, calculated from these figures, demonstrates a fluctuating pattern.
- Financial Leverage Trend
- The financial leverage ratio decreased from 2.66 in 2021 to 2.31 in 2022, indicating a reduced reliance on debt financing relative to equity. A slight increase to 2.41 was noted in 2023, before a more substantial decrease to 2.04 in 2024. This trend continued with a further reduction to 1.99 in 2025, representing the lowest level of leverage during the analyzed period. However, the ratio increased again in 2026, reaching 2.32.
The observed decrease in financial leverage from 2021 to 2025 suggests the company was becoming less reliant on debt to finance its assets. This could be due to increased profitability leading to greater retained earnings, or through equity financing. The increase in leverage in 2026 warrants further investigation to determine the underlying cause, such as increased debt financing or a decrease in equity.
- Relationship to Equity and Assets
- The growth in total assets outpaced the growth in stockholders’ equity for much of the period, contributing to the initial decrease in the leverage ratio. The decrease in stockholders’ equity in 2026, coupled with a relatively stable asset base, is a primary driver of the increase in the leverage ratio during that year.
Overall, the company demonstrated a generally decreasing trend in financial leverage until 2025, followed by a reversal in the final year. Continued monitoring of these trends, alongside other financial metrics, is recommended to fully assess the company’s financial risk profile.
Interest Coverage
| Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Net income (loss) | |||||||
| Add: Income tax expense | |||||||
| Add: Interest expense | |||||||
| Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) | |||||||
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Interest coverage1 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Interest Coverage, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Interest Coverage, Sector | |||||||
| Software & Services | |||||||
| Interest Coverage, Industry | |||||||
| Information Technology | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 2026 Calculation
Interest coverage = EBIT ÷ Interest expense
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The interest coverage ratio exhibits significant fluctuation over the observed period. Initially negative, the ratio demonstrates improvement before declining again, ultimately trending positively towards the end of the analyzed timeframe.
- Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT)
- EBIT begins at a negative value, indicating a loss before accounting for interest and taxes. A positive value is then recorded, followed by another negative value before a substantial and consistent increase is observed in subsequent years. This increasing trend in EBIT is a primary driver of the improving interest coverage ratio.
- Interest Expense
- Interest expense remains relatively stable throughout the period, with a slight decrease from 2021 to 2022, and then remaining consistent. This stability suggests a consistent debt structure and associated financing costs. The consistent interest expense, combined with the fluctuating EBIT, significantly impacts the interest coverage ratio.
- Interest Coverage Ratio
- The interest coverage ratio starts at -3.00, signifying an inability to cover interest obligations with earnings. It improves to 1.97, indicating a limited ability to meet interest payments, before declining to -1.54. From 2023 onwards, the ratio experiences substantial growth, reaching 4.12, 6.60, and finally 9.85. This upward trend suggests a strengthening ability to comfortably cover interest expenses with earnings, indicating improved solvency. The negative values in earlier years represent periods where earnings were insufficient to cover interest obligations.
The observed pattern suggests a period of financial difficulty followed by a substantial improvement in profitability and, consequently, the ability to service debt. The increasing EBIT, coupled with stable interest expense, has driven the positive trend in the interest coverage ratio.
Fixed Charge Coverage
| Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Net income (loss) | |||||||
| Add: Income tax expense | |||||||
| Add: Interest expense | |||||||
| Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) | |||||||
| Add: Operating lease cost | |||||||
| Earnings before fixed charges and tax | |||||||
| Interest expense | |||||||
| Operating lease cost | |||||||
| Fixed charges | |||||||
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Fixed charge coverage1 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Fixed Charge Coverage, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Fixed Charge Coverage, Sector | |||||||
| Software & Services | |||||||
| Fixed Charge Coverage, Industry | |||||||
| Information Technology | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 2026 Calculation
Fixed charge coverage = Earnings before fixed charges and tax ÷ Fixed charges
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The fixed charge coverage ratio exhibits significant fluctuation over the observed period. Initially negative, the ratio demonstrates improvement before declining again, ultimately trending positively towards the end of the analyzed timeframe. Earnings before fixed charges and tax demonstrate a similar pattern of volatility, directly influencing the coverage ratio.
- Earnings Before Fixed Charges and Tax
- Earnings before fixed charges and tax were negative in both 2021 and 2023. A substantial increase to positive territory is observed in 2022, followed by a decline in 2023, and then a strong upward trend through 2026. The magnitude of these earnings significantly impacts the ability to cover fixed charges.
- Fixed Charges
- Fixed charges decreased from 2021 to 2022, then increased through 2026. While the increase is consistent, it is moderate relative to the fluctuations in earnings before fixed charges and tax. The relatively stable nature of fixed charges highlights the earnings volatility as the primary driver of the fixed charge coverage ratio’s changes.
- Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
- The fixed charge coverage ratio began at -0.69 in 2021, indicating an inability to cover fixed charges with available earnings. The ratio improved to 1.15 in 2022, demonstrating sufficient coverage. A return to negative coverage occurred in 2023 at -0.29. From 2024 onwards, the ratio shows a consistent and substantial improvement, reaching 2.60, 3.69, and finally 4.67 in 2026. This indicates a strengthening ability to meet fixed obligations as the period progresses.
The trend suggests a period of financial instability followed by a strengthening financial position. The increasing fixed charge coverage ratio from 2024 onwards is a positive indicator, suggesting improved solvency and a reduced risk of default on fixed obligations.