EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Workday Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Cash Flow Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Profitability Ratios
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Selected Financial Data since 2013
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2013
- Price to Sales (P/S) since 2013
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Workday Inc. for $24.99.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | Jan 31, 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2025 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The financial data indicates several notable trends in the company's performance over the analyzed periods.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The NOPAT exhibits a substantial improvement from a negative value of -$113 million in early 2020 to positive figures in subsequent years. The most significant leap occurs between 2020 and 2021, where it rises from a loss to $84 million profit. This upward trend continues with fluctuations, peaking at $860 million by early 2025. Despite a dip in 2023, the overall trajectory reflects enhanced operational profitability.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remains relatively stable throughout the period, fluctuating marginally around 17%. This consistency suggests a steady risk profile and capital structure without significant changes affecting the cost of financing.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital shows a continuous upward movement from $5,129 million in early 2020 to $9,420 million by early 2025. This growth implies ongoing investment in assets or business expansion, which may support future revenue generation. The increase is steady, with no abrupt changes, indicating a consistent capital deployment strategy.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit remains negative over the entire period, signaling that the company’s returns do not exceed its cost of capital. While the deficit improves slightly from -$984 million to -$752 million, the persistent negative values point to challenges in value creation despite rising NOPAT and invested capital. The dip in 2023 to -$1,281 million is notably severe, diverging from the general pattern and suggesting a period of intensified value erosion.
In summary, the company demonstrates a positive shift in operational profitability and a consistent investment approach. However, the inability to achieve positive economic profit indicates that returns have not sufficiently surpassed the cost of capital, highlighting areas for potential efficiency improvements or strategic adjustments to enhance shareholder value.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in unearned revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring liability.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss).
6 2025 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2025 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss).
9 2025 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
The financial data reveals notable fluctuations in both net income and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) over the six-year period under review.
- Net Income (Loss)
- The net income figures exhibit significant volatility. In the initial two years, there are substantial losses of US$481 million and US$282 million, respectively. This trend reverses in the third year with a modest net income of US$29 million, followed by another loss of US$367 million in the fourth year. The final two years show a marked improvement, with net income surging to US$1,381 million in the fifth year before moderating to US$526 million in the sixth year. This pattern indicates a recovery trajectory with considerable ups and downs, culminating in positive and substantially higher profitability compared to the initial years.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT shows a consistent upward trend overall despite a minor dip in the fourth year. Starting from a significant negative value of US$113 million in the first year, NOPAT shifts to positive territory at US$84 million in the second year and climbs further to US$506 million in the third year. Although it declines to US$102 million in the fourth year, the metric rebounds strongly to US$673 million and US$860 million in the final two years. This trend corresponds with improving operational efficiency and profitability before tax considerations, underscoring enhanced operating performance over time.
In summary, the data reflects a company experiencing initial financial challenges with losses and negative operating profits that progressively improve, culminating in positive net income and solid operational profitability in the most recent years. The fluctuations observed in net income suggest episodic impacts beyond operational capabilities, while the upward trend in NOPAT demonstrates strengthening core business performance.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31).
- Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
- The provision for income taxes demonstrates considerable volatility over the analyzed periods. It begins with a negative value of -2 million USD in early 2020, indicating a tax benefit or credit. This shifts to a modest positive provision of 7 million USD in 2021, before returning to a larger benefit of -13 million USD in 2022. A significant increase to 107 million USD is observed in 2023, followed by a sharp reversal to a substantial tax benefit of -1025 million USD in 2024. The latest figure in 2025 reflects a positive provision again at 112 million USD. These fluctuations suggest an irregular tax expense pattern, possibly influenced by varying taxable income, deferred tax adjustments, or extraordinary items across the years.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes show a generally increasing trend with notable irregularities. Starting at 13 million USD in 2020, this figure rises to 20 million USD in 2021, then unexpectedly falls to a negative value of -4 million USD in 2022, indicating a refund or credit situation. The amount then spikes sharply to 118 million USD in 2023. However, similar to previous volatility, it drops again to -3 million USD in 2024 before rising to 34 million USD in 2025. This pattern points to inconsistent cash tax payments possibly due to timing differences, utilization of tax credits, or adjustments in prior year tax liabilities.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of unearned revenue.
5 Addition of restructuring liability.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of marketable securities.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases value exhibited an overall upward trend over the observed periods. Starting at 1,570 million USD in early 2020, the figure increased to 2,238 million USD by early 2021, followed by a slight decrease to 2,103 million USD in early 2022. Subsequent years saw a marked increase with values reaching 3,249 million USD in early 2023, then increasing gradually to 3,296 million USD in early 2024 and 3,362 million USD in early 2025. This pattern indicates a growing reliance on debt and lease obligations, particularly notable from 2022 onward.
- Stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity displayed a consistent and substantial growth trend throughout the periods analyzed. Beginning at 2,487 million USD in early 2020, it rose steadily each year: 3,278 million USD (2021), 4,535 million USD (2022), 5,586 million USD (2023), culminating at 8,082 million USD in early 2024 and 9,034 million USD by early 2025. The continuous increase in equity suggests positive retained earnings, additional capital contributions, or asset revaluations, strengthening the company’s net worth.
- Invested capital
- The invested capital increased at a diminishing yet overall positive rate across the reported years. Starting at 5,129 million USD in early 2020, it grew to 6,061 million USD by early 2021, then to 7,706 million USD in early 2022. Growth continued more slowly in subsequent years, reaching 8,178 million USD (2023), 8,631 million USD (2024), and 9,420 million USD (2025). This upward trend reflects increased resources committed to the business, likely in both equity and debt financing.
- Summary of financial position trends
- The increasing stockholders’ equity alongside a rising total debt and leases balance indicates that the company has been expanding its capital structure with a mixture of equity and debt. The growth in invested capital parallels these changes, showing an overall expansion in resource deployment. Notably, debt growth accelerated in later years, emphasizing a possible strategic leveraging to support business growth. The consistent equity increase suggests a solid financial foundation and potential profitability or capital inflows contributing to retained earnings and equity balance. These patterns demonstrate steady financial growth, with a balanced but gradually increasing leverage position.
Cost of Capital
Workday Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | Jan 31, 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2025 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit demonstrates a consistent negative trend over the six-year period, indicating that the company has not generated surplus returns over its cost of capital. Starting from -984 million US dollars in 2020, the loss narrowed slightly to -805 million in 2022 but then worsened again to -1281 million in 2023, before improving somewhat to -752 million in 2025. This pattern suggests volatility in the company's ability to generate economic value, with notable deterioration in 2023 followed by partial recovery.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital has shown a continuous and steady increase each year, rising from 5,129 million US dollars in 2020 to 9,420 million in 2025. This upward trend indicates ongoing investment activity and growth in the asset base. The rate of increase is relatively consistent, reflecting sustained capital expansion or acquisition efforts.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio remains negative throughout the observed period, starting at -19.18% in 2020 and improving slightly to -7.99% in 2025. Despite the gradual improvement, the negative values indicate that the company’s returns on invested capital fall below its cost of capital. The narrowing gap suggests some progress in operational efficiency or profitability but not to the extent of achieving positive economic returns.
- Overall Insights
- The data reflects a company investing heavily in capital with increasing assets, but facing challenges in translating this investment into positive economic profit. The persistent negative economic spread ratio underscores ongoing difficulties in generating returns that exceed cost of capital. The recovery from the economic profit dip in 2023 suggests some operational adjustments may have been implemented, yet the company remains unprofitable on an economic value basis as of the latest period.
Economic Profit Margin
| Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | Jan 31, 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in unearned revenue | |||||||
| Adjusted revenues | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2025 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Revenue Trends
- Adjusted revenues exhibited a consistent upward trajectory over the observed period. Starting at approximately 3,987 million US dollars, the revenues increased every year to reach 8,866 million US dollars by the most recent year, reflecting strong growth in top-line performance.
- Economic Profit Patterns
- The company reported negative economic profit throughout the entire period, indicating that it was not generating economic value in excess of its cost of capital. Although losses fluctuated, there was a general improvement trend, with the economic profit deficit reducing from -984 million US dollars to -752 million US dollars. Despite this progress, the magnitude of the negative economic profit remains substantial.
- Economic Profit Margin Dynamics
- The economic profit margin, which measures the ratio of economic profit relative to revenues, remained in negative territory each year. The margin improved notably from -24.67% at the start to -8.48% at the end of the period, demonstrating a progressive reduction in losses relative to revenue size. This suggests enhanced operational efficiency or better returns on invested capital but still indicates a failure to create economic profit.
- Overall Insights
- While the company achieved strong revenue growth, it consistently experienced economic losses, though these losses diminished over time. The improving economic profit margin highlights positive momentum towards financial sustainability and value creation; however, the firm has yet to reach positive economic profit, signaling ongoing challenges in generating returns above its cost of capital.