EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Salesforce Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Common-Size Income Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Assets
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Current Ratio since 2005
- Analysis of Revenues
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Salesforce Inc. for $24.99.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2026 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The financial performance, as measured by economic profit, demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative value creation over the observed period. While net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibits significant fluctuation, it has not been sufficient to overcome the cost of capital employed. Invested capital has generally increased throughout the period, contributing to the persistent negative economic profit.
- Economic Profit Trend
- Economic profit consistently remains negative from 2021 through 2026. The magnitude of the negative economic profit peaked in 2023 at -14,941 US$ millions, before gradually decreasing to -6,925 US$ millions in 2026. This suggests a slow improvement in value creation, but the company still destroys economic value each year.
- NOPAT Analysis
- Net operating profit after taxes experienced a slight increase from 2021 to 2022, followed by a substantial decline in 2023. A significant recovery is then observed in 2024 and 2025, with further substantial growth in 2026. Despite this recovery, NOPAT levels are not consistently high enough to generate a positive economic profit.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remains relatively stable, fluctuating between 20.15% and 20.84% from 2021 to 2025. A slight decrease to 19.93% is observed in 2026. This stability suggests that changes in economic profit are primarily driven by changes in NOPAT and invested capital, rather than shifts in the cost of funding.
- Invested Capital Trend
- Invested capital demonstrates a consistent upward trend throughout the period, increasing from 53,200 US$ millions in 2021 to 96,559 US$ millions in 2026. This continuous increase in capital employed, coupled with a cost of capital exceeding NOPAT, contributes significantly to the negative economic profit.
In summary, the company consistently fails to generate economic profit over the analyzed timeframe. While NOPAT shows improvement in later years and the cost of capital remains relatively stable, the increasing invested capital base continues to result in value destruction. The decreasing magnitude of the negative economic profit in the final years suggests a potential, albeit slow, trend towards improved financial performance.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in unearned revenue.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
4 2026 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
5 2026 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibited considerable fluctuation over the observed period. While net income experienced volatility, NOPAT demonstrates a distinct pattern of initial stability, a significant decline, and subsequent strong recovery and growth.
- Initial Stability (2021-2022)
- NOPAT remained relatively consistent between 2021 and 2022, registering values of US$4,388 million and US$4,442 million respectively. This suggests a period of stable operational profitability before considering the impact of financing costs and taxes.
- Significant Decline (2023)
- A substantial decrease in NOPAT occurred in 2023, falling to US$1,931 million. This represents a significant contraction in operating profitability after taxes, considerably lower than the preceding two years. This decline is more pronounced than the decrease observed in net income during the same period.
- Recovery and Growth (2024-2026)
- Following the decline, NOPAT experienced a robust recovery, increasing to US$5,317 million in 2024. This upward trend continued, with NOPAT reaching US$7,014 million in 2025 and culminating in a substantial value of US$12,319 million in 2026. This indicates a strong resurgence in core operational profitability.
- Relationship to Net Income
- While NOPAT and net income generally move in the same direction, the magnitude of change differs. The decline in 2023 was more severe for NOPAT than for net income, and the subsequent recovery in NOPAT appears to be accelerating relative to net income growth. This divergence suggests changes in the company’s capital structure or non-operating items are influencing net income to a greater extent than operating performance.
The observed trend in NOPAT suggests a period of operational challenges in 2023 followed by a successful turnaround and a period of strong operational performance through 2026. Further investigation into the factors driving the 2023 decline and the subsequent recovery would be beneficial.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
The provision for (benefit from) income taxes demonstrates significant fluctuation over the observed period. Initially, a substantial benefit was recorded in 2021, followed by a return to a provision in subsequent years, with a consistent upward trend from 2022 through 2025. Cash operating taxes also exhibit an increasing trend, though with more pronounced year-over-year growth.
- Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
- In 2021, a benefit of US$1,511 million was recorded, indicating a reduction in tax liabilities, potentially due to tax loss carryforwards or other tax credits. This was followed by a provision of US$88 million in 2022, suggesting a shift towards taxable income. The provision increased steadily to US$452 million in 2023, US$814 million in 2024, and reached US$1,241 million in 2025. This consistent increase suggests growing profitability and a reduced reliance on tax benefits. The provision is projected to further increase to US$2,063 million in 2026.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes began at US$322 million in 2021 and increased to US$403 million in 2022, representing a moderate growth rate. The increase accelerated in 2023 to US$868 million, and continued to US$1,635 million in 2024. A further substantial increase to US$2,531 million is observed in 2025. However, a decrease to US$1,192 million is projected for 2026. This final decrease could be attributable to various factors, including changes in tax laws, tax planning strategies, or a shift in the geographic distribution of income.
- Relationship between Provision and Cash Taxes
- The difference between the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes indicates the impact of non-cash tax items, such as deferred tax assets and liabilities. In 2021, the significant difference reflects the large tax benefit, while the cash taxes paid were relatively low. As the provision increased from 2022 onwards, the gap between the provision and cash taxes narrowed, suggesting a greater alignment between reported tax expense and actual cash outflows. The projected decrease in cash taxes in 2026, despite a continued increase in the provision, warrants further investigation to understand the underlying drivers.
Overall, the trend suggests a transition from utilizing tax benefits to paying increasingly substantial cash taxes, reflecting improved financial performance. The projected decline in cash operating taxes in 2026 is a notable deviation from the preceding trend and merits further scrutiny.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of unearned revenue.
4 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
6 Subtraction of marketable securities.
The reported invested capital demonstrates a consistent upward trajectory over the observed period. While fluctuations exist in the components contributing to invested capital, the overall trend indicates increasing financial resources deployed within the business. A detailed examination of the underlying elements reveals specific patterns.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- Total reported debt and leases experienced a substantial increase between 2021 and 2022, nearly doubling from US$6,413 million to US$14,370 million. Subsequent years show some moderation, with a decrease in 2024 to US$12,070 million, before rising again to US$17,711 million in 2026. This suggests periods of aggressive debt financing followed by potential deleveraging or reinvestment of debt proceeds.
- Stockholders’ Equity
- Stockholders’ equity exhibited a steady increase from US$41,493 million in 2021 to US$61,173 million in 2025. A slight decrease is observed in 2026, settling at US$59,142 million. This growth indicates increasing retained earnings and/or capital contributions from shareholders, contributing to a stronger equity base.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital, calculated as the sum of total reported debt & leases and stockholders’ equity, increased from US$53,200 million in 2021 to US$96,559 million in 2026. The rate of increase was most pronounced between 2021 and 2022, mirroring the significant rise in debt. While growth continued in subsequent years, the pace moderated. The consistent expansion of invested capital suggests ongoing investment in operations and strategic initiatives.
The interplay between debt and equity in funding invested capital is noteworthy. The initial surge in invested capital appears heavily reliant on debt financing, while later periods demonstrate a more balanced contribution from both debt and equity. The observed fluctuations in debt levels warrant further investigation to understand the underlying drivers and associated financial implications.
Cost of Capital
Salesforce Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Workday Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2026 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio demonstrates a consistently negative trend over the observed period, although the rate of decline appears to be moderating in the later years. Initially, the ratio exhibits a substantial decrease, followed by a potential stabilization towards the end of the forecast. This suggests a diminishing, but persistent, shortfall in returns relative to the cost of capital.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio declined from -12.59% in 2021 to -17.85% in 2023, representing the most significant deterioration during the analyzed timeframe. This indicates an increasing gap between the company’s return on invested capital and its weighted average cost of capital. A subsequent improvement is noted, with the ratio reaching -14.41% in 2024 and further to -12.60% in 2025. The most recent value, -7.17% in 2026, suggests a considerable, though incomplete, recovery.
The negative economic spread ratio consistently observed throughout the period indicates that the company’s invested capital is not generating returns sufficient to cover its cost. The magnitude of the negative spread, while initially worsening, shows signs of lessening in the later years, potentially reflecting improved operational efficiency or a change in capital allocation strategies. However, the continued negative value suggests that value creation, as measured by economic profit, remains a challenge.
- Relationship between Economic Profit and Invested Capital
- Economic profit remains negative across the entire period, mirroring the negative economic spread ratio. While invested capital generally increases year-over-year, the growth in economic profit is not commensurate. The increasing invested capital, coupled with consistently negative economic profit, contributes to the widening negative economic spread ratio observed between 2021 and 2023. The slight reduction in the magnitude of negative economic profit in the later years coincides with the observed stabilization and eventual improvement in the economic spread ratio.
The trend suggests that while the company is increasing its investment, it is not yet achieving the returns necessary to satisfy investor expectations. The improvement in the economic spread ratio in the final two years of the period warrants further investigation to determine the underlying drivers and assess the sustainability of this positive trend.
Economic Profit Margin
| Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 31, 2025 | Jan 31, 2024 | Jan 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in unearned revenue | |||||||
| Adjusted revenues | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Accenture PLC | |||||||
| Adobe Inc. | |||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | |||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |||||||
| Datadog Inc. | |||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | |||||||
| Intuit Inc. | |||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | |||||||
| Oracle Corp. | |||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | |||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | |||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | |||||||
| Workday Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2026 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative values over the observed period, indicating the company consistently generated economic losses. However, the magnitude of these losses appears to be decreasing in recent years.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- The economic profit margin began at -28.87% on January 31, 2021, and deteriorated to -45.14% by January 31, 2023. This represents the lowest point in the observed period. A subsequent improvement is evident, with the margin reaching -15.36% by January 31, 2026. This suggests a narrowing of the gap between the company’s return on capital and its cost of capital.
Adjusted revenues show a consistent upward trend throughout the period. This positive revenue growth contrasts with the persistent negative economic profit margin, suggesting that increased sales volume alone has not been sufficient to generate positive economic returns.
- Relationship between Revenue and Economic Profit Margin
- Despite adjusted revenues increasing from US$23,197 million in 2021 to US$45,099 million in 2026, the economic profit margin remained negative throughout. The improvement in the economic profit margin from 2023 to 2026 coincides with a period of accelerating revenue growth, indicating a potential correlation. However, further investigation is needed to determine if revenue growth is directly driving the improvement in economic performance or if other factors are at play.
The trend in economic profit itself mirrors the economic profit margin, displaying negative values that decrease initially and then begin to improve. The absolute value of economic profit decreased from US$6,696 million in 2021 to US$14,941 million in 2023, before decreasing to US$6,925 million in 2026.
- Economic Profit Evolution
- The reduction in the magnitude of economic loss, as evidenced by both the economic profit margin and the absolute value of economic profit, suggests potential improvements in capital efficiency or a reduction in the cost of capital. However, the company continues to destroy economic value, as indicated by the consistently negative economic profit.