Solvency ratios also known as long-term debt ratios measure a company ability to meet long-term obligations.
Paying user area
Try for free
International Business Machines Corp. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Current Ratio since 2005
- Debt to Equity since 2005
- Price to Sales (P/S) since 2005
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to International Business Machines Corp. for $24.99.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Solvency Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
Overall, the solvency position demonstrates a generally improving trend from 2021 to 2025, though with some fluctuations. Leverage ratios consistently decrease over the period, suggesting a reduced reliance on debt financing. Coverage ratios, while volatile, also indicate an enhanced ability to meet fixed and interest obligations towards the end of the analyzed timeframe.
- Debt Ratios
- The Debt-to-Equity ratio decreased from 2.74 in 2021 to 1.88 in 2025. A similar downward trend is observed in the Debt-to-Equity ratio including operating lease liability, moving from 2.92 to 1.98 over the same period. This indicates a strengthening equity base relative to debt. The Debt-to-Capital ratio also exhibits a slight decline, from 0.73 to 0.65, and the same is true for the Debt-to-Capital ratio including operating lease liability, decreasing from 0.74 to 0.66. The Debt-to-Assets ratio remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 0.39 and 0.44, while the Debt-to-Assets ratio including operating lease liability showed a similar pattern, ranging from 0.42 to 0.43. These figures suggest a consistent proportion of assets financed by debt.
- Leverage Ratio
- Financial leverage decreased from 6.98 in 2021 to 4.65 in 2025. This decline signifies a reduced use of debt to amplify returns, indicating a more conservative capital structure. The decrease is not linear, with a slight increase from 2022 to 2023, but the overall trend is clearly downward.
- Coverage Ratios
- The Interest Coverage ratio experienced significant volatility, dropping to 1.97 in 2022 before recovering to 6.35 in 2025. This suggests a period of reduced earnings relative to interest expense, followed by a substantial improvement. The Fixed Charge Coverage ratio mirrored this pattern, declining to 1.52 in 2022 and then increasing to 4.50 in 2025. The improvement in both coverage ratios towards the end of the period indicates a greater capacity to cover both interest and fixed charges with available earnings.
In conclusion, the observed trends suggest a strengthening solvency position. While short-term fluctuations exist, the overall trajectory points towards reduced leverage and improved coverage capabilities, indicating a decreasing risk profile.
Debt Ratios
Coverage Ratios
Debt to Equity
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Short-term debt | ||||||
| Long-term debt, excluding current maturities | ||||||
| Total debt | ||||||
| Total IBM stockholders’ equity | ||||||
| Solvency Ratio | ||||||
| Debt to equity1 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Debt to Equity, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | ||||||
| Adobe Inc. | ||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | ||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Datadog Inc. | ||||||
| Intuit Inc. | ||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
| Oracle Corp. | ||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
| Workday Inc. | ||||||
| Debt to Equity, Sector | ||||||
| Software & Services | ||||||
| Debt to Equity, Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 2025 Calculation
Debt to equity = Total debt ÷ Total IBM stockholders’ equity
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The debt to equity ratio demonstrates a generally decreasing trend over the five-year period. Initially, the ratio stood at 2.74 in 2021, indicating a substantial reliance on debt financing relative to equity. Subsequent years show a reduction in this reliance, though with some fluctuation.
- Overall Trend
- A consistent downward trend in the debt to equity ratio is observed from 2021 to 2025. The ratio decreased from 2.74 to 1.88 over this period, suggesting an improvement in the company’s financial leverage position.
- Year-over-Year Changes
- From 2021 to 2022, the ratio decreased significantly, from 2.74 to 2.32. This indicates a reduction in debt or an increase in equity, or a combination of both. A slight increase was then noted from 2022 to 2023, moving to 2.51, potentially due to increased debt levels. The ratio then decreased again in 2024 to 2.01, and continued its downward trajectory in 2025, reaching 1.88.
- Debt and Equity Movements
- Total debt increased from US$51,704 million in 2021 to US$61,260 million in 2025. However, total stockholders’ equity experienced a more substantial increase, rising from US$18,901 million in 2021 to US$32,648 million in 2025. This larger growth in equity, relative to debt, is the primary driver of the declining debt to equity ratio.
The decreasing debt to equity ratio suggests the company is becoming less reliant on debt financing and is strengthening its equity base. This could indicate improved financial stability and reduced risk for creditors and investors.
Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability)
International Business Machines Corp., debt to equity (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Short-term debt | ||||||
| Long-term debt, excluding current maturities | ||||||
| Total debt | ||||||
| Current operating lease liabilities | ||||||
| Noncurrent operating lease liabilities | ||||||
| Total debt (including operating lease liability) | ||||||
| Total IBM stockholders’ equity | ||||||
| Solvency Ratio | ||||||
| Debt to equity (including operating lease liability)1 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability), Competitors2 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | ||||||
| Adobe Inc. | ||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | ||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Datadog Inc. | ||||||
| Intuit Inc. | ||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
| Oracle Corp. | ||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
| Workday Inc. | ||||||
| Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability), Sector | ||||||
| Software & Services | ||||||
| Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability), Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 2025 Calculation
Debt to equity (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Total IBM stockholders’ equity
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The debt to equity ratio, incorporating operating lease liabilities, demonstrates a generally decreasing trend over the five-year period. Total debt fluctuated, while stockholders’ equity consistently increased, contributing to the observed changes in the ratio.
- Debt to Equity Ratio Trend
- The ratio began at 2.92 in 2021. A significant decrease was observed in 2022, falling to 2.46. The ratio experienced a slight increase to 2.66 in 2023, before continuing its downward trajectory, reaching 2.14 in 2024 and further decreasing to 1.98 in 2025. This indicates a strengthening equity position relative to debt over time.
- Total Debt
- Total debt, including operating lease liability, decreased from US$55,140 million in 2021 to US$54,013 million in 2022. An increase to US$59,935 million was noted in 2023, followed by a slight decrease to US$58,396 million in 2024. The most recent year, 2025, shows a further increase to US$64,607 million. Despite these fluctuations, the overall increase in equity has outpaced the increase in debt.
- Total Stockholders’ Equity
- Total stockholders’ equity exhibited consistent growth throughout the period. It increased from US$18,901 million in 2021 to US$21,944 million in 2022, US$22,533 million in 2023, US$27,307 million in 2024, and reached US$32,648 million in 2025. This consistent growth in equity is a primary driver of the declining debt to equity ratio.
The decreasing debt to equity ratio suggests an improving solvency position. While debt levels have fluctuated, the consistent growth in stockholders’ equity indicates a strengthening financial structure.
Debt to Capital
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Short-term debt | ||||||
| Long-term debt, excluding current maturities | ||||||
| Total debt | ||||||
| Total IBM stockholders’ equity | ||||||
| Total capital | ||||||
| Solvency Ratio | ||||||
| Debt to capital1 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Debt to Capital, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | ||||||
| Adobe Inc. | ||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | ||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Datadog Inc. | ||||||
| Intuit Inc. | ||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
| Oracle Corp. | ||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
| Workday Inc. | ||||||
| Debt to Capital, Sector | ||||||
| Software & Services | ||||||
| Debt to Capital, Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 2025 Calculation
Debt to capital = Total debt ÷ Total capital
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The debt to capital ratio exhibits a generally decreasing trend over the five-year period. While fluctuations are present, the overall movement suggests a strengthening of the company’s capital structure relative to its debt obligations.
- Debt to Capital Ratio - Overall Trend
- The debt to capital ratio decreased from 0.73 in 2021 to 0.65 in 2025. This indicates a diminishing proportion of debt financing compared to total capital employed. The decline is not strictly linear, with a slight increase observed between 2022 and 2023, but the overarching pattern is downward.
- Debt to Capital Ratio - Year-over-Year Changes
- From 2021 to 2022, the ratio decreased from 0.73 to 0.70, representing a 4.1% reduction. A subsequent increase occurred from 2022 to 2023, with the ratio rising to 0.72. The ratio then decreased to 0.67 in 2024, and further to 0.65 in 2025. These changes suggest potential shifts in financing strategies or capital structure adjustments during these periods.
- Underlying Components
- Total debt increased from US$51,704 million in 2021 to US$61,260 million in 2025. However, total capital experienced a more substantial increase, rising from US$70,605 million in 2021 to US$93,908 million in 2025. The greater growth in total capital, relative to total debt, is the primary driver of the observed decline in the debt to capital ratio.
The consistent growth in total capital alongside the more moderate increase in total debt suggests the company is increasingly funding its operations and growth through equity or retained earnings, rather than relying heavily on debt financing. This could indicate improved financial flexibility and reduced financial risk.
Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability)
International Business Machines Corp., debt to capital (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Short-term debt | ||||||
| Long-term debt, excluding current maturities | ||||||
| Total debt | ||||||
| Current operating lease liabilities | ||||||
| Noncurrent operating lease liabilities | ||||||
| Total debt (including operating lease liability) | ||||||
| Total IBM stockholders’ equity | ||||||
| Total capital (including operating lease liability) | ||||||
| Solvency Ratio | ||||||
| Debt to capital (including operating lease liability)1 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability), Competitors2 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | ||||||
| Adobe Inc. | ||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | ||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Datadog Inc. | ||||||
| Intuit Inc. | ||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
| Oracle Corp. | ||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
| Workday Inc. | ||||||
| Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability), Sector | ||||||
| Software & Services | ||||||
| Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability), Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 2025 Calculation
Debt to capital (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Total capital (including operating lease liability)
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The debt to capital ratio, inclusive of operating lease liabilities, exhibits a generally decreasing trend over the five-year period. While fluctuations are present, the overall movement suggests a strengthening capital structure from a solvency perspective.
- Total Debt (including operating lease liability)
- Total debt increased from US$55.14 billion in 2021 to US$54.01 billion in 2022, representing a slight decrease. It then rose to US$59.94 billion in 2023, followed by a marginal decline to US$58.40 billion in 2024. The most significant increase occurred between 2024 and 2025, reaching US$64.61 billion. This indicates a recent trend of increased reliance on debt financing.
- Total Capital (including operating lease liability)
- Total capital demonstrated consistent growth throughout the period. It increased from US$74.04 billion in 2021 to US$75.96 billion in 2022. Continued growth was observed in subsequent years, reaching US$82.47 billion in 2023, US$85.70 billion in 2024, and culminating in US$97.26 billion in 2025. This growth suggests increasing equity and retained earnings, or other capital contributions.
- Debt to Capital Ratio
- The debt to capital ratio began at 0.74 in 2021, decreased to 0.71 in 2022, and then slightly increased to 0.73 in 2023. A more pronounced decrease was observed in 2024, with the ratio falling to 0.68. This downward trend continued into 2025, reaching 0.66. Despite the increase in total debt in 2025, the larger increase in total capital resulted in a further reduction of the ratio. The decreasing ratio suggests a diminishing proportion of debt relative to the overall capital structure, potentially indicating reduced financial risk.
The observed growth in total capital appears to be outpacing the growth in total debt, leading to the improved debt to capital ratio. However, the recent increase in total debt in 2025 warrants continued monitoring to assess whether this represents a shift in financing strategy or a temporary fluctuation.
Debt to Assets
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Short-term debt | ||||||
| Long-term debt, excluding current maturities | ||||||
| Total debt | ||||||
| Total assets | ||||||
| Solvency Ratio | ||||||
| Debt to assets1 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Debt to Assets, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | ||||||
| Adobe Inc. | ||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | ||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Datadog Inc. | ||||||
| Intuit Inc. | ||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
| Oracle Corp. | ||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
| Workday Inc. | ||||||
| Debt to Assets, Sector | ||||||
| Software & Services | ||||||
| Debt to Assets, Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 2025 Calculation
Debt to assets = Total debt ÷ Total assets
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The debt-to-assets ratio exhibits a generally increasing trend over the observed period, followed by stabilization. Initial values indicate a moderate level of financial leverage, which fluctuates before reaching a consistent state.
- Debt to Assets Ratio - Overall Trend
- The debt-to-assets ratio increased from 0.39 in 2021 to 0.42 in 2022, indicating a rise in the proportion of assets financed by debt. This increase suggests a greater reliance on borrowing. The ratio then decreased slightly to 0.40 in 2023 and remained stable at 0.40 through 2024 and 2025. This stabilization suggests a potential shift towards maintaining a consistent capital structure.
- Debt to Assets Ratio - Specific Observations
- The highest ratio value of 0.42 was recorded in 2022. While this represents an increase in leverage compared to 2021, the subsequent stabilization at 0.40 for the following three years suggests that the company has managed to control its debt levels relative to its asset base. The initial increase in 2022 could be attributed to increased borrowing for investment or operational needs, while the later stability may reflect debt repayment or asset growth offsetting further borrowing.
- Debt and Asset Values
- Total debt increased from US$51,704 million in 2021 to US$61,260 million in 2025, representing a net increase of approximately 18.4%. Total assets also increased over the same period, rising from US$132,001 million to US$151,880 million, a growth of approximately 14.9%. The slower growth in assets compared to debt contributed to the initial increase in the debt-to-assets ratio. However, the substantial asset growth in later years helped to stabilize the ratio.
In conclusion, the debt-to-assets ratio indicates a period of increasing leverage followed by a period of stabilization. The company appears to have successfully managed its debt levels in relation to its asset base in the latter part of the observed period.
Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability)
International Business Machines Corp., debt to assets (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Short-term debt | ||||||
| Long-term debt, excluding current maturities | ||||||
| Total debt | ||||||
| Current operating lease liabilities | ||||||
| Noncurrent operating lease liabilities | ||||||
| Total debt (including operating lease liability) | ||||||
| Total assets | ||||||
| Solvency Ratio | ||||||
| Debt to assets (including operating lease liability)1 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability), Competitors2 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | ||||||
| Adobe Inc. | ||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | ||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Datadog Inc. | ||||||
| Intuit Inc. | ||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
| Oracle Corp. | ||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
| Workday Inc. | ||||||
| Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability), Sector | ||||||
| Software & Services | ||||||
| Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability), Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 2025 Calculation
Debt to assets (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Total assets
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The debt to assets ratio, including operating lease liability, exhibited relative stability over the five-year period from 2021 to 2025. While fluctuations occurred, the ratio remained within a narrow range, indicating a consistent level of financial leverage. Total debt increased over the period, but total assets grew at a similar pace, resulting in the observed stability in the ratio.
- Debt to Assets Ratio Trend
- The ratio began at 0.42 in 2021 and remained at the same level in 2022. A slight increase was observed in 2023, reaching 0.44, before decreasing to 0.43 in 2024 and holding steady at that level through 2025. This suggests a modest increase in leverage followed by stabilization.
- Total Debt
- Total debt, inclusive of operating lease liabilities, demonstrated an overall upward trend. Starting at US$55,140 million in 2021, it decreased slightly to US$54,013 million in 2022. Subsequently, it increased to US$59,935 million in 2023, then decreased to US$58,396 million in 2024, and concluded at US$64,607 million in 2025. The 2025 value represents the highest level of debt observed during the analyzed period.
- Total Assets
- Total assets experienced a general increase throughout the period. Beginning at US$132,001 million in 2021, assets decreased to US$127,243 million in 2022. They then rose to US$135,241 million in 2023, continued to US$137,175 million in 2024, and reached US$151,880 million in 2025. The growth in assets partially offset the increase in debt, contributing to the stability of the debt to assets ratio.
The consistent debt to assets ratio, despite increasing absolute debt levels, suggests the company has been effectively managing its financial structure by aligning debt growth with asset expansion. The slight increase in the ratio in 2023 warrants monitoring, but the subsequent stabilization indicates this was not indicative of a sustained shift in leverage.
Financial Leverage
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Total assets | ||||||
| Total IBM stockholders’ equity | ||||||
| Solvency Ratio | ||||||
| Financial leverage1 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Financial Leverage, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | ||||||
| Adobe Inc. | ||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | ||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Datadog Inc. | ||||||
| Intuit Inc. | ||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
| Oracle Corp. | ||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
| Workday Inc. | ||||||
| Financial Leverage, Sector | ||||||
| Software & Services | ||||||
| Financial Leverage, Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 2025 Calculation
Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Total IBM stockholders’ equity
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An examination of the provided financial information reveals trends in the company’s financial leverage over a five-year period. Total assets experienced a slight decrease between 2021 and 2022, followed by increases in subsequent years, culminating in a notable rise between 2024 and 2025. Simultaneously, total stockholders’ equity demonstrated consistent growth throughout the period, accelerating from 2022 onwards.
- Financial Leverage
- The financial leverage ratio exhibited a significant decrease from 6.98 in 2021 to 5.80 in 2022. This indicates a reduced reliance on debt financing relative to equity. The ratio stabilized around 6.00 in 2023 before continuing its downward trajectory, reaching 5.02 in 2024 and further decreasing to 4.65 in 2025. This consistent decline suggests a strengthening financial position, with the company becoming less dependent on debt to finance its assets.
- The decrease in financial leverage coincides with the growth in total stockholders’ equity. This suggests that the company is increasingly funding its operations and asset acquisitions through equity rather than debt. The reduction in leverage could also indicate a deliberate strategy to lower financial risk and improve the company’s creditworthiness.
- While total assets increased overall during the period, the rate of increase in equity outpaced that of assets, contributing to the observed decline in the financial leverage ratio. This dynamic suggests improved efficiency in utilizing equity to generate asset growth.
In summary, the company demonstrated a consistent reduction in financial leverage between 2021 and 2025, accompanied by growth in both total assets and stockholders’ equity. This trend points towards a strengthening financial structure and a decreasing reliance on debt financing.
Interest Coverage
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net income attributable to IBM | ||||||
| Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | ||||||
| Less: Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | ||||||
| Add: Income tax expense | ||||||
| Add: Interest expense | ||||||
| Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) | ||||||
| Solvency Ratio | ||||||
| Interest coverage1 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Interest Coverage, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | ||||||
| Adobe Inc. | ||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | ||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Datadog Inc. | ||||||
| Intuit Inc. | ||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
| Oracle Corp. | ||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
| Workday Inc. | ||||||
| Interest Coverage, Sector | ||||||
| Software & Services | ||||||
| Interest Coverage, Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 2025 Calculation
Interest coverage = EBIT ÷ Interest expense
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The period under review demonstrates fluctuating performance in the ability to meet interest obligations. Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) and interest expense both exhibit variability, resulting in a corresponding fluctuation in the interest coverage ratio.
- Overall Trend
- The interest coverage ratio initially decreased, then increased significantly, followed by a decline and subsequent recovery. This suggests a dynamic relationship between profitability and financing costs.
- Initial Decline (2021-2022)
- From 2021 to 2022, the interest coverage ratio decreased substantially from 5.20 to 1.97. This decline was driven by a significant reduction in EBIT, while interest expense remained relatively stable. The decrease indicates a weakening ability to cover interest payments with operating income during this period.
- Significant Improvement (2022-2023)
- A marked improvement occurred between 2022 and 2023, with the interest coverage ratio rising to 6.42. This improvement was primarily attributable to a substantial increase in EBIT, exceeding the increase in interest expense. This suggests a strengthened capacity to comfortably meet interest obligations.
- Subsequent Moderation (2023-2024)
- The ratio experienced a decline from 6.42 in 2023 to 4.40 in 2024. While EBIT decreased, the increase in interest expense contributed to this reduction. This indicates a lessening, though still adequate, ability to cover interest payments.
- Recent Recovery (2024-2025)
- The most recent period, from 2024 to 2025, shows a recovery in the interest coverage ratio to 6.35. This was driven by a further increase in EBIT, outpacing the rise in interest expense. This suggests a renewed strengthening in the ability to meet interest obligations.
In summary, the interest coverage ratio demonstrates a pattern of initial weakness, substantial improvement, moderate decline, and recent recovery. The ratio’s movement is closely tied to fluctuations in EBIT and, to a lesser extent, changes in interest expense.
Fixed Charge Coverage
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net income attributable to IBM | ||||||
| Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | ||||||
| Less: Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | ||||||
| Add: Income tax expense | ||||||
| Add: Interest expense | ||||||
| Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) | ||||||
| Add: Operating lease cost | ||||||
| Earnings before fixed charges and tax | ||||||
| Interest expense | ||||||
| Operating lease cost | ||||||
| Fixed charges | ||||||
| Solvency Ratio | ||||||
| Fixed charge coverage1 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Fixed Charge Coverage, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | ||||||
| Adobe Inc. | ||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | ||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Datadog Inc. | ||||||
| Intuit Inc. | ||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
| Oracle Corp. | ||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
| Workday Inc. | ||||||
| Fixed Charge Coverage, Sector | ||||||
| Software & Services | ||||||
| Fixed Charge Coverage, Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 2025 Calculation
Fixed charge coverage = Earnings before fixed charges and tax ÷ Fixed charges
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The company’s fixed charge coverage exhibited considerable fluctuation between 2021 and 2025. Earnings before fixed charges and tax, and fixed charges themselves, both experienced changes over the period, influencing the overall coverage ratio.
- Earnings Before Fixed Charges and Tax
- Earnings before fixed charges and tax decreased significantly from US$7,137 million in 2021 to US$3,442 million in 2022. A substantial recovery was then observed in 2023, reaching US$11,326 million. This level was followed by a decrease to US$8,544 million in 2024, before increasing again to US$13,316 million in 2025, representing the highest value within the observed period.
- Fixed Charges
- Fixed charges remained relatively stable between 2021 and 2023, fluctuating between US$2,266 million and US$2,620 million. An upward trend became apparent in 2024 and 2025, with fixed charges increasing to US$2,730 million and US$2,962 million respectively.
- Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
- The fixed charge coverage ratio declined sharply from 3.13 in 2021 to 1.52 in 2022, coinciding with the decrease in earnings before fixed charges and tax. The ratio rebounded strongly in 2023 to 4.32, reflecting the significant increase in earnings. It then decreased to 3.13 in 2024, before rising again to 4.50 in 2025, the highest ratio observed during the period. The ratio’s volatility suggests a sensitivity to changes in earnings before fixed charges and tax.
Overall, while the fixed charge coverage ratio experienced fluctuations, it generally remained above 1.0, indicating the company generated sufficient earnings to cover its fixed charges throughout the analyzed period. The most pronounced change occurred between 2021 and 2022, followed by a strong recovery in 2023 and continued growth through 2025.