Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Autodesk Inc. (NASDAQ:ADSK)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since December 3, 2024.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check

Economic Profit

Autodesk Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 31, 2024 Jan 31, 2023 Jan 31, 2022 Jan 31, 2021 Jan 31, 2020 Jan 31, 2019
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-01-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2024 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The analysis of the financial performance from 2019 to 2024 reveals a consistent inability to generate positive economic profit. Throughout the six-year period, the organization failed to create value above its cost of capital, with economic profit remaining in negative territory across all reported years.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT exhibited significant volatility. After a minimal start of 41 million US$ in 2019, there was a sharp increase to 1,197 million US$ in 2020. Following a period of fluctuation, NOPAT reached a peak of 1,402 million US$ in 2023 before experiencing a substantial decline to 493 million US$ in 2024.
Invested Capital and Cost of Capital
Invested capital followed a steady growth trajectory, rising from 4,412 million US$ in 2019 to a peak of 7,372 million US$ in 2023, with a marginal decrease to 7,325 million US$ in 2024. Concurrently, the cost of capital remained highly stable, oscillating within a narrow range between 21.74% and 22.50%.
Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained negative throughout the analysis period, indicating that the returns on invested capital were insufficient to cover the cost of financing. The most favorable result occurred in 2020, where the deficit was nearly eliminated at -7 million US$. However, the most severe value destruction was observed in 2024, with economic profit falling to -1,138 million US$, driven by the combined effect of high invested capital and a sharp reduction in NOPAT.

Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Autodesk Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 31, 2024 Jan 31, 2023 Jan 31, 2022 Jan 31, 2021 Jan 31, 2020 Jan 31, 2019
Net income (loss)
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in restructuring and other exit costs reserve4
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents5
Interest and investment income (expense), net
Interest expense, operating lease liability6
Adjusted interest and investment income (expense), net
Tax benefit of interest and investment income (expense), net7
Adjusted interest and investment income (expense), net, after taxes8
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-01-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring and other exit costs reserve.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss).

6 2024 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

7 2024 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest and investment income (expense), net = Adjusted interest and investment income (expense), net × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss).


Net Income (Loss)

The net income demonstrates significant fluctuations over the observed periods. Starting from a loss of US$81 million in January 2019, the company experienced a substantial turnaround, achieving a positive net income of US$215 million in January 2020. This upward trend accelerated noticeably in January 2021, reaching a peak of US$1,208 million. Subsequently, net income declined to US$497 million in January 2022 but rebounded to US$823 million in January 2023 and further increased to US$906 million by January 2024. The data suggests a period of recovery and growth following an initial loss, followed by some volatility, with the most recent figures indicating a strengthening profit position.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)

NOPAT shows a rising trend from January 2019 through January 2023, starting at US$41 million and climbing consistently to a peak of US$1,402 million in January 2023. After a low base in 2019, there was a rapid increase to US$1,197 million in 2020, followed by a decrease to US$833 million in January 2021. NOPAT then resumed growth with US$970 million in January 2022 and peaked notably in January 2023. However, in January 2024, NOPAT declined sharply to US$493 million. This pattern indicates periods of strong operational profitability, especially between 2020 and 2023, though the most recent year shows a significant reduction.


Cash Operating Taxes

Autodesk Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 31, 2024 Jan 31, 2023 Jan 31, 2022 Jan 31, 2021 Jan 31, 2020 Jan 31, 2019
Income tax provision (benefit)
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest and investment income (expense), net
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-01-31).


The financial data indicates notable fluctuations in both the income tax provision (benefit) and cash operating taxes over the analyzed periods.

Income Tax Provision (Benefit)

The income tax provision demonstrates considerable volatility throughout the periods. Initially, it increased from 38 million USD in 2019 to 80 million USD in 2020, indicating a rising tax expense. However, in 2021, there is a significant benefit recorded, reflected by a negative provision of -662 million USD, which represents a tax benefit rather than an expense. This sharp reversal may suggest extraordinary tax adjustments or recognition of deferred tax assets during that period. Subsequent years show a return to positive provisions, rising from 68 million USD in 2022 to 123 million USD in 2023, and reaching 230 million USD in 2024, indicating increased tax expenses once again. Overall, the income tax provision reflects uneven tax charges with an exceptional benefit in 2021 followed by increasing tax liabilities.

Cash Operating Taxes

Cash operating taxes display a generally upward trend across the years, with some variation in magnitude. Starting at 64 million USD in 2019, cash taxes increased slightly to 82 million USD in 2020. A more substantial rise is seen in 2021 with 130 million USD, despite the negative income tax provision in the same year, suggesting a divergence between cash taxes paid and accounting tax charges. Cash taxes decreased to 100 million USD in 2022 but then surged significantly to 415 million USD in 2023 before declining to 310 million USD in 2024. This pattern indicates increasing cash tax outflows, peaking in 2023, which might reflect higher taxable income or changes in tax payment schedules.

In summary, the data reveal inconsistencies between accounting tax provisions and cash tax payments, particularly highlighted by the negative income tax provision in 2021 juxtaposed with rising cash operating taxes. The overall trend suggests increasing tax-related cash outflows in recent years, and significant fluctuations in tax accounting entries, which could be attributable to changes in tax regulations, one-time adjustments, or differences in timing between tax accruals and payments.


Invested Capital

Autodesk Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Jan 31, 2024 Jan 31, 2023 Jan 31, 2022 Jan 31, 2021 Jan 31, 2020 Jan 31, 2019
Current portion of long-term notes payable, net
Long-term notes payable, net, excluding current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for doubtful accounts3
Deferred revenue4
Restructuring and other exit costs reserve5
Equity equivalents6
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax7
Adjusted stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Marketable securities8
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-01-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of restructuring and other exit costs reserve.

6 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity (deficit).

7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

8 Subtraction of marketable securities.


The financial data presents a mixed set of trends over the six-year period ending in January 2024. The following analysis focuses on the reported debt and leases, stockholders’ equity, and invested capital, highlighting significant movements and potential implications.

Total Reported Debt & Leases
The debt and lease obligations experienced fluctuations over the period. Starting at 2,445 million USD in early 2019, the total increased slightly to 2,545 million USD by 2020, followed by a noticeable reduction to 2,105 million USD in 2021. However, debt levels surged again in 2022, reaching 3,060 million USD, which is the highest in the provided timeframe. Subsequently, it declined to 2,666 million USD in 2023 and further to 2,626 million USD in early 2024. The pattern suggests an overall cyclical adjustment in financing strategy, with a peak possibly reflecting increased borrowing or lease arrangements in 2022, and partial deleveraging thereafter.
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
The stockholders’ equity profile shows a significant transformation from a deficit position to a positive equity base. At the start of 2019, equity was negative at -211 million USD, indicating liabilities exceeded assets. This deficit narrowed to -139 million USD in 2020 before turning positive at 966 million USD in 2021. Although there was a slight decrease to 849 million USD in 2022, the trend reversed with equity rising substantially to 1,145 million USD in 2023 and 1,855 million USD in 2024. This improvement demonstrates strengthening financial health, reflecting either retained earnings growth, capital injections, or asset revaluation effectively reducing the deficit and building shareholder value.
Invested Capital
Invested capital steadily increased over the analyzed periods. Commencing at 4,412 million USD in 2019, it rose to 5,535 million USD in 2020, and 5,723 million USD in 2021. Growth accelerated in the following years, reaching 6,835 million USD in 2022, peaking at 7,372 million USD in 2023, and slightly declining to 7,325 million USD in 2024. The general upward movement of invested capital suggests ongoing investments in operations, fixed assets, or other long-term assets, supporting expansion or optimization strategies. The marginal drop in 2024 may reflect asset disposals or adjustments but does not significantly reverse the growth trend.

In summary, the company's financial structure demonstrates evolving leverage with a notable peak in debt in 2022, followed by partial reduction. Simultaneously, a transition from equity deficit to a positive and growing equity base indicates improving solvency and capital adequacy. Continuous increases in invested capital highlight sustained investment activity, supporting business growth and operational capacity enhancement.


Cost of Capital

Autodesk Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term notes payable, including current portion3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term notes payable, including current portion. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term notes payable, including current portion3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term notes payable, including current portion. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term notes payable, including current portion3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term notes payable, including current portion. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term notes payable, including current portion3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term notes payable, including current portion. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term notes payable, including current portion3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term notes payable, including current portion. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term notes payable, including current portion3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-01-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term notes payable, including current portion. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Autodesk Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jan 31, 2024 Jan 31, 2023 Jan 31, 2022 Jan 31, 2021 Jan 31, 2020 Jan 31, 2019
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Accenture PLC
Adobe Inc.
AppLovin Corp.
Cadence Design Systems Inc.
Datadog Inc.
International Business Machines Corp.
Intuit Inc.
Microsoft Corp.
Oracle Corp.
Palantir Technologies Inc.
Palo Alto Networks Inc.
Salesforce Inc.
ServiceNow Inc.
Synopsys Inc.
Workday Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-01-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2024 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data indicates a sustained period of value destruction, as the company consistently reported negative economic profit from 2019 through 2024. While there were intermittent periods of relative improvement, the company failed to achieve a positive economic spread, meaning the returns generated on invested capital remained below the required cost of capital throughout the analyzed timeframe.

Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained negative across the entire period, exhibiting significant volatility. A notable recovery occurred in January 2020, where losses narrowed to 7 million USD, nearly reaching a break-even point. However, this improvement was not sustained, with deficits widening in subsequent years and reaching a period low of negative 1,138 million USD in January 2024.
Invested Capital Growth
A consistent upward trajectory in invested capital is observed, rising from 4,412 million USD in 2019 to a peak of 7,372 million USD in 2023, before slightly moderating to 7,325 million USD in 2024. This growth represents a substantial expansion of the capital base utilized to fund operations over the six-year period.
Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
The economic spread ratio remained negative for all reporting dates, confirming that the cost of capital consistently exceeded the return on investment. The ratio reached its highest point at -0.13% in 2020, suggesting a temporary convergence of returns and capital costs. However, the ratio deteriorated sharply to -15.53% by January 2024, reflecting a widening gap between operational returns and the cost of the expanded capital base.

Economic Profit Margin

Autodesk Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jan 31, 2024 Jan 31, 2023 Jan 31, 2022 Jan 31, 2021 Jan 31, 2020 Jan 31, 2019
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
 
Net revenue
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted net revenue
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Accenture PLC
Adobe Inc.
AppLovin Corp.
Cadence Design Systems Inc.
Datadog Inc.
International Business Machines Corp.
Intuit Inc.
Microsoft Corp.
Oracle Corp.
Palantir Technologies Inc.
Palo Alto Networks Inc.
Salesforce Inc.
ServiceNow Inc.
Synopsys Inc.
Workday Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-01-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2024 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net revenue
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance over the six-year period is characterized by a persistent inability to generate positive economic profit, indicating that the returns on invested capital consistently failed to exceed the company's cost of capital. Despite fluctuations in revenue, the company remained in a state of economic value destruction throughout the entire duration analyzed.

Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit exhibited significant volatility, starting at negative 938 million USD in 2019. A near-breakeven point was achieved in 2020 with a loss of only 7 million USD, marking the strongest performance in the series. However, this recovery was short-lived, as losses expanded again in 2021 and 2022. While a partial recovery occurred in 2023, the period concluded with a sharp decline in 2024, reaching a peak deficit of 1,138 million USD.
Adjusted Net Revenue Trajectory
Revenue showed a general upward trend for the majority of the period, growing from 2,706 million USD in 2019 to a peak of 5,795 million USD in 2023. This represents substantial scaling of the top line. However, this growth trend reversed in 2024, with revenue contracting to 5,181 million USD.
Economic Profit Margin Analysis
The economic profit margin mirrored the volatility of the absolute profit figures. The margin improved drastically from negative 34.65% in 2019 to negative 0.17% in 2020. Between 2021 and 2022, the margin stabilized around negative 11%, before improving to negative 3.99% in 2023. The final year of the analysis shows a severe deterioration, with the margin dropping to negative 21.96%, suggesting that the decline in revenue in 2024 was accompanied by a disproportionate increase in the cost of capital or a significant drop in operating efficiency.

A critical observation is the disconnect between revenue growth and economic value creation. Even during the period of maximum revenue expansion in 2023, the economic profit margin remained negative. The simultaneous decline in both adjusted net revenue and economic profit in 2024 highlights a period of significant financial contraction and increased value erosion.