Stock Analysis on Net

Marriott International Inc. (NASDAQ:MAR)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 11, 2020.

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
Quarterly Data

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Marriott International Inc., decomposition of ROE (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Mar 31, 2020 = ×
Dec 31, 2019 = ×
Sep 30, 2019 = ×
Jun 30, 2019 = ×
Mar 31, 2019 = ×
Dec 31, 2018 = ×
Sep 30, 2018 = ×
Jun 30, 2018 = ×
Mar 31, 2018 = ×
Dec 31, 2017 = ×
Sep 30, 2017 = ×
Jun 30, 2017 = ×
Mar 31, 2017 = ×
Dec 31, 2016 = ×
Sep 30, 2016 = ×
Jun 30, 2016 = ×
Mar 31, 2016 = ×

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31).


The analysis of the quarterly financial data reveals several notable trends in key profitability and leverage metrics over the observed periods.

Return on Assets (ROA)
The ROA exhibited significant fluctuations during the period. Starting from a relatively high 14.23% in the first quarter of 2016, it decreased sharply to under 3% by the third quarter of 2016. Thereafter, a recovery trend was observed, with ROA gradually rising to a peak just above 8% by the fourth quarter of 2018. Following that peak, ROA showed some volatility but generally declined from 2019 onward, reaching approximately 3.64% in the first quarter of 2020. This indicates that the efficiency in generating profit from assets was unstable, with a general weakening trend starting in late 2018 and continuing into early 2020.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage displayed a consistent and pronounced upward trend throughout the periods. Beginning close to 4.28 in the third quarter of 2016, leverage increased steadily to 6.42 by the fourth quarter of 2017. This rise accelerated significantly in subsequent years, soaring to over 35 by the first quarter of 2020. This substantial increase suggests that the company progressively amplified its use of debt financing relative to equity, potentially elevating financial risk levels.
Return on Equity (ROE)
ROE experienced dramatic growth over the same timeframe, starting from around 12.63% in the third quarter of 2016 and escalating sharply to reach approximately 181.08% by the first quarter of 2020. The increase was especially steep from 2018 onwards. While such growth may appear impressive, it is important to note that the concurrently increasing financial leverage could be disproportionately inflating ROE figures, thus indicating that the return to equity holders is being driven substantially by higher leverage rather than solely improved operational performance.

Overall, the data indicate a strategic increase in leverage over the years, which correlates with escalating ROE but not a consistent improvement in ROA. The decline in ROA from late 2018 onwards, coupled with rising leverage, suggests potential risks related to asset profitability sustainability and increased financial risk exposure as of early 2020.


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Marriott International Inc., decomposition of ROE (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Mar 31, 2020 = × ×
Dec 31, 2019 = × ×
Sep 30, 2019 = × ×
Jun 30, 2019 = × ×
Mar 31, 2019 = × ×
Dec 31, 2018 = × ×
Sep 30, 2018 = × ×
Jun 30, 2018 = × ×
Mar 31, 2018 = × ×
Dec 31, 2017 = × ×
Sep 30, 2017 = × ×
Jun 30, 2017 = × ×
Mar 31, 2017 = × ×
Dec 31, 2016 = × ×
Sep 30, 2016 = × ×
Jun 30, 2016 = × ×
Mar 31, 2016 = × ×

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31).


The analysis of the quarterly financial data reveals several notable trends in the company's profitability, efficiency, leverage, and return on equity over the observed periods.

Net Profit Margin
The net profit margin exhibited moderate fluctuations with an overall upward trend from early 2016 until late 2018, increasing from approximately 5.9% to above 9%. Following this peak in late 2018 and early 2019, there was a decline through 2019 and into the first quarter of 2020, dropping to 4.5%. This trend indicates an improvement in profitability margin over the initial periods, but potential challenges or cost pressures impacted profitability near the end of the timeline.
Asset Turnover
Asset turnover showed significant variability initially, with a marked drop from above 2.4 in early 2016 to below 1 from the third quarter of 2016 onwards. Subsequently, the ratio stabilized within a narrow range between 0.81 and 0.96 for the remainder of the periods, indicating relatively consistent efficiency in using assets to generate sales, albeit at a significantly lower level compared to the start of the timeline.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage ratios presented a strong upward trend from the third quarter of 2016 through the first quarter of 2020. Starting at approximately 4.28, the leverage ratio increased markedly, reaching levels above 35 by early 2020. This substantial increase suggests a growing reliance on debt or other liabilities to finance the company's assets, which could amplify both returns and risks.
Return on Equity (ROE)
ROE demonstrated a dramatic increase over the periods with data available, starting at around 12.6% in the third quarter of 2016 and rising to over 180% by the first quarter of 2020. This trend is indicative of enhanced shareholder returns, possibly fueled by increased financial leverage. The surge in ROE in later periods merits careful consideration regarding sustainability and the underlying drivers.

In summary, the company showed increasing profitability margins and extraordinary growth in equity returns over the periods analyzed, supported by sustained financial leverage escalation. However, the decrease in net profit margin toward the beginning of 2020 and the plateau in asset turnover efficiency point to potential operational or market challenges. The high leverage level underscores elevated risk exposure that should be monitored.


Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Marriott International Inc., decomposition of ROE (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Mar 31, 2020 = × × × ×
Dec 31, 2019 = × × × ×
Sep 30, 2019 = × × × ×
Jun 30, 2019 = × × × ×
Mar 31, 2019 = × × × ×
Dec 31, 2018 = × × × ×
Sep 30, 2018 = × × × ×
Jun 30, 2018 = × × × ×
Mar 31, 2018 = × × × ×
Dec 31, 2017 = × × × ×
Sep 30, 2017 = × × × ×
Jun 30, 2017 = × × × ×
Mar 31, 2017 = × × × ×
Dec 31, 2016 = × × × ×
Sep 30, 2016 = × × × ×
Jun 30, 2016 = × × × ×
Mar 31, 2016 = × × × ×

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31).


The analysis of the quarterly financial data reveals several notable trends and changes over the observed periods.

Tax Burden
The tax burden ratio remained relatively stable around 0.68 to 0.70 during 2016 and early 2017, before declining significantly to around 0.48–0.56 in late 2017 and throughout 2018. It then increased sharply in early 2019, reaching above 0.80, and remained elevated through the first quarter of 2020. This pattern indicates fluctuating effective tax rates, with a notable reduction during 2017–2018 followed by a marked increase thereafter.
Interest Burden
The interest burden ratio showed a gradual decline from approximately 0.88 in early 2016 to 0.75 in the first quarter of 2020. There was an initial stability near 0.90 during late 2017 and 2018, but a downward trend is evident afterward. This suggests increasing interest expenses relative to earnings before interest and taxes over time.
EBIT Margin
EBIT margin displayed an upward trajectory from under 10% in 2016 to a peak of over 16% in mid-2018. However, the margin sharply declined starting late 2018, dropping below 10% by late 2019 and further to 7.64% by the first quarter of 2020. This demonstrates a period of improving operational profitability followed by a significant contraction near the end of the timeline.
Asset Turnover
Asset turnover showed high values above 2.0 only at the beginning of 2016 but experienced a sharp decrease to below 1.0 from September 2016 onward. From that point, it remained generally stable between 0.79 and 0.96 until the end of 2019, with a slight decline to 0.81 in early 2020. This points to major changes in asset efficiency during 2016 with subsequent stabilization at a lower turnover level.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage reflected a significant upward trend from 4.28 in the third quarter of 2016 to a very high level of 35.63 by the end of 2019. This drastic increase indicates a growing reliance on debt or equity financing to support assets, implying heightened financial risk and greater capitalization.
Return on Equity (ROE)
ROE exhibited a strong and consistent increase from 12.63% in the third quarter of 2016 to an exceptionally high 181.08% by the first quarter of 2020. This dramatic growth is likely influenced by the rising financial leverage and fluctuating operational margins, reflecting amplification of returns on shareholders’ equity but also suggesting increased volatility and risk exposure.

Overall, the company experienced periods of improving profitability and operational efficiency in the earlier years, followed by increased financial leverage and heightened risk, accompanied by significant volatility in returns and profitability in the most recent periods. The data from early 2020 shows declining margins, slightly reduced asset turnover, lower interest burden, but continued very high leverage and outstanding ROE, indicating a complex financial profile requiring careful monitoring going forward.


Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Marriott International Inc., decomposition of ROA (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Mar 31, 2020 = ×
Dec 31, 2019 = ×
Sep 30, 2019 = ×
Jun 30, 2019 = ×
Mar 31, 2019 = ×
Dec 31, 2018 = ×
Sep 30, 2018 = ×
Jun 30, 2018 = ×
Mar 31, 2018 = ×
Dec 31, 2017 = ×
Sep 30, 2017 = ×
Jun 30, 2017 = ×
Mar 31, 2017 = ×
Dec 31, 2016 = ×
Sep 30, 2016 = ×
Jun 30, 2016 = ×
Mar 31, 2016 = ×

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31).


The analysis of key financial ratios over the examined periods reveals several notable trends in profitability and asset efficiency.

Net Profit Margin
The net profit margin shows fluctuations throughout the periods. It starts at approximately 5.9% in early 2016 and experiences a dip during the third and fourth quarters of 2016, dropping to below 5%. From 2017 onwards, there is a general upward trend, peaking at over 9% by the end of 2018. However, after this peak, the margin decreases significantly throughout 2019 and into the first quarter of 2020, finishing around 4.5%. This suggests a period of improved profitability culminating in late 2018, followed by a downturn approaching 2020.
Asset Turnover
The asset turnover ratio displays a sharp decline in late 2016, falling from above 2 in early 2016 to approximately 0.6-0.7 in the last quarter of 2016. Following this decline, asset turnover stabilizes between 0.8 and 0.96 for the remainder of the period, with a slight downward drift into early 2020. This indicates a significant reduction in asset utilization efficiency during late 2016, followed by a relatively stable but lower level throughout the subsequent years.
Return on Assets (ROA)
Return on assets mirrors the patterns seen in net profit margin and asset turnover. It is initially high at around 14% in early 2016 but drops sharply in the middle of 2016. From 2017 onwards, ROA gradually recovers to about 8% by the end of 2018. After 2018, a gradual decrease is noted again, falling below 4% by the beginning of 2020, reflecting reduced profitability and asset efficiency impacts combined.

Overall, the data indicates that the company experienced a period of strong profitability and efficiency through 2017 and 2018, likely driven by improved profit margins and stable asset utilization. However, both profitability and efficiency measures decline moving into 2019 and early 2020, suggesting challenges that affected financial performance prior to the first quarter of 2020.


Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Marriott International Inc., decomposition of ROA (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover
Mar 31, 2020 = × × ×
Dec 31, 2019 = × × ×
Sep 30, 2019 = × × ×
Jun 30, 2019 = × × ×
Mar 31, 2019 = × × ×
Dec 31, 2018 = × × ×
Sep 30, 2018 = × × ×
Jun 30, 2018 = × × ×
Mar 31, 2018 = × × ×
Dec 31, 2017 = × × ×
Sep 30, 2017 = × × ×
Jun 30, 2017 = × × ×
Mar 31, 2017 = × × ×
Dec 31, 2016 = × × ×
Sep 30, 2016 = × × ×
Jun 30, 2016 = × × ×
Mar 31, 2016 = × × ×

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31).


Tax Burden
The tax burden ratio displayed a fluctuating trend, starting around 0.68 in early 2016. It experienced gradual increases with some volatility, peaking near 0.85 in the third quarter of 2019 before slightly declining to approximately 0.78 by the first quarter of 2020. Notably, there was a sharp drop to 0.48 near the end of 2017, followed by recovery and subsequent increases, indicating periods of tax rate variation or changes in tax-related adjustments.
Interest Burden
The interest burden ratio showed a generally stable to slightly declining pattern. Starting at about 0.88 in early 2016, it remained near that level for much of the period until a gradual decrease began in late 2018, reaching approximately 0.75 by the first quarter of 2020. This implies a decrease in operating profit after interest expenses, suggesting potentially higher interest costs or lower earnings before interest and taxes in later periods.
EBIT Margin
The EBIT margin experienced significant variability across the observed quarters. Initially around 9.85% in the first quarter of 2016, it increased markedly to a peak of about 16.38% in the third quarter of 2018. However, after this peak, the margin declined sharply to roughly 7.64% by the first quarter of 2020. The sharp rise followed by a downturn may reflect changes in operating efficiency, revenue composition, or pricing strategies during these periods.
Asset Turnover
Asset turnover exhibited a pronounced decline in 2016, dropping from 2.41 early in the year to nearly 0.61 by the third quarter, indicating a significant reduction in the efficiency of asset utilization. Subsequently, it showed a moderate recovery and relative stabilization around 0.8 to 0.9 from 2017 onward, albeit with a slight downward trend towards early 2020. This suggests that the company improved its ability to generate sales from its assets after the initial drop but faced challenges maintaining those efficiency levels later.
Return on Assets (ROA)
Return on assets mirrored the pattern seen in asset turnover and EBIT margin, showing a steep decline in 2016 from over 14% to below 3%, indicative of a sharp reduction in asset profitability. From 2017 onwards, ROA improved progressively, reaching above 8% by late 2018 but declined again to around 3.6% by early 2020. The fluctuations in ROA highlight variable effectiveness in generating net income from the asset base across the periods examined.

Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin

Marriott International Inc., decomposition of net profit margin ratio (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
Net Profit Margin = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin
Mar 31, 2020 = × ×
Dec 31, 2019 = × ×
Sep 30, 2019 = × ×
Jun 30, 2019 = × ×
Mar 31, 2019 = × ×
Dec 31, 2018 = × ×
Sep 30, 2018 = × ×
Jun 30, 2018 = × ×
Mar 31, 2018 = × ×
Dec 31, 2017 = × ×
Sep 30, 2017 = × ×
Jun 30, 2017 = × ×
Mar 31, 2017 = × ×
Dec 31, 2016 = × ×
Sep 30, 2016 = × ×
Jun 30, 2016 = × ×
Mar 31, 2016 = × ×

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31).


The analysis of the quarterly financial ratios over the specified periods reveals several notable trends regarding profitability and financial burden management.

Tax Burden
The tax burden ratio exhibited relative stability from early 2016 through early 2017, fluctuating modestly around 0.66 to 0.7. However, a significant decline occurred in the last quarter of 2017, dropping to approximately 0.48, indicating a reduced effective tax rate during that period. Subsequently, the tax burden ratio increased sharply, peaking near 0.85 by mid to late 2019, suggesting a higher proportion of earnings absorbed by taxes. By the first quarter of 2020, the ratio showed a slight decrease but remained elevated compared to earlier periods.
Interest Burden
The interest burden ratio showed a mild downward trend over time. It started around 0.88 in early 2016, remained relatively consistent near 0.9 until the end of 2018, and then gradually declined to approximately 0.75 by the first quarter of 2020. This decline implies increasing interest expenses relative to earnings before interest and taxes over the later periods.
EBIT Margin
The EBIT margin displayed an overall improving trend from 2016 through 2018, rising from approximately 9.85% to a peak of 16.38% in the third quarter of 2018, with a notable peak of 13.65% at the end of 2017. Following this peak, the margin declined progressively through 2019 and into early 2020, reaching about 7.64% by the first quarter of 2020, indicating diminishing operational profitability in the most recent quarters.
Net Profit Margin
Net profit margin trends reflect a general increase from 2016 levels near 5.9% to a peak of about 9.19% at the end of 2018, demonstrating improved profitability after accounting for all expenses. However, starting in 2019, the net profit margin saw a decline, dropping to approximately 4.5% by the first quarter of 2020. This decline suggests pressures on overall profitability, potentially related to increased tax and interest expenses alongside operational challenges.

Overall, the data indicates that while operational efficiency, as measured by EBIT margin, improved substantially up to 2018, this was followed by a trajectory of declining profitability in subsequent quarters. The increasing tax burden and growing interest expenses likely contributed to the reduction in net profit margin observed toward 2020. These trends suggest heightened financial pressures in the periods leading up to early 2020.