- Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
- Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
- Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
- Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
- Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- Adjusted Financial Leverage
- Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The total provision for income taxes exhibited significant volatility over the five-year period, characterized by a substantial peak in 2017 followed by a period of normalization and gradual decline.
- Provision for Income Taxes
- Annual tax provisions remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2016, hovering around US$ 400 million. A sharp escalation occurred in 2017, where the provision surged to US$ 1,464 million. This peak was followed by a significant reduction to US$ 438 million in 2018 and a further decrease to US$ 326 million by the end of 2019, representing a downward trend in total tax obligations following the 2017 anomaly.
- Current Tax Expense
- The current tax component was the primary driver of the volatility observed in the overall provision. Following a slight increase from US$ 257 million in 2015 to US$ 300 million in 2016, current taxes spiked to US$ 1,583 million in 2017. Subsequent years saw a correction, with expenses falling to US$ 547 million in 2018 and US$ 490 million in 2019.
- Deferred Tax Component
- A structural shift in deferred taxes is evident. In 2015 and 2016, deferred taxes were recorded as expenses of US$ 139 million and US$ 104 million, respectively. Starting in 2017, this trend reversed, with the company recording deferred tax benefits (represented by negative values) for three consecutive years. These benefits increased from US$ 119 million in 2017 to US$ 164 million by 2019, serving to partially offset the current tax expenses during the latter half of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The effective income tax rate exhibited significant volatility between 2015 and 2019, primarily driven by legislative changes in the United States. While the rate remained relatively stable between 31.50% and 34.10% from 2015 to 2016, it experienced a sharp spike to 51.60% in 2017 before normalizing to approximately 19% to 20% in the subsequent two years.
- Impact of U.S. Statutory Tax Rate Changes
- A fundamental shift in the tax environment occurred between 2017 and 2018, as the U.S. statutory tax rate decreased from 35.00% to 21.00%. This reduction is the primary driver behind the lower effective income tax rates observed in 2018 (18.70%) and 2019 (20.40%).
- Analysis of the 2017 Tax Anomaly
- The peak effective income tax rate of 51.60% in 2017 was predominantly caused by the Transition Tax on foreign earnings, which added 23.90% to the tax burden. This one-time impact significantly outweighed other offsetting factors, such as the benefit from non-U.S. income (-7.80%) and the change in the U.S. tax rate (-5.60%).
- Contribution of Non-U.S. Income and Asset Dispositions
- Non-U.S. income consistently acted as a downward pressure on the effective tax rate throughout the period. The most significant benefit occurred in 2017 at -7.80%, while the benefit diminished to -1.00% in 2018 and -3.30% in 2019. Additionally, tax benefits from asset dispositions emerged in 2018 and 2019, contributing reductions of -2.90% and -0.70%, respectively.
- Equity Awards and Valuation Allowances
- Excess tax benefits related to equity awards became a consistent factor in reducing the effective rate starting in 2017, with the benefit increasing from -2.50% in 2017 to -3.20% by 2019. Conversely, changes in valuation allowances exerted upward pressure on the tax rate, showing a steady increasing trend from 1.20% in 2015 to 3.40% in 2019.
- Post-Reform Stabilization
- Following the implementation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the effective income tax rate before the act's specific adjustments stabilized near the new statutory rate, recording 20.30% in 2018 and 20.70% in 2019. The final effective rates for these years (18.70% and 20.40%) indicate that various tax benefits, particularly from equity awards and non-U.S. income, continued to keep the actual tax burden near or slightly below the statutory mandate.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The financial position regarding deferred taxes transitioned from a net asset position in 2015 to a consistent net liability position between 2016 and 2019. While the net deferred tax liability peaked in 2016, a gradual recovery trend is observed through 2019, with the net liability reducing from 904 million US$ to 136 million US$.
- Deferred Tax Asset Components
- Total deferred tax assets exhibited significant growth over the five-year period, rising from 882 million US$ in 2015 to 1,756 million US$ in 2019. This growth was primarily driven by net operating loss carry-forwards, which increased steadily from 205 million US$ to 680 million US$. Additionally, a substantial increase in assets related to the Loyalty Program is noted, jumping from 12 million US$ in 2017 to 249 million US$ in 2019. The introduction of lease liabilities in 2019 contributed an additional 261 million US$ to the asset base.
- Deferred Tax Liability Components
- Deferred tax liabilities experienced a sharp increase in 2016, reaching 1,931 million US$, largely due to a surge in liabilities related to intangibles, which peaked at 1,724 million US$ in that year. Although intangible-related liabilities decreased to 895 million US$ by 2019, they remained a primary driver of the overall liability position. In 2019, the recognition of right-of-use assets added 229 million US$ to the deferred tax liabilities.
- Valuation Allowance and Net Asset Recoverability
- The valuation allowance against deferred tax assets expanded consistently from 163 million US$ in 2015 to 616 million US$ in 2019. This upward trend indicates an increasing amount of deferred tax assets that were not deemed realizable. Consequently, while gross deferred tax assets grew, the deferred tax assets after valuation allowance fluctuated, ending at 1,140 million US$ in 2019 after a period of volatility between 2016 and 2018.
- Net Deferred Tax Position Trend
- The net deferred tax position shifted from a surplus of 656 million US$ in 2015 to a deficit of 904 million US$ in 2016. Following this shift, the net liability narrowed each subsequent year, moving to 511 million US$ in 2017, 314 million US$ in 2018, and finally 136 million US$ in 2019, suggesting a convergence toward a neutral tax position.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred tax assets | 154) | 171) | 93) | 116) | 672) | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 290) | 485) | 604) | 1,020) | 16) |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The financial data reveals a substantial shift in the deferred tax position of the organization over the five-year period ending December 31, 2019. A transition from a net deferred tax asset position to a net deferred tax liability position occurred in 2016, followed by a period of gradual reduction in liabilities.
- Deferred Tax Assets
- A significant contraction is observed between 2015 and 2017, with values decreasing from 672 million US$ to 93 million US$. A modest recovery occurred in 2018, reaching 171 million US$, before stabilizing at 154 million US$ by the end of 2019. This indicates a sharp reduction in future tax benefits available to the organization after 2015.
- Deferred Tax Liabilities
- A dramatic increase occurred in 2016, where liabilities surged from 16 million US$ to 1,020 million US$. Following this peak, a consistent downward trend is evident, with liabilities decreasing to 604 million US$ in 2017, 485 million US$ in 2018, and 290 million US$ in 2019. This trajectory suggests a steady settlement or reversal of deferred tax obligations over the four-year period following the 2016 spike.
- Net Deferred Tax Position
- The relationship between assets and liabilities inverted sharply in 2016. While 2015 was characterized by a dominant asset position, subsequent years showed a dominant liability position. However, the gap between deferred tax assets and liabilities narrowed progressively from 2016 to 2019, reflecting a reduction in the net future tax burden.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
Marriott International Inc., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
A significant expansion in the scale of the balance sheet is observed between 2015 and 2016, with reported total assets increasing from 6,082 million US$ to 24,140 million US$. Following this period of rapid growth, asset levels remained relatively stable through 2019. Throughout the analyzed period, a consistent pattern emerges where adjusted total assets are lower than reported total assets, indicating the systematic removal of deferred tax assets.
- Balance Sheet Adjustments and Liability Trends
- Reported total liabilities exhibited a steady upward trajectory, rising from 9,672 million US$ in 2015 to 24,348 million US$ by 2019. The adjustments for deferred taxes resulted in a decrease in total liabilities in every year except 2015. The most substantial reduction occurred in 2016, where adjusted liabilities were 1,020 million US$ lower than reported figures, suggesting a high concentration of deferred tax liabilities during that fiscal year.
- Impact on Shareholders' Equity
- The adjustment for deferred taxes generally had a positive impact on the shareholders' equity position from 2016 onward. While the reported equity showed a deficit of 3,590 million US$ in 2015, the adjusted equity deficit was deeper at 4,246 million US$. However, from 2016 to 2019, adjusted shareholders' equity consistently exceeded reported equity. Despite this adjustment-driven cushion, a clear downward trend in equity is observed from a peak adjusted value of 6,261 million US$ in 2016 to 839 million US$ in 2019.
- Net Income Variance
- Adjusted net income demonstrates volatility relative to reported figures. In 2015, 2016, and 2018, the removal of deferred tax effects resulted in higher adjusted net income. Conversely, in 2017 and 2019, adjusted net income was lower than the reported values. The highest point of profitability was recorded in 2018, with both reported and adjusted net income reaching their period peaks at 1,907 million US$ and 1,798 million US$, respectively.
The overall impact of removing deferred taxes is a reduction in the reported size of the balance sheet, as both assets and liabilities are decreased. The net effect on equity is typically positive after 2015, as the removal of deferred tax liabilities outweighs the removal of deferred tax assets, although this does not offset the broader trend of equity erosion observed toward the end of the five-year period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
Marriott International Inc., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
An evaluation of the financial ratios from 2015 to 2019 reveals a significant divergence between reported and adjusted figures, particularly as they relate to the impact of deferred taxes on leverage and equity returns. While profitability margins exhibited volatility, the most prominent trend is the aggressive expansion of financial leverage and a corresponding surge in return on equity toward the end of the period.
- Net Profit Margin
- Reported net profit margins fluctuated throughout the period, peaking at 9.19% in 2018 before declining to 6.07% in 2019. The adjusted margins generally followed this trend but remained lower than reported figures in 2018 and 2019, suggesting that deferred tax adjustments reduced the perceived profitability in the later years.
- Total Asset Turnover
- A substantial decline in asset efficiency is observed between 2015 and 2016, with the reported ratio falling from 2.38 to 0.71. Following this drop, the ratio remained relatively stable, ranging between 0.84 and 0.96. The removal of deferred taxes only impacted the 2015 figure, where the adjusted turnover was higher at 2.68.
- Financial Leverage
- There is a sharp and consistent increase in financial leverage from 2016 to 2019, with reported leverage rising from 4.51 to 35.63. Adjusted financial leverage remained consistently lower than reported figures across all available years, indicating that deferred tax liabilities contributed significantly to the reported leverage levels.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- Reported ROE experienced exponential growth, escalating from 14.56% in 2016 to 181.08% in 2019. While the adjusted ROE also showed a strong upward trajectory, it remained notably lower than the reported figures, ending at 132.18% in 2019. This disparity suggests that deferred tax accounting significantly amplified the reported returns on equity.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- The reported ROA peaked in 2015 at 14.12% and reached a low of 3.23% in 2016, eventually ending the period at 5.08%. In 2015, the adjusted ROA was substantially higher at 18.45%, whereas in the final two years of the analysis, the adjusted ROA trended slightly lower than the reported values.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net income ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 1,273 ÷ 20,972 = 6.07%
2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 1,109 ÷ 20,972 = 5.29%
Between 2015 and 2019, net income and profit margins exhibited significant volatility, characterized by a sharp growth peak in 2018 followed by a contraction in 2019.
- Net Income Trajectory
- Reported net income fluctuated from US$ 859 million in 2015 to a peak of US$ 1,907 million in 2018, before declining to US$ 1,273 million in 2019. Adjusted net income followed a nearly identical trajectory, peaking at US$ 1,798 million in 2018. A notable decline occurred in 2016, where both reported and adjusted figures reached local minima before entering a period of expansion.
- Net Profit Margin Performance
- The reported net profit margin reached its maximum efficiency in 2018 at 9.19%, representing a substantial increase from the 4.57% recorded in 2016. The adjusted net profit margin mirrored this trend, ascending from 5.18% in 2016 to a peak of 8.66% in 2018, then reverting to 5.29% by the end of 2019. This suggests that the profitability peak in 2018 was driven by fundamental operational improvements rather than one-time accounting gains.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- A shift in the relationship between reported and adjusted figures is observed over the five-year period. In 2015 and 2016, adjusted net income and adjusted profit margins were higher than the reported figures, indicating that non-recurring charges negatively impacted the reported results. Conversely, from 2017 through 2019, reported net income consistently exceeded adjusted net income, suggesting that adjustments for specific items reduced the normalized bottom line during the latter half of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Total assets
= 20,972 ÷ 25,051 = 0.84
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 20,972 ÷ 24,897 = 0.84
The financial performance from 2015 to 2019 is characterized by a significant expansion of the asset base and a subsequent adjustment in operational efficiency as measured by asset turnover. A substantial increase in total assets occurred between 2015 and 2016, which coincided with a sharp decline in the asset turnover ratio, suggesting a period of rapid growth or acquisition that temporarily outpaced revenue generation.
- Total Asset Evolution
- Reported total assets experienced a sharp increase from 6,082 million US$ in 2015 to 24,140 million US$ in 2016. Following this surge, the asset base remained relatively stable, with a slight contraction to 23,696 million US$ by 2018 before rising to 25,051 million US$ in 2019. Adjusted total assets followed a nearly identical trajectory, peaking in 2016 and maintaining a consistent level through 2019.
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover Trends
- The adjusted total asset turnover ratio saw a dramatic decrease from 2.68 in 2015 to 0.71 in 2016, reflecting the impact of the expanded asset base on efficiency. A recovery occurred in 2017, with the ratio rising to 0.96. However, a gradual downward trend followed in the subsequent two years, with the ratio declining to 0.88 in 2018 and 0.84 in 2019, indicating a slight reduction in the ability to generate revenue per unit of adjusted asset.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- In 2015, a notable variance existed between reported and adjusted figures; adjusted total assets were lower (5,410 million US$) than reported assets (6,082 million US$), resulting in a higher adjusted turnover ratio (2.68) compared to the reported ratio (2.38). From 2016 through 2019, this variance effectively disappeared, as the reported and adjusted asset turnover ratios converged to identical values.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Shareholders’ equity (deficit)
= 25,051 ÷ 703 = 35.63
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity (deficit)
= 24,897 ÷ 839 = 29.67
The financial structure experienced a significant transformation between 2015 and 2019, characterized by a massive expansion of the asset base followed by a consistent erosion of shareholders' equity. This combination has resulted in an exponential increase in financial leverage over the period.
- Asset Base Trends
- A substantial increase in total assets occurred between 2015 and 2016, with reported assets rising from 6,082 million to 24,140 million. Following this surge, the asset base remained relatively stable, fluctuating slightly before reaching 25,051 million by December 31, 2019. Adjusted total assets mirrored this pattern, maintaining a consistent correlation with reported figures.
- Shareholders' Equity Dynamics
- Equity transitioned from a deficit of 4,246 million (adjusted) in 2015 to a peak of 6,261 million in 2016. However, a persistent downward trend followed, with adjusted shareholders' equity declining each subsequent year to end at 839 million in 2019. This represents a significant reduction in the equity cushion relative to the total asset base.
- Financial Leverage Acceleration
- Both reported and adjusted financial leverage ratios exhibit an aggressive upward trajectory. Adjusted financial leverage increased from 3.84 in 2016 to 29.67 in 2019. The acceleration became particularly acute between 2018 and 2019, where the adjusted ratio more than tripled from 9.27 to 29.67.
- Reported versus Adjusted Metrics
- Adjusted financial leverage remained consistently lower than reported financial leverage throughout the analyzed period. While both metrics trended upward, the adjusted ratio provided a slightly more moderated view of the company's leverage position, although the overarching trend toward high gearing remains evident in both sets of figures.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income ÷ Shareholders’ equity (deficit)
= 100 × 1,273 ÷ 703 = 181.08%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity (deficit)
= 100 × 1,109 ÷ 839 = 132.18%
Financial performance between 2015 and 2019 is characterized by volatile fluctuations in shareholders' equity and a corresponding exponential increase in return on equity (ROE). While net income experienced growth through 2018, the equity base diminished significantly over the latter half of the period, leading to an inflated ROE profile.
- Net Income Trends
- Reported net income grew from 859 million US dollars in 2015 to a peak of 1,907 million US dollars in 2018, before declining to 1,273 million US dollars in 2019. Adjusted net income followed a similar trajectory, peaking in 2018 at 1,798 million US dollars. The divergence between reported and adjusted figures suggests the impact of non-recurring items or accounting adjustments on bottom-line profitability.
- Shareholders' Equity Dynamics
- A significant shift in the capital structure occurred between 2015 and 2016, moving from a reported equity deficit of 3,590 million US dollars to a positive position of 5,357 million US dollars. Following this recovery, a consistent downward trend is observed, with reported equity declining each year to reach 703 million US dollars by December 31, 2019. Adjusted equity mirrored this pattern, falling from a high of 6,261 million US dollars in 2016 to 839 million US dollars in 2019.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Escalation
- Both reported and adjusted ROE exhibited an aggressive upward trend starting in 2016. Reported ROE rose from 14.56% in 2016 to 181.08% in 2019. Adjusted ROE similarly climbed from 14.12% in 2016 to 132.18% in 2019. This acceleration is primarily attributable to the shrinking equity base in the denominator rather than proportional growth in net income, as the decline in equity was more rapid than the fluctuations in earnings.
- Reported versus Adjusted Variance
- A widening gap is observed between reported and adjusted ROE over time. While the two metrics were closely aligned in 2016, by 2019, the reported ROE exceeded the adjusted ROE by 48.9 percentage points. This indicates that the adjustments applied to both net income and equity serve to moderate the perceived return, providing a more conservative view of the company's financial efficiency.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 1,273 ÷ 25,051 = 5.08%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 1,109 ÷ 24,897 = 4.45%
A comprehensive analysis of the financial results from 2015 to 2019 reveals a significant transformation in the asset structure and corresponding shifts in profitability metrics. The most prominent feature of this period is the substantial expansion of the asset base between 2015 and 2016, which fundamentally altered the return on assets profile.
- Net Income Performance
- Net income exhibited a general upward trajectory from 2016, peaking in 2018. Reported net income rose from 780 million USD in 2016 to a high of 1,907 million USD in 2018, before declining to 1,273 million USD in 2019. Adjusted net income followed a similar pattern, though it remained lower than reported figures in the latter three years of the period, suggesting the presence of non-recurring gains or specific tax adjustments that inflated reported earnings relative to adjusted figures after 2016.
- Asset Base Evolution
- A dramatic increase in total assets occurred between December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2016, with reported assets rising from 6,082 million USD to 24,140 million USD. Following this expansion, the asset base remained relatively stable, fluctuating slightly between 23,696 million USD and 25,051 million USD through 2019. This sharp increase in the denominator for return calculations heavily influenced the efficiency ratios observed in subsequent years.
- Return on Assets (ROA) Trends
- The ROA experienced a severe contraction in 2016, falling from a reported 14.12% in 2015 to 3.23% in 2016, primarily driven by the massive increase in total assets. A recovery phase followed, with reported ROA climbing to 8.05% by 2018. However, this momentum reversed in 2019, with the ROA dropping to 5.08%. The adjusted ROA consistently mirrored this trend, peaking at 18.45% in 2015 before settling into a lower range between 3.68% and 7.64% for the remainder of the period.
- Comparison of Adjusted and Reported Metrics
- The variance between reported and adjusted figures shifted over time. In 2015 and 2016, adjusted net income and adjusted ROA were higher than their reported counterparts, indicating that certain expenses or losses were excluded to show a stronger underlying performance. Conversely, from 2017 through 2019, reported net income and reported ROA exceeded the adjusted figures, suggesting that non-operating gains or one-time tax benefits contributed positively to the reported results but were stripped out for the adjusted analysis.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?