Adjusted Financial Ratios (Summary)
Marriott International Inc., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The financial performance between 2015 and 2019 is characterized by a significant shift in capital structure and asset utilization, marked by a substantial increase in leverage and a corresponding surge in equity returns.
- Asset Efficiency and Utilization
- A sharp decline in total asset turnover is observed between 2015 and 2016, with the adjusted ratio falling from 2.32 to 0.67. Following this contraction, the ratio stabilized, ending 2019 at 0.84. This suggests a significant expansion of the asset base that was not immediately matched by proportional revenue growth.
- Liquidity Position
- The current ratio remained consistently below 1.0 throughout the period, fluctuating between 0.42 and 0.66 for reported values. The adjusted current ratio followed a similar pattern, peaking at 0.66 in 2016 before settling at 0.49 by 2019, indicating a persistent trend of low liquidity relative to short-term obligations.
- Leverage and Solvency
- There is a pronounced upward trend in leverage metrics. The reported debt-to-equity ratio escalated from 1.59 in 2016 to 15.56 in 2019, while the adjusted ratio rose from 1.58 to 6.37. Similarly, reported financial leverage increased from 4.51 in 2016 to 35.63 in 2019. The debt-to-capital ratio also showed a steady increase, rising from 0.61 in 2016 to 0.94 by the end of 2019, reflecting a strategic shift toward high debt financing.
- Profitability and Returns
- Net profit margins remained relatively stable, with the adjusted margin peaking at 7.63% in 2018 before declining to 6.06% in 2019. Return on Assets (ROA) experienced an initial drop from 13.84% in 2015 to 2.27% in 2016, subsequently recovering to 5.12% by 2019. Conversely, Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited exponential growth; the reported ROE rose from 14.56% in 2016 to 181.08% in 2019, while the adjusted ROE increased from 9.20% to 68.16%. This divergence between ROA and ROE indicates that the increase in equity returns was driven primarily by the heightened financial leverage rather than organic operational growth.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Total asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Total assets
= 20,972 ÷ 25,051 = 0.84
2 Adjusted revenues. See details »
3 Adjusted total assets. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Adjusted total asset turnover = Adjusted revenues ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 21,101 ÷ 24,973 = 0.84
The analysis of financial performance from 2015 to 2019 reveals a significant structural shift in asset utilization and revenue generation. The most prominent feature of this period is the sharp decline in asset turnover following 2015, followed by a period of relative stabilization.
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover Trends
- The adjusted total asset turnover ratio experienced a substantial decrease from 2.32 in 2015 to 0.67 in 2016. Following this decline, the ratio showed a partial recovery to 0.89 in 2017, before stabilizing at 0.83 in 2018 and 0.84 in 2019. This indicates a fundamental change in the efficiency with which assets are used to generate revenue compared to the 2015 baseline.
- Impact of Asset Base Expansion
- A dramatic increase in adjusted total assets is observed between 2015 and 2016, rising from 6,241 million US$ to 25,452 million US$. This expansion of the asset base was the primary driver behind the contraction of the asset turnover ratio. Despite a subsequent slight decrease in adjusted assets to 24,973 million US$ by 2019, the asset base remained significantly elevated throughout the remainder of the period.
- Revenue Performance and Correlation
- Adjusted revenues grew steadily from 14,486 million US$ in 2015 to a peak of 22,894 million US$ in 2017. While revenues increased, the growth rate did not keep pace with the rapid expansion of the asset base occurred in 2016. Consequently, the turnover ratio remained well below 2015 levels. The marginal increase in adjusted revenue from 20,904 million US$ in 2018 to 21,101 million US$ in 2019 contributed to the stabilization of the turnover ratio at 0.84.
- Comparison Between Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- The adjusted total asset turnover is consistently lower than or equal to the reported total asset turnover across the analyzed timeframe. This discrepancy is attributed to the use of adjusted total assets, which were higher than reported total assets in every year except 2019. By 2019, the reported and adjusted turnover ratios converged at 0.84, suggesting a narrowing gap between reported and adjusted financial positions.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Current Ratio
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 3,127 ÷ 6,677 = 0.47
2 Adjusted current assets. See details »
3 Adjusted current liabilities. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Adjusted current ratio = Adjusted current assets ÷ Adjusted current liabilities
= 3,203 ÷ 6,557 = 0.49
An analysis of the liquidity position from 2015 to 2019 reveals a consistent deficit in short-term solvency, as current liabilities systematically exceeded current assets throughout the period. The overall trend indicates a significant expansion of short-term obligations that outpaced the growth of liquid assets.
- Current Liability Expansion
- Short-term obligations experienced an uninterrupted upward trajectory, increasing from US$ 3,233 million in 2015 to US$ 6,677 million by 2019. This represents more than a doubling of current liabilities over the five-year duration, indicating a steady increase in immediate financial obligations.
- Current Asset Volatility
- Current assets exhibited a non-linear trend, reaching a peak of US$ 3,371 million in 2016. Following this peak, assets declined and fluctuated, ending the period at US$ 3,127 million in 2019. The lack of sustained growth in assets relative to liabilities contributed to a constrained liquidity profile.
- Adjusted Current Ratio Trends
- The adjusted current ratio remained below the 1.0 threshold for the entire duration, peaking at 0.66 in 2016 and reaching a low of 0.44 in 2015 and 2018. A ratio consistently below 1.0 suggests that short-term assets were insufficient to cover short-term liabilities at any point during the analyzed period.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- Adjusted figures provided a marginal improvement over reported figures. The adjusted current ratio was slightly higher than the reported ratio in every year; for example, in 2019, the adjusted ratio was 0.49 compared to the reported 0.47. This variance is primarily driven by slightly higher adjusted current assets and, in later years, lower adjusted current liabilities. However, these adjustments do not fundamentally alter the objective conclusion regarding the liquidity gap.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Debt to Equity
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Debt to equity = Total debt ÷ Shareholders’ equity (deficit)
= 10,940 ÷ 703 = 15.56
2 Adjusted total debt. See details »
3 Adjusted shareholders’ equity (deficit). See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Adjusted debt to equity = Adjusted total debt ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity (deficit)
= 11,952 ÷ 1,875 = 6.37
An analysis of the leverage profile from 2015 to 2019 reveals a consistent increase in total debt obligations coupled with a volatile equity base. While reported figures suggest a rapid escalation in financial leverage, adjusted metrics provide a more moderated view of the capital structure.
- Debt Accumulation Trends
- Total debt experienced a significant upward trajectory, increasing from US$ 4,107 million in 2015 to US$ 10,940 million by 2019. Adjusted total debt followed a parallel path, rising from US$ 4,913 million to US$ 11,952 million over the same period. Adjusted debt figures consistently exceed reported debt, indicating the accounting of additional liabilities in the adjusted framework.
- Equity Dynamics
- Shareholders' equity transitioned from a deficit of US$ 3,590 million in 2015 to a positive balance of US$ 5,357 million in 2016. Following this recovery, a steady decline was observed, with reported equity falling to US$ 703 million by 2019. Adjusted shareholders' equity mirrored this volatility but maintained a higher valuation throughout the decline, ending at US$ 1,875 million in 2019, which suggests a stronger equity buffer than reported.
- Debt to Equity Ratio Divergence
- A pronounced divergence is evident between the reported and adjusted debt to equity ratios. The reported ratio escalated sharply from 1.59 in 2016 to 15.56 by 2019. Conversely, the adjusted ratio demonstrated a more controlled increase, moving from 1.58 in 2016 to 6.37 in 2019. The significant gap between these two ratios in the latter years indicates that adjustments to the equity and debt components substantially mitigate the perceived risk of over-leverage indicated by the reported figures.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Debt to Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Debt to capital = Total debt ÷ Total capital
= 10,940 ÷ 11,643 = 0.94
2 Adjusted total debt. See details »
3 Adjusted total capital. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Adjusted debt to capital = Adjusted total debt ÷ Adjusted total capital
= 11,952 ÷ 13,827 = 0.86
The financial data indicates a significant transformation in the capital structure beginning in 2016, followed by a steady increase in leverage through 2019.
- Debt Obligations
- Total debt experienced substantial growth over the analyzed period, rising from 4,107 million US$ in 2015 to 10,940 million US$ by 2019. This upward trend is mirrored in the adjusted total debt, which increased from 4,913 million US$ to 11,952 million US$, reflecting a consistent expansion of the company's borrowing.
- Capitalization Trends
- A dramatic shift in capitalization occurred between 2015 and 2016, where total capital increased from 517 million US$ to 13,863 million US$. Following this surge, total capital underwent a gradual decline, ending the period at 11,643 million US$ in 2019. Adjusted total capital followed a similar trajectory, peaking at 16,195 million US$ in 2016 before descending to 13,827 million US$ by 2019.
- Debt to Capital Ratio Evolution
- The reported debt to capital ratio exhibited extreme volatility initially, falling from 7.94 in 2015 to 0.61 in 2016 due to the massive increase in capital. From 2016 to 2019, the reported ratio climbed steadily to 0.94. The adjusted debt to capital ratio followed a comparable pattern, dropping from 7.10 in 2015 to 0.61 in 2016, and subsequently increasing to 0.86 by 2019.
- Impact of Adjustments
- The variance between reported and adjusted ratios suggests that adjustments provided a more favorable view of leverage in the later years. While the reported debt to capital ratio reached 0.94 by 2019, the adjusted ratio remained lower at 0.86. This divergence indicates that the adjustments to total debt and total capital mitigated the perceived increase in financial leverage from 2017 through 2019.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Shareholders’ equity (deficit)
= 25,051 ÷ 703 = 35.63
2 Adjusted total assets. See details »
3 Adjusted shareholders’ equity (deficit). See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity (deficit)
= 24,973 ÷ 1,875 = 13.32
Between 2015 and 2019, a significant escalation in financial leverage is observed, primarily driven by a steady contraction in shareholders' equity following a peak in 2016, while total assets remained relatively stable.
- Asset Trends
- A substantial increase in total assets occurred between 2015 and 2016, rising from 6,082 million to 24,140 million. Following this expansion, asset levels remained consistent, fluctuating between 23,696 million and 25,051 million through 2019. Adjusted total assets mirrored this pattern, maintaining a range between 24,973 million and 25,703 million from 2016 onward.
- Shareholders' Equity Dynamics
- Equity positions transitioned from a deficit in 2015 to a peak in 2016, with reported equity reaching 5,357 million and adjusted equity reaching 6,281 million. From 2017 through 2019, a consistent downward trend is evident. Reported equity declined sharply to 703 million by the end of 2019, while adjusted equity decreased to 1,875 million. The adjusted equity figures remained consistently higher than the reported figures from 2016 onward, providing a larger equity base for leverage calculations.
- Financial Leverage Analysis
- Reported financial leverage exhibited an exponential increase, climbing from 4.51 in 2016 to 35.63 in 2019. In contrast, adjusted financial leverage demonstrated a more moderate growth trajectory, rising from 4.05 in 2016 to 13.32 in 2019. The divergence between these two metrics intensified over the period, suggesting that the adjustments made to assets and equity significantly tempered the perceived increase in financial risk and leverage volatility.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Net profit margin = 100 × Net income ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 1,273 ÷ 20,972 = 6.07%
2 Adjusted net income. See details »
3 Adjusted revenues. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × 1,278 ÷ 21,101 = 6.06%
The financial performance from 2015 to 2019 is characterized by significant volatility in profitability, with a notable contraction in 2016 followed by a period of margin expansion and a subsequent return to baseline levels by 2019.
- Revenue Trajectory
- Adjusted revenues showed a strong growth trend between 2015 and 2017, increasing from US$ 14,486 million to a peak of US$ 22,894 million. Following this peak, revenues remained relatively stable, concluding the period at US$ 21,101 million in 2019.
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin Analysis
- The adjusted net profit margin experienced a sharp decline in 2016, falling to 3.39% from 5.96% in 2015. A strong recovery occurred in 2017, with the margin rising to 7.61% and maintaining stability at 7.63% in 2018. However, a downward correction was observed in 2019, as the margin decreased to 6.06%.
- Comparative Performance of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- Discrepancies between reported and adjusted net income are most evident in 2016, 2017, and 2018. In 2017, adjusted net income was significantly higher than reported net income (US$ 1,742 million vs. US$ 1,372 million), leading to an adjusted margin that exceeded the reported margin. This trend reversed in 2018, where the reported net profit margin of 9.19% outperformed the adjusted margin of 7.63%, suggesting that non-recurring gains influenced the reported results. By 2019, the reported and adjusted margins converged, aligning at approximately 6.07% and 6.06% respectively.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
ROE = 100 × Net income ÷ Shareholders’ equity (deficit)
= 100 × 1,273 ÷ 703 = 181.08%
2 Adjusted net income. See details »
3 Adjusted shareholders’ equity (deficit). See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity (deficit)
= 100 × 1,278 ÷ 1,875 = 68.16%
The financial performance from 2015 to 2019 is characterized by a significant shift in equity positioning and a subsequent escalation in return on equity metrics. While net income exhibited fluctuations, the consistent reduction in the equity base following 2016 has mathematically amplified the return ratios.
- Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE) Trends
- The Adjusted ROE demonstrates a consistent upward trajectory, rising from 9.20% in 2016 to 68.16% by 2019. This growth reflects a substantial increase in the efficiency of generating profits relative to adjusted shareholders' equity, despite a decline in adjusted net income between 2018 and 2019.
- Equity Position and Capital Structure
- A transition from a deficit position in 2015 to a positive equity balance in 2016 is observed. Following this recovery, however, adjusted shareholders' equity declined steadily from a peak of 6,281 million US$ in 2016 to 1,875 million US$ in 2019. This trend indicates a contraction of the equity base, which contributes to the elevation of the ROE percentages.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- A pronounced divergence exists between reported and adjusted ROE. Reported ROE experienced exponential growth, reaching 181.08% in 2019, whereas Adjusted ROE grew more moderately to 68.16% over the same period. This variance is driven by the difference between reported shareholders' equity, which fell to 703 million US$ in 2019, and adjusted shareholders' equity, which remained higher at 1,875 million US$.
- Net Income Performance
- Adjusted net income grew significantly between 2016 and 2017, increasing from 578 million US$ to 1,742 million US$. Although a gradual decline followed, ending at 1,278 million US$ in 2019, the profitability levels remained substantially higher than those recorded in the 2015-2016 period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
ROA = 100 × Net income ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 1,273 ÷ 25,051 = 5.08%
2 Adjusted net income. See details »
3 Adjusted total assets. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 1,278 ÷ 24,973 = 5.12%
The analysis of financial performance from 2015 to 2019 reveals a significant transformation in the asset structure and corresponding profitability ratios. A primary driver of change was the substantial expansion of the asset base between 2015 and 2016, which fundamentally altered the Return on Assets (ROA) profile.
- Asset Base Dynamics
- Adjusted total assets experienced a sharp increase from US$ 6,241 million in 2015 to US$ 25,452 million in 2016. Following this expansion, the asset base remained relatively stable, fluctuating between US$ 24,973 million and US$ 25,703 million through 2019. This rapid increase in the denominator significantly impacted the resulting ROA percentages.
- Adjusted Net Income Trends
- Adjusted net income showed considerable volatility over the five-year period. After a decline from US$ 864 million in 2015 to US$ 578 million in 2016, a sharp recovery occurred in 2017, reaching a peak of US$ 1,742 million. Income subsequently moderated to US$ 1,594 million in 2018 and US$ 1,278 million in 2019.
- Adjusted ROA Performance
- The Adjusted ROA exhibits a strong downward shift coinciding with the asset expansion, falling from 13.84% in 2015 to a period low of 2.27% in 2016. A partial recovery was observed in 2017 and 2018, with the ratio rising to 6.78% and 6.32% respectively, before settling at 5.12% in 2019. The variance between reported and adjusted ROA indicates that non-recurring items or accounting adjustments had a fluctuating impact on perceived efficiency, particularly in 2017 and 2018.
Overall, the data indicates that while adjusted net income recovered and grew beyond 2015 levels, the massive increase in total assets resulted in a long-term reduction in the overall rate of return on assets compared to the 2015 baseline.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?