Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Marriott International Inc. (NASDAQ:MAR)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 11, 2020.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Marriott International Inc., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Turnover Ratios
Receivables turnover 8.79 9.76 11.54 10.09 13.21
Payables turnover 24.66 22.27 24.61 21.03 20.85
Working capital turnover — — — — —
Average No. Days
Average receivable collection period 42 37 32 36 28
Average payables payment period 15 16 15 17 18

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


An analysis of short-term operating activity ratios from 2015 to 2019 reveals a divergence in efficiency between the management of accounts receivable and accounts payable.

Receivables Management
A consistent decline in the receivables turnover ratio is observed, falling from 13.21 in 2015 to 8.79 in 2019. This trend is reflected in the average receivable collection period, which expanded from 28 days to 42 days over the five-year period. These metrics indicate a reduction in the efficiency of credit collection and a slower conversion of receivables into cash.
Payables Management
The payables turnover ratio remained relatively stable with a slight overall increase, moving from 20.85 in 2015 to 24.66 in 2019. Correspondingly, the average payables payment period experienced a marginal decrease, shifting from 18 days to 15 days. This suggests a consistent approach to supplier obligations, with a trend toward more rapid settlement of short-term liabilities.
Cash Cycle Implications
The simultaneous increase in the collection period and the decrease in the payment period indicates a widening gap in the operating cycle. The lengthening of the time required to collect cash from customers, coupled with the accelerated payment to vendors, suggests an increase in the working capital requirements to sustain operational activities.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Turnover Ratios


Average No. Days


Receivables Turnover

Marriott International Inc., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenues 20,972 20,758 22,894 17,072 14,486
Accounts receivable, net 2,386 2,127 1,984 1,692 1,097
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 8.79 9.76 11.54 10.09 13.21
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc. — — — — —
Booking Holdings Inc. — — — — —
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
DoorDash, Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Revenues ÷ Accounts receivable, net
= 20,972 ÷ 2,386 = 8.79

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance between 2015 and 2019 reveals a general decline in the efficiency of receivable collections. While revenues experienced significant volatility, reaching a peak in 2017, accounts receivable demonstrated a consistent and uninterrupted upward trajectory throughout the five-year period.

Receivables Turnover Trend
A downward trend in the receivables turnover ratio is observed, falling from 13.21 in 2015 to 8.79 by 2019. Despite a temporary recovery to 11.54 in 2017, the overall decline indicates a reduction in the frequency with which the company collects its average receivables balance during each year.
Accounts Receivable Expansion
Net accounts receivable increased steadily every year, rising from 1,097 million US dollars in 2015 to 2,386 million US dollars in 2019. This consistent growth in outstanding receivables suggests a cumulative increase in credit extended to clients, which continued even during years when revenue growth slowed or declined.
Revenue Correlation and Collection Efficiency
Revenue growth was most pronounced between 2015 and 2017, peaking at 22,894 million US dollars. However, from 2018 onward, revenues stabilized around the 20,000 to 21,000 million US dollar range while receivables continued to climb. The divergence between plateauing revenues and rising receivables contributed to the deterioration of the turnover ratio, signaling a potential increase in the average collection period and a decrease in short-term operating liquidity efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Payables Turnover

Marriott International Inc., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of revenues 17,755 17,084 19,192 14,446 12,363
Accounts payable 720 767 780 687 593
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 24.66 22.27 24.61 21.03 20.85
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc. — — — — —
Booking Holdings Inc. — — — — —
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
DoorDash, Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of revenues ÷ Accounts payable
= 17,755 ÷ 720 = 24.66

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a consistent pattern of high payables turnover between 2015 and 2019, indicating a rapid cycle of settlement with suppliers. Despite fluctuations in the cost of revenues, the company maintained a disciplined and efficient approach to managing its short-term obligations throughout the period.

Cost of Revenues and Accounts Payable Trends
Cost of revenues experienced significant volatility, increasing from 12,363 million US dollars in 2015 to a peak of 19,192 million US dollars in 2017, before moderating to 17,755 million US dollars by 2019. Accounts payable mirrored this initial growth, rising from 593 million US dollars in 2015 to 780 million US dollars in 2017, followed by a gradual decrease to 720 million US dollars by the end of the analyzed period.
Payables Turnover Analysis
The payables turnover ratio demonstrated a general upward trajectory, starting at 20.85 in 2015 and concluding at 24.66 in 2019. A significant increase is observed in 2017, where the ratio reached 24.61, coinciding with the highest recorded cost of revenues. This suggests a period of intensified operating activity where payments were processed more frequently relative to the average payable balance. While a moderate decline to 22.27 occurred in 2018, the ratio recovered in 2019 to its five-year peak, indicating a high velocity of payment and a short duration for outstanding supplier liabilities.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Working Capital Turnover

Marriott International Inc., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 3,127 2,706 2,747 3,371 1,384
Less: Current liabilities 6,677 6,437 6,010 5,147 3,233
Working capital (3,550) (3,731) (3,263) (1,776) (1,849)
 
Revenues 20,972 20,758 22,894 17,072 14,486
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 — — — — —
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc. — — — — —
Booking Holdings Inc. — — — — —
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
DoorDash, Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Revenues ÷ Working capital
= 20,972 ÷ -3,550 = —

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the operational activity from 2015 to 2019 reveals a consistent pattern of negative working capital paired with an overall upward trend in revenue. This financial configuration indicates an operational model where current liabilities consistently exceed current assets, effectively utilizing short-term obligations to fund the revenue-generating activities of the business.

Working Capital Trends
Working capital remained in a deficit throughout the entire period. A significant expansion of this deficit occurred between 2016 and 2018, with the negative balance moving from -1,776 million to a peak of -3,731 million. A slight moderation in the deficit was observed by the end of 2019, settling at -3,550 million.
Revenue Performance
Annual revenues experienced substantial growth in the early part of the period, rising from 14,486 million in 2015 to a peak of 22,894 million in 2017. Following this peak, revenues underwent a slight contraction in 2018 to 20,758 million and remained relatively stable through 2019 at 20,972 million.
Working Capital Turnover Analysis
The working capital turnover ratio remained negative throughout the five-year span, which is indicative of a strategy of leveraging current liabilities. The absolute value of the turnover ratio fluctuated as the growth in revenue was countered by the widening working capital deficit. The shift between 2016 and 2018 is particularly notable, as the increase in the negative working capital base occurred more rapidly than the increase in revenue, leading to a decrease in the absolute efficiency ratio during that window.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Receivable Collection Period

Marriott International Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 8.79 9.76 11.54 10.09 13.21
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 42 37 32 36 28
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc. — — — — —
Booking Holdings Inc. — — — — —
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
DoorDash, Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 8.79 = 42

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of short-term operating activity ratios from 2015 to 2019 reveals a decline in the efficiency of receivables management. There is a clear inverse correlation between the receivables turnover ratio and the average receivable collection period, indicating a lengthening cycle for converting credit sales into cash.

Receivables Turnover
A general downward trend is observed in the receivables turnover ratio, which decreased from 13.21 in 2015 to 8.79 by 2019. While a moderate recovery occurred in 2017 with an increase to 11.54, the ratio subsequently declined in 2018 and 2019. This trajectory indicates that the company is turning over its receivables less frequently over time.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The time required to collect outstanding receivables has expanded significantly, rising from 28 days in 2015 to 42 days in 2019. This represents a substantial increase in the duration of the collection cycle. A temporary reduction to 32 days was noted in 2017, but this was followed by a consistent increase to 37 days in 2018 and 42 days in 2019.

The overall data suggests a weakening in the efficiency of credit collection. The transition from a 28-day collection window to a 42-day window signifies that receivables are remaining outstanding for a longer period, which may impact short-term liquidity and suggest a shift in credit terms or customer payment behavior.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Payables Payment Period

Marriott International Inc., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 24.66 22.27 24.61 21.03 20.85
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 15 16 15 17 18
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc. — — — — —
Booking Holdings Inc. — — — — —
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
DoorDash, Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 24.66 = 15

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity from 2015 to 2019 reveals a consistent trend toward accelerated settlement of obligations to suppliers. There is a clear inverse correlation between the payables turnover ratio and the average payables payment period, indicating an overall shift toward faster payment cycles over the five-year period.

Payables Turnover Ratio
An overall upward trajectory is observed, with the ratio increasing from 20.85 in 2015 to 24.66 by 2019. While a temporary contraction occurred in 2018, where the ratio dipped to 22.27, the subsequent recovery in 2019 indicates a sustained increase in the frequency with which accounts payable are cleared relative to the average balance held.
Average Payables Payment Period
The duration required to settle obligations has generally decreased, reflecting a tightening of the payment cycle. The period shortened from 18 days in 2015 to 15 days in 2019. A minor fluctuation is noted in 2018, where the period increased to 16 days, but it returned to 15 days by the end of 2019, representing a net reduction of three days in the average time taken to pay creditors.

AI Ask an analyst for more