Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 1,577) | 2,260) | 1,463) | 1,039) | 1,097) | |
| Invested capital2 | 13,992) | 14,627) | 14,229) | 16,537) | 758) | |
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| ROIC3 | 11.27% | 15.45% | 10.28% | 6.29% | 144.80% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| ROIC, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| DoorDash, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| McDonald’s Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Starbucks Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 1,577 ÷ 13,992 = 11.27%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2015 to 2019 is characterized by a profound structural shift in the capital base, which fundamentally altered the return on invested capital (ROIC) profile.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT exhibited a general upward trajectory from 2016, peaking at 2,260 million US$ in 2018. This represents a significant increase from the 1,097 million US$ recorded in 2015. A contraction occurred in 2019, with NOPAT falling to 1,577 million US$, indicating a decline in operating profitability toward the end of the observed period.
- Invested Capital
- A substantial expansion in invested capital occurred between 2015 and 2016, rising from 758 million US$ to 16,537 million US$. Following this sharp increase, the capital base remained relatively stable, fluctuating between approximately 14 billion and 16.5 billion US$ through 2019. This suggests a major capital deployment or structural acquisition event took place in 2016.
- Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
- The ROIC in 2015 was an outlier at 144.80% due to the exceptionally low level of invested capital relative to profits. Following the capital expansion in 2016, the ROIC normalized significantly to 6.29%. A subsequent recovery trend is observed, with the ratio climbing to a peak of 15.45% in 2018, driven primarily by the growth in NOPAT. In 2019, the ROIC declined to 11.27%, correlating with the reduction in operating profit.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Decomposition of ROIC
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »
2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »
3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »
An analysis of the return on invested capital (ROIC) reveals a period of extreme volatility followed by a phase of relative stabilization. The most significant movement occurred between 2015 and 2016, where ROIC declined from an anomalous peak of 144.80% to 6.29%. From 2016 onwards, the metric demonstrated a recovery trend, peaking at 15.45% in 2018 before moderating to 11.27% in 2019.
- Turnover of Capital (TO)
- Capital turnover served as the primary driver for the volatility observed in the early part of the period. A drastic reduction in the turnover ratio from 19.12 in 2015 to 1.03 in 2016 suggests a substantial increase in the invested capital base, which fundamentally reset the ROIC profile. Following this correction, turnover stabilized, fluctuating within a narrow range between 1.03 and 1.61 through 2019.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
- Operational efficiency showed a general improvement following a dip in 2016. The margin rose from 8.35% in 2016 to a peak of 13.81% in 2018. This expansion in operating profitability contributed positively to the recovery of ROIC during the 2017-2018 period, although a contraction to 10.21% occurred in 2019.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate (1 – CTR)
- The tax multiplier remained relatively stable and high for most of the period, typically exceeding 70%, which served to preserve the majority of operating returns. A notable exception occurred in 2017, where the value dropped to 46.38%, indicating a significant increase in the effective cash tax rate that year. This tax spike acted as a drag on the overall ROIC, partially offsetting the gains made in operating profit margins during the same period.
- ROIC Decomposition Summary
- The transition from 2015 to 2019 indicates a shift from an atypical capital structure to a more conventional operational model. While the 2015 ROIC was driven by an exceptionally high capital turnover, the subsequent returns were more balanced, driven by the interplay between stabilized turnover and improving operating margins, despite intermittent tax pressures.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 1,577) | 2,260) | 1,463) | 1,039) | 1,097) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 577) | 626) | 1,691) | 386) | 315) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 2,155) | 2,886) | 3,154) | 1,426) | 1,412) | |
| Revenues | 20,972) | 20,758) | 22,894) | 17,072) | 14,486) | |
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | 129) | 146) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Adjusted revenues | 21,101) | 20,904) | 22,894) | 17,072) | 14,486) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| OPM3 | 10.21% | 13.81% | 13.78% | 8.35% | 9.75% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| OPM, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| DoorDash, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| McDonald’s Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Starbucks Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × 2,155 ÷ 21,101 = 10.21%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the operating performance from 2015 to 2019 reveals a period of significant volatility, characterized by a substantial peak in profitability and operational efficiency between 2017 and 2018, followed by a contraction in 2019.
- Revenue and Profitability Trends
- Adjusted revenues exhibited a strong upward trajectory from 2015 to 2017, increasing from US$ 14,486 million to a peak of US$ 22,894 million. This growth was mirrored by the Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT), which rose from US$ 1,412 million in 2015 to US$ 3,154 million in 2017. Following this peak, a downward trend emerged, with NOPBT declining to US$ 2,155 million by 2019, despite revenues remaining relatively stable at US$ 21,101 million.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM) Dynamics
- The operating profit margin experienced a slight contraction between 2015 and 2016, falling from 9.75% to 8.35%. A sharp expansion occurred in 2017, with the margin climbing to 13.78%, and reaching its highest point of 13.81% in 2018. However, this efficiency gain was not sustained into 2019, as the margin retreated to 10.21%, indicating a decline in the ability to convert adjusted revenues into operating profit.
- Operational Efficiency and Leverage
- The data indicates a period of high operational leverage during 2017 and 2018. Notably, in 2018, the operating profit margin remained stable at 13.81% even as adjusted revenues and NOPBT experienced slight declines. The subsequent drop in OPM in 2019, occurring alongside nearly flat revenue growth compared to the previous year, suggests that operating expenses increased disproportionately to revenue, thereby eroding the profit margin.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Turnover of Capital (TO)
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Revenues | 20,972) | 20,758) | 22,894) | 17,072) | 14,486) | |
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | 129) | 146) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Adjusted revenues | 21,101) | 20,904) | 22,894) | 17,072) | 14,486) | |
| Invested capital1 | 13,992) | 14,627) | 14,229) | 16,537) | 758) | |
| Efficiency Ratio | ||||||
| TO2 | 1.51 | 1.43 | 1.61 | 1.03 | 19.12 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| TO, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| DoorDash, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| McDonald’s Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Starbucks Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Invested capital. See details »
2 2019 Calculation
TO = Adjusted revenues ÷ Invested capital
= 21,101 ÷ 13,992 = 1.51
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of capital turnover between 2015 and 2019 reveals a significant structural shift in the asset base, which fundamentally altered the efficiency metrics of the organization. A primary transition occurred in 2016, characterized by a substantial expansion of invested capital that normalized the turnover ratio following an anomalous peak in the preceding year.
- Adjusted Revenue Trends
- Adjusted revenues exhibited a general upward trajectory from 2015 to 2017, rising from 14,486 million US$ to a peak of 22,894 million US$. Following this peak, revenues experienced a moderate correction in 2018 to 20,904 million US$ and remained relatively stable through 2019 at 21,101 million US$.
- Invested Capital Dynamics
- A drastic increase in invested capital is observed between 2015 and 2016, where the value rose from 758 million US$ to 16,537 million US$. This represents a fundamental change in the capital structure. From 2016 onward, the invested capital stabilized, fluctuating within a range of approximately 14,000 million US$ to 16,500 million US$, ending the period at 13,992 million US$ in 2019.
- Turnover of Capital (TO) Analysis
- The turnover ratio shows a sharp decline from an exceptionally high 19.12 in 2015 to 1.03 in 2016, directly correlating with the surge in invested capital. This shift indicates a move from a highly asset-light model to one with a significantly larger capital base. Post-2016, the ratio demonstrated recovery and stabilization, peaking at 1.61 in 2017 before settling at 1.51 by 2019. This stabilization suggests that the organization successfully scaled its revenue generation to align with the expanded capital investment.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 1,577) | 2,260) | 1,463) | 1,039) | 1,097) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 577) | 626) | 1,691) | 386) | 315) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 2,155) | 2,886) | 3,154) | 1,426) | 1,412) | |
| Tax Rate | ||||||
| CTR3 | 26.80% | 21.68% | 53.62% | 27.10% | 22.29% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| CTR, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| DoorDash, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| McDonald’s Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Starbucks Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 577 ÷ 2,155 = 26.80%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data from 2015 to 2019 reveals significant volatility in the company's cash tax obligations and their relationship to operating profitability. While the effective cash tax rate remained relatively stable for the majority of the period, a substantial anomaly occurred in 2017 that deviated from the established trend.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR) Volatility
- The effective cash tax rate exhibited a non-linear trend, starting at 22.29% in 2015 and ending at 26.80% in 2019. A significant spike is observed in 2017, where the CTR reached 53.62%, more than doubling the rates seen in the preceding and succeeding years. By 2018, the rate corrected sharply to 21.68%, returning to a historical baseline.
- Analysis of Cash Operating Taxes and Profitability
- Cash operating taxes remained under $400 million between 2015 and 2016, corresponding with Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT) of approximately $1.4 billion. In 2017, both metrics surged, with NOPBT increasing to $3,154 million and cash operating taxes rising disproportionately to $1,691 million. This suggests that the tax burden in 2017 was not merely a function of increased profitability but may have been influenced by one-time tax settlements or changes in tax jurisdiction impacts.
- Post-Peak Stabilization
- Following the 2017 peak, a downward trend in both NOPBT and cash tax payments is observed. From 2018 to 2019, NOPBT declined from $2,886 million to $2,155 million, while cash operating taxes stabilized between $577 million and $626 million. The consistency of the CTR during these final two years indicates a return to a predictable tax regime relative to operating earnings.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?