Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The financial performance between 2015 and 2019 is characterized by a period of substantial growth in cash generation reaching a peak in 2017, followed by a contraction in the subsequent two years.
- Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
- A steady increase in operating cash flow was observed from 2015 to 2017, rising from US$ 1,430 million to a peak of US$ 2,436 million. This represents a significant expansion in the ability to generate cash from core business operations. However, this trend reversed after 2017, with a slight decrease in 2018 and a more pronounced decline in 2019, ending at US$ 1,685 million.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- FCFF followed a similar trajectory to operating cash flow, exhibiting strong growth from US$ 1,082 million in 2015 to a maximum of US$ 2,163 million in 2017. A downward trend emerged thereafter, with FCFF decreasing to US$ 2,032 million in 2018 and experiencing a sharp reduction to US$ 1,308 million by December 31, 2019.
- Cash Flow Relationship and Capital Allocation
- The correlation between operating cash flow and FCFF remained tight throughout the period, though the magnitude of the decline in FCFF in 2019 was more severe than the decline in operating cash flow. This divergence suggests that while operational cash generation weakened, the impact on free cash flow was amplified, potentially due to increased capital expenditures or other cash outflows required to maintain the firm's asset base during that period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2 2019 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, tax = Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized × EITR
= 348 × 20.70% = 72
A comprehensive review of the financial data from 2015 to 2019 reveals a sustained upward trajectory in net cash outflows for interest payments, occurring alongside a significant reduction in the effective income tax rate starting in 2018.
- Net Cash Paid for Interest
- A consistent and substantial increase in cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized and net of tax, is observed over the five-year period. Outflows rose from 78 million US dollars in 2015 to 276 million US dollars by 2019, representing a total increase of approximately 253.8%. The most aggressive growth occurred between 2017 and 2018, where the amount increased by 75 million US dollars in a single fiscal year.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Volatility
- The effective income tax rate exhibited relative stability between 2015 and 2017, fluctuating within a narrow range between 31.50% and 34.10%. However, a sharp contraction occurred in 2018, with the rate falling to 20.30%, and remaining relatively flat at 20.70% in 2019. This indicates a significant structural shift in the tax burden during the latter part of the period.
- Interaction Between Tax Rates and Interest Outflows
- The increase in net interest payments was compounded by the decrease in the effective income tax rate. Because the interest paid is reported net of tax, a lower tax rate reduces the tax shield benefit, thereby increasing the actual net cash outflow for a given amount of gross interest expense. The convergence of rising interest obligations and a lower EITR contributed to the accelerated growth of net cash outflows observed in 2018 and 2019.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 37,405) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | 1,308) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | 28.60 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Airbnb Inc. | 22.70 |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | 12.16 |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | 29.36 |
| DoorDash, Inc. | 41.23 |
| McDonald’s Corp. | 28.14 |
| Starbucks Corp. | 46.14 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 49,504) | 51,303) | 58,357) | 41,398) | 20,472) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | 1,308) | 2,032) | 2,163) | 1,412) | 1,082) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | 37.85 | 25.25 | 26.98 | 29.32 | 18.92 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| DoorDash, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| McDonald’s Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Starbucks Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
3 2019 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 49,504 ÷ 1,308 = 37.85
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Between 2015 and 2019, the relationship between enterprise value and free cash flow to the firm exhibited significant volatility, resulting in a substantial overall increase in the valuation multiple. The period was characterized by a rapid expansion of the enterprise base followed by a contraction in cash flow generation.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- A sharp upward trajectory is observed from 2015 to 2017, with the enterprise value increasing from $20,472 million to a peak of $58,357 million. Following this peak, the valuation entered a period of moderate decline, decreasing to $51,303 million in 2018 and further to $49,504 million by the end of 2019.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- FCFF experienced steady growth from 2015 through 2017, rising from $1,082 million to a maximum of $2,163 million. This growth trend reversed after 2017, with a slight dip in 2018 followed by a significant contraction to $1,308 million in 2019, indicating a marked reduction in the cash available to all capital providers.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Interpretation
- The EV/FCFF ratio rose sharply from 18.92 in 2015 to 29.32 in 2016, suggesting that the increase in enterprise value significantly outpaced the growth in free cash flow during that interval. The ratio remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2018, oscillating between 25.25 and 29.32. However, a dramatic spike to 37.85 occurred in 2019. This final increase was primarily driven by the substantial decline in FCFF rather than a rise in enterprise value, reflecting a deterioration in the conversion of enterprise value into free cash flow.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?