AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Marriott International Inc. (NASDAQ:MAR)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 11, 2020.

Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)

Microsoft Excel

Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)

Marriott International Inc., FCFF calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Net income 1,273 1,907 1,372 780 859
Net noncash charges 685 526 983 979 697
Working capital changes (273) (76) 81 (177) (126)
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,685 2,357 2,436 1,582 1,430
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, net of tax1 276 231 156 109 78
Capital expenditures (653) (556) (240) (199) (305)
Contract acquisition costs — — (189) (80) (121)
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) 1,308 2,032 2,163 1,412 1,082

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


The financial performance between 2015 and 2019 is characterized by a period of substantial growth in cash generation reaching a peak in 2017, followed by a contraction in the subsequent two years.

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
A steady increase in operating cash flow was observed from 2015 to 2017, rising from US$ 1,430 million to a peak of US$ 2,436 million. This represents a significant expansion in the ability to generate cash from core business operations. However, this trend reversed after 2017, with a slight decrease in 2018 and a more pronounced decline in 2019, ending at US$ 1,685 million.
Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
FCFF followed a similar trajectory to operating cash flow, exhibiting strong growth from US$ 1,082 million in 2015 to a maximum of US$ 2,163 million in 2017. A downward trend emerged thereafter, with FCFF decreasing to US$ 2,032 million in 2018 and experiencing a sharp reduction to US$ 1,308 million by December 31, 2019.
Cash Flow Relationship and Capital Allocation
The correlation between operating cash flow and FCFF remained tight throughout the period, though the magnitude of the decline in FCFF in 2019 was more severe than the decline in operating cash flow. This divergence suggests that while operational cash generation weakened, the impact on free cash flow was amplified, potentially due to increased capital expenditures or other cash outflows required to maintain the firm's asset base during that period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Interest Paid, Net of Tax

Marriott International Inc., interest paid, net of tax calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
EITR1 20.70% 20.30% 33.30% 34.10% 31.50%
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, before tax 348 290 234 165 114
Less: Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, tax2 72 59 78 56 36
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, net of tax 276 231 156 109 78

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 See details »

2 2019 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, tax = Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized × EITR
= 348 × 20.70% = 72


A comprehensive review of the financial data from 2015 to 2019 reveals a sustained upward trajectory in net cash outflows for interest payments, occurring alongside a significant reduction in the effective income tax rate starting in 2018.

Net Cash Paid for Interest
A consistent and substantial increase in cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized and net of tax, is observed over the five-year period. Outflows rose from 78 million US dollars in 2015 to 276 million US dollars by 2019, representing a total increase of approximately 253.8%. The most aggressive growth occurred between 2017 and 2018, where the amount increased by 75 million US dollars in a single fiscal year.
Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Volatility
The effective income tax rate exhibited relative stability between 2015 and 2017, fluctuating within a narrow range between 31.50% and 34.10%. However, a sharp contraction occurred in 2018, with the rate falling to 20.30%, and remaining relatively flat at 20.70% in 2019. This indicates a significant structural shift in the tax burden during the latter part of the period.
Interaction Between Tax Rates and Interest Outflows
The increase in net interest payments was compounded by the decrease in the effective income tax rate. Because the interest paid is reported net of tax, a lower tax rate reduces the tax shield benefit, thereby increasing the actual net cash outflow for a given amount of gross interest expense. The convergence of rising interest obligations and a lower EITR contributed to the accelerated growth of net cash outflows observed in 2018 and 2019.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current

Marriott International Inc., current EV/FCFF calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV) 37,405
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) 1,308
Valuation Ratio
EV/FCFF 28.60
Benchmarks
EV/FCFF, Competitors1
Airbnb Inc. 22.70
Booking Holdings Inc. 12.16
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. 29.36
DoorDash, Inc. 41.23
McDonald’s Corp. 28.14
Starbucks Corp. 46.14

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 Click competitor name to see calculations.

If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.


Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical

Marriott International Inc., historical EV/FCFF calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV)1 49,504 51,303 58,357 41,398 20,472
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 1,308 2,032 2,163 1,412 1,082
Valuation Ratio
EV/FCFF3 37.85 25.25 26.98 29.32 18.92
Benchmarks
EV/FCFF, Competitors4
Airbnb Inc. — — — — —
Booking Holdings Inc. — — — — —
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
DoorDash, Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 See details »

2 See details »

3 2019 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 49,504 ÷ 1,308 = 37.85

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2015 and 2019, the relationship between enterprise value and free cash flow to the firm exhibited significant volatility, resulting in a substantial overall increase in the valuation multiple. The period was characterized by a rapid expansion of the enterprise base followed by a contraction in cash flow generation.

Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
A sharp upward trajectory is observed from 2015 to 2017, with the enterprise value increasing from $20,472 million to a peak of $58,357 million. Following this peak, the valuation entered a period of moderate decline, decreasing to $51,303 million in 2018 and further to $49,504 million by the end of 2019.
Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
FCFF experienced steady growth from 2015 through 2017, rising from $1,082 million to a maximum of $2,163 million. This growth trend reversed after 2017, with a slight dip in 2018 followed by a significant contraction to $1,308 million in 2019, indicating a marked reduction in the cash available to all capital providers.
EV/FCFF Ratio Interpretation
The EV/FCFF ratio rose sharply from 18.92 in 2015 to 29.32 in 2016, suggesting that the increase in enterprise value significantly outpaced the growth in free cash flow during that interval. The ratio remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2018, oscillating between 25.25 and 29.32. However, a dramatic spike to 37.85 occurred in 2019. This final increase was primarily driven by the substantial decline in FCFF rather than a rise in enterprise value, reflecting a deterioration in the conversion of enterprise value into free cash flow.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?