Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Marriott International Inc. (NASDAQ:MAR)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 11, 2020.

Analysis of Property, Plant and Equipment

Microsoft Excel

Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure

Marriott International Inc., balance sheet: property, plant and equipment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Land 684 591 601 654 299
Buildings and leasehold improvements 1,100 1,275 1,052 1,352 729
Furniture and equipment 1,225 1,439 1,121 1,159 768
Construction in progress 196 168 116 155 130
Property and equipment, gross 3,205 3,473 2,890 3,320 1,926
Accumulated depreciation (1,301) (1,517) (1,097) (985) (897)
Property and equipment, net 1,904 1,956 1,793 2,335 1,029

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


The gross valuation of property and equipment exhibited significant volatility between 2015 and 2019, characterized by a substantial increase in 2016 followed by periodic fluctuations. Gross assets rose from 1,926 million in 2015 to a peak of 3,473 million in 2018, before concluding the period at 3,205 million in 2019.

Asset Composition Trends
Land holdings increased from 299 million in 2015 to 684 million by 2019, representing a steady long-term growth pattern. Buildings and leasehold improvements, as well as furniture and equipment, mirrored each other's trajectories, both experiencing sharp increases in 2016 and reaching their highest values in 2018 at 1,275 million and 1,439 million, respectively.
Capital Investment and Pipeline
Construction in progress demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory over the five-year period, growing from 130 million in 2015 to 196 million in 2019. This indicates a sustained commitment to the development of new assets and infrastructure expansion.
Depreciation and Net Asset Value
Accumulated depreciation showed a general upward trend from 897 million in 2015 to 1,517 million in 2018, reflecting the aging of the asset base. However, a decrease to 1,301 million in 2019 suggests the possible disposal or write-down of older assets. Consequently, net property and equipment, which spiked to 2,335 million in 2016, stabilized toward the end of the period, closing at 1,904 million in 2019.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Asset Age Ratios (Summary)

Marriott International Inc., asset age ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Average age ratio 51.61% 52.64% 47.92% 36.95% 55.13%
Estimated total useful life (years) 7 11 10 17 12
Estimated age, time elapsed since purchase (years) 4 6 5 6 7
Estimated remaining life (years) 4 5 5 11 6

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


The analysis of property, plant, and equipment reveals significant volatility in asset aging and useful life estimations between 2015 and 2019. The asset portfolio demonstrates a fluctuating replacement cycle, characterized by periodic adjustments in the calculation of the remaining utility of fixed assets.

Average Age Ratio Trends
The average age ratio experienced a notable decline in 2016, dropping to 36.95% from 55.13% in 2015. This was followed by a steady increase over the subsequent two years, peaking at 52.64% in 2018 before stabilizing at 51.61% in 2019. This progression suggests that following a period of asset rejuvenation or accounting adjustment in 2016, the asset base has aged significantly relative to its total estimated useful life.
Useful Life Estimations
Estimated total useful life lacks a linear trend, peaking at 17 years in 2016 and reaching a minimum of 7 years by 2019. This contraction in the total useful life window indicates either a more conservative approach to depreciation or a shift in the asset mix toward components with shorter functional lifespans.
Asset Aging and Remaining Utility
The estimated age of assets fluctuated between 4 and 7 years throughout the analyzed period. While the estimated age reached its lowest point of 4 years in 2019, the estimated remaining life also decreased to 4 years in the same period. The convergence of estimated age and remaining life in 2019, coupled with a lower total useful life, indicates an accelerated transition toward the end of the asset lifecycle for a larger portion of the property, plant, and equipment portfolio.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Average Age

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Accumulated depreciation 1,301 1,517 1,097 985 897
Property and equipment, gross 3,205 3,473 2,890 3,320 1,926
Land 684 591 601 654 299
Asset Age Ratio
Average age1 51.61% 52.64% 47.92% 36.95% 55.13%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Property and equipment, gross – Land)
= 100 × 1,301 ÷ (3,205 – 684) = 51.61%


The asset base experienced significant volatility between 2015 and 2019, characterized by a substantial expansion of property and equipment in 2016. The gross value of these assets rose from 1,926 million USD in 2015 to a peak of 3,473 million USD in 2018, before moderating to 3,205 million USD by the end of 2019. This overall increase in the asset base is mirrored by the growth in land holdings, which more than doubled from 299 million USD in 2015 to 684 million USD in 2019.

Average Age Ratio Trends
The average age ratio exhibited a sharp decline from 55.13% in 2015 to 36.95% in 2016. This downward movement coincided with a significant increase in gross property and equipment, indicating the acquisition or construction of new, undepreciated assets. Following this period of rejuvenation, the ratio trended upward, reaching 52.64% in 2018, as the newer assets aged and depreciation accumulated. The ratio remained relatively stable in 2019 at 51.61%.
Accumulated Depreciation and Asset Disposition
Accumulated depreciation showed a consistent upward trajectory from 2015 through 2018, rising from 897 million USD to 1,517 million USD. However, a reversal occurred in 2019, with accumulated depreciation decreasing to 1,301 million USD. This reduction, paired with the decrease in gross property and equipment during the same period, suggests the disposal or write-off of older, fully or significantly depreciated assets from the balance sheet.
Capital Investment Patterns
The concentration of land value remained high following the 2016 increase, shifting from a minor component of the asset base to a more substantial one. The stability of land values relative to the fluctuations in gross property and equipment suggests that the volatility in the average age ratio was primarily driven by the depreciation and renewal of buildings and equipment rather than changes in land holdings.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Estimated Total Useful Life

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Property and equipment, gross 3,205 3,473 2,890 3,320 1,926
Land 684 591 601 654 299
Gross depreciation expense 346 256 231 157 132
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated total useful life1 7 11 10 17 12

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 Estimated total useful life = (Property and equipment, gross – Land) ÷ Gross depreciation expense
= (3,205 – 684) ÷ 346 = 7


An analysis of the asset base and depreciation patterns between 2015 and 2019 reveals significant fluctuations in gross property and equipment values alongside a consistent upward trajectory in depreciation expenses. While total asset values experienced volatility, the cost of asset consumption increased steadily over the five-year period.

Gross Property and Equipment Trends
The gross value of property and equipment exhibited a non-linear growth pattern, rising from 1,926 million US dollars in 2015 to a peak of 3,473 million US dollars in 2018, before declining slightly to 3,205 million US dollars in 2019. A notable surge occurred in 2016, coinciding with a substantial increase in land holdings, which rose from 299 million US dollars to 654 million US dollars in the same year. Land values remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2018 before reaching a period high of 684 million US dollars in 2019.
Depreciation Expense Analysis
Gross depreciation expense demonstrated a consistent year-over-year increase, growing from 132 million US dollars in 2015 to 346 million US dollars in 2019. This steady rise persisted despite fluctuations in the gross value of property and equipment, suggesting an expanding base of depreciable assets or a shift in accounting estimates that accelerated the recognition of expenses.
Estimated Useful Life Volatility
The estimated total useful life of assets showed significant instability, fluctuating from a low of 7 years in 2019 to a peak of 17 years in 2016. A critical correlation is observed between 2018 and 2019, where the reduction of the estimated useful life from 11 years to 7 years corresponds with the sharpest annual increase in gross depreciation expense, rising by 90 million US dollars. This indicates that the shortening of estimated asset lifespans has contributed directly to higher annual depreciation charges.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Accumulated depreciation 1,301 1,517 1,097 985 897
Gross depreciation expense 346 256 231 157 132
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Time elapsed since purchase1 4 6 5 6 7

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Gross depreciation expense
= 1,301 ÷ 346 = 4


An analysis of the property, plant, and equipment indicates a dynamic cycle of asset acquisition and depreciation between 2015 and 2019. While depreciation expenses have grown steadily, the average age of assets has generally decreased, suggesting a strategy of continuous modernization and significant asset turnover.

Accumulated Depreciation Trends
Accumulated depreciation exhibited a steady growth trend from 2015 to 2018, rising from 897 million US$ to a peak of 1,517 million US$. However, a notable reduction to 1,301 million US$ occurred in 2019. This decrease, occurring in tandem with a reduction in the average age of assets, suggests the disposal of older, fully depreciated assets or a significant restructuring of the asset portfolio.
Gross Depreciation Expense Growth
A consistent year-over-year increase in gross depreciation expense is observed, climbing from 132 million US$ in 2015 to 346 million US$ in 2019. This upward trajectory indicates a substantial expansion of the total depreciable asset base, as the annual depreciation charge more than doubled over the five-year period.
Asset Age and Replacement Cycle
The time elapsed since purchase shows a general downward trajectory, moving from 7 years in 2015 to a low of 4 years in 2019. The reduction in asset age, particularly the drop to 4 years in the final period, correlates with the decrease in accumulated depreciation. This pattern confirms the integration of newer assets into the balance sheet, which has effectively lowered the average age of the property, plant, and equipment holdings.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Estimated Remaining Life

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Property and equipment, net 1,904 1,956 1,793 2,335 1,029
Land 684 591 601 654 299
Gross depreciation expense 346 256 231 157 132
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated remaining life1 4 5 5 11 6

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 Estimated remaining life = (Property and equipment, net – Land) ÷ Gross depreciation expense
= (1,904 – 684) ÷ 346 = 4


Between 2015 and 2019, the valuation and lifecycle of property and equipment were characterized by a significant expansion in 2016, followed by a period of stabilization in asset values and a consistent increase in depreciation expenses.

Asset Base and Land Valuation
Net property and equipment experienced a substantial increase from US$ 1,029 million in 2015 to US$ 2,335 million in 2016. This growth was mirrored in land holdings, which rose from US$ 299 million to US$ 654 million during the same interval. Following this peak, net property and equipment fluctuated moderately, ending the period at US$ 1,904 million in 2019, while land values remained relatively stable, closing at US$ 684 million.
Depreciation Expense Trajectory
A consistent upward trend is observed in gross depreciation expense, which rose steadily from US$ 132 million in 2015 to US$ 346 million in 2019. The continuous growth in annual depreciation suggests an expanding base of depreciable assets or a shift in the allocation of costs over the assets' useful lives.
Estimated Remaining Life Analysis
The estimated remaining life of assets exhibited significant volatility. A peak of 11 years was recorded in 2016, up from 6 years in 2015. However, this was followed by a sustained decline, dropping to 5 years in 2017 and 2018, and further decreasing to 4 years by the end of 2019. The inverse relationship between the rising depreciation expenses and the shortening estimated remaining life indicates a maturing asset portfolio where assets are moving closer to the end of their estimated useful lives.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?