EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Illumina Inc. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Illumina Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 29, 2019 | Dec 30, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2020 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates fluctuating economic profit performance. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) generally increased from 2016 to 2019, followed by a substantial decrease in 2020. Simultaneously, the cost of capital exhibited a gradual upward trend throughout the period. Invested capital increased consistently until 2020, where it experienced a slight decline.
- Economic Profit Trend
- Economic profit began at a negative value in 2016, at -36 US$ million. It turned positive in 2017, reaching 122 US$ million, and remained positive through 2019, peaking at 91 US$ million in 2018 and then slightly decreasing to 86 US$ million in 2019. A significant shift occurred in 2020, with economic profit falling to -276 US$ million. This indicates a substantial decline in value creation during that year.
- NOPAT and Cost of Capital Relationship
- While NOPAT increased from 2016 to 2019, the concurrent rise in the cost of capital suggests increasing funding costs. The substantial drop in NOPAT in 2020, coupled with a further increase in the cost of capital, directly contributed to the significant negative economic profit observed in that year. The increasing cost of capital consistently placed pressure on profitability.
- Invested Capital and Economic Profit
- Invested capital generally increased, suggesting expansion and growth initiatives. However, the increase in invested capital did not consistently translate into increased economic profit. The 2020 decline in economic profit occurred despite a relatively stable invested capital base, indicating that the returns generated from the invested capital were insufficient to cover the cost of that capital.
Overall, the analysis reveals a period of initial value creation followed by a substantial erosion of economic profit. The combination of decreasing NOPAT and increasing cost of capital in 2020 appears to be the primary driver of this negative trend. Further investigation into the factors contributing to the 2020 NOPAT decline would be warranted.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in reserve for product warranties.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Illumina stockholders.
5 2020 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2020 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Illumina stockholders.
8 2020 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net Income Attributable to Illumina Stockholders
- The net income demonstrated an overall upward trend from 2016 to 2019, starting at 463 million US dollars in 2016 and reaching a peak of 1002 million US dollars in 2019. This represents a substantial growth over the four-year period. However, in 2020, there was a notable decline to 656 million US dollars, which indicates a reversal of the previous growth trend.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT followed a similar pattern to net income, increasing consistently from 453 million US dollars in 2016 to 957 million US dollars in 2019. This increase reflects improving operational efficiency and profitability. However, in 2020, NOPAT decreased to 593 million US dollars, signaling a significant downturn in operating profitability in that year.
- Overall Observations
- Both net income and NOPAT showed strong positive growth through 2019, indicating solid financial performance and effective management of operational costs and taxes. The decline observed in 2020 suggests that external factors or internal challenges may have adversely affected profitability. The 2020 results warrant further investigation to identify specific causes and to assess the sustainability of future earnings.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
The financial data reveals the trends in tax-related expenses over five fiscal years ending from 2016 to 2020. Both the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes have exhibited fluctuations throughout this period.
- Provision for Income Taxes
- This item showed a significant increase from $133 million in 2016 to a peak of $365 million in 2017. Subsequently, it decreased sharply to $112 million in 2018 and remained relatively stable in 2019 with a slight increase to $128 million. In 2020, there was a notable rise again to $200 million.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes also followed a somewhat similar pattern, increasing from $140 million in 2016 to $344 million in 2017. After 2017, there was a decline to $133 million in 2018, followed by a further decrease to $114 million in 2019. In 2020, cash operating taxes dropped dramatically to $35 million, reaching the lowest level in the five-year span.
Overall, both tax provisions and cash operating taxes peaked sharply in 2017, followed by declines in subsequent years. However, while the provision for income taxes saw a rebound in 2020, cash operating taxes continued to decline substantially. This divergence in 2020 may indicate changes in tax payment timing, tax strategy, or the recognition of deferred tax liabilities.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of reserve for product warranties.
5 Addition of equity equivalents to total Illumina stockholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of construction in progress.
8 Subtraction of short-term investments.
The financial data indicates several notable trends in the company's capital structure and financing components over the five-year period ending December 31, 2020.
- Total reported debt & leases
- This metric exhibits moderate fluctuations, beginning at $1,795 million in 2016, rising to a peak of $2,599 million in 2018, before decreasing to approximately $1,881 million in 2019 and stabilizing around $1,906 million in 2020. The increase through 2018 suggests a period of increased borrowing or lease commitments, followed by a reduction implying possible debt repayment or lease adjustments.
- Total stockholders’ equity
- Equity shows a consistent, steady increase year-over-year, rising from $2,197 million in 2016 to $4,694 million in 2020. The equity nearly doubled over the period, reflecting retained earnings growth, possible capital raises, or accumulated comprehensive income, indicating strengthening financial stability and increased shareholder value.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital generally trends upward from $2,874 million in 2016 to a peak of $4,997 million in 2019, with a slight decrease to $4,907 million in 2020. This overall growth reflects increased funding employed in the business, either through equity or liabilities, aligning with growth or expansion strategies. The small decline in 2020 suggests a minor contraction or adjustment in the capital base.
Overall, the company demonstrates a strengthening equity base coupled with management of debt levels, maintaining total invested capital at elevated levels consistent with potential expansion or operational scaling. The reduction in debt after 2018, alongside rising equity, may suggest a strategic shift towards lower leverage, improving financial flexibility.
Cost of Capital
Illumina Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-29).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 29, 2019 | Dec 30, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| AbbVie Inc. | ||||||
| Amgen Inc. | ||||||
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | ||||||
| Danaher Corp. | ||||||
| Eli Lilly & Co. | ||||||
| Gilead Sciences Inc. | ||||||
| Johnson & Johnson | ||||||
| Merck & Co. Inc. | ||||||
| Pfizer Inc. | ||||||
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | ||||||
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2020 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited considerable fluctuation between 2016 and 2020. Initially negative, it demonstrated improvement before declining significantly in the final year of the observed period. This analysis details the observed trends in economic profit, invested capital, and the resulting economic spread ratio.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit began at a loss of US$36 million in 2016, increasing substantially to a profit of US$122 million in 2017. It remained positive through 2019, peaking at US$91 million in 2018 and then decreasing to US$86 million in 2019. A significant decline occurred in 2020, resulting in a loss of US$276 million.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital consistently increased from US$2,874 million in 2016 to US$4,997 million in 2019. The rate of increase slowed in 2020, with invested capital reported at US$4,907 million, representing a slight decrease from the prior year.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio mirrored the trend in economic profit. It started at -1.25% in 2016, improving to 3.39% in 2017. Subsequent years saw a gradual decline to 2.29% in 2018 and 1.72% in 2019. The ratio experienced a substantial decrease in 2020, falling to -5.63%. This indicates a significant deterioration in the return generated relative to the capital invested during that year.
The increasing invested capital base did not translate into proportional economic profit growth, particularly evident in 2020. The negative economic spread ratio in both 2016 and 2020 suggests that, in those years, the company’s returns did not cover the cost of capital employed. The period between 2017 and 2019 demonstrates a positive economic spread, indicating value creation, but this was not sustained.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 29, 2019 | Dec 30, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Revenue | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| AbbVie Inc. | ||||||
| Amgen Inc. | ||||||
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | ||||||
| Danaher Corp. | ||||||
| Eli Lilly & Co. | ||||||
| Gilead Sciences Inc. | ||||||
| Johnson & Johnson | ||||||
| Merck & Co. Inc. | ||||||
| Pfizer Inc. | ||||||
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | ||||||
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2020 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Revenue
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited considerable fluctuation between 2016 and 2020. Initial observations reveal a period of negative economic profit followed by positive performance, ultimately concluding with a substantial negative margin in the most recent year analyzed.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- In 2016, the economic profit margin stood at -1.49%. A significant positive shift occurred in 2017, with the margin increasing to 4.43%. This positive trend continued, albeit at a decelerating rate, reaching 2.74% in 2018 and 2.43% in 2019. However, 2020 witnessed a dramatic decline, resulting in a margin of -8.53%. This represents a substantial reversal from the preceding years and a return to negative economic profit territory.
The economic profit margin’s movement appears correlated with the revenue trend, though not perfectly. Revenue increased consistently from 2016 to 2019, while the economic profit margin generally improved during this period. However, despite a slight revenue decrease in 2020, the economic profit margin experienced a much more pronounced decline, suggesting factors beyond revenue impacted profitability.
- Relationship to Economic Profit
- The economic profit margin directly reflects the absolute economic profit values. Negative economic profit in 2016 and 2020 corresponds with the negative margins observed in those years. The positive economic profit values in 2017, 2018, and 2019 are consistent with the positive economic profit margins during those periods. The magnitude of the margin change in 2020 is notably larger than the change in economic profit, indicating a potentially significant shift in the cost of capital or operational efficiency.
The substantial decline in the economic profit margin in 2020 warrants further investigation. While revenue decreased modestly, the significant drop in the margin suggests increased costs, a higher cost of capital, or a combination of both contributed to the negative economic profit.