Decomposing ROE involves expressing net income divided by shareholders’ equity as the product of component ratios.
Paying user area
Try for free
Celgene Corp. pages available for free this week:
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Geographic Areas
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2005
- Debt to Equity since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
- Price to Sales (P/S) since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Celgene Corp. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-03-31).
The analysis of the quarterly financial performance reveals distinct trends in the key profitability and leverage ratios over the observed periods.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- The ROA percentage exhibits variability throughout the timeline, starting at a high point of 13.95% in March 2015 and declining to its lowest level of approximately 5.92% by December 2015. Following this trough, the ROA gradually recovers and stabilizes around a range of 7-11% until late 2018. The last recorded quarters show a consistent upward trajectory, peaking at 14.22% in September 2019, indicating improving asset utilization effectiveness over the longer term.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage ratios display considerable fluctuations. Initially, the ratio increases sharply from 2.58 in March 2015 to more than 5 by September 2015. After peaking at 5.12 in March 2016, the leverage ratio generally trends downward with intermittent rises, reaching a peak at 9.75 in June 2018. Post this peak, there is a marked and consistent decline in leverage, reaching 3.42 by September 2019. This suggests periods of increased borrowing or asset utilization followed by deleveraging efforts towards the end of the period.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- The ROE shows a decreasing trend in the first year, falling from 36.06% in March 2015 to 27.07% in December 2015, mirroring the decline in ROA. However, it then rises significantly, with notable peaks such as 42.48% in December 2017 and an exceptional 81.57% in June 2018. After this peak, ROE experiences a downturn but remains elevated compared to the early periods, finishing at 48.65% in September 2019. The high ROE values, especially in mid-2018, indicate strong profitability relative to equity, potentially influenced by higher financial leverage.
Overall, the data shows a phase of declining asset returns and equity profitability in 2015, followed by recovery and expansion in both metrics. The fluctuating and generally high financial leverage during certain periods suggests that leverage significantly impacted equity returns, especially the sharp ROE increase in mid-2018 coincident with a spike in leverage. The later periods indicate a trend towards reducing leverage while maintaining strong profitability, reflecting a possible strategic shift towards a more balanced financial structure without compromising returns.
Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-03-31).
The analysis of the quarterly financial ratios reveals notable fluctuations and trends in profitability, efficiency, leverage, and overall shareholder return over the examined periods.
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin exhibited a declining trend from the first quarter of 2015, dropping from approximately 31% to a low near 17% by the end of 2015. Throughout 2016 and early 2017, the margin stabilized in the 18% to 22% range. From the second quarter of 2017 onwards, a gradual upward trend became apparent, culminating in a significant increase to above 34% by the third quarter of 2019. This suggests improving profitability in more recent periods.
- Asset Turnover
- The asset turnover ratio remained relatively stable with minor fluctuations. Starting at 0.45 in early 2015, it dipped to a low of approximately 0.32-0.34 by late 2015. From 2016 through 2019, the ratio hovered consistently around 0.40 to 0.43, indicating steady efficiency in utilizing assets to generate revenue. The slight decreasing trend towards the last quarter, down to 0.41, indicates marginally reduced efficiency, though the change is minimal.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage experienced significant variability throughout the period. It increased sharply in 2015, reaching a peak above 5.0 times in the third quarter of that year, followed by fluctuations between about 3.5 and 5.0 through 2016 and 2017. Notably, a substantial spike occurred in mid-2018, with leverage soaring to nearly 9.75 times, the highest point in the timeframe. After this peak, a steady decline ensued, bringing leverage down to approximately 3.4 times by the third quarter of 2019. These fluctuations indicate changes in the company’s use of debt or equity to finance assets, with the mid-2018 period representing a peak in financial risk or capital structure adjustment.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- The ROE mirrored some of the patterns seen in leverage and profitability. It started near 36% in Q1 2015 but then declined to just over 27% by the end of 2015. Over the following quarters, ROE regained strength and displayed considerable volatility, including a sharp increase beginning in late 2017. This rise continued dramatically through 2018, peaking at an exceptionally high 82% in mid-2018. This surge aligns with the leverage spike, suggesting amplified returns on equity possibly driven by increased financial leverage. After mid-2018, ROE declined gradually but remained robust above 48% by late 2019, indicating enhanced profitability and effective equity utilization despite reduced leverage.
In summary, the financial data reflects a period of significant adjustment in capital structure and operational performance. The company improved its profit margins and maintained stable asset utilization over the years. The mid-2018 period marked a peak in financial leverage and ROE, followed by a deleveraging phase with sustained strong returns on equity. These insights suggest strategic financial management and improving profitability dynamics in the more recent quarters.
Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-03-31).
The financial analysis over the observed quarters reveals varying trends in key profitability and efficiency ratios.
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden ratio shows a general decline from early 2015 through late 2018, falling from 0.86 to a low of 0.6 in September 2018, indicating a reduction in the proportion of pre-tax income paid in taxes during this period. However, there is a notable rebound starting in late 2018, with the ratio increasing again to 0.88 by the third quarter of 2019, suggesting a higher effective tax rate in the most recent periods.
- Interest Burden
- This ratio exhibits a moderate decreasing trend from 0.94 in March 2015 to a low point of 0.83 in the final quarter of 2015, indicating rising interest expenses relative to EBIT. Following this trough, the interest burden gradually improves, reaching 0.9 by September 2019, which implies a slight easing of interest expense pressure over time.
- EBIT Margin
- The EBIT margin experiences volatility with an initial decline from 38.15% in early 2015 to approximately 25% by the end of 2015. From 2016 onwards, a steady upward trajectory is evident, culminating in a notable increase to 43.78% by the third quarter of 2019, suggesting improving operating profitability across the period.
- Asset Turnover
- The asset turnover ratio declines sharply in 2015 from around 0.47 to a low near 0.32 but stabilizes in subsequent years, fluctuating narrowly between 0.39 and 0.43. This stabilization indicates consistent efficiency in asset utilization post-2015, despite the initial decrease.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage shows significant variability, initially rising sharply from 2.58 in early 2015 to a peak of 5.12 in March 2016, followed by fluctuations that reach a maximum of 9.75 in mid-2018. After this peak, leverage decreases steadily to 3.42 by the third quarter of 2019. The high leverage levels in 2017-2018 indicate increased use of debt financing during that time, with subsequent deleveraging through 2019.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- ROE displays a declining trend from 36.06% in early 2015 to approximately 27% by the end of 2015, reflecting declining profitability. Subsequently, it rises substantially, peaking at 81.57% in the second quarter of 2018, driven likely by a combination of higher EBIT margins and increased leverage. After this peak, ROE gradually decreases to 48.65% by September 2019 but remains elevated relative to early period levels, indicating strong overall equity profitability.
In summary, the company experienced initial pressure on profitability and efficiency in 2015, with recovery and improvement in EBIT margins and ROE occurring from 2016 through 2019. Asset efficiency stabilized after 2015, while financial leverage showed significant fluctuations suggesting strategic adjustments in capital structure, peaking in 2018 before deleveraging. The effective tax burden declined notably through 2018 but increased again thereafter, which may have implications for net profitability going forward.
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-03-31).
The analysis of the quarterly financial metrics over the observed period reveals notable trends in profitability, efficiency, and asset utilization.
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin displays a fluctuating pattern with an overall upward trajectory. It begins at a high of 30.83% and declines to a low near 17.49% by the end of 2015. Throughout 2016 and 2017, the margin fluctuates modestly between approximately 17% and 27%, indicating periods of varying profitability. From late 2017 onward, there is a clear upward momentum, reaching 34.64% by the third quarter of 2019. This indicates improving profitability, with the margin surpassing previous peaks.
- Asset Turnover
- The asset turnover ratio remains relatively stable but shows mild variation. The ratio starts at 0.45 and declines to a low of 0.32 in the third quarter of 2015. It then gradually recovers and stabilizes around the 0.40 to 0.43 range from 2016 through 2019, with minor fluctuations. This suggests a consistent level of asset utilization to generate sales, with no significant improvement or deterioration over time.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- The ROA follows a pattern somewhat similar to the net profit margin but begins at a moderate 13.95%, sharply declining to around 5.92% at the end of 2015. Subsequently, ROA steadily increases, with occasional slight dips, rising to 14.22% by the third quarter of 2019. This upward trend reflects enhanced overall profitability relative to asset base and improved operational effectiveness across the period.
In summary, the data indicates an initial decline in profitability and asset efficiency metrics in 2015, followed by a recovery phase starting in 2016. Net profit margin and ROA notably strengthen in the last few years, suggesting improved earnings quality and asset returns. The asset turnover ratio remains largely stable with minor oscillations, indicating consistent asset utilization to generate revenues without major efficiency changes. The overall trend is positive with increasing profitability and asset returns toward the end of the observed periods.
Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-03-31).
The financial data over multiple quarters reveals several noteworthy trends regarding profitability, operational efficiency, and financial burdens.
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden ratio demonstrates some volatility throughout the observed periods. Initially, it remained relatively high, around 0.86, but experienced a notable dip to as low as 0.60 during late 2018. Following this trough, the tax burden increased again, stabilizing in the range of approximately 0.84 to 0.88 by late 2019. This variation may suggest changes in effective tax rates or tax planning strategies during this timeframe.
- Interest Burden
- Interest burden shows a gradual downward trend in the early quarters, declining from around 0.94 to about 0.83 by the end of 2016, indicating a possible increase in interest expenses or debt levels impacting operating income. However, after stabilizing for a few quarters, it exhibits a gentle upward trend reaching 0.90 by the third quarter of 2019, which may reflect improved interest cost management or changes in capital structure.
- EBIT Margin
- EBIT margin experiences a noteworthy decline in the first half of the observed period, dropping from 38.15% to a low of 25.48% by the end of 2015. Post this decline, it gradually recovers, with a marked improvement starting in 2017, reaching a peak of 43.78% in late 2019. This upward trend signifies enhanced operational profitability, likely driven by improved cost efficiencies or increased sales prices and/or volumes.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset turnover exhibits some fluctuation but remains relatively stable overall, oscillating between 0.32 and 0.47. Initial declines in 2015 give way to moderate recovery and stabilization around 0.40 to 0.43 in subsequent years, suggesting consistent asset utilization efficiency in generating revenues over the periods.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- The ROA data reflects a decrease mid-period, falling to approximately 5.92% in late 2015 from near 14% at the start. Thereafter, it follows an upward trajectory, recovering steadily and ending on a strong note at 14.22% by the third quarter of 2019. This recovery aligns with the improvements seen in EBIT margin and a stable asset turnover, indicating improved overall profitability relative to assets employed.
In summary, after an initial phase characterized by rising burdens and decreasing profitability and efficiency, the company shows a clear recovery and strengthening of financial performance from 2017 onwards, marked by improved EBIT margins, stable asset utilization, and stronger returns on assets.
Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-03-31).
The financial data reveals several notable trends in the company's operational efficiency and profitability over the analyzed periods.
- Tax Burden Ratio
- The tax burden ratio exhibited moderate fluctuations, beginning at 0.86 in early 2015 and demonstrating a gradual decline through 2017, reaching a low of 0.60 by the third quarter of 2018. This suggests a period of reduced effective tax rates. However, from late 2018 onward, the ratio increased again, stabilizing near the initial levels by the end of the data range, indicating a partial reversal of the earlier tax burden reduction.
- Interest Burden Ratio
- This ratio followed a generally declining trend from 0.94 in March 2015 to 0.83 by the end of 2016, implying rising interest expenses relative to earnings before interest and taxes during that time. From 2017 forward, the ratio showed a slight improvement, climbing progressively to 0.90 in the third quarter of 2019, suggesting a gradual easing of interest-related expenses or improved earnings capacity in relation to those costs.
- EBIT Margin
- The EBIT margin showed a significant downward trend throughout 2015, falling from above 38% to around 25%, indicative of squeezed operating profitability in the early period. Starting from 2016, a recovery is apparent, with margins rising steadily, reaching over 43% by late 2019. This improvement signals enhanced operational efficiency or favorable cost structures supporting earnings before interest and tax.
- Net Profit Margin
- Net profit margin mirrored the EBIT margin's early decline, dropping sharply from 30.83% in March 2015 to under 18% by the end of 2015. A moderate recovery beginning in 2016 continued with some volatility, with a notable dip in late 2017. From 2018 onward, net profit margin strengthened substantially, reaching approximately 35% in the third quarter of 2019. This upward trajectory reflects improved bottom-line profitability, likely benefiting from the combined effects of operating margin improvements, stable interest costs, and variable tax burdens.
Overall, the data illustrate a period of initial pressure on profitability ratios in 2015, followed by progressive operational and net profitability recovery through 2019. The fluctuations in tax and interest burdens appear to have influenced net margins, but the dominant trend is one of improving earnings performance and efficiency toward the latter periods.