Adjustment to Net Income (Loss): Mark to Market Available-for-sale Securities
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
A general upward trajectory in both reported and adjusted net income is observed from 2015 through 2018. Reported net income increased from 1,602 million US$ in 2015 to 4,046 million US$ in 2018, indicating a substantial growth in profitability over the observed period.
- Analysis of Net Income Adjustments
- The variance between reported and adjusted net income reveals fluctuations in the mark-to-market adjustments for available-for-sale securities. In 2014, a positive adjustment of 324 million US$ resulted in adjusted net income exceeding reported figures. This trend shifted in 2015 and 2016, during which adjusted net income was lower than reported net income by 189 million US$ and 127 million US$, respectively, indicating negative mark-to-market impacts during those years.
- Recent Performance and Convergence
- A significant positive adjustment was recorded in 2017, with adjusted net income exceeding reported net income by 418 million US$. However, by 2018, the gap between the two metrics narrowed considerably to 7 million US$, suggesting that mark-to-market volatility had a negligible impact on the final net income figures by the end of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Profitability Ratios: Mark to Market Available-for-sale Securities (Summary)
Celgene Corp., Profitability Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
The financial performance between 2014 and 2018 is characterized by an initial contraction in profitability followed by a robust recovery and significant expansion in equity returns. A notable decline occurred in 2015 across all primary profitability metrics, which subsequently trended upward through the end of the period.
- Net Profit Margin Trends
- The reported net profit margin experienced a decrease from 26.44% in 2014 to 17.49% in 2015. A consistent recovery was observed thereafter, with the margin climbing to 26.51% by December 31, 2018. The adjusted net profit margin followed a similar trajectory, though it exhibited higher volatility, dipping to 15.42% in 2015 before rebounding to 26.55% in 2018.
- Return on Equity and Asset Efficiency
- Return on Equity (ROE) demonstrated the most aggressive growth pattern. After a slight dip in 2015, the reported ROE surged from 30.29% in 2016 to 65.67% in 2018, while the adjusted ROE reached 65.78% in the same period. Return on Assets (ROA) mirrored the net profit margin's trend, falling from 11.53% in 2014 to a low of 5.92% in 2015, before recovering to 11.40% by the end of 2018.
- Impact of Mark-to-Market Adjustments
- The variance between reported and adjusted figures indicates fluctuating impacts from the valuation of available-for-sale securities. In 2014 and 2017, adjusted ratios were higher than reported ratios, suggesting that reported earnings were suppressed by non-operational valuation changes. Conversely, in 2015 and 2016, reported ratios slightly exceeded adjusted figures. By 2018, a near-total convergence of reported and adjusted values is observed across all three metrics, suggesting a stabilization in the impact of these adjustments.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net income ÷ Net product sales
= 100 × 4,046 ÷ 15,265 = 26.51%
2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income ÷ Net product sales
= 100 × 4,053 ÷ 15,265 = 26.55%
A cyclical trend in profitability is evident between 2014 and 2018, characterized by a significant contraction in 2015 followed by a sustained recovery. Net income, both reported and adjusted, demonstrates a strong upward trajectory in the final three years of the period, culminating in peak values by the end of 2018.
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin Evolution
- The adjusted net profit margin experienced a sharp decline from 30.72% in 2014 to 15.42% in 2015. This represents the lowest point of profitability for the observed period. Subsequently, a consistent recovery occurred, with the margin climbing to 16.73% in 2016, 25.88% in 2017, and reaching 26.55% by 2018.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- Discrepancies between reported and adjusted net income indicate the influence of non-recurring items. In 2014 and 2017, adjusted net income exceeded reported figures, suggesting the exclusion of non-cash charges or one-time expenses. In contrast, during 2015 and 2016, adjusted net income was lower than reported figures. By 2018, the gap narrowed significantly, with reported net income at 4,046 million US$ and adjusted net income at 4,053 million US$, indicating a convergence of performance metrics.
- Net Income Growth Patterns
- Following the 2015 trough of 1,602 million US$ in reported net income, a strong growth phase is observed. Reported net income increased consistently, rising to 1,999 million US$ in 2016, 2,940 million US$ in 2017, and 4,046 million US$ in 2018. This expansion in absolute profit correlates with the recovery in net profit margins, signaling improved operational efficiency or increased revenue scale over the latter half of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 4,046 ÷ 6,161 = 65.67%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 4,053 ÷ 6,161 = 65.78%
The financial performance from 2014 to 2018 is characterized by a period of initial volatility followed by a sustained and aggressive growth phase in both absolute profitability and capital efficiency.
- Net Income Trends
- Both reported and adjusted net income experienced a decline in 2015 before entering a strong growth trajectory. Reported net income grew from US$ 2,000 million in 2014 to US$ 4,046 million in 2018. Adjusted net income showed more pronounced volatility, falling from US$ 2,324 million in 2014 to a low of US$ 1,413 million in 2015, before recovering sharply to reach US$ 4,053 million by 2018.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis
- ROE metrics mirrored the trends seen in net income, with a notable dip in 2015 followed by an accelerating upward trend. The Adjusted ROE fell to 23.87% in 2015 from 35.61% in 2014, then rose significantly over the subsequent three years, peaking at 65.78% in 2018. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's ability to generate profit from shareholders' equity over the five-year period.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- A convergence between reported and adjusted figures is observable over the analysis period. In 2014, a significant variance existed between Reported ROE (30.65%) and Adjusted ROE (35.61%). However, by 2018, these figures nearly aligned, with Reported ROE at 65.67% and Adjusted ROE at 65.78%, suggesting that the impact of non-recurring or adjusting items became negligible relative to the total earnings by the end of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 4,046 ÷ 35,480 = 11.40%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 4,053 ÷ 35,480 = 11.42%
The financial performance from 2014 to 2018 is characterized by an initial contraction in profitability and asset efficiency followed by a sustained period of recovery and growth. Both reported and adjusted metrics exhibit a U-shaped trajectory, with a notable trough occurring in 2015.
- Net Income Trends
- Reported net income experienced a decline from US$ 2,000 million in 2014 to US$ 1,602 million in 2015, before increasing consistently to reach US$ 4,046 million by 2018. Adjusted net income followed a similar pattern but showed greater volatility, dropping sharply to US$ 1,413 million in 2015 before rebounding strongly to US$ 4,053 million in 2018.
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA) Analysis
- The Adjusted ROA reflects a significant decrease from 13.40% in 2014 to 5.22% in 2015, indicating a temporary reduction in the efficiency of asset utilization. This metric then trended upward for three consecutive years, recording 6.66% in 2016, 11.14% in 2017, and peaking at 11.42% in 2018.
- Comparative Performance Metrics
- A divergence between reported and adjusted ROA is observed throughout the period. While Adjusted ROA was higher than Reported ROA in 2014, 2017, and 2018, it fell below the reported figure in 2015 and 2016. The convergence of Reported ROA (11.40%) and Adjusted ROA (11.42%) by the end of 2018 suggests a stabilization in the impact of non-recurring items on asset productivity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?