Stock Analysis on Net

Celgene Corp. (NASDAQ:CELG)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 31, 2019.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

Economic Profit

Celgene Corp., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2018 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The period under review demonstrates a fluctuating relationship between net operating profit after taxes, cost of capital, and invested capital, ultimately impacting economic profit. Initial years exhibit negative economic profit, followed by a substantial improvement in the final year.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT remained relatively stable between 2014 and 2017, fluctuating around the US$1.8 to US$1.9 billion range. A significant increase is observed in 2018, with NOPAT reaching US$4.676 billion. This represents a substantial improvement in operational profitability.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital experienced a decreasing trend throughout the period. Starting at 21.15% in 2014, it declined to 17.90% in 2018. This suggests a decreasing risk profile or improved capital market conditions for the company.
Invested Capital
Invested capital increased considerably from 2014 to 2018. A large jump occurred between 2014 and 2015, increasing from US$9.844 billion to US$18.136 billion. Growth continued, albeit at a slower pace, reaching US$27.773 billion in 2018. This indicates significant investment in the business over the period.
Economic Profit
Economic profit was negative for the first four years of the period. Losses ranged from US$-256 million in 2014 to US$-1.728 billion in 2015, with subsequent years showing similar negative values. However, economic profit improved substantially in 2018, reaching US$-294 million. While still negative, this represents a significant reduction in the loss compared to prior years, driven by the substantial increase in NOPAT and the decrease in the cost of capital. The magnitude of the negative economic profit diminished as NOPAT increased and the cost of capital decreased, despite the concurrent increase in invested capital.

In summary, while the company experienced negative economic profit throughout most of the observed period, the trend indicates a positive shift in 2018. The substantial increase in NOPAT, coupled with a lower cost of capital, contributed to a significantly reduced economic loss.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Celgene Corp., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Net income
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents4
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability5
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense6
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes7
(Gain) loss on marketable securities
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income8
Investment income, after taxes9
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.

5 2018 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

6 2018 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.

8 2018 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


Net Income
The net income demonstrates a fluctuating yet generally upward trend over the five-year period. Starting at $2,000 million in 2014, it experienced a notable decline to $1,602 million in 2015. This was followed by a recovery in 2016, reaching $1,999 million, subsequently increasing more substantially in 2017 to $2,940 million. The most significant growth occurred in 2018, with net income reaching $4,046 million, more than doubling the 2015 low point and exceeding the 2014 figure by a substantial margin. This trend suggests an overall improvement in profitability, with a particularly strong performance in the final year under review.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT shows a more consistent pattern over the period, with marginal fluctuations between 2014 and 2017. It started at $1,826 million in 2014, experienced a slight decrease to $1,787 million in 2015, then increased moderately to $1,954 million in 2016, before a small decrease to $1,913 million in 2017. A significant increase occurred in 2018, with NOPAT more than doubling to $4,676 million. This sharp rise contrasts with the relative stability of previous years and indicates a substantial improvement in operational efficiency or profitability in 2018. The disparity between net income and NOPAT values also suggests changes in tax impact or non-operating items affecting earnings.
Overall Analysis
Both net income and NOPAT reveal a period of relative stability or moderate variation from 2014 to 2017, followed by significant growth in 2018. The sharp increase in 2018 for both metrics represents a notable positive shift in financial performance. While net income shows some volatility, NOPAT is comparatively stable until the final year, indicating consistent operating profitability prior to the substantial improvement. The data suggests the company may have implemented effective strategies or benefited from market conditions that dramatically enhanced profitability and operational results in 2018.

Cash Operating Taxes

Celgene Corp., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Provision for taxes on income
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).


Provision for taxes on income
The provision for taxes on income exhibited fluctuations over the observed period. Starting at $328 million in 2014, it increased to $422 million in 2015, then decreased to $373 million in 2016. A significant rise occurred in 2017, reaching $1,374 million, followed by a notable decline to $786 million in 2018. This pattern indicates volatility in the tax obligations estimated for income taxes, with a pronounced peak in 2017.
Cash operating taxes
Cash operating taxes showed a similar volatile pattern. Beginning at $654 million in 2014, the value fell to $555 million in 2015, then rose substantially to $884 million in 2016. A dramatic increase was observed in 2017, peaking at $2,853 million. The following year, 2018, saw a sharp decrease to $903 million. This trend suggests a significant variation in the actual cash tax payments, with the highest cash outflow recorded in 2017.
Comparative insights
Both provisions for income taxes and cash operating taxes demonstrate notable volatility with peaks in 2017. The magnitude of cash operating taxes consistently exceeds the provision for taxes, particularly evident in 2017 when cash taxes were more than double the provision amount. This discrepancy might indicate timing differences or adjustments between accrued tax expenses and actual cash payments during these periods.
Overall trend
The data reveals inconsistent patterns in both tax provisions and cash taxes over the five years, with a significant spike in 2017 followed by a decrease in 2018. The spikes may be linked to underlying changes in earnings, tax planning strategies, or external tax regulations affecting the company’s tax liabilities and payments.

Invested Capital

Celgene Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
Long-term debt, net of discount, excluding current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for doubtful accounts3
Deferred revenue4
Equity equivalents5
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax6
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Construction in progress7
Debt securities available-for-sale and equity investments with readily determinable fair values8
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

7 Subtraction of construction in progress.

8 Subtraction of debt securities available-for-sale and equity investments with readily determinable fair values.


Total reported debt & leases
The total reported debt and leases exhibited a significant upward trend over the five-year period. Starting at $7,068 million in 2014, the figure more than doubled by 2015 to $14,456 million. It then remained relatively stable in 2016 around $14,480 million before increasing consistently to reach $20,645 million by 2018. This indicates a growing reliance on debt and lease obligations to finance operations or investments during this timeframe.
Stockholders’ equity
Stockholders’ equity showed some fluctuations with no clear positive trend. The equity started at $6,525 million in 2014, decreased to $5,919 million in 2015, then increased gradually in 2016 and 2017 to reach $6,921 million. However, in 2018, equity declined again to $6,161 million. This pattern may suggest variability in retained earnings, issuance or repurchase of shares, or other equity-related activities affecting the net book value of shareholders' investment.
Invested capital
Invested capital expanded substantially over the period assessed. It nearly doubled from $9,844 million in 2014 to $18,136 million in 2015 and then continued to grow steadily to $18,672 million in 2016 and $18,857 million in 2017. A marked increase occurred in 2018, with invested capital soaring to $27,773 million. This substantial growth points to increased capital deployment into long-term assets or working capital, possibly reflecting strategic expansion or acquisition initiatives supported partially by rising debt levels.

Cost of Capital

Celgene Corp., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Celgene Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
AbbVie Inc.
Amgen Inc.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Danaher Corp.
Eli Lilly & Co.
Gilead Sciences Inc.
Johnson & Johnson
Merck & Co. Inc.
Pfizer Inc.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2018 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic spread ratio exhibited a notable trend over the five-year period. Initially negative, the ratio demonstrated significant deterioration before showing signs of improvement towards the end of the observed timeframe. Economic profit remained negative throughout the period, though its magnitude fluctuated. Invested capital consistently increased year-over-year.

Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio began at -2.61% in 2014 and declined substantially to -9.53% in 2015. This represented a significant widening of the negative spread. A slight improvement to -9.24% was seen in 2016, followed by a further, though less dramatic, improvement to -8.58% in 2017. The most substantial positive change occurred in 2018, with the ratio increasing to -1.06%. This indicates a diminishing gap between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital, though it remained negative.
Economic Profit
Economic profit started at a loss of US$256 million in 2014. This loss expanded considerably to US$1,728 million in 2015 and remained high at US$1,725 million in 2016. A modest decrease in the loss was observed in 2017, with economic profit reported at US$1,619 million. The loss continued to decrease in 2018, reaching US$294 million, the lowest level of loss over the period.
Invested Capital
Invested capital increased consistently throughout the period. Starting at US$9,844 million in 2014, it rose to US$18,136 million in 2015, US$18,672 million in 2016, and US$18,857 million in 2017. The largest single-year increase occurred in 2018, with invested capital reaching US$27,773 million. This consistent growth in invested capital occurred alongside negative economic profit, potentially contributing to the initially widening negative economic spread.

The improvement in the economic spread ratio in 2017 and particularly in 2018, coupled with the decreasing magnitude of economic loss, suggests a potential shift in the company’s ability to generate returns relative to its capital costs. However, the continued negative economic profit indicates that the cost of capital still exceeds the returns generated by the invested capital.


Economic Profit Margin

Celgene Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
 
Net product sales
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted net product sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
AbbVie Inc.
Amgen Inc.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Danaher Corp.
Eli Lilly & Co.
Gilead Sciences Inc.
Johnson & Johnson
Merck & Co. Inc.
Pfizer Inc.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2018 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net product sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic profit margin exhibited significant fluctuation over the five-year period. Initially negative, the margin demonstrated a substantial decline before exhibiting improvement towards the end of the observed timeframe. A consistent pattern of negative economic profit was present throughout the period, indicating that the company’s returns were not exceeding its cost of capital.

Economic Profit Margin
The economic profit margin began at -3.39% in 2014. This metric then experienced a marked deterioration, reaching -18.79% in 2015. A moderate improvement followed in 2016, with the margin increasing to -15.43%. Further improvement was observed in 2017, reaching -12.45%. The most substantial positive change occurred between 2017 and 2018, with the margin increasing to -1.92%. While remaining negative, this represents a significant reduction in the magnitude of the economic loss.
Relationship between Economic Profit and Adjusted Net Product Sales
Adjusted net product sales consistently increased throughout the period, rising from US$7,569 million in 2014 to US$15,302 million in 2018. Despite this revenue growth, economic profit remained negative for all years. The largest increase in sales occurred between 2017 and 2018, coinciding with the most significant improvement in the economic profit margin. However, the continued negative economic profit suggests that the cost of capital remained higher than the returns generated from these sales.

The trend suggests that while the company was able to increase sales, its ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital improved over time, but did not become positive within the analyzed period. The substantial improvement in the economic profit margin in 2018, despite continued negative economic profit, indicates a potential shift in the company’s profitability dynamics.