Stock Analysis on Net

Twitter Inc. (NYSE:TWTR)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since July 26, 2022.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Twitter Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The analysis of the financial data over a five-year period reveals several notable trends regarding net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT), cost of capital, invested capital, and economic profit.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT exhibited considerable volatility throughout the period. Initially, the company experienced a negative NOPAT in 2017, indicating operational losses after taxes. A significant turnaround occurred in 2018 with a sharp increase to a positive NOPAT, peaking at approximately 443 million USD. However, the following years saw a decline with NOPAT dropping sharply in 2020 and turning negative again by 2021, reaching roughly -388 million USD. This pattern suggests fluctuating operating performance and challenges in sustaining profitability.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital remained relatively stable around 11% for the first four years, showing only minor fluctuations between 10.63% and 10.97%. In 2021, there was a slight decrease to approximately 9.95%. This modest reduction could reflect changes in market conditions, the company’s risk profile, or capital structure adjustments.
Invested Capital
Invested capital consistently increased each year, growing from approximately 4.63 billion USD in 2017 to nearly 7.45 billion USD in 2021. This steady increase indicates ongoing investments in assets or working capital, suggesting an expansion in the company’s operational base or strategic asset deployment over time.
Economic Profit
Despite fluctuations in NOPAT, economic profit remained negative throughout the entire period, reflecting that the company has not generated returns above its cost of capital. Economic losses decreased from around -580 million USD in 2017 to a low of approximately -108 million USD in 2018, followed by an increase in economic losses in subsequent years, culminating in the largest negative value of about -1.13 billion USD in 2021. This trend highlights persistent value destruction and an inability to cover the capital costs associated with its investments.

Overall, the data illustrates challenges in achieving consistent profitability and generating economic value despite increasing capital investments, coupled with a largely stable cost of capital during the analyzed timeframe.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Twitter Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net income (loss)
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents4
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability5
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense6
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes7
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income8
Investment income, after taxes9
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss).

5 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

6 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss).

8 2021 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in net income and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) over the five-year period.

Net Income (Loss)
Initially, there was a substantial net loss of approximately -108 million US dollars at the end of 2017. This was followed by a strong recovery in 2018, with net income increasing sharply to nearly 1.2 billion US dollars. The positive trend continued into 2019, with net income reaching around 1.47 billion US dollars. However, the company experienced a pronounced reversal in 2020, recording a significant net loss of approximately -1.14 billion US dollars. This negative result persisted into 2021, albeit at a reduced loss of about -221 million US dollars. Overall, net income demonstrates high volatility, with a peak in 2019 and losses resurging in the last two years of the period.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT follows a similar pattern to net income, starting with a negative value of around -74 million US dollars in 2017. It then sharply increased to 443 million US dollars in 2018, followed by a slight decline to 382 million US dollars in 2019. A notable decline occurred in 2020, with NOPAT dropping to a marginal positive figure of about 17.5 million US dollars, indicating a substantial reduction in operational profitability. In 2021, NOPAT turned negative again, reaching approximately -388 million US dollars, which reflects a deterioration in operational efficiency or increased operating costs relative to revenue.

In summary, both profitability measures indicate a period of growth and profitability in the middle years (2018–2019), contrasting sharply with losses and reduced operating performance in the earlier and later years. This suggests the company faced considerable challenges affecting its bottom line and operations towards the end of the examined timeframe.


Cash Operating Taxes

Twitter Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


Provision (benefit) for income taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes displays significant fluctuations over the analyzed periods. Initially, in 2017, the company reported a positive provision, indicating tax expenses amounting to approximately 12.6 million US dollars. Subsequently, in 2018 and 2019, the figures reflect substantial negative values, with benefits representing tax credits or reductions exceeding 782 million and 1.07 billion US dollars respectively. This shift suggests large tax benefits or loss carrybacks during these years. However, in 2020, the provision reverted sharply to a positive expense exceeding 1.08 billion US dollars, indicating a considerable tax charge. Lastly, in 2021, the provision again turned negative at around 190 million US dollars, signifying a tax benefit. This volatililty suggests that the company experienced considerable variability in taxable income, tax planning outcomes, or tax accounting treatments across the years.
Cash operating taxes
Cash operating taxes have generally remained within a more stable range compared to the provision for income taxes. The amounts paid in cash taxes fluctuated moderately between approximately 27.6 million and 51.6 million US dollars throughout the periods. The lowest cash taxes occurred in 2018 at roughly 27.6 million US dollars, while the highest payment was recorded in 2021 at approximately 51.6 million US dollars. The intermediate years show amounts oscillating around 41.8 million to 49.7 million US dollars. The overall trend suggests relatively consistent cash outflows for taxes despite the considerable volatility in the tax provision figures, which may indicate timing differences, deferred tax effects, or non-cash tax items affecting the taxable income reconciliation.

Invested Capital

Twitter Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Convertible notes, short-term
Finance lease liabilities, short-term
Convertible notes, long-term
Senior notes, long-term
Finance lease liabilities, long-term
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for doubtful accounts3
Deferred revenue4
Equity equivalents5
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax6
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Construction in progress7
Short-term investments8
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

7 Subtraction of construction in progress.

8 Subtraction of short-term investments.


The financial data reveals several key trends in the company's capital structure and financial positioning over the five-year period ending in 2021.

Total Reported Debt & Leases
This liability measure shows a general upward trend throughout the period. Starting at approximately 2.34 billion USD in 2017, the amount increased significantly to around 3.49 billion USD in 2018. A slight decrease to roughly 3.29 billion USD is observed in 2019, but the figure rises sharply again in the two subsequent years, reaching approximately 4.48 billion USD in 2020 and peaking at about 5.55 billion USD by the end of 2021. This trend indicates a growing reliance on debt and lease obligations to finance operations or investments.
Stockholders’ Equity
Equity shows overall growth from 2017 to 2019, moving from around 5.05 billion USD to above 8.7 billion USD. However, this is followed by a decline in the two subsequent years, falling to roughly 7.97 billion USD in 2020 and further to about 7.31 billion USD in 2021. This decrease suggests potential distribution of earnings (such as dividends or share buybacks), losses, or other equity-reducing events during these years.
Invested Capital
Invested capital displays a solid overall upward trajectory. It starts at approximately 4.63 billion USD in 2017 and steadily rises each year, reaching close to 7.45 billion USD by 2021. The progression is consistent, with the most notable increases occurring from 2019 onward. This upward movement indicates an expanding base of capital utilized to support the company’s operations and growth initiatives.

In summary, the company has increasingly utilized debt and leases as part of its capital structure, while stockholders' equity experienced growth through 2019 followed by reductions in subsequent years. The consistent increase in invested capital underscores an ongoing expansion in financial resources employed by the company, reflecting potential investments in assets or operational capabilities. The interplay between rising debt and declining equity toward the end of the period may warrant further analysis regarding financial risk and capital cost optimization.


Cost of Capital

Twitter Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Twitter Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Alphabet Inc.
Comcast Corp.
Meta Platforms Inc.
Netflix Inc.
Take-Two Interactive Software Inc.
Walt Disney Co.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of the annual economic profit, invested capital, and economic spread ratio reveals significant trends over the five-year period ending in 2021.

Economic Profit
The economic profit has consistently been negative throughout the period, indicating that the company did not generate returns above its cost of capital. Initially, the economic loss decreased from -579,764 thousand US dollars in 2017 to a smaller loss of -108,474 thousand US dollars in 2018. However, from 2018 onward, the economic profit deteriorated again, with losses increasing to -193,111 thousand US dollars in 2019, then sharply declining to -637,418 thousand US dollars in 2020, and further worsening to -1,128,973 thousand US dollars in 2021. This suggests increasing challenges in achieving value creation annually.
Invested Capital
Invested capital showed a consistent upward trend, growing from approximately 4,627,898 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 7,449,784 thousand US dollars in 2021. This indicates ongoing capital investment or asset growth over the years, with a particularly marked increase between 2020 and 2021. The expanding capital base suggests efforts to increase capacity, scale, or resources, even as economic profit remained negative.
Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio, representing the differential between return on invested capital and cost of capital, was negative in all years, reflecting that the company did not earn sufficient returns above costs. The ratio showed improvement from -12.53% in 2017 to -2.09% in 2018, indicating a relatively better position; however, it then worsened to -3.65% in 2019, further declined to -10.68% in 2020, and reached the lowest point of -15.15% in 2021. This pattern suggests increasing inefficiency or diminishing profitability relative to invested capital.

Overall, the trends indicate that despite rising invested capital, the company's ability to generate economic profit has declined significantly in recent years, with increasing negative spreads highlighting challenges in achieving returns above capital costs. The deteriorating economic profit and spread ratio despite growth in capital investment could concern stakeholders regarding operational efficiency and value creation.


Economic Profit Margin

Twitter Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
 
Revenue
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted revenue
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Alphabet Inc.
Comcast Corp.
Meta Platforms Inc.
Netflix Inc.
Take-Two Interactive Software Inc.
Walt Disney Co.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenue
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data reveals notable trends in economic profit, adjusted revenue, and economic profit margin over the five-year period ending December 31, 2021.

Adjusted Revenue
The adjusted revenue shows a consistent upward trajectory each year, increasing from approximately 2.44 billion US dollars in 2017 to over 5.09 billion US dollars in 2021. This represents more than a doubling of revenue within the period, indicating significant growth in the company's top-line performance.
Economic Profit
Economic profit remains negative throughout the entire period, indicating the company did not generate economic value over its cost of capital. The figure exhibits substantial volatility, with a marked decrease in 2017 to -579.8 million US dollars, a smaller negative in 2018 at -108.5 million, then deteriorating again to -193.1 million in 2019. Post-2019, there is a sharp decline in economic profit, plunging to -637.4 million in 2020 and further down to -1.13 billion in 2021. This worsening trend suggests increasing economic losses despite revenue growth.
Economic Profit Margin
The economic profit margin follows a fluctuating yet predominantly negative pattern, starting at -23.79% in 2017, improving significantly to -3.55% in 2018, and then declining to -5.53% in 2019. The margin then sharply decreases to -17.18% in 2020 and further to -22.16% in 2021. This pattern mirrors the economic profit trend, underscoring rising inefficiency or increased cost burdens relative to revenue as time progresses despite the revenue growth.

In summary, the data indicates robust revenue growth coupled with increasingly negative economic profit and deteriorating economic profit margins. This suggests that although sales grew substantially, the costs and capital charges grew at a pace that worsened the company's overall economic profitability during the period under review.