EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Twitter Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Common-Size Income Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Operating Profit Margin since 2013
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2013
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2013
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2013
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Twitter Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
An analysis of the financial performance from 2017 to 2021 reveals a consistent failure to generate positive economic value. Throughout the five-year period, economic profit remained negative, indicating that the returns generated from operations were insufficient to cover the cost of the capital employed in the business.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT exhibited significant volatility over the period. After a negative start in 2017, there was a substantial recovery in 2018, reaching a peak of 442,934 thousand US dollars. However, a consistent downward trajectory followed, with profits diminishing through 2019 and 2020, eventually returning to a deficit of 387,636 thousand US dollars by 2021.
- Invested Capital and Cost of Capital
- Invested capital showed a steady and uninterrupted increase, growing from 4,627,898 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 7,449,784 thousand US dollars in 2021. During this expansion of the capital base, the cost of capital remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 11.65% and 12.83%.
- Economic Profit Trajectory
- The economic profit trend reflects a deepening erosion of value. While the deficit narrowed in 2018 to 199,922 thousand US dollars, it widened progressively in subsequent years. The situation deteriorated sharply by 2021, reaching a period low of negative 1,255,552 thousand US dollars. This decline was driven by the simultaneous occurrence of a shrinking NOPAT and a significantly enlarged invested capital base, which increased the total capital charge.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss).
5 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss).
8 2021 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in net income and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) over the five-year period.
- Net Income (Loss)
- Initially, there was a substantial net loss of approximately -108 million US dollars at the end of 2017. This was followed by a strong recovery in 2018, with net income increasing sharply to nearly 1.2 billion US dollars. The positive trend continued into 2019, with net income reaching around 1.47 billion US dollars. However, the company experienced a pronounced reversal in 2020, recording a significant net loss of approximately -1.14 billion US dollars. This negative result persisted into 2021, albeit at a reduced loss of about -221 million US dollars. Overall, net income demonstrates high volatility, with a peak in 2019 and losses resurging in the last two years of the period.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT follows a similar pattern to net income, starting with a negative value of around -74 million US dollars in 2017. It then sharply increased to 443 million US dollars in 2018, followed by a slight decline to 382 million US dollars in 2019. A notable decline occurred in 2020, with NOPAT dropping to a marginal positive figure of about 17.5 million US dollars, indicating a substantial reduction in operational profitability. In 2021, NOPAT turned negative again, reaching approximately -388 million US dollars, which reflects a deterioration in operational efficiency or increased operating costs relative to revenue.
In summary, both profitability measures indicate a period of growth and profitability in the middle years (2018–2019), contrasting sharply with losses and reduced operating performance in the earlier and later years. This suggests the company faced considerable challenges affecting its bottom line and operations towards the end of the examined timeframe.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
- Provision (benefit) for income taxes
- The provision (benefit) for income taxes displays significant fluctuations over the analyzed periods. Initially, in 2017, the company reported a positive provision, indicating tax expenses amounting to approximately 12.6 million US dollars. Subsequently, in 2018 and 2019, the figures reflect substantial negative values, with benefits representing tax credits or reductions exceeding 782 million and 1.07 billion US dollars respectively. This shift suggests large tax benefits or loss carrybacks during these years. However, in 2020, the provision reverted sharply to a positive expense exceeding 1.08 billion US dollars, indicating a considerable tax charge. Lastly, in 2021, the provision again turned negative at around 190 million US dollars, signifying a tax benefit. This volatililty suggests that the company experienced considerable variability in taxable income, tax planning outcomes, or tax accounting treatments across the years.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes have generally remained within a more stable range compared to the provision for income taxes. The amounts paid in cash taxes fluctuated moderately between approximately 27.6 million and 51.6 million US dollars throughout the periods. The lowest cash taxes occurred in 2018 at roughly 27.6 million US dollars, while the highest payment was recorded in 2021 at approximately 51.6 million US dollars. The intermediate years show amounts oscillating around 41.8 million to 49.7 million US dollars. The overall trend suggests relatively consistent cash outflows for taxes despite the considerable volatility in the tax provision figures, which may indicate timing differences, deferred tax effects, or non-cash tax items affecting the taxable income reconciliation.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of construction in progress.
8 Subtraction of short-term investments.
The financial data reveals several key trends in the company's capital structure and financial positioning over the five-year period ending in 2021.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- This liability measure shows a general upward trend throughout the period. Starting at approximately 2.34 billion USD in 2017, the amount increased significantly to around 3.49 billion USD in 2018. A slight decrease to roughly 3.29 billion USD is observed in 2019, but the figure rises sharply again in the two subsequent years, reaching approximately 4.48 billion USD in 2020 and peaking at about 5.55 billion USD by the end of 2021. This trend indicates a growing reliance on debt and lease obligations to finance operations or investments.
- Stockholders’ Equity
- Equity shows overall growth from 2017 to 2019, moving from around 5.05 billion USD to above 8.7 billion USD. However, this is followed by a decline in the two subsequent years, falling to roughly 7.97 billion USD in 2020 and further to about 7.31 billion USD in 2021. This decrease suggests potential distribution of earnings (such as dividends or share buybacks), losses, or other equity-reducing events during these years.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital displays a solid overall upward trajectory. It starts at approximately 4.63 billion USD in 2017 and steadily rises each year, reaching close to 7.45 billion USD by 2021. The progression is consistent, with the most notable increases occurring from 2019 onward. This upward movement indicates an expanding base of capital utilized to support the company’s operations and growth initiatives.
In summary, the company has increasingly utilized debt and leases as part of its capital structure, while stockholders' equity experienced growth through 2019 followed by reductions in subsequent years. The consistent increase in invested capital underscores an ongoing expansion in financial resources employed by the company, reflecting potential investments in assets or operational capabilities. The interplay between rising debt and declining equity toward the end of the period may warrant further analysis regarding financial risk and capital cost optimization.
Cost of Capital
Twitter Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Alphabet Inc. | ||||||
| Comcast Corp. | ||||||
| Meta Platforms Inc. | ||||||
| Netflix Inc. | ||||||
| Trade Desk Inc. | ||||||
| Walt Disney Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by a persistent inability to generate positive economic value, with economic profit remaining negative throughout the entire period. Despite a significant increase in invested capital, the entity failed to translate these investments into a return that exceeds the cost of capital, resulting in a deteriorating economic spread ratio.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit exhibited high volatility with a pronounced downward trend in the latter half of the period. After an initial loss of $665.3 million in 2017, the figure improved to its peak of negative $199.9 million in 2018. However, this recovery was short-lived, as losses widened progressively to $289.6 million in 2019, $748.3 million in 2020, and reached a low of negative $1.26 billion by 2021.
- Invested Capital Expansion
- A consistent increase in invested capital is evident, rising from $4.63 billion in 2017 to $7.45 billion in 2021. This represents a steady growth in the capital base; however, the correlation between increased investment and economic profit is inverse, as the expansion of capital coincided with deepening economic losses.
- Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
- The economic spread ratio remained negative across all five years, indicating continuous value destruction. The ratio improved from -14.38% in 2017 to -3.86% in 2018, suggesting a momentary increase in capital efficiency. This trend reversed sharply thereafter, with the ratio sliding to -5.48% in 2019, -12.53% in 2020, and concluding at -16.85% in 2021, signaling an accelerating gap between the actual return on capital and the cost of capital.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Revenue | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | ||||||
| Adjusted revenue | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Alphabet Inc. | ||||||
| Comcast Corp. | ||||||
| Meta Platforms Inc. | ||||||
| Netflix Inc. | ||||||
| Trade Desk Inc. | ||||||
| Walt Disney Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenue
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the financial performance from 2017 to 2021 reveals a persistent inability to generate positive economic value despite consistent growth in adjusted revenue. The negative economic profit across all five years indicates that the returns generated were insufficient to cover the company's cost of capital, resulting in a destruction of shareholder value over the period.
- Adjusted Revenue Growth
- Adjusted revenue demonstrated a consistent and uninterrupted upward trajectory, increasing from US$ 2,437,464 thousand in 2017 to US$ 5,094,705 thousand in 2021. This represents a significant expansion of the top line, with the most substantial year-over-year increase occurring between 2020 and 2021.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit exhibited high volatility and a general downward trend. While there was a notable recovery in 2018, where the deficit narrowed to US$ 199,922 thousand, the subsequent years saw a progressive decline. By December 31, 2021, economic profit reached its lowest point at US$ -1,255,552 thousand, indicating an accelerating loss of economic value.
- Economic Profit Margin Analysis
- The economic profit margin fluctuated significantly, starting at -27.30% in 2017 and improving to -6.55% in 2018. However, this improvement was temporary, as the margin deteriorated to -8.30% in 2019, -20.17% in 2020, and finally -24.64% in 2021. The widening negative margin, occurring simultaneously with revenue growth, suggests that the costs of capital or operational inefficiencies grew at a rate that far outpaced revenue gains.