EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. pages available for free this week:
- Cash Flow Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Profitability Ratios
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Debt to Equity since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit, alongside fluctuations in the underlying components. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) initially increased before experiencing substantial declines, while the cost of capital decreased over time. Invested capital generally increased, though a slight decrease is observed in the most recent year. These factors combined to produce consistently negative economic profit figures throughout the analyzed timeframe.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT exhibited growth from 2017 to 2019, increasing from approximately US$1.9 billion to US$2.3 billion. However, a significant downturn occurred in 2020, with NOPAT falling to a loss of approximately US$4.9 billion. This negative trend continued into 2021, though the loss moderated slightly to approximately US$4.0 billion. The substantial declines in NOPAT from 2019 to 2020 and 2021 likely reflect external factors impacting operations.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital demonstrated a consistent downward trend, decreasing from 30.47% in 2017 to 20.08% in 2021. This reduction in the cost of capital suggests a decreasing risk profile or changes in the company’s capital structure and financing costs over the period. Despite this decrease, the cost of capital remained substantial throughout the period.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital generally increased from US$18.1 billion in 2017 to US$28.4 billion in 2020. A slight decrease was observed in 2021, with invested capital falling to US$26.3 billion. The increase in invested capital suggests expansion or investment in assets, while the 2021 decrease could indicate asset sales or a reduction in investment.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative in each year of the analyzed period. The magnitude of the negative economic profit increased significantly from 2017 to 2020, moving from approximately US$3.6 billion to US$11.2 billion. While the negative economic profit decreased in 2021 to approximately US$9.2 billion, it remained substantial. The consistent negative economic profit indicates that the company’s returns on invested capital were consistently below its cost of capital.
The combination of declining NOPAT and a consistently high cost of capital, despite the cost of capital’s downward trend, resulted in substantial and persistent negative economic profit. The fluctuations in invested capital appear to have a secondary effect on economic profit, but are less impactful than the performance of NOPAT relative to the cost of capital.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in credit loss allowance.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss) attributable to Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd..
5 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense, net of interest capitalized = Adjusted interest expense, net of interest capitalized × Statutory income tax rate
= × 0.85% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss) attributable to Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd..
8 2021 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 0.85% =
9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in the company's profitability over the five-year period.
- Net income (loss) attributable to Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
- From 2017 to 2019, net income exhibited a steady increase, rising from approximately $1.63 billion to nearly $1.88 billion. However, the years 2020 and 2021 show a drastic reversal to substantial net losses, amounting to negative $5.80 billion and negative $5.26 billion respectively. This sharp decline reflects a critical downturn in net profitability during these latter years.
- Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)
- Similarly, NOPAT increased consistently from about $1.90 billion in 2017 to approximately $2.33 billion in 2019, demonstrating a positive operational performance before taxes. In contrast, 2020 and 2021 recorded significant negative NOPAT values, at nearly negative $4.92 billion and negative $3.96 billion respectively, signaling severe operational challenges impacting the company’s profitability after tax obligations.
Overall, the data indicates a period of strong financial performance up until 2019, followed by a sharp deterioration in both net income and operational profitability in the subsequent two years. The magnitude of losses recorded in 2020 and 2021 suggests substantial adverse impacts on the company's financial health during this period.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
- Income Tax (Expense) Benefit
- The income tax benefit showed an increasing trend from 2017 to 2019, rising from 18,300 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 32,600 thousand US dollars in 2019. However, there was a significant reversal in 2020 and 2021, with the figures turning into expenses of 15,000 thousand and 45,200 thousand US dollars respectively. This indicates a shift from tax benefits to tax expenses in these two years, suggesting a possible change in profitability, tax regulations, or financial strategy.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes followed a similar pattern to the income tax benefit, increasing steadily from 21,373 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 39,556 thousand US dollars in 2019. In 2020 and 2021, there was a sharp decline turning into negative values of 12,780 thousand and 34,028 thousand US dollars respectively. This negative value implies possible tax refunds, credits, or adjustments during these years, which aligns with the shift observed in income tax figures.
- Overall Insight
- The data reflects a period of consistent growth in tax-related expenses and benefits until 2019, followed by a sudden and marked change in 2020 and 2021. The switch from positive to negative figures likely indicates an unusual financial situation or external impact affecting taxable income and tax payments during the latter years, possibly linked to broader economic factors or company-specific events.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of restructuring.
5 Addition of equity equivalents to shareholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of ships under construction.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
-
The total reported debt and leases increased significantly over the period analyzed. Starting from approximately $7.7 billion at the end of 2017, it rose markedly to about $11.3 billion by the end of 2018. The upward trend continued with a smaller increase to $11.7 billion by the end of 2019, followed by a very sharp rise to nearly $20.0 billion at the end of 2020. By the end of 2021, the figure further increased to around $21.7 billion. This reflects a consistent and steep growth in the company's leverage position over the five-year period.
- Shareholders’ Equity
-
Shareholders’ equity showed a fluctuating and ultimately declining trend. Starting at approximately $10.7 billion at the end of 2017, it rose slightly to about $11.1 billion in 2018, and then further increased to $12.2 billion at the end of 2019, marking the highest level within the timeframe. However, by the end of 2020, equity decreased sharply to around $8.8 billion. This downward trajectory continued in 2021, with equity dropping significantly to approximately $5.1 billion. The decline suggests a reduction in net asset value, possibly indicating losses, dividend payments, or other factors reducing equity.
- Invested Capital
-
Invested capital demonstrated an overall upward trend with some volatility. It increased from about $18.1 billion at the end of 2017 to approximately $22.8 billion in 2018, continuing to climb to $24.2 billion at the end of 2019. A notable increase occurred by the end of 2020, reaching about $28.4 billion. However, by the end of 2021, invested capital decreased to roughly $26.3 billion. This pattern indicates ongoing investment or capital deployment, particularly between 2019 and 2020, with a slight contraction observed in the final period.
- Overall Insights
-
The data reveals a pronounced increase in total debt and leases, especially during 2020 and 2021, suggesting increased borrowing or lease commitments, possibly to support operations or capital expenditures during challenging periods. Meanwhile, shareholders’ equity experienced a marked decline after 2019, which could signal operational difficulties, impairments, or significant distributions. Invested capital's growth until 2020 suggests increased resource commitment, with a slight reduction in 2021 potentially reflecting asset disposals or changes in capital structure. The combination of rising debt and falling equity points to increased financial leverage and potential risk in the company’s capital structure.
Cost of Capital
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 0.85%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 0.85%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 0.26%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 0.26%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 1.68%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 1.68%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 1.14%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 1.14%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 1.11%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 1.11%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | ||||||
| Booking Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | ||||||
| DoorDash, Inc. | ||||||
| McDonald’s Corp. | ||||||
| Starbucks Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio demonstrates a consistently negative trend over the observed period. Initially, the ratio stood at -19.99% in 2017 and exhibited improvement, reaching -14.99% in 2019. However, this improvement was short-lived, as the ratio experienced a substantial decline in 2020 and 2021, ending at -35.12%.
- Economic Spread Ratio Trend
- The economic spread ratio, which indicates the margin by which a company’s return on invested capital exceeds its cost of capital, has consistently been negative. This suggests that, throughout the period, the company’s returns have not covered its cost of capital. The ratio’s movement from -19.99% to -14.99% between 2017 and 2019 indicates a narrowing gap between returns and capital costs, but this was reversed dramatically in subsequent years.
- Impact of 2020-2021
- The most significant changes occurred in 2020 and 2021, with the economic spread ratio falling to -39.42% and -35.12% respectively. This substantial deterioration coincides with a period of significant economic disruption, likely impacting the company’s ability to generate returns. The magnitude of the decline in these years is considerably larger than the improvements seen in prior periods.
- Relationship to Economic Profit and Invested Capital
- The negative economic spread ratio is consistent with the consistently negative economic profit reported for each year. While invested capital generally increased over the period, the increase in economic profit did not keep pace, resulting in a widening negative spread. The substantial increase in invested capital between 2019 and 2021 did not translate into improved returns, further exacerbating the negative economic spread.
In summary, the economic spread ratio indicates a consistent underperformance relative to the cost of capital. The situation worsened considerably in 2020 and 2021, suggesting a significant impact from external factors and a failure to generate sufficient returns on increased investment.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | ||||||
| Booking Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | ||||||
| DoorDash, Inc. | ||||||
| McDonald’s Corp. | ||||||
| Starbucks Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin demonstrates a consistently negative trend over the observed period. Initially negative, the margin deteriorated significantly, reaching substantial negative values in the latter years of the period.
- Economic Profit Margin
- In 2017, the economic profit margin was -41.24%. This figure worsened to -43.49% in 2018, indicating a decrease in economic profitability relative to revenue. A relative improvement was seen in 2019, with the margin decreasing to -33.09%. However, this improvement was short-lived.
- A dramatic decline occurred in 2020, with the economic profit margin plummeting to -507.46%. This substantial decrease suggests a significant shortfall in economic profit generation compared to revenue. The trend continued in 2021, with the margin further declining to -603.47%, representing the lowest value within the observed timeframe.
The economic profit itself consistently registered negative values throughout the period, mirroring the trend in the economic profit margin. The magnitude of the negative economic profit increased substantially from 2017 to 2021, with the largest negative value occurring in 2020. This suggests that the company’s returns were consistently below its cost of capital.
- Revenue Trend
- Revenues increased from US$8,777,845 thousand in 2017 to US$10,950,661 thousand in 2019, indicating growth in sales. However, revenues experienced a sharp contraction in 2020, falling to US$2,208,805 thousand, and continued to decline in 2021, reaching US$1,532,133 thousand. This revenue decline likely contributed to the worsening economic profit margin in the later years.
The combined effect of declining revenues and consistently negative economic profit resulted in a substantial deterioration of the economic profit margin. The magnitude of the negative margin in 2020 and 2021 indicates a considerable underperformance from an economic value creation perspective.