Stock Analysis on Net

DoorDash, Inc. (NASDAQ:DASH)

$24.99

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

DoorDash, Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2025 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The financial performance, as measured by economic profit, demonstrates a volatile period with a shift towards profitability in the later years. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) initially exhibits substantial losses, followed by a significant improvement. This trend is coupled with increasing invested capital, and a relatively stable cost of capital, impacting the overall economic profit.

NOPAT Trend
Net operating profit after taxes begins with a loss of US$411 million in 2021, worsening considerably to a loss of US$1,420 million in 2022. A partial recovery is seen in 2023 with a loss of US$662 million, followed by a near-break-even position with a loss of US$5 million in 2024. By 2025, NOPAT turns positive, reaching US$781 million.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital remains relatively consistent across the observed period, fluctuating between 26.31% and 27.34%. A slight decrease is noted in 2025, to 26.31%, but the overall variation is minimal. This suggests a stable risk profile or consistent financing structure.
Invested Capital
Invested capital demonstrates a clear upward trend. It increases from US$3,179 million in 2021 to US$5,320 million in 2022, and then to US$5,237 million in 2023. Further growth is observed in 2024, reaching US$6,261 million, and a substantial increase to US$11,248 million in 2025. This indicates significant reinvestment and expansion of operations.
Economic Profit
Economic profit consistently remains negative until 2025. The losses decrease in magnitude over time, from US$1,276 million in 2021 to US$2,853 million in 2022, then to US$2,088 million in 2023, and US$1,717 million in 2024. Despite the positive NOPAT in 2025, economic profit remains negative at US$2,178 million, due to the significantly higher invested capital base. This suggests that while operational profitability is improving, the return on invested capital is still below the cost of capital.

In summary, the period is characterized by initial losses, substantial investment, and a recent shift towards operational profitability. However, achieving positive economic profit requires a further increase in returns relative to the invested capital base, or a reduction in the cost of capital.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

DoorDash, Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Net income (loss) attributable to DoorDash, Inc. common stockholders
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses2
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents3
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability4
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense5
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes6
Interest income, net
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income7
Investment income, after taxes8
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss) attributable to DoorDash, Inc. common stockholders.

4 2025 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

5 2025 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss) attributable to DoorDash, Inc. common stockholders.

7 2025 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


The financial performance, as indicated by Net Income and Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT), demonstrates a period of initial losses followed by a trajectory towards profitability. A significant shift occurs between the 2022 and 2023 periods, continuing into the subsequent years.

NOPAT Trend
NOPAT exhibited substantial negative values from 2021 through 2023, registering at -411, -1,420, and -662 million US dollars respectively. This indicates that, during these years, the company’s operating profits, after accounting for taxes, were insufficient to cover the cost of capital employed. However, a marked improvement is observed in 2024, with NOPAT nearing breakeven at -5 million US dollars. This trend culminates in a positive NOPAT of 781 million US dollars in 2025, signifying a substantial increase in value creation.

The magnitude of the negative NOPAT in 2022 is considerably larger than in 2021 and 2023, suggesting a period of heightened operational challenges or increased investment during that year. The progression from negative to positive NOPAT over the observed period suggests improving operational efficiency, successful scaling of operations, or a combination of both. The substantial positive NOPAT in 2025 represents a significant turnaround and potential for future value generation.

Relationship between Net Income and NOPAT
The patterns in Net Income attributable to DoorDash, Inc. common stockholders closely mirror those of NOPAT. Both metrics are negative for 2021, 2022, and 2023, and both turn positive in 2024 and 2025. While the absolute values differ, the directional consistency suggests that changes in operating profitability are a primary driver of overall net income. The difference between the two metrics likely reflects items not included in NOPAT, such as financing costs or non-operating income/expenses.

The transition to positive NOPAT and Net Income in the later years of the period suggests a strengthening financial position and improved ability to generate returns for investors.


Cash Operating Taxes

DoorDash, Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).


The provision for (benefit from) income taxes exhibited significant volatility over the observed period. Beginning at US$5 million in 2021, it decreased substantially to a benefit of US$31 million in 2022, before returning to a provision of US$31 million in 2023. This was followed by an increase to US$39 million in 2024, and a subsequent decline to US$7 million in 2025.

Cash operating taxes demonstrated a generally decreasing trend, although with fluctuations. Starting at US$12 million in 2021, these taxes decreased to US$5 million in 2022, and further to US$7 million in 2023. A further decrease to US$4 million occurred in 2024, before stabilizing at US$7 million in 2025.

Relationship between Provision for Income Taxes and Cash Operating Taxes
A divergence is apparent between the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes. In 2022, a significant benefit from income taxes was recorded, while cash operating taxes remained positive, albeit lower than in the prior year. This suggests the presence of non-cash tax expenses or deferred tax assets impacting the provision. The difference between the two metrics narrowed in subsequent years, but remained notable, indicating ongoing timing differences or other factors influencing the effective tax rate.
Trend Analysis - Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes displayed a lack of consistent direction. The initial decrease in 2022, resulting in a benefit, was followed by a return to positive provisions in subsequent years. The peak provision in 2024, followed by a decline in 2025, suggests potential impacts from changes in taxable income or applicable tax laws.
Trend Analysis - Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes generally trended downward from 2021 to 2024, indicating a reduction in actual cash outflows related to income taxes. The stabilization at US$7 million in 2025 suggests a potential floor to this decline, or a leveling off of taxable income.

The fluctuations in both metrics warrant further investigation to understand the underlying drivers, including changes in profitability, tax credits, and deferred tax positions. The difference between the provision and cash taxes should be examined to assess the quality of earnings and potential impacts on future cash flows.


Invested Capital

DoorDash, Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Convertible notes, net
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for credit losses3
Equity equivalents4
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax5
Redeemable non-controlling interests
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Construction in progress6
Marketable securities7
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

6 Subtraction of construction in progress.

7 Subtraction of marketable securities.


The reported invested capital demonstrates a generally increasing trend over the observed period. However, the rate of increase fluctuates significantly, with a substantial jump occurring between 2024 and 2025. A detailed examination of the components contributing to invested capital reveals further insights.

Total Invested Capital
Invested capital increased from US$3,179 million in 2021 to US$5,320 million in 2022, representing a significant expansion. Growth slowed in 2023, with a slight decrease to US$5,237 million. Further growth was observed in 2024, reaching US$6,261 million, before accelerating dramatically to US$11,248 million in 2025. This final increase suggests a considerable shift in capital allocation or financing activities.
Debt & Leases
Total reported debt and leases exhibited moderate growth from 2021 to 2023, increasing from US$399 million to US$522 million. Growth remained relatively stable in 2024 at US$536 million. However, a substantial increase is noted in 2025, reaching US$3,290 million. This suggests a significant reliance on debt financing in the latter period.
Stockholders’ Equity
Stockholders’ equity consistently increased throughout the period. From US$4,667 million in 2021, it rose to US$6,754 million in 2022, US$6,806 million in 2023, US$7,803 million in 2024, and finally to US$10,033 million in 2025. This indicates a strengthening equity position, although the proportional contribution to invested capital changes with the debt increase.

The composition of invested capital shifted notably in 2025. While stockholders’ equity continued to grow, the substantial increase in debt and leases contributed to the overall accelerated growth in invested capital. This change in capital structure warrants further investigation to understand the underlying strategic decisions and potential financial implications.


Cost of Capital

DoorDash, Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
0% Convertible Senior Notes due 20303 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2030. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
0% Convertible Senior Notes due 20303 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2030. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
0% Convertible Senior Notes due 20303 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2030. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
0% Convertible Senior Notes due 20303 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2030. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
0% Convertible Senior Notes due 20303 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2030. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

DoorDash, Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Airbnb Inc.
Booking Holdings Inc.
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
McDonald’s Corp.
Starbucks Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2025 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic spread ratio demonstrates a consistent, though moderating, negative trend over the five-year period. Initially, the ratio is significantly negative and subsequently moves closer to zero, indicating an improving, but still unfavorable, relationship between returns and the cost of capital.

Economic Spread Ratio
In 2021, the economic spread ratio is -40.15%. This represents a substantial gap where the company’s returns are considerably lower than its cost of capital. The ratio worsens to -53.64% in 2022, signifying a further decline in value creation relative to invested funds.
A slight improvement is observed in 2023, with the ratio moving to -39.86%, suggesting a marginal increase in efficiency or profitability. This positive movement continues into 2024, where the ratio reaches -27.43%, indicating a more substantial, though still negative, spread.
The trend of improvement persists in 2025, with the economic spread ratio reaching -19.37%. While still negative, this represents the smallest negative spread over the observed period, suggesting a narrowing gap between returns and the cost of capital.

The invested capital exhibits an increasing trend throughout the period. Starting at US$3,179 million in 2021, it rises to US$11,248 million by 2025. This growth in invested capital occurs alongside the improving, yet negative, economic spread ratio.

Economic Profit
Economic profit remains negative across all five years, ranging from -US$1,276 million to -US$2,853 million. The largest negative economic profit is recorded in 2022, coinciding with the most negative economic spread ratio. While the absolute value of economic profit decreases from 2022 to 2024, it increases again in 2025, potentially due to the significant increase in invested capital.

The combined trends suggest that while the company is increasing its investment, it is still not generating returns sufficient to cover its cost of capital, although the gap is diminishing. The increasing invested capital, coupled with the improving economic spread ratio, indicates a potential path towards positive economic profit, but further improvements in profitability are necessary.


Economic Profit Margin

DoorDash, Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Revenue
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Airbnb Inc.
Booking Holdings Inc.
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
McDonald’s Corp.
Starbucks Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2025 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Revenue
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic profit margin demonstrates a volatile pattern over the five-year period. While consistently negative, the magnitude of the negative margin fluctuates significantly, indicating periods of relative improvement followed by renewed decline.

Economic Profit Margin Trend
In 2021, the economic profit margin stood at -26.11%. This figure deteriorated substantially in 2022, reaching -43.34%, representing the most significant negative margin within the observed timeframe. A notable improvement occurred in 2023, with the margin increasing to -24.18%. This positive trend continued into 2024, further improving to -16.02%. However, the margin experienced a slight worsening in 2025, settling at -15.88%.

The economic profit itself mirrors this trend. Declining from negative $1,276 million in 2021 to negative $2,853 million in 2022, it improved to negative $2,088 million in 2023 and negative $1,717 million in 2024 before slightly increasing to negative $2,178 million in 2025. This suggests that while the company is increasing revenue, the cost of capital continues to exceed generated profits.

Revenue and Margin Relationship
Revenue consistently increased throughout the period, rising from $4,888 million in 2021 to $13,717 million in 2025. Despite this substantial revenue growth, the economic profit margin remained negative, indicating that revenue increases have not been sufficient to offset the cost of capital. The initial improvement in the margin from 2022 to 2024, despite continued negative values, suggests some efficiency gains or improved capital allocation during those years, but this trend stalled in 2025.

The stabilization of the economic profit margin around -16% in the final two years suggests a potential plateau in the relationship between revenue growth and capital costs. Further investigation would be required to determine the underlying drivers of this pattern and assess the long-term sustainability of the business model.