Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1, 2 See details »
The analysis of cash flow performance from 2017 to 2021 reveals a period of initial operational growth followed by a severe financial contraction. The transition from positive to negative cash positions indicates a substantial shift in the firm's liquidity and operational capacity.
- Operating Cash Flow Trends
- Net cash provided by operating activities experienced steady growth between 2017 and 2019, peaking at 3,716,366 thousand US$. This upward trajectory was abruptly reversed in 2020, when operating cash flow shifted to a deficit of 3,731,653 thousand US$. While 2021 showed a recovery trend, the value remained negative at 1,877,815 thousand US$.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Dynamics
- FCFF exhibited significant volatility throughout the period. After a high of 2,581,204 thousand US$ in 2017, a sharp decline to 117,733 thousand US$ occurred in 2018, despite the simultaneous increase in operating cash flow. A moderate recovery to 989,428 thousand US$ was observed in 2019, followed by a severe collapse to negative 5,220,761 thousand US$ in 2020 and negative 3,222,065 thousand US$ in 2021.
- Relationship Between Operating Cash and FCFF
- A consistent divergence between operating cash flow and FCFF is evident, particularly in 2018, where the disparity suggests substantial capital expenditures during a period of operational growth. In 2020 and 2021, the FCFF deficits were more pronounced than the operating deficits, indicating that the firm continued to incur capital outflows despite the absence of positive cash generation from core operations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2 2021 Calculation
Cash paid during the year for interest, net of amount capitalized, tax = Cash paid during the year for interest, net of amount capitalized × EITR
= 834,245 × 0.85% = 7,091
3 2021 Calculation
Capitalized interest costs, tax = Capitalized interest costs × EITR
= 58,800 × 0.85% = 500
An analysis of financial outflows related to interest from 2017 through 2021 reveals a period of stability followed by a significant escalation in cash expenditures.
- Cash Outlays for Interest
- Between 2017 and 2019, cash paid for interest remained relatively stagnant, fluctuating within a narrow range between 242 million and 250 million US dollars. A sharp upward trajectory began in 2020, with payments increasing to 417 million US dollars, and accelerating further in 2021 to 827 million US dollars. This represents a substantial increase in the cash required to service debt obligations in the final two years of the observed period.
- Capitalized Interest Costs
- Capitalized interest costs demonstrated a consistent growth trend from 2017 to 2020, rising from approximately 24 million US dollars to nearly 59 million US dollars. This upward movement suggests a sustained phase of investment in qualifying assets. In 2021, these costs plateaued at 58.3 million US dollars, indicating a stabilization in the amount of interest being capitalized.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Influence
- The effective income tax rate remained consistently low throughout the five-year period, peaking at 1.68% in 2019 before declining to 0.26% in 2020 and recovering slightly to 0.85% in 2021. Because interest expenditures are reported net of tax, the low EITR indicates that the tax-shield benefits typically associated with high interest payments were minimal during this timeframe.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 28,261,911) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | (3,222,065) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | — |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Airbnb Inc. | 22.70 |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | 12.16 |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | 29.36 |
| DoorDash, Inc. | 41.23 |
| McDonald’s Corp. | 28.14 |
| Starbucks Corp. | 46.14 |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | |
| Consumer Services | 36.22 |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | |
| Consumer Discretionary | 82.64 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 37,174,624) | 37,799,471) | 29,507,089) | 35,786,782) | 35,324,272) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | (3,222,065) | (5,220,761) | 989,428) | 117,733) | 2,581,204) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | — | — | 29.82 | 303.96 | 13.69 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | 42.36 | — | — | — | — | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | 36.39 | — | — | — | — | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | 50.61 | — | — | — | — | |
| DoorDash, Inc. | 65.41 | — | — | — | — | |
| McDonald’s Corp. | 26.32 | — | — | — | — | |
| Starbucks Corp. | 28.09 | 281.97 | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | ||||||
| Consumer Services | 32.14 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | ||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 60.31 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
3 2021 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 37,174,624 ÷ -3,222,065 = —
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by extreme volatility in cash flow generation contrasted with a relatively stable enterprise value. While the overall valuation of the firm remained within a consistent range, the capacity to generate free cash flow to the firm suffered a severe decline, culminating in significant deficits during the final two years of the period.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- The enterprise value exhibited moderate fluctuations, starting at 35.3 billion USD in 2017 and peaking at 37.8 billion USD in 2020. A notable dip to 29.5 billion USD occurred in 2019, followed by a recovery to 37.2 billion USD by the end of 2021. This indicates that despite operational turbulence, the market valuation of the firm's core business assets and debt remained relatively resilient.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- A precipitous decline in FCFF is observed over the five-year period. From a strong positive position of 2.58 billion USD in 2017, cash flows dropped sharply to 117.7 million USD in 2018, before a partial recovery to 989.4 million USD in 2019. The trend shifted to negative territory in 2020, with a deficit of 5.22 billion USD, which slightly improved to a deficit of 3.22 billion USD in 2021. This pattern reflects a transition from value creation to significant capital erosion.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Analysis
- The EV/FCFF ratio demonstrates the instability of cash flow relative to valuation. In 2017, the ratio stood at 13.69, suggesting a balanced valuation relative to cash generation. However, in 2018, the ratio spiked to 303.96, a direct result of the collapse in FCFF while the enterprise value remained high. By 2019, the ratio moderated to 29.82. For the years 2020 and 2021, the ratio is not applicable as the negative FCFF values render the multiple meaningless for standard valuation purposes.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?