Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
A significant reduction in the gross asset base occurred between 2014 and 2015, characterized by a sharp decline across all asset categories. Gross property and equipment decreased from 8,246 million US$ to 5,078 million US$ during this period. This contraction was most pronounced in computer equipment and software, which fell by approximately 35%, and furniture and fixtures, which decreased by more than 50%. Following this trough in 2015, a steady recovery in gross asset value was observed through 2018, with gross property and equipment rising to 6,344 million US$.
- Asset Composition and Trends
- Computer equipment and software constitutes the primary component of the asset portfolio. After the initial decline in 2015, this category grew consistently from 3,894 million US$ to 4,933 million US$ by 2018. Other categories, including land and buildings and leasehold improvements, followed a similar pattern of sharp contraction in 2015 followed by modest, incremental growth.
- Depreciation and Net Book Value
- Accumulated depreciation showed a notable decrease in absolute terms between 2014 and 2015, dropping from 5,344 million US$ to 3,524 million US$, which aligns with the reduction in gross assets and suggests significant asset disposals or write-offs. From 2016 to 2018, accumulated depreciation increased steadily to 4,747 million US$, reflecting the ongoing aging of the asset base.
- Net Asset Stability
- The net book value of property and equipment experienced a steep decline from 2,902 million US$ in 2014 to 1,554 million US$ in 2015. In the subsequent three years, the net value remained remarkably stable, fluctuating only slightly before settling at 1,597 million US$ in 2018. This indicates that capital expenditures during the 2016-2018 period were largely offset by annual depreciation expenses.
The overall financial trajectory indicates a strategic resizing of the infrastructure in 2015, followed by a period of disciplined replacement and moderate expansion of technological assets. The stability of the net property and equipment value suggests a maintenance-level capital expenditure strategy since 2015.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
The asset base exhibits a consistent aging trend from 2014 through 2018. The average age ratio shows a steady upward trajectory, increasing from 64.81% to 74.83% over the five-year period. This indicates that a larger proportion of the total estimated useful life of the property, plant, and equipment has been consumed.
- Average Age Ratio Progression
- A continuous increase is observed in the average age ratio, which rose by approximately 10 percentage points between 2014 and 2018. This progression signifies that the asset portfolio is moving closer to the end of its projected utility.
- Useful Life and Elapsed Time Correlation
- The estimated total useful life was extended from 7 years in 2014 to 10 years by 2018. During this same interval, the estimated time elapsed since purchase increased from 5 years to 8 years. This suggests a systematic adjustment in the accounting estimation of asset longevity or the integration of assets with longer lifespans.
- Remaining Life Stability
- Despite the extension of the total useful life, the estimated remaining life remained stagnant at 3 years throughout the entire analyzed period. This constancy indicates that the extension of total useful life was exactly offset by the passage of time, suggesting that new capital expenditures were not sufficient to increase the average remaining life of the overall asset portfolio.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ Property and equipment, gross
= 100 × 4,747 ÷ 6,344 = 74.83%
An analysis of the property, plant, and equipment reveals a consistent increase in the average age of the company's asset base from 2014 through 2018. This trend suggests a gradual aging of infrastructure and a potential lag in the replacement of older assets with new capital investments.
- Asset Base Volatility and Recovery
- A significant reduction in both gross property and equipment and accumulated depreciation occurred between 2014 and 2015, with gross assets falling from 8,246 million USD to 5,078 million USD. Following this contraction, a steady upward trajectory in gross asset value was observed through 2018, reaching 6,344 million USD, indicating a period of renewed capital expenditure.
- Accumulated Depreciation Trends
- Accumulated depreciation mirrored the sharp decline observed in gross assets during 2015, dropping to 3,524 million USD. From 2016 to 2018, accumulated depreciation rose consistently to 4,747 million USD, reflecting the ongoing wear and tear of the existing asset portfolio.
- Average Age Ratio Progression
- The average age ratio exhibited an uninterrupted annual increase, rising from 64.81% in 2014 to 74.83% in 2018. This steady climb indicates that the proportion of the asset's useful life already consumed is increasing, which may signal an impending need for significant capital reinvestment to modernize operational capacity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Total Useful Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 Estimated total useful life = Property and equipment, gross ÷ Depreciation expense on property and equipment
= 6,344 ÷ 626 = 10
An analysis of the property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) trends between 2014 and 2018 reveals a significant shift in asset valuation and accounting estimates. The period is characterized by an initial contraction in the asset base followed by steady growth and a progressive extension of the estimated useful life of assets.
- Estimated Total Useful Life
- A consistent upward trend is observed in the estimated total useful life of assets, which increased annually from 7 years in 2014 to 10 years by 2017, remaining stable at 10 years through 2018. This extension suggests a revision in accounting estimates or a strategic shift toward acquiring assets with longer operational lifespans.
- Gross Property and Equipment
- Gross PP&E experienced a sharp decline between 2014 and 2015, falling from 8,246 million USD to 5,078 million USD. Following this contraction, a period of sustained growth occurred, with values rising steadily each year to reach 6,344 million USD by December 31, 2018.
- Depreciation Expense
- Depreciation expenses followed a pattern similar to the gross asset values, with a substantial drop from 1,100 million USD in 2014 to 614 million USD in 2015. From 2015 to 2018, depreciation remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 605 million USD and 626 million USD. The stability of these expenses, despite the growth in gross PP&E, is likely influenced by the simultaneous increase in the estimated useful life of the assets, which spreads the cost over a longer duration.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense on property and equipment
= 4,747 ÷ 626 = 8
The analysis of property, plant, and equipment from 2014 to 2018 reveals a significant structural shift in the asset base occurring in 2015, followed by a period of gradual aging and stabilized expenses.
- Asset Aging Profile
- The average time elapsed since purchase demonstrates a steady upward trajectory, increasing from 5 years in 2014 to 8 years by the end of 2018. This pattern indicates a maturing asset base with a consistent increase in the age of the held equipment over the five-year period.
- Accumulated Depreciation Trends
- A notable reduction in accumulated depreciation is observed between 2014 and 2015, where the value fell from 5,344 million USD to 3,524 million USD. Such a decrease typically points to the disposal or write-off of significant legacy assets. Following this event, accumulated depreciation resumed a steady annual increase, climbing to 4,747 million USD by December 31, 2018.
- Depreciation Expense Stability
- The annual depreciation expense showed a sharp decline from 1,100 million USD in 2014 to 614 million USD in 2015. For the subsequent four years, the expense remained highly stable, ranging between 605 million USD and 626 million USD. This consistency suggests a predictable depreciation schedule and an absence of substantial new capital investments that would have significantly shifted the annual depreciation charge.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Remaining Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 Estimated remaining life = Property and equipment, net ÷ Depreciation expense on property and equipment
= 1,597 ÷ 626 = 3
The financial trajectory of property and equipment reflects a significant structural adjustment between 2014 and 2015, followed by a period of stabilization. Net asset values and associated depreciation expenses shifted sharply downward before maintaining a consistent baseline through 2018.
- Net Property and Equipment Trends
- A substantial reduction in net property and equipment is observed between December 31, 2014, and December 31, 2015, where the value decreased from 2,902 million USD to 1,554 million USD. Following this contraction, the asset base remained relatively stable, ending the period at 1,597 million USD in 2018.
- Depreciation Expense Patterns
- Depreciation expenses mirrored the trend of net asset values, falling from 1,100 million USD in 2014 to 614 million USD in 2015. For the subsequent three fiscal years, depreciation expenses exhibited minimal variance, ranging between 605 million USD and 626 million USD, suggesting a steady state of asset consumption.
- Estimated Remaining Life Consistency
- The estimated remaining life of the assets remained constant at three years throughout the entire analyzed period. This lack of variance indicates a rigid and consistent accounting policy regarding the useful life of property and equipment, despite the significant changes in the total net value of the assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?