Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
The financial performance between 2014 and 2018 is characterized by significant volatility across all profitability metrics, with a notable divergence between operational earnings and net results.
- EBITDA Trend Analysis
- Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization exhibited a fluctuating trajectory. A sharp decline occurred between 2014 and 2015, where EBITDA fell from US$ 5,144 million to US$ 3,237 million. This was followed by a recovery to US$ 4,558 million in 2016, before retreating again to US$ 3,244 million in 2017 and partially recovering to US$ 3,740 million in 2018.
- Operational Profitability Consistency
- Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) and earnings before tax (EBT) closely mirrored the patterns seen in EBITDA. EBIT peaked in 2016 at US$ 3,876 million and reached its lowest point in 2015 at US$ 2,550 million. The consistent movement between EBITDA, EBIT, and EBT suggests that operational drivers remained the primary influence on pre-tax earnings.
- Net Income Divergence
- A significant disconnect is observed between core operational performance and net income. While EBITDA remained positive and relatively stable in comparison, net income experienced extreme swings, ranging from a peak of US$ 7,266 million in 2016 to a net loss of US$ 1,016 million in 2017. This disparity indicates that non-operating items, such as tax adjustments or one-time gains and losses, exerted a disproportionate influence on the final bottom line.
- Depreciation and Amortization Impact
- The gap between EBITDA and EBIT reveals a substantial shift in non-cash expenses. In 2014, depreciation and amortization amounted to US$ 1,490 million. From 2015 through 2018, these expenses decreased and stabilized significantly, remaining within a narrow range between US$ 676 million and US$ 696 million.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 33,294) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | 3,740) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.90 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Amazon.com Inc. | 16.76 |
| Home Depot Inc. | 15.80 |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 13.20 |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 16.88 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 35,495) | 47,034) | 36,629) | 28,866) | 63,477) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | 3,740) | 3,244) | 4,558) | 3,237) | 5,144) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | 9.49 | 14.50 | 8.04 | 8.92 | 12.34 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
3 2018 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 35,495 ÷ 3,740 = 9.49
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial metrics between 2014 and 2018 exhibit significant volatility in both enterprise valuation and operational profitability, resulting in a fluctuating EV/EBITDA multiple. The period is characterized by a lack of a linear trend, suggesting shifting market perceptions of value and varying levels of core earnings performance.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- A substantial contraction in enterprise value occurred between 2014 and 2015, where the figure decreased from 63,477 million US$ to 28,866 million US$. This was followed by a recovery phase through 2017, peaking at 47,034 million US$, before declining again to 35,495 million US$ by the end of 2018.
- EBITDA Performance
- Operational earnings showed inconsistent growth patterns. After a peak of 5,144 million US$ in 2014, EBITDA dropped to 3,237 million US$ in 2015. While a recovery to 4,558 million US$ was noted in 2016, a subsequent decline in 2017 to 3,244 million US$ indicates instability in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio Analysis
- The valuation multiple shifted from 12.34 in 2014 to a low of 8.04 in 2016, reflecting a period where the company was valued more conservatively relative to its earnings. A sharp increase to 14.50 in 2017 indicates a decoupling where the enterprise value rose despite a decrease in EBITDA, suggesting a temporary inflation in market valuation or expectations of future growth. The ratio normalized to 9.49 by 2018, returning to a level more consistent with the 2015-2016 range.
Overall, the divergence between the enterprise value and EBITDA in 2017 highlights a specific period of valuation expansion that was not supported by immediate operational growth. The general movement suggests a transition from a high-valuation environment in 2014 toward a more compressed multiple by 2018.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?