AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 24, 2019.

Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)

Microsoft Excel

Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)

eBay Inc., EBITDA calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Net income (loss) 2,530 (1,016) 7,266 1,725 46
Less: Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes 2 (4) (19) (222) —
Add: Income tax expense 190 3,288 (3,634) 459 3,485
Earnings before tax (EBT) 2,718 2,276 3,651 2,406 3,531
Add: Interest expense 326 292 225 144 123
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) 3,044 2,568 3,876 2,550 3,654
Add: Depreciation and amortization 696 676 682 687 1,490
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 3,740 3,244 4,558 3,237 5,144

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).


The financial performance between 2014 and 2018 is characterized by significant volatility across all profitability metrics, with a notable divergence between operational earnings and net results.

EBITDA Trend Analysis
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization exhibited a fluctuating trajectory. A sharp decline occurred between 2014 and 2015, where EBITDA fell from US$ 5,144 million to US$ 3,237 million. This was followed by a recovery to US$ 4,558 million in 2016, before retreating again to US$ 3,244 million in 2017 and partially recovering to US$ 3,740 million in 2018.
Operational Profitability Consistency
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) and earnings before tax (EBT) closely mirrored the patterns seen in EBITDA. EBIT peaked in 2016 at US$ 3,876 million and reached its lowest point in 2015 at US$ 2,550 million. The consistent movement between EBITDA, EBIT, and EBT suggests that operational drivers remained the primary influence on pre-tax earnings.
Net Income Divergence
A significant disconnect is observed between core operational performance and net income. While EBITDA remained positive and relatively stable in comparison, net income experienced extreme swings, ranging from a peak of US$ 7,266 million in 2016 to a net loss of US$ 1,016 million in 2017. This disparity indicates that non-operating items, such as tax adjustments or one-time gains and losses, exerted a disproportionate influence on the final bottom line.
Depreciation and Amortization Impact
The gap between EBITDA and EBIT reveals a substantial shift in non-cash expenses. In 2014, depreciation and amortization amounted to US$ 1,490 million. From 2015 through 2018, these expenses decreased and stabilized significantly, remaining within a narrow range between US$ 676 million and US$ 696 million.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current

eBay Inc., current EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV) 33,294
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 3,740
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA 8.90
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Competitors1
Amazon.com Inc. 16.76
Home Depot Inc. 15.80
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. 13.20
TJX Cos. Inc. 16.88

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Click competitor name to see calculations.

If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical

eBay Inc., historical EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV)1 35,495 47,034 36,629 28,866 63,477
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 3,740 3,244 4,558 3,237 5,144
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA3 9.49 14.50 8.04 8.92 12.34
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Competitors4
Amazon.com Inc. — — — — —
Home Depot Inc. — — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. — — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

1 See details »

2 See details »

3 2018 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 35,495 ÷ 3,740 = 9.49

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial metrics between 2014 and 2018 exhibit significant volatility in both enterprise valuation and operational profitability, resulting in a fluctuating EV/EBITDA multiple. The period is characterized by a lack of a linear trend, suggesting shifting market perceptions of value and varying levels of core earnings performance.

Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
A substantial contraction in enterprise value occurred between 2014 and 2015, where the figure decreased from 63,477 million US$ to 28,866 million US$. This was followed by a recovery phase through 2017, peaking at 47,034 million US$, before declining again to 35,495 million US$ by the end of 2018.
EBITDA Performance
Operational earnings showed inconsistent growth patterns. After a peak of 5,144 million US$ in 2014, EBITDA dropped to 3,237 million US$ in 2015. While a recovery to 4,558 million US$ was noted in 2016, a subsequent decline in 2017 to 3,244 million US$ indicates instability in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.
EV/EBITDA Ratio Analysis
The valuation multiple shifted from 12.34 in 2014 to a low of 8.04 in 2016, reflecting a period where the company was valued more conservatively relative to its earnings. A sharp increase to 14.50 in 2017 indicates a decoupling where the enterprise value rose despite a decrease in EBITDA, suggesting a temporary inflation in market valuation or expectations of future growth. The ratio normalized to 9.49 by 2018, returning to a level more consistent with the 2015-2016 range.

Overall, the divergence between the enterprise value and EBITDA in 2017 highlights a specific period of valuation expansion that was not supported by immediate operational growth. The general movement suggests a transition from a high-valuation environment in 2014 toward a more compressed multiple by 2018.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?