Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 2,553) | 821) | 1,955) | 1,944) | 2,846) | |
| Invested capital2 | 7,597) | 6,903) | 7,687) | 7,328) | 20,937) | |
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| ROIC3 | 33.61% | 11.90% | 25.43% | 26.53% | 13.59% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| ROIC, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2018 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 2,553 ÷ 7,597 = 33.61%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Between 2014 and 2018, the return on invested capital (ROIC) exhibited significant volatility, characterized by a sharp increase in 2015 and a peak in 2018. This performance was driven by a substantial restructuring of the invested capital base and fluctuating net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT).
- Invested Capital Trends
- A drastic reduction in invested capital occurred between 2014 and 2015, falling from 20,937 million US$ to 7,328 million US$. Following this contraction, the capital base remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 6,903 million US$ and 7,687 million US$ from 2015 through 2018.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Analysis
- Operating profitability demonstrated instability throughout the period. NOPAT decreased from 2,846 million US$ in 2014 to a period low of 821 million US$ in 2017. A significant recovery followed in 2018, with NOPAT rising to 2,553 million US$, nearing 2014 levels.
- Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) Interpretation
- The ROIC rose from 13.59% in 2014 to 26.53% in 2015, a shift primarily attributable to the substantial decrease in invested capital rather than an increase in profit. The ratio experienced a sharp decline to 11.90% in 2017, correlating with the dip in NOPAT. The period concluded with a peak ROIC of 33.61% in 2018, resulting from the convergence of recovered operating profits and a lean capital structure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Decomposition of ROIC
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »
2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »
3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) exhibited significant volatility between 2014 and 2018, characterized by a substantial contraction in 2017 followed by a recovery to a period high in 2018. While operating efficiency and asset utilization showed consistent improvement, the overall return was heavily influenced by extreme fluctuations in the effective cash tax rate.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
- A marked increase in profitability occurred between 2014 and 2015, with the margin rising from 19.55% to 28.56%. Following this peak, the margin remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 25.29% and 27.38% through 2018. This suggests a consistent ability to convert revenue into operating profit after the initial expansion in 2015.
- Turnover of Capital (TO)
- A steady upward trend in capital turnover is observed, increasing from 0.86 in 2014 to 1.42 by 2018. This consistent growth indicates an improving efficiency in the utilization of invested capital to generate revenue, contributing positively to the ROIC throughout the analyzed period.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate Impact
- The factor representing 1 minus the effective cash tax rate served as the primary driver of ROIC volatility. While this figure remained stable near 80% from 2014 to 2016, it experienced a severe decline to 33.92% in 2017. This anomaly suggests a significant increase in the cash tax burden during that year, which offset the gains made in operating margins and capital turnover.
- ROIC Decomposition and Synthesis
- The ROIC rose from 13.59% in 2014 to 26.53% in 2015, driven by simultaneous improvements in both operating margins and capital turnover. Despite continued gains in capital turnover, ROIC plummeted to 11.90% in 2017, a decline directly attributable to the sharp drop in the tax factor. The recovery to 33.61% in 2018 resulted from the normalization of the tax factor to 87.09% coinciding with the highest recorded level of capital turnover.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 2,553) | 821) | 1,955) | 1,944) | 2,846) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 378) | 1,600) | 505) | 509) | 659) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 2,932) | 2,421) | 2,460) | 2,453) | 3,505) | |
| Net revenues | 10,746) | 9,567) | 8,979) | 8,592) | 17,902) | |
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | 33) | 7) | 4) | (2) | 30) | |
| Adjusted net revenues | 10,779) | 9,574) | 8,983) | 8,590) | 17,932) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| OPM3 | 27.20% | 25.29% | 27.38% | 28.56% | 19.55% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| OPM, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2018 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Adjusted net revenues
= 100 × 2,932 ÷ 10,779 = 27.20%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Between 2014 and 2018, a significant structural shift in revenue and profitability is observed. A substantial contraction in adjusted net revenues occurred between 2014 and 2015, followed by a period of consistent annual growth through 2018. Despite the initial decline in absolute revenue and net operating profit before taxes, the operating profit margin expanded sharply and remained at a higher baseline throughout the remainder of the period.
- Revenue and Operating Profit Trends
- Adjusted net revenues decreased from 17,932 million US dollars in 2014 to 8,590 million US dollars in 2015. Following this contraction, a recovery trend emerged, with revenues increasing steadily to 10,779 million US dollars by 2018. Net operating profit before taxes followed a similar trajectory, falling from 3,505 million US dollars in 2014 to a low of 2,421 million US dollars in 2017, before rebounding to 2,932 million US dollars in 2018.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM) Analysis
- The operating profit margin experienced a marked increase from 19.55% in 2014 to 28.56% in 2015. This indicates a significant improvement in operational efficiency or a shift in the business mix toward higher-margin activities. Following the 2015 peak, the margin exhibited slight volatility, dipping to 25.29% in 2017 before recovering to 27.20% in 2018.
- Efficiency and Profitability Correlation
- The data reveals a divergence between revenue volume and profit efficiency. While the company operated with significantly lower revenues after 2014, the ability to convert those revenues into operating profit improved. The stabilization of the OPM between 25% and 28% from 2015 to 2018 suggests that the leaner operational structure established after 2014 maintained a more sustainable and higher margin profile than the structure present in 2014.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Turnover of Capital (TO)
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net revenues | 10,746) | 9,567) | 8,979) | 8,592) | 17,902) | |
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | 33) | 7) | 4) | (2) | 30) | |
| Adjusted net revenues | 10,779) | 9,574) | 8,983) | 8,590) | 17,932) | |
| Invested capital1 | 7,597) | 6,903) | 7,687) | 7,328) | 20,937) | |
| Efficiency Ratio | ||||||
| TO2 | 1.42 | 1.39 | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.86 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| TO, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
1 Invested capital. See details »
2 2018 Calculation
TO = Adjusted net revenues ÷ Invested capital
= 10,779 ÷ 7,597 = 1.42
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
A significant structural shift is evident in the financial performance between 2014 and 2015, characterized by a substantial reduction in both revenue and the invested capital base. Following this transition, a consistent improvement in capital efficiency is observed, as evidenced by the steady rise in the turnover of capital ratio through 2018.
- Adjusted Net Revenues
- A sharp decline occurred between 2014 and 2015, where revenues dropped from 17,932 million to 8,590 million. However, a recovery trend followed, with annual growth recorded from 2016 through 2018, ending the period at 10,779 million.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital experienced a contraction of approximately 65% between 2014 and 2015, falling from 20,937 million to 7,328 million. From 2015 to 2018, the capital base remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 6,903 million and 7,687 million.
- Turnover of Capital (TO)
- The turnover ratio shifted from 0.86 in 2014 to 1.17 in 2015, indicating a marked increase in asset productivity. This upward trajectory continued consistently, reaching 1.42 by December 31, 2018. The growth in this ratio suggests that the company successfully increased its revenue generation capabilities without requiring a proportional increase in invested capital.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 2,553) | 821) | 1,955) | 1,944) | 2,846) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 378) | 1,600) | 505) | 509) | 659) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 2,932) | 2,421) | 2,460) | 2,453) | 3,505) | |
| Tax Rate | ||||||
| CTR3 | 12.91% | 66.08% | 20.52% | 20.75% | 18.80% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| CTR, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2018 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 378 ÷ 2,932 = 12.91%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory between 2014 and 2018 is characterized by significant volatility in cash tax obligations despite relatively stable net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT). While operating profitability fluctuated within a broad range, the effective cash tax rate (CTR) exhibited an extreme anomaly in 2017, followed by a sharp correction in 2018.
- Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
- Operating profitability experienced a notable decline from US$ 3,505 million in 2014 to US$ 2,453 million in 2015. Following this contraction, NOPBT remained remarkably consistent over the next three years, hovering between US$ 2,421 million and US$ 2,932 million, indicating a period of stabilized core operating performance.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR) Volatility
- From 2014 to 2016, the effective cash tax rate remained stable, fluctuating narrowly between 18.80% and 20.75%. However, 2017 saw an abrupt and substantial increase in the CTR to 66.08%, driven by a surge in cash operating taxes to US$ 1,600 million. This spike represents a significant departure from historical norms, suggesting the impact of non-recurring tax events or regulatory adjustments.
- Post-Anomaly Correction
- The period concluding in 2018 shows a rapid reversal of the previous year's trend. Cash operating taxes dropped to their lowest level in the analyzed period at US$ 378 million, resulting in a compressed effective cash tax rate of 12.91%. This indicates a significant reduction in the cash tax burden relative to operating profit, contributing to improved cash flow retention in the final year of the sequence.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?