AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 24, 2019.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

eBay Inc., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Turnover Ratios
Receivables turnover 15.09 13.77 15.17 13.88 22.46
Payables turnover 8.33 6.73 7.09 5.07 14.29
Working capital turnover 4.02 2.28 1.79 1.52 1.99
Average No. Days
Average receivable collection period 24 27 24 26 16
Average payables payment period 44 54 51 72 26

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).


The operating activity ratios from 2014 to 2018 indicate a structural shift in the management of short-term assets and liabilities. After a period of significant volatility between 2014 and 2015, the company established a new operational baseline, culminating in a marked improvement in working capital efficiency by the end of the analyzed period.

Receivables Management
A downward shift in receivables turnover occurred after 2014, dropping from 22.46 to a stabilized range between 13.77 and 15.17 from 2015 to 2018. This trend is mirrored in the average receivable collection period, which extended from 16 days in 2014 to an average of approximately 25 days in the following four years, suggesting a slower conversion of credit sales into cash.
Payables Management
The payables turnover ratio decreased sharply from 14.29 in 2014 to 5.07 in 2015, reflecting a significant extension of the average payables payment period from 26 days to 72 days. Although the payment period subsequently contracted to 44 days by 2018, the company maintained a considerably longer payment window than was utilized in 2014, indicating a strategic change in the timing of obligations to suppliers.
Working Capital Utilization
Working capital turnover experienced an initial decline to 1.52 in 2015 but followed a consistent upward trajectory thereafter. This metric peaked at 4.02 in 2018, representing a substantial increase in the efficiency with which the company employed its net current assets to generate revenue.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

eBay Inc., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net revenues 10,746 9,567 8,979 8,592 17,902
Accounts receivable, net 712 695 592 619 797
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 15.09 13.77 15.17 13.88 22.46
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Amazon.com Inc. — — — — —
Home Depot Inc. — — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. — — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

1 2018 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net revenues ÷ Accounts receivable, net
= 10,746 ÷ 712 = 15.09

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


A significant structural shift is evident between 2014 and 2015, characterized by a substantial reduction in net revenues, which decreased from 17,902 million USD to 8,592 million USD. Following this decline, a period of consistent growth was observed, with revenues increasing annually to reach 10,746 million USD by the end of 2018.

Receivables Turnover Volatility
The receivables turnover ratio experienced a sharp contraction between 2014 and 2015, falling from 22.46 to 13.88. This suggests a marked change in the efficiency of credit collection or a shift in the composition of revenue streams during that transition period.
Post-2015 Stabilization
From 2015 through 2018, the turnover ratio stabilized within a narrow range between 13.77 and 15.17. This indicates a consistent pattern of receivables management and a normalized collection cycle following the initial volatility observed in 2015.
Correlation Between Receivables and Revenue
Net accounts receivable followed a trend similar to revenues from 2016 onwards, rising from 592 million USD to 712 million USD. The proportionality between the increase in net receivables and the growth in net revenues contributed to the relative stability of the turnover ratio during the final three years of the period.

Overall, the analysis indicates that while the organization operated with significantly higher collection velocity in 2014, it established a new, stable baseline for operating activity from 2015 to 2018, maintaining a consistent rate of converting receivables into cash.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

eBay Inc., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of net revenues 2,382 2,222 2,007 1,771 5,732
Accounts payable 286 330 283 349 401
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 8.33 6.73 7.09 5.07 14.29
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Amazon.com Inc. — — — — —
Home Depot Inc. — — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. — — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

1 2018 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of net revenues ÷ Accounts payable
= 2,382 ÷ 286 = 8.33

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operational efficiency regarding payables exhibits a significant transition between 2014 and 2018, characterized by a fundamental shift in the cost structure and the speed of obligation settlement.

Cost of Net Revenues Trends
A substantial reduction in the cost of net revenues occurred between 2014 and 2015, where values dropped from 5,732 million USD to 1,771 million USD. This was followed by a period of steady annual growth, with costs rising to 2,007 million USD in 2016, 2,222 million USD in 2017, and reaching 2,382 million USD by the end of 2018.
Accounts Payable Dynamics
The total amount of accounts payable showed an overall decline during the analyzed period. Starting at 401 million USD in 2014, the balance decreased to 349 million USD in 2015 and further to 283 million USD in 2016. A temporary increase to 330 million USD was noted in 2017 before the balance settled at 286 million USD in 2018.
Payables Turnover Analysis
The payables turnover ratio experienced a sharp decline from 14.29 in 2014 to 5.07 in 2015, indicating a significant slowdown in the frequency of supplier payments relative to the cost of revenues. Following this decline, the ratio demonstrated a gradual recovery trend, increasing to 7.09 in 2016, slightly dipping to 6.73 in 2017, and ultimately rising to 8.33 in 2018. This suggests that while the company accelerated its payment cycle after 2015, the turnover rate remained well below the levels observed in 2014.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

eBay Inc., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 7,126 7,743 8,875 7,904 26,531
Less: Current liabilities 4,454 3,539 3,847 2,263 17,531
Working capital 2,672 4,204 5,028 5,641 9,000
 
Net revenues 10,746 9,567 8,979 8,592 17,902
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 4.02 2.28 1.79 1.52 1.99
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Amazon.com Inc. — — — — —
Home Depot Inc. — — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. — — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

1 2018 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net revenues ÷ Working capital
= 10,746 ÷ 2,672 = 4.02

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the operating activity ratios between 2014 and 2018 reveals a significant shift in the management of short-term assets and their efficiency in generating revenue. The most prominent trend is the consistent reduction of working capital paired with a recovery in net revenues, leading to a sharp increase in the working capital turnover ratio.

Working Capital Trends
A continuous downward trajectory is observed in working capital, which decreased from US$ 9,000 million in 2014 to US$ 2,672 million by 2018. This represents a substantial reduction in the net current assets available to support operations, suggesting either a strategic shift in capital allocation or an increase in current liabilities relative to current assets.
Net Revenue Performance
Net revenues experienced a sharp decline between 2014 and 2015, dropping from US$ 17,902 million to US$ 8,592 million. Following this contraction, a steady recovery period ensued, with revenues growing incrementally each year to reach US$ 10,746 million by the end of 2018.
Working Capital Turnover Efficiency
The working capital turnover ratio exhibited a V-shaped recovery and subsequent acceleration. After a dip to 1.52 in 2015, the ratio climbed steadily, reaching 4.02 in 2018. This indicates that the organization became significantly more efficient at utilizing its working capital to generate sales. The surge in the ratio from 2016 to 2018 is primarily attributed to the rapid decrease in the working capital base occurring simultaneously with the growth in net revenues.

The convergence of declining working capital and rising revenues suggests an optimized operating cycle. By 2018, the company was generating substantially more revenue per dollar of working capital than in any previous year of the analyzed period, indicating high short-term operational efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

eBay Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 15.09 13.77 15.17 13.88 22.46
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 24 27 24 26 16
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Amazon.com Inc. — — — — —
Home Depot Inc. — — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. — — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

1 2018 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 15.09 = 24

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of receivables management from 2014 to 2018 reveals a significant shift in the efficiency of credit collection, characterized by a sharp transition between the first and second years of the period followed by a phase of relative stabilization.

Receivables Turnover
A substantial decrease in the receivables turnover ratio is observed between 2014 and 2015, falling from 22.46 to 13.88. Following this decline, the ratio remained relatively stable for the remainder of the period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 13.77 in 2017 and 15.17 in 2016. This suggests a fundamental change in the speed at which receivables were converted into cash after 2014.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average collection period experienced a corresponding increase, rising from 16 days in 2014 to 26 days in 2015. The collection cycle continued to fluctuate moderately over the subsequent three years, reaching a peak of 27 days in 2017 before returning to 24 days in 2018. This indicates that the time required to collect outstanding payments extended by approximately 50% starting in 2015 and remained elevated through 2018.

The inverse relationship between the turnover ratio and the collection period confirms a persistent deceleration in the collection process after 2014. While the initial spike in the collection period was pronounced, the subsequent consistency in both metrics suggests that the company transitioned to a new operational baseline for credit management.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

eBay Inc., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 8.33 6.73 7.09 5.07 14.29
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 44 54 51 72 26
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Amazon.com Inc. — — — — —
Home Depot Inc. — — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. — — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

1 2018 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 8.33 = 44

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of short-term operating activity indicates a period of significant volatility in the management of accounts payable, characterized by a sharp transition between 2014 and 2015 followed by a gradual trend toward normalization through 2018.

The inverse correlation between the turnover ratio and the payment period is evident throughout the observed timeframe. A significant expansion in the payment period coincided with the lowest recorded turnover ratio in 2015, suggesting a substantial shift in the company's approach to settling supplier obligations during that fiscal year.

Payables Turnover
A substantial decrease in the turnover ratio is observed from 14.29 in 2014 to 5.07 in 2015, indicating a marked slowdown in the frequency of payable settlements. Following this decline, a general recovery trend emerged; the ratio increased to 7.09 in 2016, experienced a marginal dip to 6.73 in 2017, and reached 8.33 by 2018.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average time required to settle obligations expanded sharply from 26 days in 2014 to a peak of 72 days in 2015, reflecting a significant extension of the credit period utilized. From 2016 onward, a contraction in the payment period occurred, moving to 51 days in 2016 and 54 days in 2017, before decreasing further to 44 days in 2018. While this represents an acceleration in payment velocity relative to 2015, the payment period remained substantially longer than the 2014 baseline.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?