AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 24, 2019.

Analysis of Income Taxes

Microsoft Excel

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

eBay Inc., income tax expense (benefit), continuing operations

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Federal 73 1,426 689 363 492
State and local 25 (17) 55 22 20
Foreign 245 150 178 106 165
Current 343 1,559 922 491 677
Federal (488) 1,788 77 (53) 2,808
State and local (10) 4 — (2) 14
Foreign 345 (63) (4,633) 23 (14)
Deferred (153) 1,729 (4,556) (32) 2,808
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 190 3,288 (3,634) 459 3,485

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).


The total provision for income taxes exhibited extreme volatility between 2014 and 2018, characterized by significant fluctuations between substantial expenses and a major net tax benefit. This variance is primarily attributed to large swings in deferred tax accounting rather than consistent trends in current tax obligations.

Current Tax Expense Trends
Current tax obligations showed a non-linear progression, decreasing from 677 million US$ in 2014 to 491 million US$ in 2015, before rising sharply to a peak of 1,559 million US$ in 2017. A significant reduction followed in 2018, with the expense dropping to 343 million US$.
Deferred Tax Volatility
Deferred tax components served as the primary driver of overall tax provision variance. A significant expense of 2,808 million US$ in 2014 transitioned into a substantial tax benefit of 4,556 million US$ in 2016. This was followed by a reversal back to an expense of 1,729 million US$ in 2017 and a smaller benefit of 153 million US$ in 2018.
Net Provision Analysis
The net provision for income taxes reached a high of 3,485 million US$ in 2014 and plummeted to a net benefit of 3,634 million US$ in 2016, representing a total swing of over 7 billion US$. By 2018, the net provision narrowed to 190 million US$, indicating a period of reduced overall tax impact relative to the volatility observed in the preceding four years.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)

eBay Inc., effective income tax rate (EITR) reconciliation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Federal statutory tax rate 21.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00%
Effective income tax rate 6.99% 35.00% 35.00% 19.08% 98.70%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).


An analysis of the income tax figures from 2014 to 2018 reveals significant volatility in the effective income tax rate (EITR) relative to the federal statutory tax rate, characterized by extreme fluctuations and a final period of substantial divergence.

Federal Statutory Tax Rate Trends
The federal statutory tax rate remained constant at 35.00% from 2014 through 2017. A significant reduction is observed in 2018, where the rate decreased to 21.00%, reflecting a change in the legislative tax environment.
Effective Income Tax Rate Volatility
The EITR exhibited extreme instability during the early part of the period. In 2014, the rate reached a peak of 98.70%, vastly exceeding the statutory rate. This was followed by a sharp decline to 19.08% in 2015. For the subsequent two years, 2016 and 2017, the EITR aligned perfectly with the federal statutory rate of 35.00%.
Comparative Analysis and Divergence
A notable divergence occurred in 2018. While the statutory rate dropped to 21.00%, the EITR fell even more precipitously to 6.99%. This creates the widest negative variance between the statutory and effective rates over the five-year period, indicating that the actual tax burden was significantly lower than the prescribed federal rate during that fiscal year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

eBay Inc., components of deferred tax assets and liabilities

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Net operating loss, capital loss and credits 136 86 78 206 172
Accruals and allowances 168 129 222 209 371
Stock-based compensation 22 40 65 65 161
Amortizable tax basis in intangibles 4,757 5,164 4,621 — —
Net unrealized losses — — — 8 19
Net deferred tax assets 5,083 5,419 4,986 488 723
Valuation allowance (65) (19) (37) (41) (49)
Deferred tax assets 5,018 5,400 4,949 447 674
Unremitted foreign earnings (2,930) (3,514) (1,578) (1,656) (2,995)
Acquisition-related intangibles (46) (24) (29) (19) (160)
Depreciation and amortization (132) (89) (158) (190) (398)
Net unrealized gain (27) (2) — — —
Available-for-sale securities (15) (2) (29) (251) (285)
Other — — — — (24)
Deferred tax liabilities (3,150) (3,631) (1,794) (2,116) (3,862)
Net deferred tax assets and liabilities 1,868 1,769 3,155 (1,669) (3,188)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).


The net deferred tax position underwent a significant structural transition between 2014 and 2018, shifting from a net liability position to a net asset position. This pivot occurred in 2016, where the net position moved from a liability of 1,669 million USD in 2015 to a net asset of 3,155 million USD.

Analysis of Deferred Tax Assets
A substantial increase in total deferred tax assets is observed starting in 2016, growing from 447 million USD in 2015 to 4,949 million USD in 2016. This expansion was driven almost entirely by the emergence of amortizable tax basis in intangibles, which contributed 4,621 million USD in 2016 and peaked at 5,164 million USD in 2017. Other asset components exhibited contrasting trends; stock-based compensation assets declined steadily from 161 million USD in 2014 to 22 million USD in 2018, and accruals and allowances decreased from 371 million USD in 2014 to 168 million USD in 2018.
Analysis of Deferred Tax Liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities showed significant volatility, primarily influenced by unremitted foreign earnings. This component fluctuated from a liability of 2,995 million USD in 2014 to 1,578 million USD in 2016, before increasing again to 3,514 million USD in 2017. Liabilities related to depreciation and amortization showed a general downward trend, decreasing from 398 million USD in 2014 to 132 million USD in 2018. Additionally, liabilities associated with available-for-sale securities saw a sharp reduction, falling from 285 million USD in 2014 to 15 million USD by 2018.
Valuation Allowance and Net Impact
The valuation allowance remained relatively small compared to the total assets, fluctuating between 19 million USD and 65 million USD over the five-year period. Despite these adjustments, the overarching trend was defined by the scale of the amortizable tax basis in intangibles, which outweighed the liabilities from unremitted foreign earnings and other items, resulting in a sustained net deferred tax asset position from 2016 through 2018, ending at 1,868 million USD.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes

eBay Inc., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted

eBay Inc., adjustments to financial statements

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Adjustment to Total Assets
Total assets (as reported) 22,819 25,981 23,847 17,785 45,132
Less: Noncurrent deferred tax assets, net 4,792 5,195 4,608 — —
Total assets (adjusted) 18,027 20,786 19,239 17,785 45,132
Adjustment to Total Liabilities
Total liabilities (as reported) 16,538 17,918 13,308 11,209 25,226
Less: Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities, net 2,925 3,425 1,888 2,092 792
Total liabilities (adjusted) 13,613 14,493 11,420 9,117 24,434
Adjustment to Stockholders’ Equity
Stockholders’ equity (as reported) 6,281 8,063 10,539 6,576 19,906
Less: Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) 1,868 1,769 3,155 (1,669) (3,188)
Stockholders’ equity (adjusted) 4,413 6,294 7,384 8,245 23,094
Adjustment to Net Income (loss)
Net income (loss) (as reported) 2,530 (1,016) 7,266 1,725 46
Add: Deferred income tax expense (benefit) (153) 1,729 (4,556) (32) 2,808
Net income (loss) (adjusted) 2,377 713 2,710 1,693 2,854

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).


The adjustment of financial statements to remove deferred taxes reveals significant discrepancies between reported figures and the underlying economic position from 2014 to 2018. These adjustments highlight the volatility introduced by tax accounting and provide a more stabilized view of the entity's assets, liabilities, and earnings.

Asset and Liability Adjustments
A substantial divergence between reported and adjusted total assets is observed beginning in 2016. While reported total assets remained between 19 billion and 26 billion US dollars from 2015 to 2018, adjusted assets were consistently lower, indicating the removal of significant deferred tax assets. Specifically, by 2017, the gap between reported and adjusted assets reached approximately 5.2 billion US dollars. Similarly, adjusted total liabilities remained consistently lower than reported liabilities from 2015 through 2018, suggesting that the removal of deferred tax liabilities reduces the reported debt burden on the balance sheet.
Equity Volatility and Trends
Stockholders' equity exhibits a general downward trend in both reported and adjusted metrics. Reported equity declined from 19.9 billion US dollars in 2014 to 6.3 billion US dollars in 2018. The adjusted equity figures show a more aggressive decline, falling to 4.4 billion US dollars by 2018. Notably, in 2014 and 2015, adjusted equity was higher than reported equity, but this relationship inverted from 2016 onward, where adjusted equity remained lower than reported equity, reflecting the net impact of deferred tax removals on the capital structure.
Net Income Stabilization
The removal of deferred taxes significantly reduces volatility in net income. Reported net income showed extreme fluctuations, ranging from a peak of 7.2 billion US dollars in 2016 to a loss of 1.0 billion US dollars in 2017. In contrast, adjusted net income presents a more stable performance trend, avoiding the deep loss in 2017 and the artificial spike in 2016. The adjusted figures suggest a more consistent operational profitability, with earnings remaining positive throughout the five-year period, thereby isolating core performance from one-time tax adjustments.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)

eBay Inc., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted

eBay Inc., adjusted financial ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Net Profit Margin
Reported net profit margin 23.54% -10.62% 80.92% 20.08% 0.26%
Adjusted net profit margin 22.12% 7.45% 30.18% 19.70% 15.94%
Total Asset Turnover
Reported total asset turnover 0.47 0.37 0.38 0.48 0.40
Adjusted total asset turnover 0.60 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.40
Financial Leverage
Reported financial leverage 3.63 3.22 2.26 2.70 2.27
Adjusted financial leverage 4.08 3.30 2.61 2.16 1.95
Return on Equity (ROE)
Reported ROE 40.28% -12.60% 68.94% 26.23% 0.23%
Adjusted ROE 53.86% 11.33% 36.70% 20.53% 12.36%
Return on Assets (ROA)
Reported ROA 11.09% -3.91% 30.47% 9.70% 0.10%
Adjusted ROA 13.19% 3.43% 14.09% 9.52% 6.32%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).


A comparative analysis of reported and adjusted financial ratios reveals that deferred tax items introduce significant volatility into the reported performance metrics. The removal of these tax effects provides a more stable view of the underlying operational efficiency and profitability trends from 2014 to 2018.

Profitability Margins
Reported net profit margins exhibit extreme fluctuations, ranging from a low of -10.62% in 2017 to a peak of 80.92% in 2016. In contrast, the adjusted net profit margin shows a more consistent trend, maintaining a range between 7.45% and 30.18%. This divergence indicates that deferred tax adjustments frequently distort the perceived bottom-line profitability on a reported basis.
Asset Efficiency
Total asset turnover remains relatively stable in reported terms, fluctuating between 0.37 and 0.48. However, the adjusted total asset turnover demonstrates a progressive improvement over the period, increasing from 0.40 in 2014 to 0.60 in 2018. This suggests that the actual efficiency of asset utilization is higher than reported figures imply.
Financial Leverage
Both reported and adjusted financial leverage show a distinct upward trend over the five-year period. Reported leverage rose from 2.27 in 2014 to 3.63 in 2018, while adjusted leverage increased from 1.95 to 4.08. This indicates a consistent increase in the company's reliance on debt or a reduction in equity relative to total assets.
Returns on Equity and Assets
Reported ROE and ROA are characterized by high volatility, including negative returns in 2017 (-12.60% and -3.91% respectively). The adjusted metrics eliminate these extremes, revealing a more sustainable growth trajectory. Adjusted ROE climbed from 12.36% in 2014 to 53.86% in 2018, and adjusted ROA improved from 6.32% to 13.19% over the same period, highlighting a strengthening of core returns when tax distortions are removed.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Net Profit Margin

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income (loss) 2,530 (1,016) 7,266 1,725 46
Net revenues 10,746 9,567 8,979 8,592 17,902
Profitability Ratio
Net profit margin1 23.54% -10.62% 80.92% 20.08% 0.26%
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Adjusted net income (loss) 2,377 713 2,710 1,693 2,854
Net revenues 10,746 9,567 8,979 8,592 17,902
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted net profit margin2 22.12% 7.45% 30.18% 19.70% 15.94%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

2018 Calculations

1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net income (loss) ÷ Net revenues
= 100 × 2,530 ÷ 10,746 = 23.54%

2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Net revenues
= 100 × 2,377 ÷ 10,746 = 22.12%


The financial performance from 2014 to 2018 is characterized by significant volatility in reported earnings compared to a more stabilized trajectory in adjusted earnings. This divergence suggests the influence of substantial non-recurring items, tax adjustments, or one-time gains and losses that heavily skewed the reported figures.

Adjusted Net Profit Margin Trends
The adjusted net profit margin exhibited a general upward trend from 2014 (15.94%) to a peak in 2016 (30.18%). A sharp contraction occurred in 2017, where the margin fell to 7.45%, before recovering to 22.12% in 2018. This indicates that while core operational profitability experienced a dip in 2017, it remained positive and demonstrated resilience by the end of the period.
Reported Net Profit Margin Volatility
The reported net profit margin showed extreme fluctuations, ranging from a low of -10.62% in 2017 to an anomalous peak of 80.92% in 2016. The stark contrast between the reported margin and the adjusted margin in 2016 highlights the impact of extraordinary items that do not reflect ongoing operational performance.
Comparison of Net Income Figures
Reported net income transitioned from a near-break-even state in 2014 to a significant loss in 2017, despite the adjusted net income remaining positive throughout the entire five-year period. The disparity is most evident in 2014, where reported net income was 46 million US dollars compared to an adjusted net income of 2,854 million US dollars.

The analysis indicates that reported figures are an unreliable proxy for core profitability due to the high incidence of non-operational variances. The adjusted net profit margin provides a more consistent view of earning capacity, although the systemic decline in 2017 remains a notable point of instability across both reporting metrics.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Total Asset Turnover

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net revenues 10,746 9,567 8,979 8,592 17,902
Total assets 22,819 25,981 23,847 17,785 45,132
Activity Ratio
Total asset turnover1 0.47 0.37 0.38 0.48 0.40
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net revenues 10,746 9,567 8,979 8,592 17,902
Adjusted total assets 18,027 20,786 19,239 17,785 45,132
Activity Ratio
Adjusted total asset turnover2 0.60 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.40

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

2018 Calculations

1 Total asset turnover = Net revenues ÷ Total assets
= 10,746 ÷ 22,819 = 0.47

2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Net revenues ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 10,746 ÷ 18,027 = 0.60


An analysis of the asset base and turnover ratios from 2014 to 2018 reveals a significant structural shift in asset composition and a subsequent improvement in adjusted operational efficiency.

Asset Base Trends
A substantial reduction in reported total assets occurred between 2014 and 2015, falling from 45,132 million to 17,785 million. Following this contraction, reported assets grew moderately through 2017, reaching 25,981 million, before declining to 22,819 million by the end of 2018. A consistent divergence is observed between reported and adjusted assets starting in 2016, with adjusted assets remaining lower than reported figures, resulting in a variance of 4,792 million by 2018.
Asset Turnover Performance
The reported total asset turnover exhibited volatility, peaking at 0.48 in 2015, declining to a low of 0.37 in 2017, and recovering to 0.47 in 2018. In contrast, the adjusted total asset turnover demonstrates a more stable and ultimately stronger upward trajectory. While the adjusted ratio remained relatively flat between 2015 and 2017, fluctuating between 0.48 and 0.46, it increased significantly to 0.60 in 2018.
Comparative Efficiency Analysis
The disparity between reported and adjusted turnover ratios widened over the observed period. By 2018, the adjusted total asset turnover of 0.60 represents a marked improvement over the reported ratio of 0.47. This trend indicates that when specific asset adjustments are applied, the efficiency of the remaining asset base in generating revenue improved more substantially than the reported figures suggest.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Financial Leverage

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Total assets 22,819 25,981 23,847 17,785 45,132
Stockholders’ equity 6,281 8,063 10,539 6,576 19,906
Solvency Ratio
Financial leverage1 3.63 3.22 2.26 2.70 2.27
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Adjusted total assets 18,027 20,786 19,239 17,785 45,132
Adjusted stockholders’ equity 4,413 6,294 7,384 8,245 23,094
Solvency Ratio
Adjusted financial leverage2 4.08 3.30 2.61 2.16 1.95

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

2018 Calculations

1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 22,819 ÷ 6,281 = 3.63

2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 18,027 ÷ 4,413 = 4.08


The period between 2014 and 2018 is characterized by a progressive increase in financial leverage, with adjusted metrics indicating a more aggressive upward trend than reported figures. This trajectory suggests a systemic reduction in the equity cushion relative to the total asset base over the five-year interval.

Asset Base Dynamics
A substantial reduction in total assets occurred between 2014 and 2015, with reported assets falling from 45,132 million to 17,785 million. While reported assets saw a moderate recovery and subsequent fluctuation, ending at 22,819 million in 2018, adjusted total assets remained consistently lower from 2016 onward, concluding the period at 18,027 million.
Equity Contraction
Adjusted stockholders' equity exhibited a steady and significant decline, dropping from 23,094 million in 2014 to 4,413 million in 2018. Although reported stockholders' equity showed intermittent volatility—including a peak of 10,539 million in 2016—the adjusted equity figures reflect a more linear and severe erosion of the capital base.
Financial Leverage Analysis
The adjusted financial leverage ratio increased consistently every year, rising from 1.95 in 2014 to 4.08 in 2018. This growth outperformed the increase in reported financial leverage, which rose from 2.27 to 3.63 in the same timeframe. The divergence between the two ratios indicates that the adjustments applied to the assets and equity have amplified the perceived financial leverage, signaling a higher risk profile in the adjusted view than in the reported financial statements.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income (loss) 2,530 (1,016) 7,266 1,725 46
Stockholders’ equity 6,281 8,063 10,539 6,576 19,906
Profitability Ratio
ROE1 40.28% -12.60% 68.94% 26.23% 0.23%
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Adjusted net income (loss) 2,377 713 2,710 1,693 2,854
Adjusted stockholders’ equity 4,413 6,294 7,384 8,245 23,094
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted ROE2 53.86% 11.33% 36.70% 20.53% 12.36%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

2018 Calculations

1 ROE = 100 × Net income (loss) ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,530 ÷ 6,281 = 40.28%

2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,377 ÷ 4,413 = 53.86%


The financial performance between 2014 and 2018 is characterized by significant divergence between reported and adjusted figures, particularly regarding net income and return on equity. While reported metrics exhibit high volatility, the adjusted figures provide a more normalized view of operational efficiency and capital utilization.

Net Income Volatility
Reported net income shows extreme fluctuations, ranging from a low of negative 1,016 million in 2017 to a peak of 7,266 million in 2016. In contrast, adjusted net income maintains a more stable profile, avoiding negative territory throughout the period. This disparity suggests the presence of substantial non-recurring items or tax adjustments that distort the reported earnings.
Equity Contraction
A consistent downward trend is observed in stockholders' equity. Reported equity declined from 19,906 million in 2014 to 6,281 million in 2018. The adjusted equity experienced an even more pronounced contraction, falling from 23,094 million to 4,413 million over the same period. This reduction in the equity base serves as a primary driver for the increasing return on equity percentages.
Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis
Reported ROE is highly unstable, mirroring the volatility of reported net income with a significant spike to 68.94% in 2016 followed by a drop to -12.60% in 2017. Adjusted ROE presents a more coherent growth pattern, rising from 12.36% in 2014 to 53.86% in 2018. Although a dip occurred in 2017, the overall trend indicates a substantial increase in the efficiency of generating profits relative to adjusted equity.
Comparison of Reported vs. Adjusted Metrics
The widening gap between reported and adjusted ROE highlights the impact of non-operational financial events. The adjusted ROE effectively isolates the core earning power of the company by removing the noise of reporting irregularities, revealing a steady improvement in capital productivity despite the overall decrease in total equity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income (loss) 2,530 (1,016) 7,266 1,725 46
Total assets 22,819 25,981 23,847 17,785 45,132
Profitability Ratio
ROA1 11.09% -3.91% 30.47% 9.70% 0.10%
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Adjusted net income (loss) 2,377 713 2,710 1,693 2,854
Adjusted total assets 18,027 20,786 19,239 17,785 45,132
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted ROA2 13.19% 3.43% 14.09% 9.52% 6.32%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

2018 Calculations

1 ROA = 100 × Net income (loss) ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 2,530 ÷ 22,819 = 11.09%

2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 2,377 ÷ 18,027 = 13.19%


A significant divergence exists between reported and adjusted financial metrics from 2014 to 2018, indicating that non-recurring items and tax adjustments heavily influenced the reported bottom line. While reported figures exhibit extreme volatility, the adjusted figures present a more stabilized view of operational performance and asset efficiency.

Net Income Trends
Reported net income demonstrates extreme fluctuations, ranging from a loss of 1,016 million US dollars in 2017 to a peak of 7,266 million US dollars in 2016. In contrast, adjusted net income remained more consistent, peaking at 2,854 million US dollars in 2014 and maintaining a range between 713 million and 2,710 million US dollars throughout the period, suggesting that one-time events significantly distorted the reported figures.
Asset Base Evolution
A substantial reduction in the total asset base is observed between 2014 and 2015, with reported assets decreasing from 45,132 million US dollars to 17,785 million US dollars. Following this contraction, assets remained relatively stable, fluctuating between approximately 17,000 million and 26,000 million US dollars. Adjusted assets followed a similar trajectory, generally remaining lower than reported assets from 2016 onward.
Return on Assets (ROA) Performance
The adjusted ROA provides a normalized measure of efficiency, showing a steady increase from 6.32% in 2014 to a peak of 14.09% in 2016. Despite a sharp decline to 3.43% in 2017, the metric recovered strongly to 13.19% by 2018. This stability contrasts with the reported ROA, which experienced extreme volatility, including a spike to 30.47% in 2016 and a drop to -3.91% in 2017, further highlighting the impact of non-operational variances on the reported results.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?