EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
PayPal Holdings Inc. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to PayPal Holdings Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit. While net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) and invested capital generally increased between 2018 and 2020, the cost of capital remained relatively stable, resulting in economic profit remaining negative. Subsequent years show a decline in NOPAT alongside a decreasing, but still substantial, cost of capital, leading to increasingly negative economic profit figures.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT increased from US$1,833 million in 2018 to US$4,527 million in 2020, representing significant growth. However, this was followed by a substantial decrease to US$3,793 million in 2021 and a further decline to US$1,747 million in 2022, falling below the 2018 level. This suggests a weakening in core operational profitability in the latter part of the period.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital exhibited a slight decreasing trend over the five-year period, moving from 20.43% in 2018 to 18.94% in 2022. While this decrease would typically be favorable, it was not sufficient to offset the fluctuations in NOPAT and prevent negative economic profit.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital increased steadily from US$17,780 million in 2018 to US$31,496 million in 2022. This indicates continued investment in the business, but the returns on this investment, as measured by economic profit, have been consistently negative. The rate of increase in invested capital slowed between 2020 and 2022.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative throughout the entire period, ranging from a low of US$-4,219 million in 2022 to a high of US$-1,602 million in 2020. The magnitude of the negative economic profit increased in both 2021 and 2022, indicating a widening gap between the return generated by the invested capital and the cost of that capital. This suggests the company is destroying value for its investors.
In summary, the analysis reveals a concerning trend of value destruction. Despite increases in invested capital and a temporary rise in NOPAT, the cost of capital consistently exceeded the returns generated, resulting in negative economic profit. The recent decline in NOPAT coupled with continued high levels of invested capital has exacerbated this issue, leading to a substantial increase in the magnitude of the economic loss.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring reserve.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
4 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
5 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
7 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net Income
- The net income displayed an overall increasing trend from 2018 through 2020, rising from 2,057 million USD to a peak of 4,202 million USD. In 2021, the net income slightly decreased to 4,169 million USD but remained close to the previous year's high. However, in 2022, net income experienced a significant decline to 2,419 million USD, nearly reverting to the level recorded in 2019.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT followed a similar pattern to net income, increasing steadily from 1,833 million USD in 2018 to reach a maximum of 4,527 million USD in 2020. In 2021, a notable decrease occurred, with NOPAT falling to 3,793 million USD. The downward trend continued more sharply in 2022, with NOPAT dropping to 1,747 million USD, marking the lowest figure within the period analyzed and significantly below the 2018 starting point.
- Overall Observations
- Both net income and NOPAT demonstrated strong growth leading up to 2020, indicating a period of robust profitability. However, the years following 2020 show a reversal with considerable declines in profitability metrics. The drop in 2022 is particularly pronounced, suggesting challenges or changes in operational performance affecting the company's ability to generate profit after taxes. This downward shift merits further investigation into contributing factors such as revenue changes, cost structures, or external economic conditions affecting the company.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Income tax expense (benefit)
- The income tax expense exhibited notable fluctuations over the examined period. Starting at $319 million at the end of 2018, it increased substantially to $539 million in 2019 and further to $863 million in 2020. However, there was a significant reversal in 2021, with the tax expense shifting to a benefit of $70 million, indicating a tax credit or reduction in tax liabilities for that year. This benefit sharply reversed to a substantial expense of $947 million by the end of 2022, suggesting either a change in profitability or tax strategy that led to increased tax obligations.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes followed a broadly variable trend. Beginning at $475 million in 2018, these taxes rose to $796 million in 2019, indicating an increased cash tax outflow. The figure then declined to $728 million in 2020 and further decreased to $454 million in 2021. This downward trend was reversed in 2022 with a marked increase to $1,790 million, more than tripling the cash operating taxes compared to the previous year. This sharp increase in 2022 signals a significant rise in actual cash taxes paid, which may reflect changes in profitability, tax rates, or deferred tax payments being settled.
- Overall analysis
- The data illustrates considerable volatility in both reported income tax expense and cash taxes paid over these years. The discrepancy between income tax expense turning into a benefit in 2021 while cash operating taxes decreased suggests timing differences or tax planning effects. The pronounced spike in both income tax expense and cash taxes in 2022 implies a substantial change in the company's tax situation or profitability, warranting further investigation into underlying operational or tax law changes affecting this period.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of restructuring reserve.
4 Addition of equity equivalents to total PayPal stockholders’ equity.
5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
The financial data indicate noteworthy trends in the company's capital structure and financing over the observed period from 2018 to 2022.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The company’s total reported debt and leases showed a significant increase throughout the period. Starting at $2,584 million in 2018, the debt nearly doubled by 2019 to $5,472 million. This upward trend continued sharply in 2020, reaching $9,725 million, with a slower but steady rise in 2021 at $9,810 million, and further increase to $11,555 million in 2022. This pattern suggests an expanding use of debt financing or lease obligations over the years.
- Total PayPal stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders' equity also increased overall but at a more moderate pace compared to debt. Beginning at $15,386 million in 2018, equity rose consistently each year, peaking at $21,727 million in 2021 before slightly declining to $20,274 million in 2022. This trend implies retention of earnings and possible capital infusions, though the 2022 dip may indicate distributions, losses, or other equity reductions in that year.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital showed a steady growth trend across the period. From $17,780 million in 2018, it increased annually, reaching $31,496 million by 2022. This steady increase reflects the company’s growing asset base financed by both debt and equity, with the notable acceleration seen from 2019 onwards.
In summary, the data reveal an overall expansion in the company’s financial base, with a more pronounced rise in leverage compared to equity. The increased debt levels might indicate strategic investments funded through borrowing, while the equity growth confirms continued shareholder value enhancement until 2021, followed by a slight equity contraction in 2022.
Cost of Capital
PayPal Holdings Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | ||||||
| Adobe Inc. | ||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | ||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Datadog Inc. | ||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | ||||||
| Intuit Inc. | ||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
| Oracle Corp. | ||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
| Workday Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio demonstrates a consistently negative trend over the observed five-year period. Initially negative at -10.12% in 2018, the ratio worsened to -13.39% by 2022. This indicates a widening gap between the company’s return on invested capital and its weighted average cost of capital.
- Economic Spread Ratio Trend
- The economic spread ratio experienced a slight improvement from -10.51% in 2019 to -5.30% in 2020. However, this improvement was short-lived, as the ratio resumed a downward trajectory, reaching -7.51% in 2021 and further declining to -13.39% in 2022. This suggests increasing challenges in generating returns exceeding the cost of capital.
Economic profit consistently remained negative throughout the period, ranging from a low of -4,219 US$ million in 2022 to a high of -1,602 US$ million in 2020. The increasing negative economic profit values correlate with the declining economic spread ratio, reinforcing the observation that the company is destroying economic value.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital increased substantially from 17,780 US$ million in 2018 to 31,496 US$ million in 2022. While growth in invested capital is not inherently negative, the simultaneous decline in the economic spread ratio suggests that these investments are not generating sufficient returns to cover their cost. The rate of increase in invested capital slowed considerably between 2020 and 2022.
The combination of a consistently negative economic spread ratio and increasing invested capital suggests a concerning trend. The company is deploying more capital while simultaneously experiencing a decreasing ability to generate returns that exceed its cost of capital. This pattern warrants further investigation into the underlying drivers of profitability and capital allocation efficiency.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | ||||||
| Adobe Inc. | ||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | ||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Datadog Inc. | ||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | ||||||
| Intuit Inc. | ||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
| Oracle Corp. | ||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
| Workday Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited a generally worsening trend over the five-year period. While fluctuations occurred, the overall movement indicates a decreasing ability to generate economic profit relative to net revenues.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin began at -11.65% in 2018 and declined to -15.33% in 2022. This represents a cumulative decrease of 3.68 percentage points over the observed timeframe.
- A slight improvement was noted between 2018 and 2019, with the margin worsening from -11.65% to -13.17%.
- The year 2020 saw a notable positive shift, with the margin improving to -7.47%. However, this improvement was short-lived.
- Subsequent years, 2021 and 2022, experienced renewed declines, reaching -9.28% and -15.33% respectively. The most significant deterioration occurred between 2021 and 2022.
The economic profit itself consistently remained negative throughout the period, indicating that the company’s returns were insufficient to cover the cost of capital. The magnitude of the negative economic profit increased from US$1,800 million in 2018 to US$4,219 million in 2022.
- Net Revenues
- Net revenues demonstrated a consistent upward trend, increasing from US$15,451 million in 2018 to US$27,518 million in 2022. This represents a growth of approximately 77.78% over the five-year period.
- Despite the growth in net revenues, the worsening economic profit margin suggests that the increase in revenue was not sufficient to offset the increasing cost of capital or declining operational efficiency in generating economic profit.
The divergence between increasing net revenues and a declining economic profit margin warrants further investigation into the underlying factors contributing to the company’s cost of capital and operational performance.