Paying user area
Try for free
PayPal Holdings Inc. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to PayPal Holdings Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The annual financial data indicates that the net cash provided by operating activities exhibited moderate variability over the reported five-year period. Starting at $5,483 million in 2018, there was a decline in 2019 to $4,561 million, followed by a recovery and subsequent growth to a peak of $6,340 million in 2021. In 2022, this figure slightly decreased to $5,813 million, suggesting some fluctuation but generally maintaining a strong cash-generating capability from core operations.
Similarly, the free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) follows a comparable trend pattern, beginning at $4,723 million in 2018, decreasing to $3,938 million in 2019, then rising steadily to $5,266 million in 2020 and further to $5,619 million in 2021. A minor drop is observed in 2022, with FCFF amounting to $5,313 million. This pattern reflects an overall healthy generation of free cash flows after accounting for capital expenditures, aligning closely with the trends seen in operating cash flow.
- Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
- Generally increased from 2019 to 2021 after a dip in 2019, indicating improved operational efficiency or increased profitability during this period.
- The slight decline in 2022 could indicate changing operating conditions or increased working capital requirements.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- Mirrors the operational cash flow trend closely, indicating management's ability to maintain capital expenditures at levels that allow for strong free cash flow generation.
- The dip in 2019 suggests a period of challenges, while the subsequent growth demonstrates recovery and effective capital management.
Overall, the data demonstrates robust cash flow performance with a brief period of contraction in 2019, followed by a recovery through 2021, and a slight reduction in 2022, maintaining a generally healthy liquidity and cash flow position throughout the observed timeframe.
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2 2022 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, tax = Cash paid for interest × EITR
= × =
The analysis of the financial data over the five-year period reveals discernible trends and shifts in both the effective income tax rate and cash paid for interest, net of tax.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
- The effective income tax rate exhibits an overall upward trajectory from 12.5% in 2018 to 28.1% in 2022, showing a consistent increase with minor fluctuations. The rate grew sharply between 2018 and 2019, rising from 12.5% to 18%, followed by a slight reduction to 17% in 2020. Subsequently, it increased again to 21% in 2021, culminating in the highest recorded rate of 28.1% in 2022. This upward movement suggests increasing tax obligations or changing tax strategies impacting the company's profitability over the years.
- Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Tax
- Cash paid for interest, net of tax, rose steadily and substantially throughout the five-year span. Starting from $60 million in 2018, the figure experienced modest growth to $64 million in 2019, then surged significantly to $158 million in 2020. The upward trend continued with $182 million paid in 2021 and further increased to $201 million in 2022. This consistent increase indicates a growing debt burden or higher interest rates on borrowed funds, leading to elevated financing costs and impacting net cash flows.
In summary, both the effective income tax rate and cash paid for interest have shown marked increases from 2018 to 2022. The rising tax rate may reflect evolving tax environments or company-specific factors influencing taxable income. Concurrently, the growing interest expenses point towards expanded leverage or changes in financing conditions, which could influence overall financial stability and profitability.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
Enterprise value (EV) | |
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | |
Valuation Ratio | |
EV/FCFF | |
Benchmarks | |
EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
Accenture PLC | |
Adobe Inc. | |
Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |
CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |
Fair Isaac Corp. | |
International Business Machines Corp. | |
Intuit Inc. | |
Microsoft Corp. | |
Oracle Corp. | |
Palantir Technologies Inc. | |
Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |
Salesforce Inc. | |
ServiceNow Inc. | |
Synopsys Inc. | |
Workday Inc. | |
EV/FCFF, Sector | |
Software & Services | |
EV/FCFF, Industry | |
Information Technology |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
Enterprise value (EV)1 | ||||||
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | ||||||
Valuation Ratio | ||||||
EV/FCFF3 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
Accenture PLC | ||||||
Adobe Inc. | ||||||
Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
Fair Isaac Corp. | ||||||
International Business Machines Corp. | ||||||
Intuit Inc. | ||||||
Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
Oracle Corp. | ||||||
Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
Workday Inc. | ||||||
EV/FCFF, Sector | ||||||
Software & Services | ||||||
EV/FCFF, Industry | ||||||
Information Technology |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- The enterprise value demonstrated significant variability over the period under review. Initially, it rose sharply from approximately $79.4 billion at the end of 2018 to a peak of about $278 billion at the end of 2020. Following this peak, the value experienced a substantial decline, dropping to roughly $108.2 billion by the end of 2021 and further decreasing to approximately $55 billion by the end of 2022. This pattern suggests a period of rapid market capitalization growth followed by considerable contraction.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- Free cash flow to the firm showed more stability compared to enterprise value, with modest fluctuations. It began at about $4.7 billion in 2018 and decreased slightly in 2019 to around $3.9 billion. Subsequently, FCFF increased steadily, reaching around $5.3 billion by the end of 2022. This indicates relatively consistent cash generation capacity, with a trend toward gradual improvement post-2019.
- EV to FCFF Ratio
- The EV/FCFF ratio, which is an indicator of valuation relative to cash flow, showed a marked peak in 2020 at 52.8, which aligns with the 2020 spike in enterprise value. Before this surge, the ratio was 16.81 in 2018 and increased significantly to 28.53 in 2019. After the 2020 peak, the ratio declined sharply to 19.26 in 2021 and further to 10.36 in 2022. The declining trend post-2020 suggests improved valuation relative to cash flow, possibly reflecting a market reassessment or improved operational cash flow sustainability.