EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Economic Profit
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= 1,747 – 18.84% × 31,496 = -4,187
The financial analysis indicates a persistent inability to generate positive economic profit between 2018 and 2022. Throughout this period, the returns generated were insufficient to cover the cost of capital employed, resulting in a continuous destruction of economic value.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- A non-linear trend is observed in NOPAT, which increased from 1,833 million US$ in 2018 to a peak of 4,527 million US$ in 2020. However, a substantial contraction followed, with the value falling to 1,747 million US$ by the end of 2022, representing a decline of approximately 61% from its 2020 peak.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital exhibited a consistent upward trajectory, rising from 17,780 million US$ in 2018 to 31,496 million US$ in 2022. This expansion of the capital base by approximately 77% over the five-year period increased the financial hurdle required to achieve a positive economic profit.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained relatively stable with a gradual downward trend, moving from 20.32% in 2018 to 18.84% in 2022. While the cost of funding decreased slightly, the reduction was not sufficient to mitigate the impact of declining operating profits and an expanding capital base.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit remained negative throughout the entire period, indicating that the entity did not earn enough to cover its cost of capital. While there was a relative improvement in 2020, where the deficit narrowed to 1,569 million US$, the situation deteriorated sharply by 2022, with the economic loss widening to 4,187 million US$. This decline is attributed to the simultaneous decrease in NOPAT and the continued increase in invested capital.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring reserve.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
4 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= 720 × 3.00% = 22
5 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= 326 × 21.00% = 68
6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
7 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= 174 × 21.00% = 37
8 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
An analysis of profitability metrics from 2018 to 2022 reveals a period of significant expansion followed by a substantial contraction in operating performance.
- Net Income Performance
- Net income experienced a steady increase between 2018 and 2019, followed by a surge to a peak of 4,202 million US$ in 2020. After maintaining a relatively stable level in 2021, the figure declined to 2,419 million US$ by the end of 2022, representing a regression toward 2019 levels.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Trends
- NOPAT exhibited higher volatility than net income throughout the period. Following an increase from 1,833 million US$ in 2018 to a peak of 4,527 million US$ in 2020, a consistent downward trajectory was observed. This decline culminated in a value of 1,747 million US$ in 2022, falling below the 2018 baseline.
- Comparative Operating Efficiency
- The divergence between NOPAT and net income highlights shifting financial dynamics. In 2020, NOPAT exceeded net income, indicating that core operating profitability was stronger than the final bottom-line result. By 2022, this trend reversed sharply, with net income exceeding NOPAT by a significant margin, suggesting that operating profitability deteriorated more rapidly than overall net earnings.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
An analysis of the tax metrics between 2018 and 2022 reveals significant volatility and a widening divergence between accounting tax expenses and actual cash tax outflows. While both metrics generally trended upward over the five-year period, the cash operating taxes exhibited more extreme fluctuations, particularly in the final year of the period.
- Income Tax Expense Trends
- The income tax expense grew steadily from US$319 million in 2018 to a peak of US$863 million in 2020. A sharp reversal occurred in 2021, where the company recorded a tax benefit of US$70 million, before returning to an expense of US$947 million in 2022. This volatility indicates fluctuations in taxable income or the impact of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
- Cash Operating Taxes Trends
- Cash operating taxes followed a different trajectory, increasing from US$475 million in 2018 to US$796 million in 2019. Following a period of decline in 2020 and 2021, where payments dropped to US$454 million, there was a substantial surge in 2022, with cash operating taxes reaching US$1,790 million. This represents a nearly fourfold increase from the 2021 level.
- Divergence Between Accounting and Cash Taxes
- A pronounced gap is observed between the income tax expense and cash operating taxes. In 2021, while the income statement showed a tax benefit, the company still incurred a cash outflow of US$454 million for operating taxes. This divergence peaked in 2022, where cash operating taxes were approximately 89% higher than the reported income tax expense, suggesting significant differences between accrual-based tax accounting and actual cash settlements.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of restructuring reserve.
4 Addition of equity equivalents to total PayPal stockholders’ equity.
5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
The analysis of capital components from 2018 to 2022 reveals a substantial expansion in the total invested capital base, which grew from 17,780 million to 31,496 million. The most significant period of growth occurred between 2018 and 2020, after which the total invested capital entered a phase of relative stabilization.
- Debt and Lease Trends
- A consistent and aggressive upward trend is observed in total reported debt and leases. From 2018 to 2020, these obligations increased from 2,584 million to 9,725 million, representing a rapid accumulation of leverage. Although growth slowed significantly in 2021, debt levels rose again to 11,555 million by the end of 2022, indicating a long-term strategy of increasing debt-funded capital.
- Equity Dynamics
- Stockholders' equity exhibited a steady increase for the first four years of the period, climbing from 15,386 million in 2018 to a peak of 21,727 million in 2021. This growth trend reversed in 2022, with equity declining to 20,274 million. This contraction suggests a shift in the capital structure or the impact of capital return initiatives during the final year of the analyzed period.
- Invested Capital Composition
- The growth in invested capital was driven by a combination of equity accumulation and a sharp increase in debt. Between 2018 and 2020, the rapid rise in invested capital was heavily influenced by the surge in debt and leases. By 2022, the total invested capital remained nearly flat compared to the previous year, as the increase in debt obligations effectively offset the decline in stockholders' equity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cost of Capital
PayPal Holdings Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 91,415) | 91,415) | ÷ | 102,126) | = | 0.90 | 0.90 | × | 20.75% | = | 18.57% | ||
| Debt3 | 9,991) | 9,991) | ÷ | 102,126) | = | 0.10 | 0.10 | × | 3.22% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.25% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 720) | 720) | ÷ | 102,126) | = | 0.01 | 0.01 | × | 3.00% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.02% | ||
| Total: | 102,126) | 1.00 | 18.84% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 144,810) | 144,810) | ÷ | 154,970) | = | 0.93 | 0.93 | × | 20.75% | = | 19.39% | ||
| Debt3 | 9,398) | 9,398) | ÷ | 154,970) | = | 0.06 | 0.06 | × | 2.50% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.12% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 762) | 762) | ÷ | 154,970) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 3.00% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.01% | ||
| Total: | 154,970) | 1.00 | 19.52% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 315,562) | 315,562) | ÷ | 326,048) | = | 0.97 | 0.97 | × | 20.75% | = | 20.08% | ||
| Debt3 | 9,700) | 9,700) | ÷ | 326,048) | = | 0.03 | 0.03 | × | 2.50% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.06% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 786) | 786) | ÷ | 326,048) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 3.00% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.01% | ||
| Total: | 326,048) | 1.00 | 20.15% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 140,626) | 140,626) | ÷ | 146,133) | = | 0.96 | 0.96 | × | 20.75% | = | 19.97% | ||
| Debt3 | 5,000) | 5,000) | ÷ | 146,133) | = | 0.03 | 0.03 | × | 2.69% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.07% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 507) | 507) | ÷ | 146,133) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 5.00% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.01% | ||
| Total: | 146,133) | 1.00 | 20.05% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 106,586) | 106,586) | ÷ | 109,170) | = | 0.98 | 0.98 | × | 20.75% | = | 20.26% | ||
| Debt3 | 1,998) | 1,998) | ÷ | 109,170) | = | 0.02 | 0.02 | × | 3.34% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.05% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 586) | 586) | ÷ | 109,170) | = | 0.01 | 0.01 | × | 3.34% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.01% | ||
| Total: | 109,170) | 1.00 | 20.32% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | (4,187) | (2,320) | (1,569) | (2,316) | (1,780) | |
| Invested capital2 | 31,496) | 31,317) | 30,260) | 22,276) | 17,780) | |
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | -13.29% | -7.41% | -5.19% | -10.40% | -10.01% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | 4.84% | 6.66% | — | — | — | |
| Adobe Inc. | 6.58% | 8.97% | 1.25% | — | — | |
| AppLovin Corp. | -26.37% | -29.58% | — | — | — | |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | 6.59% | 6.80% | — | — | — | |
| Datadog Inc. | -11.70% | -3.88% | — | — | — | |
| International Business Machines Corp. | -11.36% | -6.21% | — | — | — | |
| Intuit Inc. | -7.52% | 0.11% | — | — | — | |
| Microsoft Corp. | 18.54% | 27.58% | — | — | — | |
| Oracle Corp. | -7.56% | 0.65% | — | — | — | |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | -32.50% | -39.96% | — | — | — | |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | 3.53% | -5.17% | — | — | — | |
| Salesforce Inc. | -14.50% | -12.36% | — | — | — | |
| ServiceNow Inc. | 0.73% | 1.94% | — | — | — | |
| Synopsys Inc. | -0.84% | -6.86% | -6.67% | — | — | |
| Workday Inc. | -13.98% | -19.23% | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × -4,187 ÷ 31,496 = -13.29%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the economic value added metrics indicates a persistent state of economic value destruction over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022. Despite a substantial increase in the invested capital base, the organization consistently failed to generate returns that exceeded its cost of capital, resulting in negative economic profit throughout the entire timeframe.
- Invested Capital Trends
- Invested capital exhibited a consistent upward trajectory, rising from US$ 17,780 million in 2018 to US$ 31,496 million in 2022. The most pronounced expansion occurred between 2019 and 2020, where the capital base increased by approximately 35.6%, suggesting significant resource deployment during that period.
- Economic Profit Performance
- Economic profit remained negative for all five years, signifying that the company did not create value above its required return. While a temporary recovery was observed in 2020, with losses narrowing to US$ 1,569 million, this trend reversed sharply. By December 31, 2022, the economic loss widened to US$ 4,187 million, the highest deficit in the reported period.
- Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
- The economic spread ratio, which measures the difference between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital, remained negative throughout the analysis. A peak efficiency point was reached in 2020 at -5.19%; however, the ratio deteriorated significantly thereafter, reaching -13.29% by the end of 2022. This downward trend indicates an expanding gap between the cost of funding and the returns generated, reflecting a decrease in overall economic efficiency.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | (4,187) | (2,320) | (1,569) | (2,316) | (1,780) | |
| Net revenues | 27,518) | 25,371) | 21,454) | 17,772) | 15,451) | |
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | -15.21% | -9.14% | -7.31% | -13.03% | -11.52% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | 2.33% | 3.42% | — | — | — | |
| Adobe Inc. | 7.67% | 11.17% | 1.79% | — | — | |
| AppLovin Corp. | -49.38% | -59.23% | — | — | — | |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | 6.57% | 6.91% | — | — | — | |
| Datadog Inc. | -8.10% | -3.08% | — | — | — | |
| International Business Machines Corp. | -19.67% | -11.82% | — | — | — | |
| Intuit Inc. | -14.48% | 0.14% | — | — | — | |
| Microsoft Corp. | 17.77% | 22.89% | — | — | — | |
| Oracle Corp. | -13.87% | 1.29% | — | — | — | |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | -54.53% | -65.82% | — | — | — | |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | 4.11% | -6.95% | — | — | — | |
| Salesforce Inc. | -40.27% | -28.34% | — | — | — | |
| ServiceNow Inc. | 0.58% | 1.68% | — | — | — | |
| Synopsys Inc. | -1.18% | -10.92% | -11.45% | — | — | |
| Workday Inc. | -18.95% | -25.09% | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net revenues
= 100 × -4,187 ÷ 27,518 = -15.21%
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Between 2018 and 2022, a significant divergence is observed between revenue growth and the generation of economic value. While net revenues expanded consistently throughout the five-year period, economic profit remained negative, indicating that the returns generated were insufficient to cover the company's cost of capital.
- Net Revenue Growth
- A sustained upward trajectory is evident in net revenues, which increased from 15,451 million US dollars in 2018 to 27,518 million US dollars by 2022. This reflects a consistent expansion of the top-line scale over the observed period.
- Economic Profit Performance
- Economic profit remained in negative territory for all five years. After fluctuating between 2018 and 2021, a sharp deterioration occurred in 2022, with the economic profit falling to -4,187 million US dollars. This represents a substantial increase in the economic deficit compared to the 2018 starting point of -1,780 million US dollars.
- Economic Profit Margin Volatility
- The economic profit margin exhibits a fluctuating pattern, reaching its most efficient point in 2020 at -7.31%. However, this improvement was temporary, as the margin declined to -15.21% by 2022. The widening negative margin suggests that the increase in net revenues did not translate into improved economic efficiency, and the gap between operating returns and the cost of capital widened significantly by the end of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?