EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
PayPal Holdings Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Common-Size Income Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Net Profit Margin since 2015
- Price to Earnings (P/E) since 2015
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2015
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to PayPal Holdings Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The analysis of economic profit over the five-year period from 2018 to 2022 reveals a consistent inability to generate value above the cost of capital. Economic profit remained negative throughout the entire duration, indicating that the net operating profit after taxes was insufficient to cover the imputed cost of the capital employed in the business.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Trends
- A volatile trajectory is observed in NOPAT, which initially grew from 1,833 million US$ in 2018 to a peak of 4,527 million US$ in 2020. However, this growth was not sustained, as profits declined to 3,793 million US$ in 2021 and experienced a sharp contraction to 1,747 million US$ by 2022, falling below the 2018 baseline.
- Invested Capital and Cost of Capital
- Invested capital exhibited a steady upward trend, increasing from 17,780 million US$ in 2018 to 31,496 million US$ in 2022. This represents a significant expansion of the capital base. Concurrently, the cost of capital remained relatively stable, showing a slight gradual decline from 20.40% in 2018 to 18.91% in 2022.
- Economic Profit Dynamics
- Economic profit remained negative across all reported years, signifying a persistent destruction of shareholder value in economic terms. While there was a slight improvement in 2020, where the deficit narrowed to -1,592 million US$ due to the spike in NOPAT, the situation deteriorated rapidly thereafter. By 2022, the economic profit reached its lowest point at -4,208 million US$. This deterioration was driven by the combination of a substantially larger invested capital base and a simultaneous collapse in operating profitability.
The divergence between the growing invested capital and the declining NOPAT toward the end of the period resulted in an accelerated erosion of economic profit. The data indicates that the increase in capital deployment did not yield proportional increases in operating returns, leading to a widened gap between actual profit and the required return on capital.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring reserve.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
4 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
5 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
7 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net Income
- The net income displayed an overall increasing trend from 2018 through 2020, rising from 2,057 million USD to a peak of 4,202 million USD. In 2021, the net income slightly decreased to 4,169 million USD but remained close to the previous year's high. However, in 2022, net income experienced a significant decline to 2,419 million USD, nearly reverting to the level recorded in 2019.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT followed a similar pattern to net income, increasing steadily from 1,833 million USD in 2018 to reach a maximum of 4,527 million USD in 2020. In 2021, a notable decrease occurred, with NOPAT falling to 3,793 million USD. The downward trend continued more sharply in 2022, with NOPAT dropping to 1,747 million USD, marking the lowest figure within the period analyzed and significantly below the 2018 starting point.
- Overall Observations
- Both net income and NOPAT demonstrated strong growth leading up to 2020, indicating a period of robust profitability. However, the years following 2020 show a reversal with considerable declines in profitability metrics. The drop in 2022 is particularly pronounced, suggesting challenges or changes in operational performance affecting the company's ability to generate profit after taxes. This downward shift merits further investigation into contributing factors such as revenue changes, cost structures, or external economic conditions affecting the company.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Income tax expense (benefit)
- The income tax expense exhibited notable fluctuations over the examined period. Starting at $319 million at the end of 2018, it increased substantially to $539 million in 2019 and further to $863 million in 2020. However, there was a significant reversal in 2021, with the tax expense shifting to a benefit of $70 million, indicating a tax credit or reduction in tax liabilities for that year. This benefit sharply reversed to a substantial expense of $947 million by the end of 2022, suggesting either a change in profitability or tax strategy that led to increased tax obligations.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes followed a broadly variable trend. Beginning at $475 million in 2018, these taxes rose to $796 million in 2019, indicating an increased cash tax outflow. The figure then declined to $728 million in 2020 and further decreased to $454 million in 2021. This downward trend was reversed in 2022 with a marked increase to $1,790 million, more than tripling the cash operating taxes compared to the previous year. This sharp increase in 2022 signals a significant rise in actual cash taxes paid, which may reflect changes in profitability, tax rates, or deferred tax payments being settled.
- Overall analysis
- The data illustrates considerable volatility in both reported income tax expense and cash taxes paid over these years. The discrepancy between income tax expense turning into a benefit in 2021 while cash operating taxes decreased suggests timing differences or tax planning effects. The pronounced spike in both income tax expense and cash taxes in 2022 implies a substantial change in the company's tax situation or profitability, warranting further investigation into underlying operational or tax law changes affecting this period.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of restructuring reserve.
4 Addition of equity equivalents to total PayPal stockholders’ equity.
5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
The financial data indicate noteworthy trends in the company's capital structure and financing over the observed period from 2018 to 2022.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The company’s total reported debt and leases showed a significant increase throughout the period. Starting at $2,584 million in 2018, the debt nearly doubled by 2019 to $5,472 million. This upward trend continued sharply in 2020, reaching $9,725 million, with a slower but steady rise in 2021 at $9,810 million, and further increase to $11,555 million in 2022. This pattern suggests an expanding use of debt financing or lease obligations over the years.
- Total PayPal stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders' equity also increased overall but at a more moderate pace compared to debt. Beginning at $15,386 million in 2018, equity rose consistently each year, peaking at $21,727 million in 2021 before slightly declining to $20,274 million in 2022. This trend implies retention of earnings and possible capital infusions, though the 2022 dip may indicate distributions, losses, or other equity reductions in that year.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital showed a steady growth trend across the period. From $17,780 million in 2018, it increased annually, reaching $31,496 million by 2022. This steady increase reflects the company’s growing asset base financed by both debt and equity, with the notable acceleration seen from 2019 onwards.
In summary, the data reveal an overall expansion in the company’s financial base, with a more pronounced rise in leverage compared to equity. The increased debt levels might indicate strategic investments funded through borrowing, while the equity growth confirms continued shareholder value enhancement until 2021, followed by a slight equity contraction in 2022.
Cost of Capital
PayPal Holdings Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | ||||||
| Adobe Inc. | ||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | ||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Datadog Inc. | ||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | ||||||
| Intuit Inc. | ||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
| Oracle Corp. | ||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
| Workday Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of economic value added from 2018 to 2022 reveals a persistent failure to generate value above the cost of capital. Throughout the five-year period, economic profit remained consistently negative, indicating that the returns generated were insufficient to cover the implicit cost of the invested capital. Despite a significant expansion in the capital base, the inability to achieve a positive economic spread persisted, with a marked deterioration in the final year of the period.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit exhibited volatility while remaining in negative territory. After starting at -1,794 million US dollars in 2018, the figure dipped further in 2019 before experiencing a partial recovery to -1,592 million US dollars in 2020. However, this recovery was short-lived, as losses widened in 2021 and reached a peak deficit of -4,208 million US dollars in 2022, representing a substantial increase in value destruction.
- Invested Capital Growth
- A consistent upward trajectory is observed in invested capital, which grew from 17,780 million US dollars in 2018 to 31,496 million US dollars by 2022. This represents a significant increase in the total resources deployed. The fact that economic profit declined while invested capital grew suggests that the additional capital deployed failed to generate incremental returns exceeding the cost of capital.
- Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
- The economic spread ratio remained negative across all observed years, confirming that the cost of capital consistently exceeded the return on invested capital. The ratio showed a temporary improvement in 2020, reaching -5.26%, the most favorable point in the sequence. Following this, a downward trend resumed, culminating in a period low of -13.36% in 2022. This widening negative spread indicates a diminishing efficiency in capital utilization relative to the required rate of return.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | ||||||
| Adobe Inc. | ||||||
| AppLovin Corp. | ||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Datadog Inc. | ||||||
| International Business Machines Corp. | ||||||
| Intuit Inc. | ||||||
| Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
| Oracle Corp. | ||||||
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
| ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
| Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
| Workday Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of economic value added from 2018 to 2022 reveals a persistent inability to generate positive economic profit, despite a consistent and substantial increase in net revenues. The company has operated with a negative economic profit throughout the entire period, indicating that the returns generated have been insufficient to cover the cost of capital employed.
- Net Revenue Performance
- A steady upward trajectory in net revenues is observed, growing from 15,451 million US dollars in 2018 to 27,518 million US dollars in 2022. This represents continuous top-line expansion over the five-year duration.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit remained negative across all reported years. While there was a relative improvement in 2020, where the deficit narrowed to 1,592 million US dollars, this was followed by a sharp decline. By 2022, the economic profit reached its lowest point at -4,208 million US dollars, signaling a significant increase in the value destroyed relative to the cost of capital.
- Economic Profit Margin Volatility
- The economic profit margin exhibited significant fluctuations, remaining negative throughout the period. The margin reached its peak efficiency in 2020 at -7.42%, but subsequently deteriorated to -15.29% by 2022. This trend suggests that revenue growth has not been effectively translated into economic value; instead, the gap between the company's returns and its cost of capital widened considerably by the end of the period.