Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
A comprehensive analysis of the financial performance between 2018 and 2022 reveals a period of rapid expansion followed by a sequential contraction in core earnings capacity. Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) exhibited significant growth in the early part of the period, peaking in 2020 before entering a downward trend.
- EBITDA Growth and Volatility
- EBITDA rose from US$ 3,229 million in 2018 to a peak of US$ 6,463 million in 2020, representing a substantial increase of approximately 100% over two years. However, this growth was not sustained, as EBITDA declined to US$ 5,596 million in 2021 and further to US$ 4,987 million in 2022. This indicates a reversal of the growth trajectory observed during the 2018-2020 window.
- Depreciation and Amortization Trends
- The variance between EBITDA and EBIT indicates a consistent increase in depreciation and amortization expenses. In 2018, the difference was US$ 776 million, which expanded steadily every year to reach US$ 1,317 million by 2022. This suggests an increase in the company's asset base or a shift in capital expenditure patterns despite the overall decline in EBITDA after 2020.
- Net Income Correlation and Margin Compression
- Net income mirrored the trajectory of EBITDA, peaking in 2020 at US$ 4,202 million. A notable divergence is observed in 2022, where net income fell more sharply to US$ 2,419 million than EBITDA did. While EBITDA decreased by approximately 11% between 2021 and 2022, net income dropped by roughly 42% in the same period, signaling increased pressure from non-operating expenses, taxes, or interest payments.
- Earnings Before Tax (EBT) and EBIT Analysis
- EBIT and EBT followed a similar pattern of ascent and subsequent decline. EBIT peaked in 2020 at US$ 5,274 million and declined to US$ 3,670 million by 2022. The proximity of EBT to EBIT throughout the period suggests that interest expenses remained relatively stable or minimal compared to the overall scale of operating earnings.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 37,147) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | 4,987) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.45 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Accenture PLC | 10.38 |
| Adobe Inc. | 9.81 |
| AppLovin Corp. | 20.46 |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | 50.26 |
| Datadog Inc. | 502.20 |
| International Business Machines Corp. | 16.37 |
| Intuit Inc. | 12.40 |
| Microsoft Corp. | 19.16 |
| Oracle Corp. | 15.01 |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | 279.47 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | 235.29 |
| Salesforce Inc. | 15.11 |
| ServiceNow Inc. | 51.37 |
| Synopsys Inc. | 40.57 |
| Workday Inc. | 32.01 |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Software & Services | 43.21 |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Information Technology | 53.89 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 55,025) | 108,217) | 278,044) | 112,347) | 79,413) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | 4,987) | 5,596) | 6,463) | 4,025) | 3,229) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | 11.03 | 19.34 | 43.02 | 27.91 | 24.59 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | 14.25 | 23.31 | — | — | — | |
| Adobe Inc. | 22.32 | 35.44 | 43.06 | — | — | |
| AppLovin Corp. | 14.17 | 30.05 | — | — | — | |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | 42.11 | 39.61 | — | — | — | |
| Datadog Inc. | 1,785.61 | 1,949.67 | — | — | — | |
| International Business Machines Corp. | 22.17 | 12.53 | — | — | — | |
| Intuit Inc. | 36.22 | 51.96 | — | — | — | |
| Microsoft Corp. | 20.17 | 24.59 | — | — | — | |
| Oracle Corp. | 17.12 | 13.78 | — | — | — | |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | 515.19 | — | — | — | — | |
| Salesforce Inc. | 38.88 | 33.83 | — | — | — | |
| ServiceNow Inc. | 104.31 | 147.45 | — | — | — | |
| Synopsys Inc. | 36.73 | 53.43 | 42.24 | — | — | |
| Workday Inc. | 147.90 | 670.04 | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | ||||||
| Software & Services | 22.39 | 25.74 | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | 18.32 | 20.52 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 55,025 ÷ 4,987 = 11.03
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The valuation multiple of PayPal Holdings Inc. experienced significant volatility between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a period of aggressive expansion followed by a sharp contraction.
- Enterprise Value Trends
- Enterprise value grew steadily from US$ 79,413 million in 2018 to US$ 112,347 million in 2019, before surging to a peak of US$ 278,044 million in 2020. This valuation peak was followed by a precipitous decline, with the figure falling to US$ 108,217 million in 2021 and further contracting to US$ 55,025 million by the end of 2022.
- EBITDA Performance
- Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization demonstrated consistent growth in the early part of the period, increasing from US$ 3,229 million in 2018 to US$ 6,463 million in 2020. Subsequent years showed a downward trend in operational earnings, decreasing to US$ 5,596 million in 2021 and US$ 4,987 million in 2022.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio Analysis
- The EV/EBITDA ratio mirrors the volatility seen in the enterprise value. The ratio expanded from 24.59 in 2018 to a peak of 43.02 in 2020, suggesting a significant increase in the market premium attributed to the company. However, a rapid compression occurred thereafter, with the ratio dropping to 19.34 in 2021 and reaching a period low of 11.03 in 2022. This indicates a substantial correction in valuation relative to the company's cash flow generation capabilities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?