AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 21, 2020.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

Phillips 66, short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 26.64 29.02 24.77 21.19 22.34
Receivables turnover 14.55 20.59 15.93 15.37 22.44
Payables turnover 12.51 16.82 11.61 10.44 15.07
Working capital turnover 39.03 26.08 23.90 26.20 20.95
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 14 13 15 17 16
Add: Average receivable collection period 25 18 23 24 16
Operating cycle 39 31 38 41 32
Less: Average payables payment period 29 22 31 35 24
Cash conversion cycle 10 9 7 6 8

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


The analysis of short-term operating activity between 2015 and 2019 reveals a highly efficient operational model characterized by rapid inventory movement and a consistently short cash conversion cycle. While certain volatility is present in receivables and payables management, the overall trend indicates an increase in working capital efficiency.

Inventory Management Efficiency
Inventory turnover exhibits a generally positive trajectory, rising from 22.34 in 2015 to a peak of 29.02 in 2018, before settling at 26.64 in 2019. This is mirrored by the average inventory processing period, which remained stable and lean, fluctuating narrowly between 13 and 17 days. This suggests a consistent ability to move product quickly through the supply chain.
Receivables and Payables Dynamics
Receivables turnover shows significant volatility, decreasing from 22.44 in 2015 to 14.55 by 2019. Consequently, the average receivable collection period lengthened from 16 days to 25 days over the same period, indicating a slower recovery of cash from customers. Similarly, the average payables payment period fluctuated, peaking at 35 days in 2016 and reaching 29 days by 2019, suggesting shifts in credit terms or strategic payment timing with suppliers.
Operating and Cash Conversion Cycles
The operating cycle reflects the combined volatility of inventory and receivables, varying between 31 and 41 days. However, the cash conversion cycle remained remarkably stable and short, ranging from 6 to 10 days throughout the five-year period. This indicates that the company effectively offsets its operating cycle by leveraging its payables payment period, ensuring that cash is recovered very quickly after expenditures are made.
Working Capital Utilization
A strong upward trend is observed in the working capital turnover ratio, which increased from 20.95 in 2015 to 39.03 in 2019. This substantial growth suggests a heightened efficiency in utilizing net current assets to generate sales, reflecting an optimized approach to short-term asset management.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Inventory Turnover

Phillips 66, inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of operating revenues 100,603 102,810 84,108 66,743 77,693
Inventories 3,776 3,543 3,395 3,150 3,477
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 26.64 29.02 24.77 21.19 22.34
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of operating revenues ÷ Inventories
= 100,603 ÷ 3,776 = 26.64

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operational efficiency regarding inventory management between 2015 and 2019 demonstrates a general upward trajectory in throughput, characterized by a significant peak in 2018 followed by a moderate correction. The period is marked by substantial fluctuations in operating costs that served as the primary driver for the turnover metrics.

Cost of Operating Revenues
A volatile trend is observed in operating costs, which declined from 77,693 million USD in 2015 to 66,743 million USD in 2016, before rising sharply to a peak of 102,810 million USD in 2018. This indicates significant shifts in operating scale or input price volatility during this five-year window.
Inventory Levels
Inventories remained relatively stable in comparison to the volatility of operating revenues. After a decrease to 3,150 million USD in 2016, a gradual and consistent increase was recorded, reaching 3,776 million USD by December 31, 2019. This suggests that the growth in operating volume was not matched by a proportional expansion of stock holdings.
Inventory Turnover Ratio
The turnover ratio exhibits a correlation with the cost of operating revenues. The ratio dipped to 21.19 in 2016 but accelerated to a high of 29.02 in 2018, signaling a period of heightened efficiency in moving inventory. The subsequent decline to 26.64 in 2019 is attributable to the simultaneous decrease in operating revenues and the continued accumulation of inventory levels.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

Phillips 66, receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Sales and other operating revenues 107,293 111,461 102,354 84,279 98,975
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowances 7,376 5,414 6,424 5,485 4,411
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 14.55 20.59 15.93 15.37 22.44
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Sales and other operating revenues ÷ Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowances
= 107,293 ÷ 7,376 = 14.55

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a volatile trend in the efficiency of receivables collection between 2015 and 2019, characterized by fluctuating turnover rates and a general increase in outstanding receivables.

Revenue Performance
Sales and other operating revenues experienced notable fluctuations over the five-year period. A significant contraction occurred in 2016, with revenues dropping to 84,279 million. This was followed by a recovery phase that peaked in 2018 at 111,461 million, before a slight decrease to 107,293 million in 2019.
Receivables Balance Dynamics
Net accounts and notes receivable demonstrated an overall upward trend, rising from 4,411 million in 2015 to a period high of 7,376 million in 2019. A temporary decline was observed in 2018, where the balance fell to 5,414 million, indicating a brief period of improved collection or reduced credit extension.
Receivables Turnover Analysis
The receivables turnover ratio exhibited substantial instability. The highest efficiency was achieved in 2015 with a ratio of 22.44. A sharp decline to 15.37 occurred in 2016, which remained relatively stagnant through 2017. A strong recovery was evident in 2018, as the ratio climbed to 20.59, driven by the convergence of peak annual revenues and reduced net receivables. However, this efficiency eroded in 2019, with the ratio falling to its lowest point in the period at 14.55, resulting from a simultaneous increase in receivables and a decrease in overall sales.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

Phillips 66, payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of operating revenues 100,603 102,810 84,108 66,743 77,693
Accounts payable 8,043 6,113 7,242 6,395 5,155
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 12.51 16.82 11.61 10.44 15.07
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of operating revenues ÷ Accounts payable
= 100,603 ÷ 8,043 = 12.51

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals significant volatility in the management of accounts payable between 2015 and 2019. The payables turnover ratio fluctuated considerably, reflecting inconsistent shifts in both operational expenditure and the utilization of trade credit.

Cost of Operating Revenues Trend
Operational costs exhibited an overall upward trajectory over the period, rising from $77,693 million in 2015 to a peak of $102,810 million in 2018, before stabilizing at $100,603 million in 2019. A notable contraction was observed in 2016, when costs decreased to $66,743 million.
Accounts Payable Dynamics
The balance of accounts payable generally increased from $5,155 million in 2015 to $8,043 million in 2019. However, this growth was not linear; a significant reduction in the payable balance occurred in 2018, where the amount dropped to $6,113 million despite the simultaneous peak in operating revenues.
Payables Turnover Ratio Analysis
The payables turnover ratio demonstrated substantial variance, beginning at 15.07 in 2015 and dropping to a period low of 10.44 in 2016, indicating a slowing of supplier payments. A strong recovery trend followed, peaking at 16.82 in 2018, which suggests an acceleration in the payment cycle or a strategic reduction in reliance on supplier credit. By 2019, the ratio declined to 12.51, driven by a sharp increase in accounts payable coinciding with relatively stable operating costs.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

Phillips 66, working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 14,395 13,209 14,390 12,680 12,256
Less: Current liabilities 11,646 8,935 10,107 9,463 7,531
Working capital 2,749 4,274 4,283 3,217 4,725
 
Sales and other operating revenues 107,293 111,461 102,354 84,279 98,975
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 39.03 26.08 23.90 26.20 20.95
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Sales and other operating revenues ÷ Working capital
= 107,293 ÷ 2,749 = 39.03

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity between 2015 and 2019 reveals a significant increase in the efficiency of working capital utilization. While operating revenues experienced fluctuations, the overall trend indicates a strategic reduction in the working capital required to support those revenues, culminating in a sharp peak in turnover efficiency by the end of the period.

Working Capital Trends
Working capital exhibited a volatile trajectory, starting at 4,725 million US dollars in 2015 and ending at its lowest point of 2,749 million US dollars in 2019. A notable decrease occurred in 2016, followed by a recovery period in 2017 and 2018, before a substantial decline in the final year of the analyzed period.
Revenue Performance
Sales and other operating revenues demonstrated a general growth trend from 2016 to 2018. After a dip to 84,279 million US dollars in 2016, revenues climbed steadily to a peak of 111,461 million US dollars in 2018, before experiencing a slight contraction to 107,293 million US dollars in 2019.
Working Capital Turnover Analysis
The working capital turnover ratio rose from 20.95 in 2015 to 39.03 in 2019. The most significant acceleration occurred between 2018 and 2019, where the ratio increased from 26.08 to 39.03. This surge was primarily driven by the sharp reduction in working capital relative to the sustained high level of operating revenues, indicating a highly aggressive use of short-term assets to generate sales.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Average Inventory Processing Period

Phillips 66, average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 26.64 29.02 24.77 21.19 22.34
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 14 13 15 17 16
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 26.64 = 14

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating activity ratios reveals a general improvement in inventory management efficiency between 2015 and 2019, characterized by an overall increase in the speed of inventory turnover and a corresponding reduction in the time required to process inventory.

Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio exhibited a general upward trajectory over the observed period. Starting at 22.34 in 2015, the ratio experienced a slight dip to 21.19 in 2016 before climbing significantly to a peak of 29.02 in 2018. A moderate correction occurred in 2019, with the ratio settling at 26.64, though it remained substantially higher than the 2015 and 2016 levels.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period moved inversely to the turnover ratio. The period began at 16 days in 2015 and peaked at 17 days in 2016. Subsequently, a downward trend was observed, with the processing time dropping to 15 days in 2017 and reaching a minimum of 13 days in 2018. By 2019, the period slightly increased to 14 days.

The strong inverse correlation between the inventory turnover ratio and the average processing period indicates an optimization of short-term operating activity. The reduction in the average number of days inventory is held suggests enhanced operational efficiency and a more streamlined movement of goods through the supply chain, reducing the amount of capital tied up in inventory.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

Phillips 66, average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 14.55 20.59 15.93 15.37 22.44
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 25 18 23 24 16
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 14.55 = 25

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the operating activity ratios between 2015 and 2019 reveals fluctuations in the efficiency of credit management and the speed of cash recovery. The overall trend indicates a general lengthening of the collection cycle, as the period required to convert receivables into cash increased from a low of 16 days in 2015 to a high of 25 days by the end of 2019.

Receivables Turnover
The turnover ratio exhibited significant volatility throughout the five-year period. A peak was observed in 2015 with a ratio of 22.44, followed by a sharp decline to 15.37 in 2016. While a recovery was noted in 2018, where the ratio climbed back to 20.59, this gain was reversed in 2019, resulting in the lowest turnover ratio of the period at 14.55.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period mirrors the inverse movements of the turnover ratio. The duration grew from 16 days in 2015 to 24 days in 2016, remaining relatively stable in 2017 at 23 days. A notable improvement in collection efficiency occurred in 2018, with the period dropping to 18 days. However, this trend shifted again in 2019, with the collection period expanding to 25 days, representing the least efficient collection timeframe within the observed window.
Operational Implications
The data suggests a cyclical pattern in receivables management. The efficiency gains observed in 2018 were short-lived, as the 2019 metrics indicate a slowdown in the conversion of credit sales to cash. The increase from 16 to 25 days over the five-year span suggests a widening gap in the cash conversion cycle specifically related to account collections.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Operating Cycle

Phillips 66, operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 14 13 15 17 16
Average receivable collection period 25 18 23 24 16
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 39 31 38 41 32
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 14 + 25 = 39

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operating cycle analysis reveals a period of fluctuation in the time required to convert inventory investments into cash. While inventory management remained relatively stable, the overall cycle was primarily influenced by variability in the collection of accounts receivable.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Inventory turnover remains consistent throughout the analyzed period, with the processing period ranging between a minimum of 13 days in 2018 and a maximum of 17 days in 2016. This stability indicates a highly controlled and efficient inventory management system with minimal volatility in the time taken to move products through the supply chain.
Average Receivable Collection Period
A notable increase in volatility is observed in the collection of receivables. The period expanded from 16 days in 2015 to 25 days by 2019, representing a significant lengthening of the cash conversion process. Despite a temporary improvement in 2018, where the period dropped to 18 days, the overall trend suggests a general slowing in the rate of cash recovery from customers over the five-year horizon.
Operating Cycle
The total operating cycle reflects the combined impact of inventory and receivable periods, fluctuating between 31 and 41 days. The peak operating cycle occurred in 2016 at 41 days, while the most efficient cycle was recorded in 2018 at 31 days. Because the inventory processing period remained steady, the expansion and contraction of the operating cycle are almost entirely attributable to the fluctuations in the receivable collection period.

In summary, the company maintains a tight grip on inventory turnover, but the increasing trend in the receivable collection period has led to a generally longer operating cycle by the end of 2019 compared to the baseline in 2015.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

Phillips 66, average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 12.51 16.82 11.61 10.44 15.07
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 29 22 31 35 24
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 12.51 = 29

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a fluctuating pattern in the management of accounts payable between 2015 and 2019. The efficiency of the payment cycle demonstrates significant variability, indicating periodic adjustments in the timing of supplier settlements.

Average Payables Payment Period
The duration required to settle obligations exhibited a non-linear trend. A notable increase occurred between 2015 and 2016, where the period rose from 24 days to a peak of 35 days. This was followed by a gradual contraction, reaching a five-year low of 22 days in 2018, before increasing again to 29 days in 2019. These fluctuations suggest shifts in working capital management or variations in credit terms granted by suppliers.
Payables Turnover Ratio
The turnover ratio maintains an inverse relationship with the payment period. The ratio declined from 15.07 in 2015 to 10.44 in 2016, reflecting the slowed payment speed. A subsequent recovery led to a peak turnover of 16.82 in 2018, marking the point of highest operational efficiency in clearing payables. The ratio subsequently moderated to 12.51 by the end of 2019.

The operational data indicates that 2018 represented the most aggressive approach to liability settlement, characterized by the shortest payment window and the highest turnover rate. Conversely, 2016 showed the most conservative liquidity management regarding payables. The lack of a consistent linear trend suggests that payment strategies were likely responsive to specific annual cash flow requirements or external market conditions.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Cash Conversion Cycle

Phillips 66, cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 14 13 15 17 16
Average receivable collection period 25 18 23 24 16
Average payables payment period 29 22 31 35 24
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 10 9 7 6 8
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 14 + 25 – 29 = 10

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The overall short-term operating activity demonstrates a consistent ability to manage working capital, with the cash conversion cycle remaining relatively stable and short across the five-year period analyzed.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Inventory management remained highly stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 13 and 17 days. A slight improvement in efficiency was noted between 2016 and 2018, before returning to 14 days in 2019.
Average Receivable Collection Period
A general upward trend is observed in the time required to collect receivables. The period increased from 16 days in 2015 to 25 days in 2019, reflecting a lengthening of the collection cycle despite a temporary reduction to 18 days in 2018.
Average Payables Payment Period
Payables management exhibited significant volatility. The payment period peaked at 35 days in 2016 and reached a low of 22 days in 2018. This variability suggests fluctuations in supplier credit terms or strategic adjustments in the timing of cash disbursements.
Cash Conversion Cycle
The cash conversion cycle remained low, ranging from 6 to 10 days. While it reached a minimum of 6 days in 2016, a gradual increase is observed from 2017 through 2019. This indicates that the increase in the receivable collection period has not been fully offset by payables extensions or inventory reductions in the final years of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?