Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs day-to-day tasks, such us the collection of receivables and management of inventory.
Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)
Turnover Ratios
Average No. Days
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The analysis of short-term operating activity between 2015 and 2019 reveals a highly efficient operational model characterized by rapid inventory movement and a consistently short cash conversion cycle. While certain volatility is present in receivables and payables management, the overall trend indicates an increase in working capital efficiency.
- Inventory Management Efficiency
- Inventory turnover exhibits a generally positive trajectory, rising from 22.34 in 2015 to a peak of 29.02 in 2018, before settling at 26.64 in 2019. This is mirrored by the average inventory processing period, which remained stable and lean, fluctuating narrowly between 13 and 17 days. This suggests a consistent ability to move product quickly through the supply chain.
- Receivables and Payables Dynamics
- Receivables turnover shows significant volatility, decreasing from 22.44 in 2015 to 14.55 by 2019. Consequently, the average receivable collection period lengthened from 16 days to 25 days over the same period, indicating a slower recovery of cash from customers. Similarly, the average payables payment period fluctuated, peaking at 35 days in 2016 and reaching 29 days by 2019, suggesting shifts in credit terms or strategic payment timing with suppliers.
- Operating and Cash Conversion Cycles
- The operating cycle reflects the combined volatility of inventory and receivables, varying between 31 and 41 days. However, the cash conversion cycle remained remarkably stable and short, ranging from 6 to 10 days throughout the five-year period. This indicates that the company effectively offsets its operating cycle by leveraging its payables payment period, ensuring that cash is recovered very quickly after expenditures are made.
- Working Capital Utilization
- A strong upward trend is observed in the working capital turnover ratio, which increased from 20.95 in 2015 to 39.03 in 2019. This substantial growth suggests a heightened efficiency in utilizing net current assets to generate sales, reflecting an optimized approach to short-term asset management.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Inventory Turnover
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Cost of operating revenues | 100,603) | 102,810) | 84,108) | 66,743) | 77,693) | |
| Inventories | 3,776) | 3,543) | 3,395) | 3,150) | 3,477) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Inventory turnover1 | 26.64 | 29.02 | 24.77 | 21.19 | 22.34 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Inventory Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of operating revenues ÷ Inventories
= 100,603 ÷ 3,776 = 26.64
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The operational efficiency regarding inventory management between 2015 and 2019 demonstrates a general upward trajectory in throughput, characterized by a significant peak in 2018 followed by a moderate correction. The period is marked by substantial fluctuations in operating costs that served as the primary driver for the turnover metrics.
- Cost of Operating Revenues
- A volatile trend is observed in operating costs, which declined from 77,693 million USD in 2015 to 66,743 million USD in 2016, before rising sharply to a peak of 102,810 million USD in 2018. This indicates significant shifts in operating scale or input price volatility during this five-year window.
- Inventory Levels
- Inventories remained relatively stable in comparison to the volatility of operating revenues. After a decrease to 3,150 million USD in 2016, a gradual and consistent increase was recorded, reaching 3,776 million USD by December 31, 2019. This suggests that the growth in operating volume was not matched by a proportional expansion of stock holdings.
- Inventory Turnover Ratio
- The turnover ratio exhibits a correlation with the cost of operating revenues. The ratio dipped to 21.19 in 2016 but accelerated to a high of 29.02 in 2018, signaling a period of heightened efficiency in moving inventory. The subsequent decline to 26.64 in 2019 is attributable to the simultaneous decrease in operating revenues and the continued accumulation of inventory levels.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Receivables Turnover
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Sales and other operating revenues | 107,293) | 111,461) | 102,354) | 84,279) | 98,975) | |
| Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowances | 7,376) | 5,414) | 6,424) | 5,485) | 4,411) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Receivables turnover1 | 14.55 | 20.59 | 15.93 | 15.37 | 22.44 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Receivables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Sales and other operating revenues ÷ Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowances
= 107,293 ÷ 7,376 = 14.55
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a volatile trend in the efficiency of receivables collection between 2015 and 2019, characterized by fluctuating turnover rates and a general increase in outstanding receivables.
- Revenue Performance
- Sales and other operating revenues experienced notable fluctuations over the five-year period. A significant contraction occurred in 2016, with revenues dropping to 84,279 million. This was followed by a recovery phase that peaked in 2018 at 111,461 million, before a slight decrease to 107,293 million in 2019.
- Receivables Balance Dynamics
- Net accounts and notes receivable demonstrated an overall upward trend, rising from 4,411 million in 2015 to a period high of 7,376 million in 2019. A temporary decline was observed in 2018, where the balance fell to 5,414 million, indicating a brief period of improved collection or reduced credit extension.
- Receivables Turnover Analysis
- The receivables turnover ratio exhibited substantial instability. The highest efficiency was achieved in 2015 with a ratio of 22.44. A sharp decline to 15.37 occurred in 2016, which remained relatively stagnant through 2017. A strong recovery was evident in 2018, as the ratio climbed to 20.59, driven by the convergence of peak annual revenues and reduced net receivables. However, this efficiency eroded in 2019, with the ratio falling to its lowest point in the period at 14.55, resulting from a simultaneous increase in receivables and a decrease in overall sales.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Payables Turnover
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Cost of operating revenues | 100,603) | 102,810) | 84,108) | 66,743) | 77,693) | |
| Accounts payable | 8,043) | 6,113) | 7,242) | 6,395) | 5,155) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Payables turnover1 | 12.51 | 16.82 | 11.61 | 10.44 | 15.07 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Payables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of operating revenues ÷ Accounts payable
= 100,603 ÷ 8,043 = 12.51
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals significant volatility in the management of accounts payable between 2015 and 2019. The payables turnover ratio fluctuated considerably, reflecting inconsistent shifts in both operational expenditure and the utilization of trade credit.
- Cost of Operating Revenues Trend
- Operational costs exhibited an overall upward trajectory over the period, rising from $77,693 million in 2015 to a peak of $102,810 million in 2018, before stabilizing at $100,603 million in 2019. A notable contraction was observed in 2016, when costs decreased to $66,743 million.
- Accounts Payable Dynamics
- The balance of accounts payable generally increased from $5,155 million in 2015 to $8,043 million in 2019. However, this growth was not linear; a significant reduction in the payable balance occurred in 2018, where the amount dropped to $6,113 million despite the simultaneous peak in operating revenues.
- Payables Turnover Ratio Analysis
- The payables turnover ratio demonstrated substantial variance, beginning at 15.07 in 2015 and dropping to a period low of 10.44 in 2016, indicating a slowing of supplier payments. A strong recovery trend followed, peaking at 16.82 in 2018, which suggests an acceleration in the payment cycle or a strategic reduction in reliance on supplier credit. By 2019, the ratio declined to 12.51, driven by a sharp increase in accounts payable coinciding with relatively stable operating costs.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Working Capital Turnover
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Current assets | 14,395) | 13,209) | 14,390) | 12,680) | 12,256) | |
| Less: Current liabilities | 11,646) | 8,935) | 10,107) | 9,463) | 7,531) | |
| Working capital | 2,749) | 4,274) | 4,283) | 3,217) | 4,725) | |
| Sales and other operating revenues | 107,293) | 111,461) | 102,354) | 84,279) | 98,975) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Working capital turnover1 | 39.03 | 26.08 | 23.90 | 26.20 | 20.95 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Sales and other operating revenues ÷ Working capital
= 107,293 ÷ 2,749 = 39.03
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity between 2015 and 2019 reveals a significant increase in the efficiency of working capital utilization. While operating revenues experienced fluctuations, the overall trend indicates a strategic reduction in the working capital required to support those revenues, culminating in a sharp peak in turnover efficiency by the end of the period.
- Working Capital Trends
- Working capital exhibited a volatile trajectory, starting at 4,725 million US dollars in 2015 and ending at its lowest point of 2,749 million US dollars in 2019. A notable decrease occurred in 2016, followed by a recovery period in 2017 and 2018, before a substantial decline in the final year of the analyzed period.
- Revenue Performance
- Sales and other operating revenues demonstrated a general growth trend from 2016 to 2018. After a dip to 84,279 million US dollars in 2016, revenues climbed steadily to a peak of 111,461 million US dollars in 2018, before experiencing a slight contraction to 107,293 million US dollars in 2019.
- Working Capital Turnover Analysis
- The working capital turnover ratio rose from 20.95 in 2015 to 39.03 in 2019. The most significant acceleration occurred between 2018 and 2019, where the ratio increased from 26.08 to 39.03. This surge was primarily driven by the sharp reduction in working capital relative to the sustained high level of operating revenues, indicating a highly aggressive use of short-term assets to generate sales.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Average Inventory Processing Period
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Inventory turnover | 26.64 | 29.02 | 24.77 | 21.19 | 22.34 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period1 | 14 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 16 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 26.64 = 14
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of operating activity ratios reveals a general improvement in inventory management efficiency between 2015 and 2019, characterized by an overall increase in the speed of inventory turnover and a corresponding reduction in the time required to process inventory.
- Inventory Turnover
- The inventory turnover ratio exhibited a general upward trajectory over the observed period. Starting at 22.34 in 2015, the ratio experienced a slight dip to 21.19 in 2016 before climbing significantly to a peak of 29.02 in 2018. A moderate correction occurred in 2019, with the ratio settling at 26.64, though it remained substantially higher than the 2015 and 2016 levels.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- The average inventory processing period moved inversely to the turnover ratio. The period began at 16 days in 2015 and peaked at 17 days in 2016. Subsequently, a downward trend was observed, with the processing time dropping to 15 days in 2017 and reaching a minimum of 13 days in 2018. By 2019, the period slightly increased to 14 days.
The strong inverse correlation between the inventory turnover ratio and the average processing period indicates an optimization of short-term operating activity. The reduction in the average number of days inventory is held suggests enhanced operational efficiency and a more streamlined movement of goods through the supply chain, reducing the amount of capital tied up in inventory.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Average Receivable Collection Period
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Receivables turnover | 14.55 | 20.59 | 15.93 | 15.37 | 22.44 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average receivable collection period1 | 25 | 18 | 23 | 24 | 16 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 14.55 = 25
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the operating activity ratios between 2015 and 2019 reveals fluctuations in the efficiency of credit management and the speed of cash recovery. The overall trend indicates a general lengthening of the collection cycle, as the period required to convert receivables into cash increased from a low of 16 days in 2015 to a high of 25 days by the end of 2019.
- Receivables Turnover
- The turnover ratio exhibited significant volatility throughout the five-year period. A peak was observed in 2015 with a ratio of 22.44, followed by a sharp decline to 15.37 in 2016. While a recovery was noted in 2018, where the ratio climbed back to 20.59, this gain was reversed in 2019, resulting in the lowest turnover ratio of the period at 14.55.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The collection period mirrors the inverse movements of the turnover ratio. The duration grew from 16 days in 2015 to 24 days in 2016, remaining relatively stable in 2017 at 23 days. A notable improvement in collection efficiency occurred in 2018, with the period dropping to 18 days. However, this trend shifted again in 2019, with the collection period expanding to 25 days, representing the least efficient collection timeframe within the observed window.
- Operational Implications
- The data suggests a cyclical pattern in receivables management. The efficiency gains observed in 2018 were short-lived, as the 2019 metrics indicate a slowdown in the conversion of credit sales to cash. The increase from 16 to 25 days over the five-year span suggests a widening gap in the cash conversion cycle specifically related to account collections.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Operating Cycle
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period | 14 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 16 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 25 | 18 | 23 | 24 | 16 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Operating cycle1 | 39 | 31 | 38 | 41 | 32 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Operating Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 14 + 25 = 39
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The operating cycle analysis reveals a period of fluctuation in the time required to convert inventory investments into cash. While inventory management remained relatively stable, the overall cycle was primarily influenced by variability in the collection of accounts receivable.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- Inventory turnover remains consistent throughout the analyzed period, with the processing period ranging between a minimum of 13 days in 2018 and a maximum of 17 days in 2016. This stability indicates a highly controlled and efficient inventory management system with minimal volatility in the time taken to move products through the supply chain.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- A notable increase in volatility is observed in the collection of receivables. The period expanded from 16 days in 2015 to 25 days by 2019, representing a significant lengthening of the cash conversion process. Despite a temporary improvement in 2018, where the period dropped to 18 days, the overall trend suggests a general slowing in the rate of cash recovery from customers over the five-year horizon.
- Operating Cycle
- The total operating cycle reflects the combined impact of inventory and receivable periods, fluctuating between 31 and 41 days. The peak operating cycle occurred in 2016 at 41 days, while the most efficient cycle was recorded in 2018 at 31 days. Because the inventory processing period remained steady, the expansion and contraction of the operating cycle are almost entirely attributable to the fluctuations in the receivable collection period.
In summary, the company maintains a tight grip on inventory turnover, but the increasing trend in the receivable collection period has led to a generally longer operating cycle by the end of 2019 compared to the baseline in 2015.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Average Payables Payment Period
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Payables turnover | 12.51 | 16.82 | 11.61 | 10.44 | 15.07 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average payables payment period1 | 29 | 22 | 31 | 35 | 24 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 12.51 = 29
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a fluctuating pattern in the management of accounts payable between 2015 and 2019. The efficiency of the payment cycle demonstrates significant variability, indicating periodic adjustments in the timing of supplier settlements.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- The duration required to settle obligations exhibited a non-linear trend. A notable increase occurred between 2015 and 2016, where the period rose from 24 days to a peak of 35 days. This was followed by a gradual contraction, reaching a five-year low of 22 days in 2018, before increasing again to 29 days in 2019. These fluctuations suggest shifts in working capital management or variations in credit terms granted by suppliers.
- Payables Turnover Ratio
- The turnover ratio maintains an inverse relationship with the payment period. The ratio declined from 15.07 in 2015 to 10.44 in 2016, reflecting the slowed payment speed. A subsequent recovery led to a peak turnover of 16.82 in 2018, marking the point of highest operational efficiency in clearing payables. The ratio subsequently moderated to 12.51 by the end of 2019.
The operational data indicates that 2018 represented the most aggressive approach to liability settlement, characterized by the shortest payment window and the highest turnover rate. Conversely, 2016 showed the most conservative liquidity management regarding payables. The lack of a consistent linear trend suggests that payment strategies were likely responsive to specific annual cash flow requirements or external market conditions.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Cash Conversion Cycle
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period | 14 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 16 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 25 | 18 | 23 | 24 | 16 | |
| Average payables payment period | 29 | 22 | 31 | 35 | 24 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Cash conversion cycle1 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 14 + 25 – 29 = 10
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The overall short-term operating activity demonstrates a consistent ability to manage working capital, with the cash conversion cycle remaining relatively stable and short across the five-year period analyzed.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- Inventory management remained highly stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 13 and 17 days. A slight improvement in efficiency was noted between 2016 and 2018, before returning to 14 days in 2019.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- A general upward trend is observed in the time required to collect receivables. The period increased from 16 days in 2015 to 25 days in 2019, reflecting a lengthening of the collection cycle despite a temporary reduction to 18 days in 2018.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- Payables management exhibited significant volatility. The payment period peaked at 35 days in 2016 and reached a low of 22 days in 2018. This variability suggests fluctuations in supplier credit terms or strategic adjustments in the timing of cash disbursements.
- Cash Conversion Cycle
- The cash conversion cycle remained low, ranging from 6 to 10 days. While it reached a minimum of 6 days in 2016, a gradual increase is observed from 2017 through 2019. This indicates that the increase in the receivable collection period has not been fully offset by payables extensions or inventory reductions in the final years of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?