AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 21, 2020.

Selected Financial Data
since 2012

Microsoft Excel

Income Statement

Phillips 66, selected items from income statement, long-term trends

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).


The financial performance from 2012 to 2019 is characterized by significant volatility in both top-line revenue and bottom-line profitability, with a notable decoupling of sales volume and net income during specific periods.

Revenue Trends
A sustained downward trend in sales and other operating revenues is observed from 2012 to 2016, with figures declining from 179,460 million US$ to 84,279 million US$. The most precipitous drop occurred between 2014 and 2015, where revenues decreased by approximately 38.6%. A partial recovery followed, with revenues peaking again in 2018 at 111,461 million US$ before a slight contraction in 2019.
Net Income Volatility
Net income attributable to the company exhibited a non-linear relationship with revenue. Despite the sharp revenue decline in 2015, net income remained relatively resilient at 4,227 million US$. However, a significant trough was reached in 2016, with net income falling to 1,555 million US$. Profitability recovered strongly in 2017 and 2018, reaching a period high of 5,595 million US$ in 2018, followed by a sharp decline to 3,076 million US$ in 2019.
Profit Margin Analysis
An analysis of net profit margins reveals an increase in operational efficiency during periods of lower revenue. Between 2012 and 2015, the net profit margin expanded from approximately 2.3% to 4.3%, suggesting improved cost management or higher pricing power. The highest margin efficiency was observed in 2017 and 2018, where net income represented approximately 5% of total sales. This efficiency trend reversed in 2019, as the net profit margin compressed to approximately 2.9%.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Balance Sheet: Assets

Phillips 66, selected items from assets, long-term trends

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).


The financial trajectory from 2012 to 2019 reflects a divergence between the growth of total assets and the volatility of current assets. While the overall asset base expanded steadily, the liquidity profile experienced a significant contraction followed by a period of partial recovery.

Current Asset Trends
Current assets reached a peak in 2013 at 19,237 million US dollars before undergoing a sharp decline to a period low of 12,256 million US dollars in 2015. Following this trough, a gradual recovery trend was observed, with current assets increasing to 14,395 million US dollars by the end of 2019. This movement indicates a significant reduction in liquid resources between 2013 and 2015, followed by a slow stabilization.
Total Asset Growth
Total assets exhibited a consistent long-term upward trend, rising from 48,073 million US dollars in 2012 to 58,720 million US dollars in 2019. The growth remained relatively flat between 2012 and 2015, but experienced a more pronounced acceleration from 2016 onward, with the total asset base expanding by approximately 22% over the entire observed period.
Asset Composition and Liquidity Shift
An analysis of the relationship between current and total assets reveals a shift in the company's asset structure. In 2012, current assets comprised approximately 37.4% of total assets. By 2019, this proportion decreased to approximately 24.5%. This downward trend in the current asset ratio suggests a strategic shift or operational requirement that increased the weighting of non-current assets relative to liquid assets.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Phillips 66, selected items from liabilities and stockholders’ equity, long-term trends

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).


Between 2012 and 2019, the balance sheet exhibits a gradual expansion of both total liabilities and stockholders' equity, with a notable shift in the composition of the company's debt obligations and overall leverage.

Debt Obligations and Leverage
Short-term and long-term debt experienced a consistent upward trend, rising from 6,974 million US$ in 2012 to 11,763 million US$ in 2019. A significant acceleration in debt accumulation began after 2013, with debt levels increasing by approximately 68% over the analyzed period. This growth indicates a heightened reliance on borrowed capital to fund operations or strategic investments.
Liability Composition and Volatility
Total liabilities remained relatively stable between 2012 and 2018, fluctuating within a range of 24,642 million US$ to 27,928 million US$, before increasing sharply to 31,551 million US$ in 2019. Current liabilities exhibited more volatility, characterized by a significant decline to a period low of 7,531 million US$ in 2015, followed by a steady recovery to 11,646 million US$ by the end of 2019.
Equity Trends
Stockholders' equity showed a general trajectory of growth, increasing from 20,775 million US$ in 2012 to 24,910 million US$ in 2019. While equity grew by approximately 20% over the period, this growth rate was lower than the increase in total debt, suggesting a shift in the capital structure toward a higher debt-to-equity ratio.
Structural Financial Shifts
The proportion of formal debt relative to total liabilities rose from 25.6% in 2012 to 37.3% in 2019, reflecting a transition toward more formalized borrowing. Additionally, the decrease in the ratio of current liabilities to total liabilities suggests a migration toward long-term financing obligations rather than short-term operational liabilities.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Cash Flow Statement

Phillips 66, selected items from cash flow statement, long-term trends

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).


The cash flow profile exhibits significant volatility across all three primary activity categories between 2012 and 2019, reflecting a cyclical operational environment. A consistent pattern of operational cash generation is observed, which serves as the primary funding source for both capital expenditures and financing obligations.

Operating Cash Flow Trends
Net cash provided by operating activities demonstrates substantial fluctuations, with values ranging from a low of 2,963 million US$ in 2016 to a peak of 7,573 million US$ in 2018. While the trend is non-linear, the company maintained positive operational cash flow throughout the entire period, with a marked acceleration in liquidity generation between 2017 and 2018.
Investing Cash Flow Trends
A consistent net outflow of cash is maintained throughout the period, indicating sustained investment in assets. Capital expenditure peaked in 2015 at 5,738 million US$, followed by a period of contraction in spending that reached a minimum of 1,146 million US$ in 2017. The return to higher spending levels in 2019, reaching 3,688 million US$, suggests a periodic cycle of asset renewal or expansion.
Financing Cash Flow Trends
After an initial cash inflow of 699 million US$ in 2012, the company shifted to a permanent state of net cash outflows for financing activities from 2013 through 2019. This outflow peaked in 2018 at 5,167 million US$, coinciding with the year of highest operational cash generation, which indicates a strategic priority to return capital to shareholders or reduce debt during periods of high liquidity.

The synchronization of these flows indicates a strategic correlation between operational performance and capital allocation. In 2018, the surge in operating cash flow directly enabled the maximum recorded outflow in financing activities. In contrast, during 2015 and 2016, high investing outflows combined with lower operating inflows resulted in a more constrained financing capacity, highlighting a flexible approach to capital management based on annual cash availability.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Per Share Data

Phillips 66, selected data per share, long-term trends

US$

Microsoft Excel

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).

1, 2, 3 Data adjusted for splits and stock dividends.


The financial per-share metrics from 2012 to 2019 exhibit a marked contrast between volatile earnings performance and a consistent, linear growth strategy regarding shareholder distributions.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Performance
Basic and diluted earnings per share demonstrate significant volatility throughout the observed period. After maintaining a range between 6.07 US$ and 8.40 US$ from 2012 to 2015, a substantial contraction occurred in 2016, with basic EPS falling to a period low of 2.94 US$. This was followed by a sharp recovery, peaking in 2018 at 11.87 US$, before declining to 6.80 US$ in 2019. The minimal variance between basic and diluted earnings suggests that dilutive instruments had a negligible impact on per-share profitability.
Dividend Growth Trajectory
Unlike the fluctuations seen in earnings, dividends per share followed an uninterrupted upward trend. From a starting point of 0.45 US$ in 2012, the distribution increased every consecutive year, reaching 3.50 US$ by the end of 2019. This indicates a disciplined and progressive dividend policy.
Correlation Between Earnings and Dividends
A clear divergence is observed between earnings volatility and dividend payouts. This is most evident in 2016, where the dividend increased to 2.45 US$ despite basic earnings dropping to 2.94 US$. The persistence of dividend growth during periods of earnings contraction suggests a strategic prioritization of shareholder returns and a decoupling of the payout policy from short-term profitability fluctuations.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?