Paying user area
Try for free
Phillips 66 pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- Analysis of Solvency Ratios
- Analysis of Long-term (Investment) Activity Ratios
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2012
- Return on Assets (ROA) since 2012
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Phillips 66 for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1, 2 See details »
The financial data reveals notable fluctuations in the company's cash flow metrics over the five-year period ending December 31, 2019.
- Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
- The net cash provided by operating activities experienced considerable variability. Starting at $5,713 million in 2015, it declined sharply to $2,963 million in 2016. This was followed by a modest recovery to $3,648 million in 2017. In 2018, the figure surged significantly to $7,573 million, representing the highest level within the observed period. However, in 2019, the cash generated from operations decreased again to $4,808 million. This pattern suggests episodic fluctuations in operational cash generation, with a peak in 2018 indicating possibly one-off events or improvements in operational efficiency during that year.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- The free cash flow to the firm displayed an overall upward trend until 2018, followed by a decline in 2019. Beginning at $219 million in 2015, FCFF nearly doubled in 2016 to $413 million and then dramatically increased to $2,126 million in 2017. The peak was reached in 2018 at $5,317 million, reflecting strong cash generation after capital expenditures. However, in 2019, FCFF dropped substantially to $1,336 million. The sharp rise through 2018 suggests improved capital allocation or operational performance, while the decline in 2019 may indicate increased investment, lower operational cash generation, or other financial pressures.
Overall, the data indicates volatile cash flow performance, with a significant spike in both operational cash flow and free cash flow in 2018, followed by reductions in 2019. The fluctuations in these key cash flow measures could be indicative of changing market conditions, capital expenditure cycles, or variations in operational efficiency.
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2 2019 Calculation
Cash payments, interest, tax = Cash payments, interest × EITR
= × =
3 2019 Calculation
Interest capitalized, tax = Interest capitalized × EITR
= × =
The financial data reveals several trends concerning tax rates and interest-related cash flows over the five-year period.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
- The effective income tax rate demonstrates a general declining trend from 29.2% in 2015 to 20.2% in 2019. After a decrease to 25% in 2016, the rate slightly increased to 28.9% in 2017 but then exhibited a significant drop in 2018 and 2019, stabilizing near 20%. This indicates a reduction in the tax burden over this timeframe, which could reflect changes in tax regulations, corporate tax strategies, or shifts in geographic profit mix.
- Cash Payments of Interest, Net of Tax
- This item shows a consistent upward movement from 195 million USD in 2015 to a peak of 369 million USD in 2018, followed by a slight decrease to 340 million USD in 2019. The increasing trend until 2018 suggests rising interest expenses, possibly due to higher debt levels or increased borrowing costs. The marginal decline in 2019 might indicate some debt repayment or refinancing at lower rates.
- Interest Capitalized, Net of Tax
- Interest capitalized amounts are more variable, starting at 75 million USD in 2015, decreasing sharply to 11 million USD by 2017, and rising again to 61 million USD in 2019. This pattern implies fluctuations in the company's investment in capital projects where borrowing costs are being capitalized rather than expensed, reflecting possible changes in capital expenditure activity during the period.
Overall, the data indicates a reduction in tax expense rates accompanied by increasing interest expenses until 2018, with some moderation in 2019. The fluctuations in capitalized interest suggest varying levels of capital investment activity during the reviewed years.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
Enterprise value (EV) | |
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | |
Valuation Ratio | |
EV/FCFF | |
Benchmarks | |
EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
Chevron Corp. | |
ConocoPhillips | |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp. |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
Enterprise value (EV)1 | ||||||
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | ||||||
Valuation Ratio | ||||||
EV/FCFF3 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
Chevron Corp. | ||||||
ConocoPhillips | ||||||
Exxon Mobil Corp. | ||||||
Occidental Petroleum Corp. |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
3 2019 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in the enterprise value (EV) and free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) over the analyzed period from 2015 to 2019. The enterprise value exhibited a generally stable trend from 2015 through 2016, with a moderate increase in 2017, followed by a slight decrease in the subsequent years.
Free cash flow to the firm shows an overall increasing trend from 2015 to 2018, starting at a relatively low level and peaking significantly in 2018. However, in 2019, there is a notable decline in free cash flow compared to the previous year, though it remains above the levels observed in 2015 to 2017.
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- The EV remained around US$48.9 billion in 2015 and showed a minor increase to approximately US$49.5 billion in 2016. A more pronounced rise occurred in 2017, reaching about US$55.4 billion. In 2018, EV slightly decreased to US$54.9 billion and further declined to US$51.6 billion in 2019.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- FCFF increased from US$219 million in 2015 to US$413 million in 2016. There was a substantial growth in 2017, with FCFF reaching US$2.13 billion, which further surged to US$5.32 billion in 2018, representing the peak in the period analyzed. In 2019, FCFF declined to US$1.34 billion, signaling a contraction but still above 2015–2017 levels.
- EV/FCFF Ratio
- Reflecting the relationship between enterprise value and free cash flow generation, the EV/FCFF ratio decreased dramatically from a very high level of 223.52 in 2015 to 10.33 in 2018, indicating an improving valuation relative to cash flow generation. However, in 2019, the ratio increased again to 38.63, suggesting a reduced valuation efficiency compared to the prior year.
Overall, the data indicates improvement in the firm's cash flow generation capacity until 2018, accompanied by a relatively stable enterprise value. The sharp decrease in the EV/FCFF ratio over these years suggests enhanced value creation in relation to cash flow. The subsequent decrease in free cash flow and increase in EV/FCFF ratio in 2019 may warrant further investigation to understand underlying factors contributing to this volatility and its possible impact on valuation metrics.