AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 21, 2020.

Return on Capital (ROC)

Microsoft Excel

Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.


Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

Phillips 66, ROIC calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 5,344 5,129 4,664 4,480 3,281
Invested capital2 50,827 48,544 49,009 46,215 42,469
Performance Ratio
ROIC3 10.51% 10.57% 9.52% 9.69% 7.73%
Benchmarks
ROIC, Competitors4
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2019 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 5,344 ÷ 50,827 = 10.51%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2015 and 2019, a consistent upward trajectory in operational profitability and capital efficiency was observed. The growth in earnings consistently outpaced the expansion of the capital base, resulting in a sustained improvement in the return on invested capital.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
A continuous growth pattern is evident, with NOPAT increasing from US$ 3,281 million in 2015 to US$ 5,344 million by 2019. The most significant year-over-year increase occurred between 2015 and 2016, where profit rose by approximately 36.5%, establishing a higher baseline for subsequent years.
Invested Capital
The total invested capital exhibited a general increase, rising from US$ 42,469 million in 2015 to US$ 50,827 million in 2019. A minor contraction was noted in 2018, where invested capital decreased to US$ 48,544 million from US$ 49,009 million in the prior year, before expanding again in 2019.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
ROIC improved from 7.73% in 2015 to 10.51% in 2019. A sharp increase was observed in 2016, reaching 9.69%, followed by a period of relative stability. The ratio peaked in 2018 at 10.57%, reflecting a strengthened ability to generate operating profits relative to the amount of capital deployed in the business.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Decomposition of ROIC

Phillips 66, decomposition of ROIC

Microsoft Excel
ROIC = OPM1 × TO2 × 1 – CTR3
Dec 31, 2019 10.51% = 5.65% × 2.11 × 88.18%
Dec 31, 2018 10.57% = 5.88% × 2.30 × 78.21%
Dec 31, 2017 9.52% = 4.91% × 2.09 × 92.78%
Dec 31, 2016 9.69% = 5.40% × 1.82 × 98.47%
Dec 31, 2015 7.73% = 4.74% × 2.33 × 69.99%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »

2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »

3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »


Return on invested capital (ROIC) exhibited an overall upward trajectory between 2015 and 2019, rising from 7.73% to 10.51%. The most significant growth occurred between 2015 and 2016, with the metric reaching its peak of 10.57% in 2018 before stabilizing in 2019.

Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
Operational profitability demonstrated a general improvement over the five-year period. The margin increased from 4.74% in 2015 to a peak of 5.88% in 2018. Despite a slight contraction to 5.65% in 2019, the margin remained consistently higher than the 2015 baseline, suggesting an enhancement in the company's ability to convert revenue into operating profit.
Turnover of Capital (TO)
Capital efficiency showed significant volatility. A sharp decline was observed in 2016, where the ratio fell to 1.82 from 2.33 in 2015. This was followed by a recovery phase, peaking again at 2.30 in 2018. The subsequent decline to 2.11 in 2019 indicates fluctuating efficiency in utilizing the invested capital base to generate sales.
Effective Cash Tax Rate Impact (1 – CTR)
The after-tax component of the return decomposition experienced substantial fluctuations. A notable increase occurred in 2016, rising to 98.47% from 69.99% in 2015, which suggests a significant reduction in the effective cash tax rate. While this figure declined to 78.21% in 2018, it remained considerably higher than the 2015 level, contributing positively to the overall ROIC.

The expansion of ROIC was driven by a combination of improved operating margins and a lower effective tax burden, which together offset the volatility in capital turnover. The peak performance in 2018 resulted from the simultaneous alignment of the highest observed operating profit margin and a strong recovery in capital turnover.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Profit Margin (OPM)

Phillips 66, OPM calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 5,344 5,129 4,664 4,480 3,281
Add: Cash operating taxes2 716 1,429 363 70 1,407
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) 6,060 6,558 5,026 4,549 4,688
 
Sales and other operating revenues 107,293 111,461 102,354 84,279 98,975
Profitability Ratio
OPM3 5.65% 5.88% 4.91% 5.40% 4.74%
Benchmarks
OPM, Competitors4
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2019 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Sales and other operating revenues
= 100 × 6,060 ÷ 107,293 = 5.65%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2015 and 2019, the company demonstrated a general expansion in operational efficiency and profitability. While top-line revenues experienced volatility, the operating profit margin exhibited an overall upward trajectory, indicating an improved capacity to convert sales into operating profit before taxes.

Revenue and Profitability Correlation
Net operating profit before taxes grew from US$ 4,688 million in 2015 to US$ 6,060 million in 2019. A notable divergence occurred in 2016, where revenues declined significantly to US$ 84,279 million, yet the operating profit margin increased from 4.74% to 5.40%. This suggests that operational efficiencies or cost-reduction measures were effectively implemented to offset the decline in sales volume.
Peak Operational Performance
The 2018 fiscal year represents the period of maximum operational scale and efficiency. During this year, sales and other operating revenues reached a peak of US$ 111,461 million, coinciding with the highest recorded operating profit margin of 5.88% and the maximum net operating profit before taxes of US$ 6,558 million.
Operating Profit Margin Trend
The operating profit margin remained relatively stable but trended upward, moving from 4.74% in 2015 to 5.65% in 2019. Although a slight contraction was observed between 2018 and 2019, the overall five-year trend reflects an expansion of 91 basis points, indicating a sustained improvement in the company's underlying operating leverage.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Turnover of Capital (TO)

Phillips 66, TO calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Sales and other operating revenues 107,293 111,461 102,354 84,279 98,975
Invested capital1 50,827 48,544 49,009 46,215 42,469
Efficiency Ratio
TO2 2.11 2.30 2.09 1.82 2.33
Benchmarks
TO, Competitors3
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 Invested capital. See details »

2 2019 Calculation
TO = Sales and other operating revenues ÷ Invested capital
= 107,293 ÷ 50,827 = 2.11

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of capital efficiency from 2015 to 2019 reveals a period of volatility in revenue generation relative to the capital base, with the turnover of capital ratio experiencing significant fluctuations before stabilizing in the 2.11 to 2.30 range.

Sales and Operating Revenues
Revenue exhibited a non-linear trend, starting at 98,975 million US$ in 2015 and declining to a period low of 84,279 million US$ in 2016. A strong recovery followed, peaking at 111,461 million US$ in 2018, before a slight contraction to 107,293 million US$ in 2019.
Invested Capital
Invested capital showed a consistent upward trajectory for the majority of the period, increasing from 42,469 million US$ in 2015 to 50,827 million US$ by 2019. A marginal reduction occurred in 2018, falling to 48,544 million US$, but the overall trend indicates a steady expansion of the capital base over the five-year window.
Turnover of Capital (TO)
The capital turnover ratio reflects the efficiency with which invested capital is utilized to generate revenue. A sharp decline is observed in 2016, where the ratio dropped from 2.33 to 1.82, driven by the simultaneous decrease in revenues and increase in invested capital. This efficiency metric recovered steadily over the next two years, returning to 2.30 in 2018. However, by 2019, the ratio declined to 2.11, as revenue growth failed to keep pace with the continued expansion of invested capital.

The overall trend suggests that while the organization successfully recovered its operational efficiency following the 2016 downturn, the increasing scale of invested capital has placed upward pressure on the revenue requirements needed to maintain peak turnover ratios.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)

Phillips 66, CTR calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 5,344 5,129 4,664 4,480 3,281
Add: Cash operating taxes2 716 1,429 363 70 1,407
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) 6,060 6,558 5,026 4,549 4,688
Tax Rate
CTR3 11.82% 21.79% 7.22% 1.53% 30.01%
Benchmarks
CTR, Competitors4
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2019 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 716 ÷ 6,060 = 11.82%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data reveals a period of significant volatility in the effective cash tax rate (CTR) between 2015 and 2019, contrasting with a generally positive trajectory in net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT).

Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT) Trends
NOPBT demonstrated a consistent growth trend from 2015 through 2018, rising from 4,688 million US$ to a peak of 6,558 million US$. This represents a substantial increase in operating profitability over the four-year period. A slight contraction occurred in 2019, with NOPBT decreasing to 6,060 million US$, though it remained significantly higher than 2015 levels.
Cash Operating Taxes Analysis
Cash operating taxes exhibited extreme fluctuations that did not correlate linearly with operating profit. A sharp decline is observed in 2016, where taxes plummeted to 70 million US$ from 1,407 million US$ in the prior year. Payments recovered gradually in 2017 and spiked to a period high of 1,429 million US$ in 2018, before decreasing again to 716 million US$ in 2019.
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR) Volatility
The CTR reflects the volatility of cash tax payments, starting at 30.01% in 2015 and dropping precipitously to 1.53% in 2016. The rate trended upward over the next two years, reaching 21.79% by 2018. However, this upward movement reversed in 2019, with the CTR falling to 11.82%. The divergence between the steady growth of NOPBT and the erratic nature of the CTR suggests the influence of significant non-recurring tax adjustments, deferred tax assets, or changes in tax legislation during this window.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?