EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Kinder Morgan Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Common-Size Income Statement
- Analysis of Profitability Ratios
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2010
- Current Ratio since 2010
- Total Asset Turnover since 2010
- Price to Earnings (P/E) since 2010
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Kinder Morgan Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The financial performance from 2015 to 2019 is characterized by a consistent expansion in operational profitability that was offset by a high cost of capital, resulting in persistent negative economic profit. While the company succeeded in increasing its net operating profit after taxes, the returns generated remained below the required threshold to create economic value for shareholders during this period.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- A strong and continuous upward trend is observed in NOPAT, which grew from US$ 2,335 million in 2015 to US$ 4,396 million by 2019. This represents a significant increase in core operational efficiency and earnings power over the five-year horizon.
- Invested Capital and Cost of Capital
- Invested capital remained relatively stable with a slight overall contraction, decreasing from US$ 72,098 million in 2015 to US$ 67,164 million in 2019. Simultaneously, the cost of capital exhibited an upward trajectory, rising from 8.89% in 2015 to 10.30% in 2019. The increase in the cost of capital heightened the financial hurdle required to achieve a positive economic profit.
- Economic Profit Analysis
- Economic profit remained negative throughout the entire period, indicating that the NOPAT was insufficient to cover the capital charge. Despite this, a general improvement in economic profit is noted, as the deficit narrowed from US$ -4,073 million in 2015 to US$ -2,523 million in 2019. A temporary reversal of this improvement occurred in 2018, where economic profit declined to US$ -2,960 million, coinciding with a peak in the cost of capital and a slight increase in invested capital.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc..
4 2019 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
5 2019 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest, net = Adjusted interest, net × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc..
The financial data exhibits a notable progression across the five-year period from 2015 to 2019 in key profitability metrics.
- Net Income Attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc.
-
Net income shows a fluctuating pattern with significant variation. It increased substantially from 253 million USD in 2015 to 708 million USD in 2016, indicating a period of improved profitability. However, it then decreased sharply to 183 million USD in 2017 and slightly declined further to 160.9 million USD in 2018. In 2019, a pronounced rebound occurred, with net income surging to 2,190 million USD, representing the highest level within the period analyzed.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
-
NOPAT exhibits a consistent upward trajectory over the same time frame, indicating overall operational efficiency and profitability improvements. It rose steadily from 2,335 million USD in 2015 to 4,396 million USD in 2019. This steady increase contrasts the volatility seen in net income, suggesting that operational profitability strengthened continuously even during periods when net income faced short-term setbacks.
Overall, while net income experienced volatility with a significant dip in 2017 and 2018 before recovering sharply in 2019, NOPAT demonstrated consistent growth. The divergence between the volatility in net income and the stability in NOPAT could indicate the influence of non-operational factors, including one-time items, financing costs, or tax impacts affecting net income more directly. The improvement in NOPAT highlights enhanced core business performance throughout the period.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The analysis of the annual financial data reveals fluctuations in both income tax provision and cash operating taxes over the five-year period ending December 31, 2019.
- Income Tax Provision
- The income tax provision shows significant volatility during the period. Starting at USD 564 million in 2015, it increased notably to USD 917 million in 2016. A sharp rise was observed in 2017, with the provision peaking at USD 1,938 million. However, this high was not sustained, as the figure dropped substantially to USD 587 million in 2018, followed by a moderate increase to USD 926 million in 2019. The trend suggests that the income tax provision was influenced by fluctuating taxable income or changes in tax regulations during these years, with the 2017 value standing out as an outlier relative to other periods.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes remained relatively stable compared to the income tax provision. The values fluctuated within a narrow range from USD 472 million to USD 601 million throughout the five years. Notably, the cash operating taxes decreased from USD 601 million in 2015 to USD 472 million in 2016, then experienced minor increases and decreases over the subsequent years, ending at USD 590 million in 2019. This consistency indicates maintained cash tax obligations despite the volatility seen in the income tax provision, implying differences in timing or accounting recognition between these two tax-related metrics.
Overall, the data suggests that while cash taxes paid remained fairly steady, the reported income tax provisions varied considerably, reflecting potential changes in income, tax planning strategies, or tax regulation impacts during the period analyzed.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of equity equivalents to total Kinder Morgan, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity.
5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
6 Subtraction of construction work in process.
7 Subtraction of marketable securities at fair value.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- Over the five-year period, there is a clear downward trend in the total reported debt and leases. Beginning at approximately 43.9 billion USD at the end of 2015, the debt level consistently decreased each year, reaching about 34.7 billion USD by the end of 2019. This reduction indicates a strategic effort to deleverage or reduce financial obligations over time.
- Total Kinder Morgan, Inc.’s Stockholders’ Equity
- The stockholders’ equity remained relatively stable throughout the period analyzed. Starting around 35.1 billion USD at the end of 2015, it experienced slight decreases over the next three years, bottoming out near 33.6 billion USD by the end of 2017. However, by the end of 2019, equity showed a minor recovery to approximately 33.7 billion USD. This stability suggests a balanced approach to equity management without significant dilution or accumulation.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital demonstrated a modest decline from roughly 72.1 billion USD at the end of 2015 to about 67.2 billion USD by the end of 2019. The decrease was gradual, with minor fluctuations observed between the years, implying a steady but cautious approach to capital investment and asset base management.
Cost of Capital
Kinder Morgan Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | ||||||
| ConocoPhillips | ||||||
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of economic value performance from 2015 to 2019 reveals a consistent pattern of economic value destruction, although the magnitude of these losses narrowed over the five-year period.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit remained negative throughout the entire period, indicating that the return on capital was insufficient to cover the cost of capital. A general upward trajectory is observed, with losses improving from -4,073 million US dollars in 2015 to -2,523 million US dollars by 2019. A temporary reversal of this improvement occurred in 2018, where losses widened slightly to -2,960 million US dollars before continuing to decrease in 2019.
- Invested Capital Dynamics
- Invested capital exhibited a gradual decline over the period. Starting at 72,098 million US dollars in 2015, the capital base decreased to 67,164 million US dollars by 2019. This overall reduction suggests a contraction in the capital employed to generate returns or a strategic reduction in the asset base.
- Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
- The economic spread ratio remained negative, mirroring the trend in economic profit. The ratio improved from -5.65% in 2015 to -3.76% in 2019. The correlation between the shrinking capital base and the reduction in economic losses contributed to a gradual narrowing of the spread, suggesting a slow convergence toward the cost of capital, despite the failure to achieve a positive economic spread during the analyzed timeframe.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | ||||||
| ConocoPhillips | ||||||
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2019 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2015 to 2019 is characterized by persistent negative economic profit, indicating that the returns generated were insufficient to cover the company's cost of capital throughout the period. Despite this, a general trend of recovery is observed, as the magnitude of the economic loss decreased over time.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit remained negative for all five years, starting at negative 4,073 million US dollars in 2015 and ending at negative 2,523 million US dollars in 2019. A consistent reduction in economic loss occurred between 2015 and 2017, followed by a slight reversal in 2018 before reaching its highest point in 2019. This overall upward trajectory suggests a gradual improvement in value creation efficiency.
- Revenue Volatility
- Revenues exhibited fluctuations without a definitive linear trend, moving from 14,403 million US dollars in 2015 to 13,209 million US dollars in 2019. A notable dip occurred in 2016, followed by a recovery period peaking in 2018 at 14,144 million US dollars, before declining again in the final year of the analyzed period.
- Economic Profit Margin Analysis
- The economic profit margin remained in negative territory, reflecting the ongoing failure to achieve economic value added. The margin reached its lowest point in 2016 at negative 29.14%. From 2017 onward, the margin stabilized and improved, moving toward zero to reach negative 19.10% by 2019. The fact that the margin improved even in years where revenues declined suggests that the improvement in economic profit was driven more by cost management or capital structure optimizations than by top-line growth.