Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 4,396) | 3,834) | 3,502) | 2,949) | 2,335) | |
| Invested capital2 | 67,164) | 69,659) | 69,077) | 69,639) | 72,098) | |
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| ROIC3 | 6.55% | 5.50% | 5.07% | 4.23% | 3.24% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| ROIC, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 4,396 ÷ 67,164 = 6.55%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Between 2015 and 2019, a consistent improvement in capital efficiency is observed, characterized by a steady rise in the Return on Invested Capital (ROIC). This growth is the result of increasing operational profitability coupled with a gradual reduction in the total invested capital base.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- A strong upward trajectory is evident, with NOPAT increasing from US$ 2,335 million in 2015 to US$ 4,396 million in 2019. This represents a continuous growth pattern, indicating improved earning power and operational performance over the five-year period.
- Invested Capital
- The invested capital base exhibited a general downward trend, declining from US$ 72,098 million in 2015 to US$ 67,164 million in 2019. The capital levels remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2018 before a more pronounced decrease occurred in 2019.
- Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
- ROIC demonstrated a consistent annual increase, rising from 3.24% in 2015 to 6.55% in 2019. The expansion of this ratio is attributed to the simultaneous growth in NOPAT and the contraction of the capital base, signifying enhanced efficiency in generating returns from the company's investments.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Decomposition of ROIC
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »
2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »
3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »
A consistent upward trajectory in the return on invested capital (ROIC) is observed between 2015 and 2019, with the rate increasing from 3.24% to 6.55%. This growth indicates a steady improvement in the efficiency of capital deployment, driven primarily by expanding operational margins and a more favorable tax position, while asset productivity remained stagnant.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
- A strong and continuous expansion in the operating profit margin is evident, rising from 20.38% in 2015 to 37.75% in 2019. This represents the most significant driver of the ROIC increase, suggesting substantial improvements in cost management or pricing efficiency over the five-year period.
- Turnover of Capital (TO)
- The turnover of capital remained virtually unchanged, maintaining a consistent ratio of approximately 0.20 throughout the period. This indicates that the growth in ROIC was not achieved through increased asset utilization or higher revenue generation per unit of invested capital, but was instead purely a function of increased profitability per dollar of revenue.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate (1 – CTR)
- The post-tax retention ratio increased from 79.53% in 2015 to 88.16% in 2019. A notable increase occurred between 2015 and 2016, after which the rate stabilized. This upward trend in the tax multiplier provided an additional positive contribution to the net return on invested capital.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 4,396) | 3,834) | 3,502) | 2,949) | 2,335) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 590) | 592) | 516) | 472) | 601) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 4,986) | 4,426) | 4,018) | 3,422) | 2,936) | |
| Revenues | 13,209) | 14,144) | 13,705) | 13,058) | 14,403) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| OPM3 | 37.75% | 31.29% | 29.32% | 26.20% | 20.38% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| OPM, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 4,986 ÷ 13,209 = 37.75%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of operational profitability from 2015 to 2019 reveals a significant divergence between revenue performance and operating profit generation. While top-line revenues exhibited volatility and lacked a clear growth trajectory, the company achieved a consistent annual increase in net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) and a substantial expansion of the operating profit margin (OPM).
- Revenue Trends
- Revenues fluctuated throughout the period, starting at US$ 14,403 million in 2015, decreasing to US$ 13,058 million in 2016, and peaking at US$ 14,144 million in 2018 before falling to US$ 13,209 million in 2019. This indicates that growth in the top line was not the primary driver of increased profitability.
- Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
- A consistent upward trend is observed in NOPBT, which grew every year from US$ 2,936 million in 2015 to US$ 4,986 million in 2019. This represents a total increase of approximately 69.8% over the five-year window, occurring independently of revenue fluctuations.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
- The OPM expanded steadily from 20.38% in 2015 to 37.75% in 2019. The most notable increase occurred in the final year of the period, where the margin rose by 6.46 percentage points despite a decline in total revenues, underscoring a strong decoupling of profit growth from sales volume.
The observable patterns indicate a substantial improvement in operational efficiency. The ability to sustain and accelerate operating profit growth amidst stagnant or declining revenues suggests a successful implementation of cost-reduction initiatives, an optimized asset utilization strategy, or a strategic shift toward higher-margin revenue streams.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Turnover of Capital (TO)
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Revenues | 13,209) | 14,144) | 13,705) | 13,058) | 14,403) | |
| Invested capital1 | 67,164) | 69,659) | 69,077) | 69,639) | 72,098) | |
| Efficiency Ratio | ||||||
| TO2 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.20 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| TO, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Invested capital. See details »
2 2019 Calculation
TO = Revenues ÷ Invested capital
= 13,209 ÷ 67,164 = 0.20
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of capital efficiency from 2015 to 2019 reveals a highly stable turnover of capital ratio, suggesting a consistent relationship between the asset base and the generation of revenue.
- Revenue Trends
- Revenues exhibited volatility throughout the five-year period, starting at 14,403 million US dollars in 2015, declining to 13,058 million US dollars in 2016, and subsequently fluctuating to end at 13,209 million US dollars in 2019.
- Invested Capital Dynamics
- Invested capital showed a general downward trajectory, decreasing from 72,098 million US dollars in 2015 to 67,164 million US dollars by 2019. This reduction in the capital base occurred alongside the fluctuations in top-line performance.
- Capital Turnover Efficiency
- The turnover of capital ratio remained remarkably consistent, oscillating marginally between 0.19 and 0.20. This indicates that for every unit of invested capital, approximately 0.20 units of revenue were generated consistently over the period, demonstrating a stagnant but predictable level of capital productivity.
The simultaneous decline in invested capital and the volatility in revenues resulted in a neutralizing effect on the turnover ratio. This pattern suggests that changes in the scale of the invested capital base were mirrored by proportional changes in revenue, maintaining a steady efficiency rate despite the shifts in absolute values.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 4,396) | 3,834) | 3,502) | 2,949) | 2,335) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 590) | 592) | 516) | 472) | 601) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 4,986) | 4,426) | 4,018) | 3,422) | 2,936) | |
| Tax Rate | ||||||
| CTR3 | 11.84% | 13.37% | 12.85% | 13.81% | 20.47% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| CTR, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 590 ÷ 4,986 = 11.84%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data indicates a period of consistent growth in operating profitability paired with a significant reduction in the effective cash tax burden between 2015 and 2019.
- Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT) Trend
- A sustained upward trajectory is evident in NOPBT, which grew from US$ 2,936 million in 2015 to US$ 4,986 million in 2019. This represents a steady and significant increase in operational earning capacity over the five-year period.
- Cash Operating Taxes Analysis
- Cash operating taxes did not scale proportionally with the growth in NOPBT. After an initial decrease from US$ 601 million in 2015 to US$ 472 million in 2016, tax payments fluctuated slightly, ending at US$ 590 million in 2019. Notably, the total cash tax expenditure in 2019 remained nearly identical to the 2015 level, despite the substantial increase in pre-tax profits.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR) Dynamics
- The effective cash tax rate experienced a sharp decline from 20.47% in 2015 to 13.81% in 2016. Following this initial contraction, the rate remained relatively stable, characterized by a minor increase to 13.37% in 2018 before reaching a period low of 11.84% in 2019. The divergence between the rising NOPBT and the declining CTR suggests an increase in tax efficiency or the utilization of significant tax shields over the analyzed timeframe.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?